Showing posts with label Richard O'Neill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard O'Neill. Show all posts

Friday, December 29, 2017

Crooked as a barrel of fish hooks

 
Richard O'Neill c. 1950
     Richard O’Neill (1924-2009), a wealthy Orange County land owner, wanted the Democratic Party to be a force in staunchly Republican OC, and he was willing to spend some of his enormous wealth to secure that end. By the early 70s, somehow, he had hooked up with a doctor—and registered Republican—named Lou Cella (1924-2011), a fellow who ran some kind of political operation out of a hospital. He too had big money to spend.
     At first, nobody was quite sure where the doctor’s political money came from. Eventually, he was convicted of stealing it from the taxpayers through massive Medicare and Medi-Cal fraud.
     In 1974, “Dick and Doc,” as they were known then in California political circles, were the state’s biggest political contributors. They made quite a splash, in Orange County, and throughout the state.
     O’Neill and his political cronies were developing a local political farm system, nurturing prospective political leaders via election, initially, to unexciting nonpartisan offices. They were assisted by a new breed of smart and ruthless political advisor, like consultants Butcher and Forde, who pioneered new tactics and technologies that, while sometimes ethically questionable, were undeniably effective.
Dr. Lou Cella c 1974
     Dick and Doc managed to get four of their people, three Democrats and one Republican, on the 7-member OC Board of Supervisors. That provided protection from the local DA, a Republican, who was determined to investigate Lou Cella and bring down his political machine. (Eventually, he succeeded.)
     Dick O’Neill was especially keen to land an OC politician in state office, and he was willing to fork over hundreds of thousands of dollars to make that happen. In 1974, Dick and Doc supported local pol, Ken Cory (1937-1998), for state Controller, and Cory won the office, retaining it for three terms. Cory, a former Assemblyman and avowed foe of greedy oil companies, had been working for years with the likes of Butcher and Forde and was himself a seasoned and innovative political tactician.
     Arguably the most experienced—and least scrutinized—among O’Neill’s crew, a man judged a “political genius” by Cella, was Fred Harber (1919-1974), who, starting in the 50s, had secured some local political offices (City Council, Mayor), but by the early 70s, had developed into OC’s shadowy political kingmaker. According to OC district attorney Cecil Hicks, Harber and his pals, especially Lou Cella, ran a “shadow government.” He took a dim view of that sort of thing.
     Harber was smart all right, but he was also dirty. Early on, relying on political connections, he set up lucrative “pay to play” schemes. It appears that, along with OC Supervisor Ronald Caspers, he was pursuing one such scheme when he mysteriously disappeared, with Caspers and eight others, in a yacht off the coast of Mexico. Neither the yacht nor the ten men on it were ever seen again.
     It was not the first, and it would not be the last, curious death among this cast of characters.
     It is said that the 1974 yachting disaster, taking both Caspers and Harber, marked the beginning of the end for the “coalition.” Soon, it all went poof.
     I want to explore and investigate the darker corners of this tale.
     Here’s a good starting place: an interview of Ken Cory in late 1987 and early 1988, years after his surprise retirement from politics.

Interview of KEN CORY by Gabrielle Morris (1930-2013)
October 1, October 22, December 10, 1987, and
February 6, 1988, Sacramento, California

“YOU OWE US”

Cory
CORY: [circa 1974:] People said… “You really should run for something, and we'll back you.” I declined, and they asked me to meet with them one more time, and they made some very strong personal appeals to me as to what I owed to them for their past support.

MORRIS: People in your legislature, or in the party?

CORY: No, there is no Democratic party, there is a group of people. There were people, most of whom were Democrats, some of whom were Republicans, but they were friends of mine, and supporters of mine, who said, “You owe us more than that than to just quit. We want to continue to support you, and we don't care what it costs.” We had some very frank discussions about the cost, and I finally said, “Well, the only other office, other than governor, that I think I would be willing to run for would be senator.” It was clear that I wasn't in the league to run for governor, or United States senator, and the only other subject matter that had any appeal or interest to me was the Controller's office.

MORRIS: Could you say a little bit more about the business of your supporters saying “You owe it to us for what we've done for you”? That's pretty heavy stuff.

CORY: Well, yes. They said that they'd always supported me, and that they'd invested money, because they thought it was important, and that they believed in me, and that I had an obligation not to just quit.

MORRIS: They'd made you a visible public figure…

CORY: Yes, and it was important to them, and things they were interested in, the causes, the shades of that. There were about six or eight of them. Plus, they wanted me to run for controller. This was sort of last minute; I had decided I wasn't running for anything, although in retrospect, some of that … people who worked for you end up having a vested interest in having you continue to run, because they have…

MORRIS: Your deputy and administrative assistants?

CORY: Employees, and that sort of thing. And your fundraisers, and people get ego gratification from knowing somebody in Sacramento, and all that. They just didn't want to give that up. And so, I could see that there was some sense of obligation. There was also something that I thought would be fun to do, if I were controller, and I thought well, you know, I could do that for four years and then I could get out and do whatever I wanted.
   That didn't come to pass, and I assumed that four or five years, the major thing I was interested in was trying to resolve the price fixing of oil, which was very clearly going on. I thought that could be litigated within a four to five year period of time. Three years, if you got lucky.

MORRIS: The controller's office has a vantage point from which to initiate that kind of research. But had you had any particular contacts with your predecessor as controller, or any of his people?

PAL OF REPUBLICAN CONTROLLER, FLUORNOY

Hugh Fluornoy
CORY: I'd been a friend of [Republican moderate] Hugh Fluornoy's since '61… [I]n '61 or '62, Hugh tried to get me to go to work for him, when I was on the [Assembly Education Committee] staff. I just thanked him very much, because it was a very gracious offer that he made to me…. And I just said, “Hugh, I'm a Democrat. I'm sorry, I like you, it has nothing to do with that, but I just would not be comfortable working for a Republican.”

MORRIS: Did he have some of the same concerns you did about the way some of the large corporations did business on related matters?

CORY: Yes, I can recall one time going to Hugh and explaining what I thought the public good should be.

RUNNING FOR CONTROLLER (1974):
CONTROVERSIAL SUPPORT AND FUNDING

MORRIS: Did you anticipate your supporters and funding were going to become such a controversial issue?

CORY: I'd discussed that with them beforehand, that it would clearly become a major issue. And that they would undergo a great deal of personal scrutiny, and they ought to be prepared to endure it. It was inevitable, if they were going to contribute that much money. It was so preposterous and so foolish.

MORRIS: Why did they contribute—it may sound like an odd question—but why did they contribute that much money?

DICK AND DOC

O'Neill
CORY: They were on an ego trip and they wanted to do it. If you look at it and understand it, it was basically [Richard] Dick O'Neill and [Dr. Louis] Lou Cella. The two of them were making a great deal of money. Dick is one of the wealthier people in the state of California.
   Dick O'Neill … and his sister Alice [O'Neill]… [T]he family is a meat-packing family, and has been in the meat-packing business for generations. Dick and Alice are longtime members of the Forbes 400. Are you familiar with that … designation? … [T]hey estimate each of them were worth $275 million. They don't try to make money.

MORRIS: Just makes itself.

CORY: They spend more time avoiding money. Dick—if he had had people like the people I know that are around [ ] Sid Bass—Dick could clearly be worth two or three billion. It's inordinate wealth, and so, five, six hundred thousand dollars to Dick O'Neill is irrelevant. It truly is irrelevant, and Dick happens to like politics, and our biggest chore in that campaign was to keep him and Lou from spending money.

MORRIS: Have they backed statewide candidates before?

RESENTMENT

CORY: No, that was part of it—they had never been taken seriously. Dick really resented … you have to understand, the O'Neill family, they still own forty thousand acres of Orange County. They do not have a mortgage on the forty thousand acres.

MORRIS: They inherited it.

CORY: But it's free and clear. That land is worth… [L]arge portions of it currently you could sell for a million dollars an acre.

MORRIS: Orange County is indeed sort of a landowner's heaven.

CORY: And the O'Neill family owned Camp Pendleton at one time. Dick O'Neill's home that he grew up in as a child is the officer's club at Camp Pendleton. So he grew up going to school at the Mission San Juan Capistrano, in a landed aristocracy. When he got to high school age, they bought a house in Beverly Hills for him to get an urban education.
   So he got up there and I would guess [he was] not treated very well, because they considered him a hick from Orange County.
   He had been living under that kind of pressure from people. But through the years, O'Neill as a contributor… people from statewide campaigns would not take Orange County seriously. They would not come to Orange County; they would not help the Democratic party build.

MORRIS: Because [OC] was conservative.

CORY: Orange County was Republican, and all they were interested in was finding rich people in Orange County who would give them money, so they could spend it.

MORRIS: And not have any input in return for the money.

CORY: Yes, and that whole thing. Dick found it the same with many wealthy people; they resent being used just for their money.

MORRIS: That's interesting, I thought that the state Democratic finance committee was set up to find and cultivate and make friends of rich, rich Democrats in whatever county they were in?

CORY: Dick is substantive enough to say, “Well, why do I have to go to Beverly Hills to a meeting? Why can't we get a bunch of rich people together here in Orange County, and have them come down here and talk to us?” So in the '64 campaign (where Dick and I developed a fairly decent relationship) with [U.S. Senator] Pierre Salinger, I was able to raise money by convincing Pierre and [Donald J,] Don Bradley, who was running his campaign in the general election, that we could raise real money. [B]ut Pierre was going to have to spend time with people.
   For that period of time, we raised a lot of money for Pierre. We raised in one dinner at the Villa Fontana $93,000. Dick thought that was great, because he could go in Orange County, right in Santa Ana—actually, it was in Orange, on Main Street—and it was Orange County. It was…

MORRIS: Where he felt comfortable. He knew something.

CORY: Yes, and grew up there, and that they would give him some recognition. At that time, Pierre was a United States senator, and actually came down and had a dinner with twelve, fourteen people. They kicked in a lot of money.

MORRIS: That's the Ben Swig school of fundraising.

CORY: Yes, … Dick O'Neill puts on the fundraisers in Orange County at the ranch. Most candidates would rather have Dick O'Neill write the check, but Dick wants the action, and doing a barbecue at the ranch. It would be cheaper for Dick to write the check, but there's no point…

MORRIS: How did you get to know him?

CORY: I met him in '64, when he was sort of around. He decided to spend more time in Orange County in '64.

MORRIS: He'd been away for a while?

CORY: Dick had just won some litigation against Crocker Bank. The property was in a trust. Crocker Bank tried to sell the ranch for $five million, $seven million, one or the other, and Dick thought that was wrong, and litigated it, and won. So he wanted to start spending more time down there. He started to develop Mission Viejo [with Donald Bren]. It was just about to open…

MORRIS: He sounds like he might have been related to or had similar problems with the [University of California Irvine] Irvine campus.

CORY: He resents … that's one of his problems: the family is an older landed family than the Irvines. He resents the publicity that Irvine family gets. Jokingly, it frequently was referred to as … the Irving Company.
   …And so since then, they were referred to as the Irving Company. … I mean, here was a family that had owned this land long before [James] Jim Irvine, when Jim Irvine was the nouveau riche hustler that came in.

MORRIS: How old is Dick O'Neill? …

CORY: [pause] Late fifties, mid to late fifties.

MORRIS: Because Father Irvine, or Irving, just wasn't making or functioning as a tycoon, like in the twenties and thirties.

CORY: But these people, the O'Neill family, Dick's great-grandfather came out here in the Civil War.

MORRIS: Very interesting.

CORY: The O'Neill meatpackers, which are descendants of the family, have plants in Fresno, San Diego, and they have had their property without a mortgage on it for a long period…

MORRIS: You met him first in the Salinger campaign?

CORY: I may have met him in Dick Hanna's campaigns prior to that…

MORRIS: He'd been interested in politics…?

CORY: He'd been around, yes, but he was a hundred dollar contributor, something like that. And Dick likes to help everybody, Democrats. He can get—if he feels comfortable with you—the capacity to do more. I doubt that he will ever, given the amount of heat that he took for that contribution, will ever do that again.

MORRIS: Did he also take an interest in the campaign, in putting on your strategy meetings?

CORY: Yes, that's what Dick likes, and that's why, I guess, a friendship developed where he wanted to build the Democratic party, in Orange County, during the time that Dick O'Neill was interested in financing [campaigns], very indirectly, because he never wanted people to know… [A]nd that's the thing a lot of people don't understand… [T]hey think there's something sinister. It's just the same reason people give to charities anonymously. The Democratic party is Dick O'Neill's charity. It's the same psychology. He is bothered by reading about his contributions in the press.

O’NEILL BUILDS THE OC DEMOCRATIC PARTY

But we worked with him about what ideas would work, what ideas wouldn't, what kind of people… We started getting people running for nonpartisan offices who were Democrats who we could build into credible Democratic candidates, getting them funded for city council, school board, supervisor, those kinds of things.

MORRIS: That's local, too, city and county.

CORY: Yes, that's because you had to do that, because of the partisan thing, that they had to be nonidentified because of the Republican edge. Then you could create a persona that was acceptable, that you could bring people along with this. The same format that the Republican party, as the minority party statewide, always uses. Nothing magic about that.

MORRIS: Well, the Republicans for a while … they were using a special districts approach, putting a lot of effort into electing Republicans in certain legislative districts.

CORY: But they start … they recognize they are a minority party.

MORRIS: You still say they are a minority party? You don't…

CORY: Sure.

MORRIS: …think the demographics and the registrations make it different?

CORY: …[T]here are still less Republicans than Democrats statewide. Now, it's narrowed, and a lot of that narrowing is just returning to the pre-Watergate phenomenon. But nationwide, there are more Democrats than Republicans. The Democrats are more willing to vote for a Republican than Republicans are willing to vote for Democrats. And that's a whole other issue.
   But we use that basic format of getting people elected to places where they could get elected, nonpartisan offices.
   And that makes them credible, and puts them on the ballot. You've got a choice of four people you've never heard of, one of whom has been on the school board, and the other guy's a janitor, and the other guy's a store clerk. Who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the guy who was on the school board.

MORRIS: This is done in your local Democratic elections.

CORY: Yes, that's what we did in Orange County, … just so we have more Democrats, more credible candidates in the state. We would find we would have people that did not appear to be quality candidates. There's nothing you can really say about them.

MORRIS: Would you go around looking for people, to encourage them to run for the school board, or something like that?

THE O’NEILL (CELLA, HARBER) FARM SYSTEM

CORY: Yes, we’d sit down, and you’d work with Dick O'Neill, Lou Cella, Fred Harber, and you'd go out and you'd find—going through the list of particular, nice-looking lawyers insurance agents—try to go through the registration files, finding out which ones were Democrats, then talking to them, finding out what kind of people they really were, and then you'd start encouraging them, and then you'd end up with an obligation of running their campaigns and supporting them.
   That grew to the point where Orange County had a Democratic registration at one point, and that was Dick O'Neill. He basically made that happen, and Lou Cella.

MORRIS: And none of the surrounding counties were watching, interested, or…?

CORY: The bottom line was that when you had Dick and Lou there, if you got to the point where you needed some money to make something happen, they'd put it out. You don't have that in other places. They would not put it up.

MORRIS: Outside of Orange County…

CORY: No, they would not put it up early. It was not a thing where they would just say, “Here's the money, go do it.” But if you were struggling, and … everybody was working, and something was happening, he had people… [Y]ou could organize and get thirty people to go out and walk door to door to register Democrats. … Dick saw that organized, but you needed … “How are we going to get them out next weekend!” “Well, we're going to have to feed them lunch.” There would be the money there to do that [with O’Neill].
   Those are the kinds of things that if you don't have those kinds of supporters that will do that … if they do it too early, then everybody becomes an executive, and the money gets frittered away. And Dick understood that. Dick wouldn't play in that game. He'd walk away from that kind of thing. But over a sustained period of time, and the same kind of support would come where Howard Adler, who was a—I've known Howard since he was a high school student. He was the Democratic chairman of the central committee for Orange County for a long time.
   But you look at Howard, who worked in the Dick Hanna operation—he worked on Dick's staff, but he worked hard for the Democratic party. When he had a business opportunity and he needed help, Dick would give him help. Howard's a wealthy man today, but he'd worked hard; he's earned that money. But Dick was the kind of person who would support that kind of person, because he knew him in politics, and knew him to be a hard working and honest person.
   Somebody could come to Dick with a better financial business deal, who just wanted Dick's money, and Dick wouldn't even talk to him, because Dick would not make a stupid financial investment … he and Dick and Howard invested in various deals together, but Dick didn't do that to make money. He did it to help somebody who didn't have money.

MORRIS: Somebody he knew and loved.

Tom Fuentes' pals
CORY: Yes, Frank Barbero, a lawyer down there [OC] who was running for office—same kind of relationship. Time and time again, you'd see Dick do those kinds of things. And the other side of it, in terms of why it's an O'Neill charity… I've only had Dick O'Neill talk to me about one political issue, government issue, all the time I've known him, where he was trying to be an advocate of a position.
I can recall, when I was first elected to the legislature, they had passed the constitutional amendment on the Williamson Act and I kept expecting Dick to read the thing. And I was sitting on the Rev and Tax Committee. I finally called … Dick and said, “Dick, next week the Williamson Act is up for committee.” And he said, “What's that?” I said, “Well, that's the thing on the ballot, we have the ballot thing that said that agricultural property could be taxed differently than highest and best use.”
   “Oh, yeah? What about it?”
   “I haven't heard from you or anybody in the company about what your views were on that, and I just thought I'd check in.” This was as a legislator, not as controller.
   And he said, “Wait a minute, Ken, is somebody from the company talking to you about that?”
   I said, “No, that's just the point, nobody has contacted me.”
   He said, “Well, Ken, if anybody from the company calls you, tell them to stick it.” [Laughter]
   I said, “What do you mean?”
   He said, “Look, I paid my taxes last year, I'll pay my taxes next year. If the legislature wants to charge me less taxes, sure, I'd rather pay less taxes than more. But it's irrelevant, it's deducted from the federal, and I frankly could care less. And if anybody from the company is lobbying you to do something, I want to know.”
   So, I had that conversation with him. Several years later, he arrived in Sacramento unannounced, by himself. [Samuel] Sam Yorty was mayor of Los Angeles, and had imposed a local sales tax on drinks served in bars. It was known as the "tipplers tax" by the press.
   Dick was outraged. Dick moved up here [in Sacramento] and he stayed in my house for about two, three months, during the legislative session. (I had a house here in town.) He lobbied a bill through to preclude … make it crystal clear… [S]omebody went to court saying it was unconstitutional for the city to impose a sales tax. L.A. city put in a statute authorizing it, and Dick was up here trying to kill [that] bill.
   That was the only thing that he's ever asked my support on. He was dead right on the issue, philosophically. It was an illegal tax. The court held it was an illegal tax. It's foolishness to have those kinds of local options on taxes as a matter of tax policy, in my judgment. So it was very easy for me to support [the preclusion bill].

MORRIS: Was he a gentleman that liked a bourbon?

CORY: Well, whether he does or not, Dick has owned a lot of bars.
   He owned at that time, in the mid-Wilshire area of Los Angeles, he owned the Blarney Castle, the Black Forest, the HMS Bounty, and the Bull and Bush.

MORRIS: Sounds very international.

CORY: Those tended to be supper-club, after-work, kinds of bars in the insurance area, and the city boundaries jog around, and there are places across the street that were in the county that didn't charge. A guy getting off of work had an option of going into the Bull and Bush and getting a 6 percent tax laid on his drink, or going across the street, and not having a charge.
   I remember asking Dick, I said, “Dick, how much money do you make on the restaurants?” Here was a man that, without embarrassing him and disclosing the confidence, his personal income was millions each year. And he avoided income by hiring professionals to keep him from making money. He still had millions coming in each year, and he was making maybe fifty thousand… dollar profit in each one of those bars.
   He said, “You know, if we absorb the tax, that turns me from making a fifty thousand dollar profit to being in the red.”
   “Okay, but why do you care? Why do you care if you lose twelve thousand [dollars], or make fifty, when you've got ten million coming in? I mean, three months of your life with this? I mean, really!”
   He said, “Well, everybody in my family bitches about me owning these bars and restaurants. If they're losing money, it's really hard to justify. But if they're making money, it's okay.” That's the only issue Dick O'Neill has ever leaned on me on. … But that's O'Neill.

MORRIS: Did he enjoy it?

CORY: Oh, yes, he likes the action. He thought what he was doing was right, and he really identifies with the common man. I mean, to him it was the concept of the little bar owner and the guy buying a drink… But, yes, he enjoyed it.

MORRIS: And he never has found another issue that he took that seriously?

CORY: There were things that he cares about, and money is close to irrelevant to him. It's a burden to him. It's a problem. He does not want to be used for his money. [S]ubsequent employees of his … have profit centers who are all trying to trade on it, but Dick's never spoken to me about this, he's never hassled me, and when I've found where legislation has gone through that would be beneficial to them, it's never been O'Neill that did it. And that's not that he put people up to it, it's just that O'Neill would not do that to people.
   But other people who don't know Dick that well … --if an employee came in and asked me for something, they would think that they had to do it for Dick. If they really knew Dick…

MORRIS: Is it possible that some of his employees or associates…

CORY: --without consulting with him, had the use of his name for their own purposes?
   Sure, but I mean, it's de minimis [trivial]. But people wanted to know what was Dick O'Neill going to get out of it. …O'Neill wanted the action, he wanted someone from Orange County [e.g., Ken Cory] to be a statewide officeholder. He wanted to force the Democratic party to be recognized.

CELLA EQUALLY SELFLESS

MORRIS: Is Dr. Cella equally enlightened and disinterested? [At about the time of this interview, Cella was imprisoned for embezzlement.]

CORY: Yes, he was even a little harsher in his standards. He has always stated to me that he wanted me to always vote against any issue that affected him. He … made it very clear I was up here to vote against him. “If I have something that affects me, and I can't get it passed without your vote, I shouldn't get it passed—” He was just cold turkey.
   O'Neill … would just be offended if somebody, like the Williamson Act [mandatory disclosing of info in hostile takeovers], somebody was pushing you from his company without him knowing it. Then he'd be upset. But if you voted against O'Neill, that would bother him, because you were his friend and you shouldn't vote against him. But he doesn't have anything up here [in Sacramento], so he doesn't care.
   Cella was aware that he might have issues [e.g., bills advantageous to his business dealings] up here. He made it very clear … “Do not vote for them, I'm your contributor; I don't need the grief; you don't need the grief. If it's meritorious, it will pass.”….

MORRIS: Yes, even in the medical business [“Doc” Cella’s office was in a hospital], he was in an area where there was a lot of state legislation and concern in those years. It's hard to avoid the appearance of…

CORY: Yes, actually, he was more aggressive on the other side.

MORRIS: So, did they have some ideas about how to transfer your success in developing visibility and credibility on a statewide basis?

CORY: Not really. I mean, they were interested in—their interests were very provincial. They were basically Orange County.

CORY, NEXUS OF CAMPAIGN STRATEGY BRILLIANCE

MORRIS: So, did you have some professional staff?

CORY: Basically, we developed and built our own. Various people who were involved were Arnold Forde and Bill Butcher….

MORRIS: You worked with [them] before?

CORY: Yes, Bill Butcher ran my first campaign [for OC Assemblyman, 1966]. Arnold Forde ran the campaign of the guy that thought he was going to get the [California Democratic Council] endorsement, and didn't.

MORRIS: This is on your controller's campaign, right?

CORY: No, … first assembly campaign [1964].

MORRIS: And Forde and Butcher worked again in '74…

CORY: --they were friends; they've always been I guess supporters, but they weren't running the campaign, I've never hired a campaign firm.

MORRIS: Really? Even in '74?

CORY: No, we did it ourselves. Now, you go around to some of the campaign firms that exist, [the belief there seems to be that?] Butcher-Forde [pioneers of the ethically-challenged approach to winning elections] were very much involved in my campaign.... Carl D'Agostino [notorious for his outrageous political consulting style] was my chief deputy, and he was working for Ford Aeronotronics … when I hired him to work in politics. He is a very bright, capable person. But I knew the fellow who ran the company called Braun Campaigns, Braun Associates, who run ballot propositions in L.A … The guy who runs that, [well-known Public Affairs Strategist] Doug Jeffe, used to be my administrative assistant.

MORRIS: So you worked with everybody in the business, pretty much.

CORY: They basically worked for me, and we ran campaigns and then they'd go off on their own and start their own companies. [Cory seems inclined to take a fair amount of credit for the methods and tactics of these various, well-known political advisors/consultants.]

MORRIS: This was when you were in the administrative office in the assembly?

CORY: No, they worked for me in the assembly, and as Controller. Doug Jeffe was my district office administrative assistant. He was my administrative assistant as caucus chairman. Carl D'Agostino was consultant to the committee, Joint Committee on Public Domain, that I was chairman of. Bill was my first administrative assistant, when I was first elected to the legislature [in 1964]. … Bill Butcher and I were married to sisters. Bill and I grew up in the same hometown, a vast while ago.

MORRIS: Those are really very close ties.

CORY: And so, I don't…

MORRIS: What you're saying is that they learned a lot from you, and that over the years you've developed…

CORY: No, we've learned a lot together. I was able to raise money, I have contributed to some of the campaign techniques. I used to run campaigns for a living myself, so we developed some things, and we were able to make sure that the money was well spent. Braun Campaigns basically grew out of that [1972] Watson initiative [to lower property tax] campaign.



Thursday, June 14, 2012

What does Fuentes’ tutelage under, esteem of, and four years with, Ronald "shakedown" Caspers tell us about him?

