Between exams (grading), I’ve been tidying up the blog a bit.
Here’s a chronological list of some of the first posts on Dissent the Blog—referring to events that occurred before the blog was initiated (during the time of the newsletter Dissent).
They tell quite a story.
Click on the LINKS.
PRE-DISSENT
Thursday, March 23, 1995
The symbolic kick-off of the district’s troubled era (1995-2012); and it all started with IVC's student newspaper:
Trustee Frogue: "There is a group, right here in Orange County, called the Institute for Historical Review [the nation's top Holocaust denial organization]...they have raised questions about some of this stuff. I've looked at some of their publications, kind of strange and definitely new, I've never seen anything like it before. There's somebody that wants to engage in the debate about the Holocaust."
Tuesday, April 4, 1995
"Was it 6 million who died?" Frogue asked, saying he wonders "whether it's the number of people who were actually killed, or the number of people who actually died, or the number of people who were actually put in the gas chambers."
April 20, 1995
...According to Foothill High School student Emily Hoffman, Frogue "decided the Holocaust was made up." Frogue told his World Cultures class "the Jews made it up to make people feel sorry for them," according to Hoffman, who was quoted in the Register. "He said it was more like sixty people that got killed, rather than 6 million."
Other high school students of Frogue's say he used racially derogatory terms in class, referring to Asians as "yellow people," Latinos as "brown people" and African Americans as "negras."
Sunday, October 6, 1996
"The manner in which the reporter tried to put words into my mouth, and into the mouths of three colleagues leave little doubt in my mind as to how he elicited such comments from these young women" [who claimed that Frogue denied the Holocaust and made highly offensive remarks about women in his classes].
Friday, November 1, 1996
...And so, in December of 1996, the era of the conservative "Board Majority" began. The [Union] Old Guard got what they wanted—for the time being. But their "victory" was the beginning of a painful and precipitous decline for the two colleges and the district. The BM concentrated its efforts on dismantling the machinery of "shared governance" (a concept that emerged from the historic "AB1725" legislation of the late 80s). Phony accreditation reports were written, Old Guard schemers (Runyan, Mathur, Woodward, et al.) became administrators, and the Old Guard's long-time foes sought cover....
Saturday, November 2, 1996
WHITE: "The Faculty Association was forced to compete in the past campaign because life as we know it was under threat... [T]he Faculty Association, in desperation, turned the campaign over to a professional firm..."
Friday, November 15, 1996
OC Weekly: "Local political observers are calling it the "most scurrilous and vile" campaign ad of the season, and it wasn't the deft handiwork of ... Orange County's most infamous negative campaigner. No, the ad...was sent by a college-faculty association on behalf of a slate of three conservative candidates and one Democrat vying for seats on the governing board of the Saddleback College District."
 |
| Chunk visits San Francisco |
Monday, November 25, 1996
"Frogue has been accused of denying the Holocaust, according to a former board member and several former students who say his comments about Jews and those who died at the hands of the Nazis cross over a line of ethics, propriety and recorded fact….
“I believe Lee Harvey Oswald worked for the ADL,” Frogue said in a half-whisper during a recent interview on the Foothill High campus.
Asked to repeat his assertion, Frogue said, “That’s right. . . . I believe the ADL was behind it.”
DISSENT/VOICE:
Monday, May 19, 1997
Roy Bauer [addressing Frogue]: Excuse me. Are you saying that the referendum was rigged?....
Jan Wyma: (We're having?) a public meeting and you call our faculty liars.
Frogue: I said there have been rigged elections at Irvine Valley College. I've seen them. Twice. You want me to name names? [Indecipherable mixed voices.] The evidence is in the record.
(?): It exonerated the Senate. [It did.]....
Frogue: The record did not exonerate the Senate.
(?): I'd like (you) to name names.
Frogue: The record...We can, if you'd like [mixed voices, indecipherable; reference is made by someone to Frogue's speaking of liars.] No, I didn't call anybody "liars." I said there were rigged elections.
Bauer: You, sir, are a coward.
Wednesday, July 16, 1997
...The reorganization came as a surprise, for ... neither administrators nor shared governance groups had been consulted, and, indeed, the Sorenson Group (consultants hired to help the district with its organizational problems) strongly advised against the board taking actions absent discussion with shared governance groups. Indeed, at IVC, only days earlier, faculty were assured by Acting President Mathur that no such action would be contemplated until the fall, when faculty returned from summer vacation. In fact, however, Mathur was the key figure in the planning and execution of the reorganization, and his assurances were lies. All of this is revealed in legal declarations....
Monday, August 18, 1997
Roy Bauer (interrupting Frogue): [So you're saying that] All the papers [reporting testimony re Frogue's Holocaust denial and other remarks] are liars. All the papers. The Register, the LA Times, the Irvine World News—they’re all liars. Is there a conspiracy against you? Is that what’s going on?
