Cretin cop culture in tony Newport Beach

Have you been following that curious discrimination trial in Newport Beach? 

Neil Harvey, a 27-year veteran of the Newport Beach Police Department, alleges that he has been harassed and denied promotions because he is perceived as gay. He says he isn’t gay, but he’s got that reputation, and so he’s treated badly, he says.

Natch.

I’ve been following the trial, and it sounds like Harvey’s got a strong case.

In today’s OC Reg article about the trial (Documents: Ex-chief had religious test for Newport police), we learn that things are going from bad to worse for the reputation of the NBPD:

Sworn depositions by city police officers … depict an agency plagued over the years by homophobia, favoritism and even religious standards for employees hoping to ascend the ranks.
…
All that comes amid internal upheaval; rank-and-file officers last spring described "serious morale problems" that risked driving away seasoned personnel, although other officers called the charge baseless. In December, police management called for an investigation into the promotional process, alleging it is "not based on the actual merit of the candidates."

The worst revelations concern former Chief Bob McDonell, who left in 2007:

According to several accounts, McDonell had a religious litmus test requiring those looking to climb the department's ladder to share his "Christian values." ¶ One saying in the department suggested that "you've got to carry a Bible around or he's got to see you carrying a Bible around to get promoted," Sgt. John Hougan said in a deposition.

Apparently, under McDonell’s regime, cops in the department understood that only stable married men were promoted:

"I think there were like seven guys who got married or got engaged and all of a sudden shot to the top of the list," [Officer Kenra] Duerst said during testimony at Harvey's trial this week.

Sheesh. It turns out that McDonell was brought in in 1993 to

clean up a department tarnished by the ousting of Chief Arb Campbell and Capt. Tony Villa, who faced sexual harassment complaints from 10 female employees, including one who accused them of raping her at a party.

Natch.

See also R. Scott Moxley's comment

What is conservatism?

Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative.

—John Stuart Mill

Yesterday, the Contra Costa Times (Right wing to get its time at Berkeley) reported that

An anonymous donor has given $777,000 to [UC Berkeley] to establish a Center for the Comparative Study of Right-wing Movements. Researchers will study the right wing in other countries and its relationship to U.S. movements.

The CCT reporter notes that conservative movements don’t get much attention among scholars. Larry Rosenthal, a sociologist who will head the new program, notes that UC Berkeley will be studying the right wing when, if anything, such studies will be in retreat.

—And when the Republican Party is asking itself what it stands for.

Sounds good to me. Contrary to John Stuart Mill, who called conservatives the “stupid party” (strictly speaking, he said that about the Tories), I think that conservatism is rich in ideas that are worthy of study. Possibly, however, the Berkeley program will be studying movements—especially those outside the U.S.—and not so much ideas or philosophies.

Well, we’ll see, I guess.

Speaking of philosophies and stupid parties, have you been following the “war” between beltway Ditto Heads and conservative writer David Frum? On Monday, Frum wrote that

… [Rush Limbaugh, the self-appointed] leader of the Republicans? A man who is aggressive and bombastic, cutting and sarcastic, who dismisses the concerned citizens in network news focus groups as “losers.” With his private plane and his cigars, his history of drug dependency and his personal bulk, not to mention his tangled marital history, Rush is a walking stereotype of self-indulgence—exactly the image that Barack Obama most wants to affix to our philosophy and our party. And we’re cooperating! Those images of crowds of CPACers cheering Rush’s every rancorous word—we’ll be seeing them rebroadcast for a long time.
…
But do the rest of us understand what we are doing to ourselves by accepting this leadership? … [H]e cannot be allowed to be the public face of the enterprise—and we have to find ways of assuring the public that he is just one Republican voice among many, and very far from the most important.

Frum has taken quite a pounding from his "conservative" colleagues ever since. Unlike others who've challenged Rush and reaped the ditto-wind, Frum hasn't run to Rush to offer a heartfelt apology.

More recently (The Limbaugh schism), Frum explained that “What we are arguing about is the kind of party the GOP will be.” Frum thinks that Republicans seem intent on defining themselves out of government:

We are gradually shrinking from our former ambition—to govern—and taking our pleasure instead in alienation and complaint. Those journalists who cover the conservative world are surprised by how relieved and happy conservatives seem to be about having lost the 2008 election. No more irritating compromises, no more boring policy debates! We can recline into the pure assertion of conservative dogma, a job nobody does better than Rush Limbaugh himself. As Limbaugh told the CPAC crowd: We need no new policy ideas. Conservatism, he said, cannot be reshaped or reformed, and those who suggest otherwise must be “stamped out.” And who knows? That view may prevail among Republicans for some long time to come. But if it does, watch out. Just as the American left retreated from politics into the universities in the 1980s, so—if Rush has his way—will the American right retreat from politics into the airwaves in the 2000s.

These are interesting times.

See also

• Conservatives on the Titanic: blaming right-wing “carny barkers”
• Ten Conservative Principles

Republicans display cute trained monkey: