![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwcE2QF16K7JB4EHzvmqveKUc3DdIIKuraiKfXoxwyWLPdHkR6K1VTnRhp_fN_GNuTLBEpSwUZaJMxzIEPHZMgDDXndJtWdGgQqe_vJDaXF09xoharSLYY1L4aTjoasCDla4S-/s200/Mathur+slither.jpg)
Faculty, welcome back.
As you know, the big news right now is the governor’s proposed budget. According to CCC Chancellor
Diane Woodruff, “The California Community Colleges received a reduction of $525 million that includes a two-thirds reduction in growth funds.”
No doubt, you’ve already received lots of emails alerting you to the trouble ahead.
But NOTE WELL: there can be no doubt that
Chancellor Mathur will exploit the situation to serve his interests. That’s what the man does.
As you know, owing to his bungling, our colleges are, and have been, in crisis mode re the 50% Law. The gist: state law requires that at least half of expenditures (in community colleges) go to faculty salaries and benefits (“instruction”). But, for years, in part because of ATEP start-up costs, we’ve spent increasingly less on instruction and are now doomed to cross below the 50% mark. (See
The data &
Documents.) Among the desperate measures we’ve taken: the en masse and ASAP hiring of faculty.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTwfAKzN6XIDjKXNgHomxrOyL_R73oDxqF0IeC1GvFwAP6TD-BCqw9gcVLXaD52BVckIpTynFbK8-hn_aiDS4mchaoh_stieJahi871H8VCC0lIjSsndMQvPlY9eRTzCS2RNEP/s400/50%25+Db.jpg)
No district would do that unless it had to. Faculty hiring should be done carefully, deliberately. Not hurriedly.
Our haste has already produced fiascos. HR has bungled advertising for these 45 new hires. Check out our ad in the
Chronicle of Higher Education. It's useless; and it contains errors. (This was discovered during a recent IVC Academic Senate meeting in which it occurred to folks to actually go online and check out the ads that HR was in such a hurry to get into the CHE.)
No doubt Mathur will seize the opportunity to blame all of our woes, including our 50% woes, on the state budget. He’ll announce various obnoxious initiatives too, using the budget crisis as cover.
We can’t let him get away with that.
"But wait!", you say. "The state’s budgetary woes do not apply to us because we’re on basic aid!"
Well, yes. But there’s a big “but”: despite our special funding situation (we rely on local property taxes), our board of trustees insists on funding the colleges as though we received the more common state funding. And so that means we’re headed for seriously lean times. We’ll have to spend less money.
![](//photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2561/1609/400/e.jpg)
Meanwhile, the district (i.e., Gary Poertner) projects that we are headed for non-compliance with the 50% Law (for 2007-2008) to the tune of four and a half million dollars. But the projection
assumes a faculty COLA of 4.53%.
Among the provisions of the state budget:
no COLA.
That means that we’re headed for an even greater degree of non-compliance (with the 50% Law) than we thought. And that means: we need to hire more faculty or increase faculty salaries/benefits.
How that all fits with spending less money ain’t exactly clear to me. (Admittedly, I’m no money guy.)
At any rate, it’s important that we learn the facts about all this and keep an eye on you-know-who.
So welcome back.