Frogue: No...we’re getting away from this. What we have...
Bauer: Are you still a fan of the Institute for Historical Review [a Holocaust denial publisher]?
Frogue: Mr...? You’re out of order, please.
Wednesday, September 3, 1997
A national search was conducted by the board for a new President of IVC. Several internal candidates ... applied for the position along with more than 30 others comprising the initial pool of candidates. In establishing the selection process, the historical method was completely discarded, whereby a screening committee was appointed consisting mainly of the shared governance groups at IVC to interview and present to the board the top handful of candidates, with their ratings and recommendations. The current process is a complete “white-wash” since the screening committee neither rates the candidates nor eliminates any candidates, and the entire remaining pool ... of 18 candidates were reinterviewed by the full board of trustees, with no consideration of the committee’s input. The reason the majority of the board prevailed upon the chancellor to adopt the revised process, in my view, was so Mr. Mathur would not be eliminated from the pool....
Sunday, September 7, 1997
Our community college is in jeopardy because its elected, if overlooked, leaders violated not only the state open meetings law and their own district policy but also their covenant with our educational community. District employees who protest or question these moves have been reprimanded, and on occasion, disciplined. They've created an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear, a hostile workplace where it's increasingly difficult to teach students.
Sunday, September 21, 1997
"The hate-mongers are intent on negating the choice of the voters and working to discredit Frogue and his reform projects at Irvine Valley and Saddleback colleges."
Saturday, November 8, 1997
"The occasion here depicted is particularly memorable for me, for I arrived five minutes late and thus did not realize that the President had already advised everyone that there would be “no discussion or questions.” ... Imagine others’ shock, then, when, at the meeting’s end, I blurted out several questions with no inkling of my audacity! And imagine my embarrassment upon learning of my error. (“I said at the start, you are not to ask questions!”)"
Saturday, November 8, 1997
[A Faculty survey respondent:] '...But the survey has already achieved one item—"Making people laugh." Pam...I have a few more ideas that you might add to the list: 1 ) Hire cheerleaders to bounce around campus chanting the names of faculty and staff. 2) Have students paint themselves with school colors, and then spell out the name of the faculty/staff member of the week on their backsides. 3) Publish a ten-most-wanted list. 4) Get all of the faculty and staff together in a swimming pool full of strawberry jello and play pin the tail on the jackass.'
Sunday, December 7, 1997
'Soon, the proceedings seemed just like a meeting, and so, ever the stickler for detail, I asked, “Has the meeting begun?” Sherry said No. Nevertheless, my question seemed to cause her to declare that the meeting had now begun, which surprised me. I asked, politely, if we had a quorum, and, as she had done during a previous meeting, Sherry ignored me. Pete Espinoza, however, interrupted Sherry, saying, “I think this is important; the meetings of every organization I’ve ever belonged to start by determining whether there is a quorum” .... One or two others agreed. An unfamiliar woman then suggested that we simply hold an informal meeting. The suggestion caused Sherry obvious pain; evidently, she expected to do some real business, despite the unhelpful Marie Calendar ambiance, which seems to shout, “Mmmm! It’s time for pie!”....'
Thursday, January 15, 1998
This issue of the ‘Vine presents more information regarding our district’s infamous July, 1997, “reorganization.” Trustee Lang, in his depositions of January and February ’98 excerpted here, explains that, in the months preceding the July meeting, the issue of eliminating the “chair” model at IVC in favor of the “dean” model had not been discussed by the trustees and that the body had neither authorized nor accepted studies or materials from staff, including administration, regarding that kind of administrative change....
 |
| Irvine Valley College's PAC |
Tuesday, January 20, 1998
[Holocaust revisionist, Joe Fields:] "[It seems that] Anything that attacks western civilization or Christianity is OK.... However, the same people who tolerate that — and I might add, it’s the shrill, shrieking voice of political Zionism — is here tonight to attack Mr. Frogue and to push their agenda. ... We just said the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States, not to the flag of Israel. [I’m speaking to] Anyone here who's going to push this ADL sponsored garbage. ... If you're here to push this nonsense and keep attacking this man because of your narrow agenda I might suggest you get off your butts and go back to Israel where you belong."
Sunday, February 22, 1998
[Woodward:] Look, Steve Frogue has been teaching for 30 years; he’s had thousands and thousands of students. Supposedly—I haven’t seen this—Mr. Bauer has found five students who allege—I haven’t seen the affidavits—that somehow he’s denied the Holocaust. I can find 5 students to say, you know, similar things about Mr. Bauer....
Wednesday, March 18, 1998
"In fact, Brother Woodward chided fellow Brother Bauer about Bauer’s claim to the contrary: “Well, the faculty union actually itself, as Roy Bauer well knows, has not taken a position on Mr. Frogue....” So the union’s quick action, some four weeks later, to oppose the recall campaign and support Frogue caught some of us by surprise. Had we missed something? A meeting? A phone poll? A flyer? Were we supposed to vote on Frogue as well as our contract? What happened? And when?"