SPECIAL REPORT
  Fuentes credits former Supervisor Ronald Caspers for much of his political rearing. 
LA Times, 1985
     THE IMPORTANCE OF CALLING A SPADE A "SPADE." The philosopher* in me needs to say that falsehoods in general, and courtesy distortions—for instance, whitewashing the lurid facts of a newly-deceased cad’s record—in particular, are enemies of morality.
     And that is why I am eager to counter the absurd notion that Tom Fuentes was, in his extra-familial roles, a good and even a great man.
     I do not adopt this stance because I reject his “politics”—“Neanderthal” is the adjective I have used for that. I am able, more so than some others I think, to respect people across the political spectrum with whom I disagree. —Even cave people.
     The problem with Tom Fuentes, in my opinion, isn’t his philosophical positions about, say, the role of religion in politics, the value of freedom in the marketplace, or the importance and proper role of private property, etc. —Whatever, man. No, the problem is how he pursues his values, such as they are—er, were.

     (Note: I'm leaving aside Fuentes' role in the horrific scandal afflicting the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange. I shall leave that matter in the able hands of Gustavo Arellano.)

* * *
     To this day, Nixon's spirit seems to animate Fuentes. Close your eyes and listen to Fuentes, and you will hear precisely enunciated cadences of R.N.
     "He models himself after Richard Nixon," said Peer Swan, a Newport Beach businessman who has clashed with Fuentes. "He acts and talks like him, and has those big sweeping gestures like Richard Nixon."
LA Times, 1996
Spades
     Tom was born in 1948, in the Los Angeles area. His family later moved to Orange County.
     When he was twelve years old, Fuentes was already a supporter of the man who would become his idol—Richard Nixon. During that campaign, which pitted Nixon against Catholic John Kennedy, Fuentes proudly wore his "Nixon" button to his Catholic school.
     Tom’s curious youthful enthusiasm for local and national politics did not wane. In college—first at Santa Ana, then at Chapman—Fuentes presided over the Young Republicans. By 1968, at about age twenty, he came to the attention of Ronald Caspers, a businessman/banker who sought political office, namely, a seat on the county board for the 5th Supervisorial district.
     Caspers, of course, was a Republican.
     Fuentes became his chief assistant, famously managing Caspers' successful campaign against respected Republican incumbent, Alton Allen. (More about that below.)
     Later, of course, Fuentes would noisily declare the imperative to support Republican incumbents and denounce and "discourage" Republican challengers. Here we have one of The Fuentean Contradictions—a large and bewildering class. He seems to have participated, most foully, in precisely the dastardly deed he piously condemned.
     Though he was the manager of Caspers' 1970 victory, Tom’s role in Caspers’ seriously hinky efforts to defeat incumbent Alton Allen (including an attempted recall) and seat himself on the OC Board of Supes is unclear to me; I can find no detailed accounts of the campaign. In any event, it appears that, at least in the opinion of then-OC GOP chairman, Tom Rogers, the endeavor was a no-holds-barred descent into unscrupulousness, a rip-roaring, Karl Rovian** mud-chuck. (Explained below.)
     Further, the people behind Caspers—landowner Richard O’Neill and doctor Louis Cella—were profoundly corrupt; they were the originators, really, of the style of corruption that has come to define OC politics. For a time, they were successful: according to Cecil Hicks, the OC DA who finally addressed this corruption, O’Neill and Cella actually ran a “shadow government."
     And one of the men O'Neill and Cella controlled was Ron Caspers, who, as events would reveal, was key to the O'Neill/Caspers coalition's continued flourishing.