Wednesday, March 18, 1998
"Hubris is perhaps the best way to characterize the current jostling for power within the evolving SOCCCD administration and the insolent behavior of the board majority. How else to explain the ascent of Raghu “Narcissus” Mathur, Mike “Ganymede” Runyan, Ken “Midas” Woodward and the other Myrmidons who wait for resignations and the subsequent job announcements?"
Friday, March 27, 1998
[PIPER:] “Isn’t it ironic that … a filthy, anti-free speech mother-fucker like you [Bauer] came on the scene and caused such a big commotion in an effort to silence my views?”
Friday, March 27, 1998
...The three of us talked. The agreeable Walt explained to Ronnie and me that the union is like an amateur crew on a ship, and the ship has grown larger and the seas have grown rougher, etc. I said, sure, but why won’t this crew listen when someone finds a manual explaining how to run a goddam ship? Walt removed his glasses and appeared to stare into the distance....
Friday, March 27, 1998
[Raghu's advice:] ...Say to yourself at least ten times per day, “I love myself” or “I like myself.” Make a photo copy of the palm of your hand and give yourself a “pat on the back.” Laugh a lot with others; don’t join in the whining. Have an appreciation party. Have an appreciation break at work. Verbally appreciate at least five people daily....
Friday, March 27, 1998
Red Emma teaches writing part-time at Irvine Valley College. His activist politics demand his union membership, but in five years of teaching here, not once has anybody ever invited or encouraged him to join the union or provided him materials regarding representation by his local.
Red Emma wonders why. Red Emma organizes other part time faculty members, many of whom also wonder. ... Red Emma calls the union rep, who does not return phone calls, but later leaves photocopies of the application materials, with the full deduction for dues (full-time $70/month) written in. But, surely, this amount can't apply to adjunct faculty. Can it? [He called the CCA; no, it's $18, not $70]
Thursday, April 2, 1998
RAGHU: "I understand that some students have asked instructors to allow them to speak in their classes about campus political matters. In light of professional sense and matter [sic] of good practice, I would like to caution and advise all faculty to maintain the integrity of the classroom instruction by adhering to approved curriculum and course outlines of record for their day-to-day activities. It is not a good practice for faculty to allow campus politics to interfere with the educational interests of the students in the classroom...."
Friday, April 10, 1998
...As more union-endorsed trustees have been elected, the faculty association's power has grown. So have teachers' paychecks. The sixth-largest community college district in California, the South County district currently has the highest-paid faculty. The average full time professor's salary is $67,495—which is $12,000 more than the state average for community colleges, according to the state chancellor's office....
Tuesday, April 14, 1998
[The district gets audited:] ...So, anyway, Fortune and Williams joined [Interim Chancellor] Hodge in her office at some point—it’s all gettin’ fuzzy in my head—but, after a coupla minutes, they stomped out again still hissin’ and steamin’ like before. Yuh see, [Trustees] Fortune and Williams came back into the Conference Room and thought they could sit there all day for this string of meetings, but the Lenz Man [state fiscal dude] coughs up this big hair ball and says, No Goddam Way. I mean he says they’re just not welcome, OK? So like Fortune fills her shorts and runs around like a goddam dog, ‘cuz she’s gotta stay on the outside lookin’ in. And that’s just what she does—glarin’ and glowerin’ and snarlin’, I mean. And she’s somebody who can do that, baby.
Tuesday, April 14, 1998
Here's a frightening thought: What if part-time faculty joined the union, used their new political power, and played a role in contract negotiations, workplace issues and the life of our academic community? Scarey, huh?
Tuesday, April 14, 1998
...In response, Sharon MacMillan briefly explained how the disparity [in how the two college faculties voted] had come about. I think she said that, at first, Saddleback faculty were asked to show IDs and so on, but some objected, and so the Saddleback, but not the IVC, instructions were changed in mid-election. Naturally, union leaders saw no problem with this change at one campus but not at the other. For his part, Mr. Hart [the mediator] seemed particularly uninterested. “I’m just here to count ballots, ya know!” he said. “Hey, everybody, I’m practically worthless!” he added, in my imagination.
Sunday, April 26, 1998
...Well, it turns out that Pam works for some dog-faced fool belongin’ to the Christian Coalition, and that rat bastard found out about Pam and the Recall. So he tells her he’s concerned about her involvement—’cuz he’s a right-wing Frogue-lovin’ asshole or somethin’—and that she should meet with his Christian Coalition pals some time to talk it over with ‘em. She says OK—she doesn’t wanna say “no” to the Boss Man—and he sets it up. When she shows up to this thing—it’s at some restaurant—she’s amazed to find this rogue’s gallery sittin’ around a table breathin’ heavy Christian breath at each other: Zanelli, Williams, the Boss man, the head of the local OC Christian Coalition, a plastic Big Boy, and Frogue. She couldn’t believe it! It was an ambush at the KK Korral!....
Monday, April 27, 1998
[District press conference:] ...At some point, Glenn Roquemore seized upon the notion of “balance.” He said that it was Ray’s job to seek a balance, not just to present the views of one “side.” Eventually, [Times reporter] Ourlian responded to Glenn’s theme by asking whether Glenn was saying this: to be objective, the report must have an equal measure of praise and of criticism of the board. (Later, Ourlian and I joked: “It’s a good thing these people weren’t in charge at Nuremberg: ‘Sure, these Nazi fellas did some bad things, but, hey, there were some real positives, too.’”)....
Monday, April 27, 1998
At the meeting's conclusion, Red approached Prof. Woodward to thank him and confirm his attendance at the May 8 meeting. Woodward again agreed to attend, but candidly offered that "you should form your own unit because most full-timers are not concerned with part-time issues," a sentiment echoed by Madame Chair, who joined us briefly in what was for me, the afternoon's apogee. The honesty of these two union leaders seemed a welcome, if confusing, respite from the obfuscation and bafflement (to me) of the meeting itself.
Analysis: Part-timers have not been recruited, it seems, because they were not welcome.
Tuesday, May 12, 1998
PART-TIMERS ATTEMPT TO ORGANIZE by Red Emma
Q: What is the sound of one hand clapping?
A: A union dominated by a majority of part-timers, but represented by a minority of full-timers.
Wednesday, May 13, 1998
With the help of the union Old Guard (Sharon M, Ray C, et al., addressed the Board in this regard), Frogue was replaced with extreme anti-unionist Tom Fuentes. Having already funded the victory of the anti-teachers union Padberg and Wagner in 1998, the union Old Guard had, through these actions, helped bring about a board dominated by anti-unionists who are largely hostile to faculty interests.
Sunday, June 21, 1998
A MOTLEY CREW OF NAZIS VS. JDL THUGS: OH, WHAT A NIGHT! by Chunk Wheeler
I read out loud a letter sent to me by Frogue's "scholar," Mike Piper:
“Some of my Black Nationalist supporters in Southern California are watching your activities closely. They believe in Freedom of Speech, motherfucker, but you don’t.”
Tuesday, June 30, 1998
...A coupla weeks ago, Jeff K and Rich Z spoke with Raghu on behalf of the Academic Senate. (Such meetings are routine.) I am told that, in the course of the conversation, [President Mathur] briefly raised his hands to the heavens and declared that he believes in God and that (therefore?) the latter entity is on his side. He went on to refer to a coming era of justice or retribution, evidently of the divinely instigated variety. Jeff and Rich insist that glossolalia was not involved, though Jeff thought he saw stigmata form on Raghu’s right cheek. (Hey, everybody in A100: hide all the dictionaries! While you’re at it, hide the Captain’s palm tree.)....
Tuesday, July 28, 1998
Years ago [in 1994], after Dan Larios was selected as IVC president—but before he arrived on campus—the cunning Mr. Goo, sensing an opportunity, busily constructed a document that listed IVC personnel and that drew yellow lines over the names of those employees whom Goo judged to be troublesome or unsavory. Essentially, it was a Mr. Goo “enemies list.” When Larios arrived, at some point, the ignoble Goo presented himself to the new president and handed the document over to him, hoping the unsolicited “gift” would create a useful debt of gratitude.
Monday, August 17, 1998
Did you know that...during an address at the May board meeting in which he defended himself against a 74% faculty vote of no confidence, IVC president Mathur, offering no evidence whatsoever, falsely accused three faculty of sending him racist “mail threats”? When one of the three demanded an apology, district legal counsel Spencer Covert responded on behalf of the district with a letter asserting that Mathur, by virtue of his participation in a “legislative proceeding,” was protected by an “absolute privilege” that is not lost “even if the person making the statement acted with actual malice or with intent to do harm.”....
Tuesday, September 8, 1998
Today, a friend told me that Mr. Goo had just hosted one of his lunch events. I expressed surprise and explained that I had heard nothing about it. ... As you know, Mr. Goo’s history with special lunches has been disastrous. Last November, he scheduled a “Brown Bag Lunch” that managed to attract only George McCrory, who showed up with a banana. Under the circumstances, an ordinary human being would immediately drop the matter and never speak of it again, but not our Goo. A few weeks later, in the execrable Laser Beam, he expressed his gratitude to “everyone” who participated in this “very successful” event. I wonder what it’s like to be able to just lie like that?