* * *
     On Democratic voters [Fuentes] says are unaware of the "evils" their party has perpetrated: "It's a little like good Germans denying the existence of the Holocaust."
LA Times, 1996
Louis Cella ("Doc")
     DICK AND DOC. Louis Cella died only recently. His death inspired the Sacramento Bee’s Dan Walters (see) to recall the scandal at which Cella was the center. Dr. Cella, he wrote, was “a physician who virtually controlled Orange County politics in the 1970s….” According to Walters,
     Cella and a very wealthy Orange County rancher and developer, Richard O'Neill, formed a political and business alliance known as "Dick and Doc," that was, in effect, a shadow government. It placed four sycophants [Ralph Diedrich, Caspers, Robert Battin, & Ralph Clark] on the five-member Board of Supervisors [three Democrats plus Republican Ronald Caspers], and Cella's Santa Ana medical clinic [he owned two hospitals] had a wing devoted to political operations.
     Writes Walters, back in 1975, he and his reporting partner, Al Donner, worked laboriously on a story about the “Cella-O’Neill machine”:
     While I concentrated on Orange County, [my partner] delved into [State Controller Ken] Cory's appointments of campaign donors and their relatives as "inheritance tax referees" – some of whom were tied to the Orange County machine.
     The deeper we dug, the more tangled the story became, such as the murder of one tax referee*** as he desperately sought reappointment by Cory, and the never-solved mystery of a yacht that vanished off Baja California. There were 10 people aboard, including the machine's chief political operative, Fred Harber, and Ronald Caspers, an Orange County supervisor and banker who had financed the hospitals.
     We uncovered indications of Mafia involvement, including an obscure company partially owned by a known Mafia figure from Las Vegas who was involved in one Orange County land deal.
     Donner and I wrote thousands of words, but we always suspected that we had barely scratched the surface.
     Back in 1976, Walters and Donner suggested that the death of Caspers and Harber was a major blow to the Dick and Doc operation—perhaps the beginning of the end for the "shadow government":
     With Harber’s passing, Cella was forced to move into the open, and investigators began taking an interest in his complex of business affairs. Orange County District Attorney Cecil Hicks, perhaps the only major Orange County official openly hostile to Cella and O’Neill, has called Cella the man behind “a shadow government”.
     THE EL TORO LAND DEAL. Also back in 76, Walters and Donner reported:
     The influence of Cella and O’Neill in county government is apparent in many ways. A prime example is the El Toro case. El Toro Land Company was formed as a partnership in 1970 to develop a 39-acre parcel along the San Diego Freeway in Orange County. One of the original partners, with a $25,000 investment, was Albert Parvin, one-time Las Vegas casino-owner and head of the Parvin-Dohrmann Company and the Parvin Foundation. Meyer Lansky, reputed Mafia financial brain, was one of Parvin’s partners in the Flamingo Hotel and the Parvin Foundation had former Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas on its payroll for $12,000 per year – a revelation that sparked an impeachment effort against Douglas several years ago. Cella, O’Neill and Harber bought into El Toro Land in 1971 and remain as major partners, along with Parvin, according to corporate records. Shortly after they bought in, the Orange County Board of Supervisors took emergency action to establish a freeway interchange adjacent to that property and the land increased in value by 600 percent, county records show. (See Unscrambling Dick and Doc’s financial and political empire, California Journal; January 1976)
      TAKING OUT ALTON ALLEN. To get a sense of the ethics of Cella/O’Neill's boy Caspers, consider this account, written by the chair of the OC GOP during this period, Tom Rogers:
Republican Alton Allen: taken out
by Caspers and crew 
     The incumbent in the 5th [OC Supervisorial] district was [Republican] Alton Allen [born: 1897], a retired banker, who lived in … Laguna Beach….
     Allen was widely respected for his representation of the 5th District, which included the beach communities of Newport, Balboa, Laguna, and San Clemente, plus the vast inland areas held by the Irvine Ranch and the Rancho Mission Viejo, with thousands of acres devoted to agricultural production.
     It came as a rude shock when, in 1969, a tabloid-type mailer was received by residents of the 5th District alleging wrongdoing on the part of Allen and his staff. Allen’s reputation for honesty and integrity had been undoubted.... Campaign finance reporting requirements were almost nonexistent in those days, so it was impossible to determine who was behind this puzzling attack, which was to develop into a recall movement. Anthony Tarantino, one of the nominal sponsors of the mailer, … was a man of modest means and it was obvious that there was someone else, unidentified, who was engaged in the expensive campaign to destroy Alton Allen’s character.
. . .
     The mysterious anti-Allen forces opened a headquarters in Laguna Hills from which to launch a formal recall campaign. The mailers kept arriving with insinuations of Allen’s “wrongdoing.” Staff at the recall headquarters refused any information to the press that had become interested in the plot. The Alton Allen recall petition failed to obtain sufficient signatures and it is doubtful that the exercise was anything other than to prepare the way for the upcoming supervisorial election in the 5th District. Alton Allen’s campaign for reelection was close at hand.
. . .
Supervisor Robert Battin
     It would be revealed later that Tarantino had ties to Lou Cella, Fred Harber, and others identified by [Supervisor] Robert Battin as “the Coalition.” Battin, in an attempt to depict his own conviction as discriminatory, revealed the existence of the group, which also included [OC land baron] R.J. O’Neill.
. . .
     The original plan to recall Allen was scrubbed when it was decided that if Allen were recalled, Governor Reagan would probably appoint his assistant John Killifer, who was in no way connected to the scheme….
. . .
     Robert Battin was to use his position on the Board of Supervisors to make Allen look inept in dealing with certain issues. [Local politician] Paul Carpenter also admitted to being part of the recall effort much later, but denied knowledge of the other Coalition members being involved. Carpenter claimed that the clandestine effort was confined to himself and a Republican who aspired to be a supervisor.
     Emerging out of the shadows was Ron Caspers, a Republican who was the owner of Keystone Savings and Loan in Westminster. In the beginning there were suspicions expressed that he was the moving force behind Allen’s recall, a charge he denied but which was later confirmed in the course of several unrelated criminal prosecutions.
. . .
     Allen’s reelection campaign received no help from the GOP, and his campaign staff were amateurs, at best. Alton never recovered from the personal attacks and he went down to defeat.
. . .
     With Caspers’ election, Orange County politics were turned upside down. It was the dawning of a new era, and whether Caspers was a Republican or a Democrat, the special interests flocked to his office confident that they had a supervisor with whom they could do “business.”
     The fact he claimed to be a Republican had little to do with the support he received from the Coalition. That group supported other Republicans including Larry Schmit for supervisor. [Another politician in the Coalition's stable: Robert Citron.]
     Caspers is rumored to have indicated that important county appointments, such as the Planning Commission, would cost an applicant $15,000.
     At this point, Rogers turns briefly to Tom Fuentes:
     Caspers hired a young graduate of Chapman College who had helped in his campaign to serve on this staff. As Casper’s assistant, Tom Fuentes ... worked diligently to convince Republicans that Caspers was not what many party regulars feared, an unscrupulous opportunist who had no permanent loyalty to any political party. Fuentes was aided in his duties by the ubiquitous Frank Michelena. Michelena, a lobbyist with a checkered career, was notorious in the field of political influence. [See.]
Tom with mentor, Ron Caspers, c. 1973