You’d think a man who received a vote of confidence from only 24% of the full-time faculty would know better than to host “lunches” of this sort. Not so. My friend reported that Thursday’s event was also an abject failure, despite the lure of a free hot lunch. [4 of his flunkies showed; he had ordered 20 lunches]
Wednesday, September 16, 1998
…[C]hief Romas acknowledged that 38s are not unsafe; but the district’s 38s are old, he said. Lang jumped in to express both his respect for Romas/Parmer and his inclination to disarm them. “Why are we the exception among community college districts in the area [arming officers]?” asked Lang. Frogue opined that it is unwise to leave cops unarmed. Williams, finally finding a topic he cares about, stated that it is a “travesty” to suggest not arming police officers. Apparently addressing Mr. Lang, he said, “Get real.” “Stop living in an ivory castle.” (Yes, an ivory castle.)….
Frogue then explained that, if only people knew the details—details, he implied, that were suppressed by the press!—of the Lorches’ fabled encounter with violence (?!), they would understand the need to arm campus cops. (Huh?) Idiotically, Lorch explained that only someone who has experienced what she experienced knows whether campus cops should have guns. “You don’t know until you’ve experienced this yourself,” she said, thereby marking the nadir of the evening….
Thursday, September 17, 1998
SOCCCD Brown Act Declarations: September 1998 (Burgess, Deegan, Loeffler)
[VPI Burgess on Williams' backroom "deal":] At the meeting on September 5, 1997, Trustee Lang stated that Trustee Williams, on behalf of the Board Majority, had contacted him regarding the appointment of Mathur as the president at IVC. Trustee Williams stated that the Board Majority had agreed to appoint Mathur to the position of president at the September 8, 1997 meeting. Trustee Lang stated that the Board Majority was concerned with the consequences attendant to a 4 to 3 vote for the Mathur appointment [i.e., they sought unanimity] and that they were interested in reaching a compromise. Trustee Lang stated that the Board Majority promised to renew my administrative contract and the administrative contract of Dean Deegan if the Board Minority [Lang, Hueter, Milchiker] would agree to vote with the Majority on the Mathur appointment or abstain from voting against Mathur. ... Dean Deegan and I refused to allow the renewal of our administrative contracts to be exchanged for the Board Minority’s promise to support (or not oppose) the Mathur appointment.... On August 22, 1997, Chancellor Lombardi informed me that the Board Majority would not renew my administrative contract....
Monday, September 28, 1998
I got there on time, and so I didn’t see the motley crew of Nazis who, I later learned, picketed outside, for the stupid fellows arrived late. (Someone should explain to these people that real Nazis are punctual.) I did, however, encounter a man at the entrance—not a Nazi, a Democrat—who waved a sign that said that Congressmen Cox and Rohrabacher are “hypocrites.” I said, “Well, of course,” and then started to walk inside; he handed me a red comb on which was written, “Get Dornan out of our hair!”
Monday, October 5, 1998
Last year students, local residents and members of the Jewish and gay communities joined the faculty and staff efforts to challenge the board. In a rare show of Orange County activism, students Delilah Snell and Diep Burbridge gathered nearly 100 of their colleagues for a series of campus demonstrations, the first in the college’s near-twenty-year history. … The rallies attracted major media coverage. In response, the board, Mathur and their cronies claimed the students were “misled” by a handful of “disgruntled employees” and “leftist” faculty. Even freedom of speech took a nosedive…. Now the students, represented by the ACLU, are suing Mathur and the board for violating their First Amendment rights. … The board’s actions are astonishing, but what is even more astonishing is that at a small commuter college, in a largely Republican district where most people never learn the names of public officials, these students cared enough to challenge injustice and are fighting to secure future students’ rights….
Tuesday, October 6, 1998
[Revealing Williams, that conniving hayseed cop (who later became the poster boy of OC corruption)]
"No matter what the details were, Mr. Williams’ attempts, during a private conversation with a trustee prior to a board meeting, to broker a deal between opposing trustee camps regarding an upcoming vote, was an assault on the ideal of open and honest government. With the Ralph M. Brown Act, the state of California has wisely forbidden private agreements among members of “legislative bodies”—e.g., community college trustees. We believe that, prior to the Sept. 8 meeting, Mr. Williams and his compatriots secretly agreed, through private conversations, to support Raghu Mathur and, further, secretly pursued a deal concerning the presidential appointment with their opponents on the board. These actions were violations of the Brown Act."
Monday, October 26, 1998
General Pinochet’s house arrest notwithstanding, there is room for evil in the world and it resides in a little room in the Saddleback library where, true to Red Emma’s sorry expectations, that group we whimsically call the union leadership attempted first to get everybody to agree that nothing could be done about my concern.... Then Mr. Lebow and his CTA team advised that he was there to “officially” advise the correctness of my interpretation of the “each” clause, after which time it was the responsibility of the Rep Council to amend the bylaws. Yikes....
 |
| Lisa & Roy |
Saturday, October 31, 1998
“Why is the faculty union giving money to endorse candidates who are appealing to a segment of the voter population who is opposed to unions? “ said Irvine Valley College professor and union member Brenda Borron. “It’s simple. It’s the buying and selling of board members. They will do anything to keep control of the board majority.”
Monday, November 2, 1998
THE CRISIS AT IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE by Red Emma
Our district represents a microcosm of what’s happening across the state and the nation. Sadly, the crisis at SOCCCD has received almost no state or national media attention since Mr. Frogue’s proposed seminar. Why not? It is in fact because in its way, this crisis nearly perfectly represents all the coordinated attacks on public education: the attack on intellectual integrity, the attack on labor and student rights, the promotion of corporate hegemony and so on.
Monday, November 9, 1998
I remember challenging Sherry to acknowledge this aspect of her “leadership” at a forum shortly after the notorious ’96 campaign. (January 10, 1997.) On that occasion, she said that the leadership had to resort to unsavory campaign tactics in order to “preserve life as we know it.” “So,” I said, “you are saying that the end justifies the means.” “No,” she answered. “I am not saying that at all. I’m saying that we needed to take this action [using a homophobic flier] to protect life as we know it.” Oh. At the time, I got the distinct impression that the woman does not know what the phrase “end justifies the means” means.
Monday, November 9, 1998
THE CHARACTER OF THE OPPOSITION by Big Bill [Roy]
I could not help imagining the party for the other side: Mr. McClendon discoursing on democracy and unionism; Lee Walker in the corner, trying to think of the name of the Governor; Ken Woodward hissing and sneering and alerting others of his “Ph.D. in economics”; a bepolyestered Sherry bitching and moaning about her unparalleled labors at the Xerox machine; some of the “Scandalous Boys” leering and choking and turning red; Frogue and Mathur trading paranoid fantasies. In a room like that, no decent person could resist the urge to go postal.
Tuesday, November 10, 1998
ANTI-CHRISTIAN DISCRIMINATION? by Chunk Wheeler
...Undoubtedly, the educators Mathur praises in his email deserve commendation. But those who know the Goo know that the last paragraph of his message is intended as a comment. It is saying that there exist educators at IVC who don’t “deserve our affection, support, and gratitude” and don’t “care about the students, the college, and the profession.”
Tuesday, November 10, 1998
MATHUR CENSURED FOR LYING by Chunk Wheeler
[INSTRUCTIONAL COUNCIL MEETING:] Wendy mentioned that she had met with Chancellor Lombardi ... and he indicated to her that he had met with Raghu on Monday, March 21, and was aware of the petition Raghu had been circulating. Many chairs expressed anger at hearing this because, at the Instructional Council meeting on Tuesday, March 22 [i.e., one day after Raghu’s meeting with Lombardi], Raghu had been questioned regarding this petition and had said that he had not forwarded [it] to anyone. IC had agreed that no one will work outside of the IVC governance structure and agreed-upon processes. They felt that Raghu had lied to IC because he had already spoken with the Chancellor [about the petition]. ... Margie made a motion to censure Raghu Mathur. [It carried.]
Tuesday, November 10, 1998
“MAIM” (aka EMMA’S MODEST PROPOSAL) by Red Emma
This month’s Lingua Franca reports disturbing developments from Serbia, these at the University of Belgrade. Passage of President Milosevic’s “Law on Universities” allows the government to appoint deans directly…. Deans and rectors, reports Lingua Franca, are now responsible for all future faculty appointments. … Let’s see: Government interference in administration. Heavy-handed control of hiring policies. Unannounced meetings. Laws passed absent public input. Attacks on activist Philosophers. Personal vendettas against disloyal faculty. Messing with curriculum. Violating the Brown Act. —I certainly hope Raghu and Glenn are getting this down.
Monday, November 16, 1998
"Recent decisions made by some of the trustees have resulted in dismantling of outstanding educational and administrative structures at Irvine Valley College and Saddleback College. Nearly all of the most talented managers have left the college district because of micromanagement and poor judgment by some trustees and their appointees. The state of California is closely examining financial, educational, legal and administrative actions taken—sometimes in secret...."
Monday, November 23, 1998
FROGUE ON A NUT ROLL by Big Bill
[Trustee] Lorch had evidently used her brief time away from the mike to create a demeanor of utter stupidity and condescension. She now lectured: “We are in a new era.” There is an “industrial revolution in education.” We need to compete with other schools, and that requires being productive. Concerning productivity and its role in the hiring process, she was hearing one thing from IVC, another thing from Saddleback, she said. She just wanted to know whether the colleges were using a “straight productivity model.” “I don’t need more data,” she concluded, once again sinking into her chair with an air of peevitude. Someone near me muttered that, after 5 1/2 years, Lorch had learned absolutely nothing. Another person just shook his head, saying, “She’s an idiot.”
Monday, November 30, 1998
THE "RAT BASTARD" INCIDENT plus MORE LIES by Big Bill
During one session [to prepare new School Chairs], I challenged Glenn [Roquemore] and Howard [Dachschlager] to explain to me the basis of their evident distrust of the School of Humanities and Languages, an attitude shared by many, it seemed, at their end of campus. I assured them that, in my experience, and contrary to what they seemed to think, I had never encountered nor even heard about plots against them or against anyone else by the School of H&L. As far as I could tell, I said, H&L has always pursued its goals and agendas openly and directly. (I could have added: without the use of anonymous petitions, enemies lists, or secret backroom deals.) I added that, whatever anyone else had allegedly done, I was determined to be completely open about anything I was contemplating doing as chair....
December 07, 1998
THE CLOCK TOWER INCIDENT by Big Bill
Just before 1:45, J emerged from the A100 building with a faintly foppish [Chancellor] Sampson in tow. (One senses that our new Chancellor cares more about his haircut than about, say, the Brown Act.) A circle immediately formed around him while Mathur, the consummate unprofessional, still in his office, scribbled at his desk with his back turned to us…. What happened next was amazing. For the next half hour, as the crowd grew to perhaps sixty (others stood off to the side and watched), Sampson was peppered with challenges from this disparate group of people who nonetheless agreed that we had had enough [from Mathur]. At least a dozen people spoke; they spoke eloquently and passionately and unanimously about Mathur’s arbitrary and autocratic ways. It was a proud, if rare, moment in the history of the Goolag.
Tuesday, December 15, 1998
NARCISSUS by Niles Nemesis (Dissent's "Northern Field Correspondent")
What I am referring to, of course, is the recent “Poinsettia episode” at IVC classified staff’s holiday event. In case you haven’t heard, our beloved leader crashed the party, insisted on delivering a seasoned message (“We really don’t think of you as [second class citizens]!”), and snatched the holiday centerpiece—a beautiful poinsettia—from a senior classified staff member by pulling a “six months seniority in the district” card to trump the astonished throng. Never mind that this was a party conducted to celebrate the fine work of classified staff. Never mind that he wasn’t even invited (a conscious decision). And never mind that the purpose of the “contest” to award the table centerpieces was to acknowledge and honor our most senior classified staff members. In the Magoo universe, all celestial objects revolve around him in Ptolemaic perfection.
Tuesday, December 15, 1998
MATHUR’S INFAMOUS “CLAP” AND POINSETTIA EPISODES by Big Bill
Yesterday, I sought to duplicate something for one of my classes but found that the A200 copier was down for repairs. So I ventured into A100—IVC’s Administration Building—to use its copier, but, when I entered, I found that THE PRESIDENT, Raghu P. Mathur, was conducting a bizarre ritual. He stood before a crowd of perhaps thirty people; he said something—“Bla”—and then the audience responded with a single CLAP. Then he said something else—“Bla Bla”—and, again, a single, loud CLAP. These antics pleased him enormously, though his audience seemed disturbed, like that kid who had to hop on Saddam’s lap. What, I asked myself, could this possibly mean? [Mathur had learned this routine from OC GOP chief Tom Fuentes, a Saddamesque fellow.]
Monday, December 28, 1998
Teddi threatened to sue the district, I guess, cuz we were puttin' her head on this dinosaur. I think she was once a "Breck Girl" or something. Or was that a "Beck's Girl"?
Monday, January 4, 1999
Mathur: "This was a pure and simple case of racial discrimination against a professional educator, who all his life has worked hard to earn people’s trust, confidence, respect, and affection. There is absolutely no question in my mind even today that I am the best qualified to do the job 100 times better than Clella Wood or any other dean in this position at IVC on any day of any week, month, or year...."
Thursday, January 7, 1999
[Student Deb Burbridge:] “He’s been writing [the newsletter] for 18 months and only now they’re reprimanding him. I’ve been reading it for six or seven months and it’s always been that way. For me, it was really informative, because I couldn’t go to all the board meetings and I relied on “The Dissent” for what was going on. I find his sense of humor satirical. I didn’t take it very seriously at all. If anyone knows Roy he’s the most soft-spoken and non-violent person you can imagine.“
Monday, January 11, 1999
[Opening session:] ...Next came introductions of some visiting bigwigs, starting with Williams and then moving on to Nancy Padberg, one of the new trustees. Marcia Milchiker was introduced last for some reason. I seem to recall that Sampson also mentioned Trustee President Dot Fortune, who was not actually present, though she was there in spirit, a kind of moral stinkwater that covered the ground and filled the air. Dot gives Cedric his marching orders each morning. Despite her zany past (witchcraft, professional wrestling) and her manifest looniness and boorishness (she drives everyone nuts), she is now the Empress of SOCCCD, the “brains” of the operation. Good Lord. (I was just kidding about the professional wrestling.)....
Thursday, January 14, 1999
How, we asked, is using the phrase "Mr. Goo" to refer to Raghu an instance of racial discrimination? Well, explained Sampson, Goo sounds like “gook,” and “gook” is a term of disparagement for Asians. “President Mathur,” explained Sampson, “is an Asian.” I responded by noting that never—I mean never—had I associated the phrase Mr. Goo with the term “gook.” I said that I intended the term Mr. Goo as an allusion to “Mr. Magoo” and perhaps to, well, goo, the sticky substance. Besides, isn’t the term “gook” usually associated with Vietnam and the North Vietnamese?
Thursday, January 21, 1999
A judge has ordered the South Orange County Community College District to tape-record its closed-door meetings for two years because of its “persistent and defiant misconduct” in violating state open-meeting laws. Orange County Superior Court Judge Tully H. Seymour also referred the case to the District Attorney’s Office for possible criminal prosecution, court records show. A prior finding of Brown Act violations against the district in 1997 also will be forwarded…”
Monday, March 15, 1999
"Ask Ms. Fortune" (or "Ask Miss Fortune") was one of our more popular features. "Miss Fortune" is, of course, a pun. "Misfortune" or "Miss Fortune"? The latter was a certain notoriously bumptious trustee, one who quit the Board amid rumors that she no longer resided in the county. Ah, a typical SOCCCD factoid! The feature was authored by the one and only Red Emma, starting March of 1999.
Tuesday, March 23, 1999
Wagner was always thus
Monday, August 16, 1999
“Under the current president, decisions are made unilaterally by the president, and at his direction are kept at the administrative level only, or reflect Board directive[s] irrespective of the college-wide governance organizations…When the president establishes priorities for the college and makes decisions, he usually does so irrespective of the advice of others and without their support.” “[A]lthough the current president had previously been a school chair for a school of eight full-time faculty, he had never served in a senior administrative position. His chosen Acting Vice-President of Instruction [Glenn Roquemore] has had no administrative experience at the college other than one month as a school chair….” “Outside observers note that the Board continues to make sweeping changes with ‘very little depth and understanding of consequences’ of those actions…, without ‘linking changes to evidence’…, and without consulting the administrators most affected…These matters confirm the conclusion of the Sorenson report that there ‘is little evidence of trust anywhere in the organization.’”
—Excerpted from the supplemental [Accreditation] report for standard 10. (7/31/98) THEIR MONKEY BOY
Monday, August 16, 1999
...Fortune broke in to read endlessly from the policy, and then she said something. I’m not sure what she said, ‘cuz I tuned out, but it had that “you mean to tell me!” feel to it. Everyone ignore her and rolled their eyes, which only increased her agitation and peevitude….
Frogue seemed befuddled again. “Is this a motion or an amendment?”, he asked. Someone said, “Good God.” A snore ripped through the night.
Monday, August 16, 1999
...Fortune quickly established a redolent peevitude that never dissipated. We had discussed this damn business for over a year, she said. Everybody was involved—a lawyer, the ACLU, students, my Aunt Minnie, et al. We did everything right, she declared. In the end, we adopted UCI’s new policy, and, she noted, at the time, no complaints were heard from the two Academic Senates. So what’s all this infernal caterwauling?!
Naturally, Dot didn’t know what she was talking about....
Monday, October 4, 1999
...Johnny Boy [Williams] mentioned his having attended something called “Constitution Day” at the Claremont Institute, which, I’m told, is a right wing think tank. During his report, Frogue said he showed up for that one, too, and he even asked questions. I bet the people at the Institute were impressed by these two dolts from south OC, one bouncing a soccer ball on his head, the other quoting Spotlight [a white supremacist tabloid]....
A nice example of an SOCCCD board meeting, 2010:
Padberg seeks to impose PG on Saddleback College TV content
Also: Mathur is fired
Here we find trustee Don Wagner seeking to pull the two colleges out of membership with the American Library Association, a group he judges to be a bunch of "liberal busybodies."
2000: Williams targets WASC
An effort by faculty to convince the board not to renew Raghu Mathur's contract
8 comments:
Almost all of those folks are gone but there’s a few still around. You think they’d apologize for what they did. I find it really hard to even say hello to them, even in a zoom meeting. They pretend to be polite and friendly as if they hadn’t been racist sexist homophobic assholes for decades. I think they probably explain that they were trying to keep their jobs.
Since you are anonymous you should tell us who they are.
Hey some of us were able to keep our jobs and still speak out…
The arrogance of tenured faculty...
I'm not a union member--I'm able to keep my job for years and still speak out...
Some tenured faculty are arrogant. I''ve run into them on both campuses but they are in the minority. The other faculty try to solve problems, propose solutions and keep their students foremost in the minds.
Most of them are in leadership--shared governance-- positions (although not all)...
Thankks for a great read
Post a Comment