     NASTY DEVELOPERS—AMONG OTHERS. The bogeymen of Rogers' book's**** saga of the OCGOP's descent from principle are developers—but, in this case, it was the politician who initiated the era of "government for sale":
     In this election [1970], it appears that the candidate preceded the special interests, and it was after his election that Caspers made the contacts and set the ground rules for developer participation in the grand scheme of patronage carried to an exponential degree.
     In Orange County, that's never stopped, says Rogers.
     Rogers bring up a weird wrinkle in the Caspers saga:
     In a later criminal case, a paid informant with reputed ties to organized crime would allege that Caspers had received a $600,000 loan from two banks, Coast and U.S. National. The informant, Gene Conrad, had been working with the district attorney’s office in an attempt to connect the Board of Supervisors to the syndicate. Conrad’s testimony did not bear out the suspicion of the D.A. that supervisors had been provided with interest-free loans from gambling interests. Conrad stated that his research had determined that the loan in question did carry interest. Whether it was ever paid back remains a mystery.
     Sheesh.

Fuentes meets his hero; he had met him before, at age 14, at the OC Fairgrounds
* * *
     “If [Ron] Caspers had lived, we would have had the votes to stop [DA Cecil] Hicks,” said Cella. “He was a very strong vote against Cecil and he disliked Cecil even more than Fred [Harber] did.”
—OC Magazine, 1984
     SHAKEDOWN. Then there was the period from Caspers’ election in 1970 until his peculiar death in June of 1974. During that time (or part of it), Fuentes was a “consultant” for Caspers’ S&L. (Caspers provided some of the financial backing for Doc's hospitals.) Further, Tom was Caspers’ right-hand man at the County. By the time of Caspers’ death in '74, Tom was Caspers’ “executive assistant,” and he was expected to be Caspers’ replacement on the board—indeed, then-Governor Reagan made an announcement to that effect, but the appointment was undone by Fuentes’ failure to meet a residency requirement.
     Some have suggested that, using his county office as a base, Caspers and his associate, Fred Harber, participated in a "shakedown" operation. According to former OC GOP chair Tom Rogers,
     ...[Caspers' associate Fred] Harber had been considered a prime mover in county politics…. Prior to his [1974] disappearance, he was alleged to have been involved in a shakedown of a developer in behalf of Supervisor Caspers. The builder Richard V. Jordan, in a sworn statement, declared that Harber had contacted him after his project in Casper’s 5th District had been turned down, and had told him what it would take to solve the problem. “$10,000 and $2,000 per month” Harber is alleged to have demanded form Jordan….
     Jordan asserted in his deposition that the meeting with Harber was prior to meeting with Caspers in a rubber raft off Cabo San Lucas. Jordan was represented by attorney R.S. “Sam” Barnes and his client contacted District Attorney [and Cella foe] Cecil Hicks and arranged for a payoff with marked bills. Before the plan was put into motion, Caspers won reelection and, with Harber, boarded the Shooting Star and headed once again for the Cape…. [From there, the ship headed north and disappeared during rough weather.]
     In the end the county paid off $700,000 to Jordan’s company…, as a result of losses caused by the extortion scheme. [For excerpts of Rogers' book, see here.]
     In his excellent 1984 article, "The Sinking of a Political Machine" (which suggested that the demise of Caspers/Harber was also the beginning of the end of Dick and Doc), journalist Larry Peterson wondered if Harber and Caspers attempted this "shakedown" with others—others who, unlike Jordan, were disposed to respond with violence rather than litigation:
     ...[E]vidence that Harber and Caspers were up to potentially dangerous mischief at the time surfaced four years [after the sinking of "Shooting Star"]. In 1978, developer Richard V. Jordan alleged in a suit against the county that the two were trying to shake him down for a $10,000 payoff plus $2000 a month for approval of a project he wanted to build near El Toro, in Caspers’ supervisorial district.
     The county settled out of court on Jordan’s claim that the county illegally revoked his building permit, paying him $700,000. The matter was investigated by the district attorney’s office to determine whether persons still alive might be criminally liable, but that probe ended inconclusively.
     As it turns out, preliminary discussion concerning the alleged deal took place in Mexican waters aboard the Shooting Star, Jordan said in papers filed with his lawsuit.
     Before the arrangement could be consummated, however, Caspers, Harber and the others departed on the fateful trip. Ironically, Jordan said, he was invited along, but declined because he didn’t think the Shooting Star was seaworthy. But the Coast Guard cited reports that deficiencies on the boat had been corrected prior to the trip.
     Jordan, the record shows, knew how to seek and obtain remedies for his grievance in a court of law. But one is tempted to ask: Were Harber and/or Caspers using the same routine on anyone else, perhaps someone prone to resort to different—and more violent—remedies?....
* * *
     In speeches, Fuentes rails against the "Westside liberals" and the "San Francisco Democrats" as if they were a disease. 
LA Times, 1996
Ronald Caspers

    SINS OF THE FATHER. It seems highly unlikely that an honest assessment of Mr. Caspers today could yield anything but a highly negative outcome. The tragic nature and timing of his death in 1974, occurring as it did before the Cella shite hit the fan, prevented any clear assessment of the man, and that fact, I think, has made Tom Fuentes' career as a Republican leader possible.
     I have asked reporters who worked in Orange County during the relevant period whether it is conceivable that Tom Fuentes, a very bright guy who was intimately involved in Ron Caspers' business and political affairs, could have been uninvolved in Caspers’ hinky ways and means, as described above.
     Did he participate in any of that? “I don’t know about that,” one reporter who covered OC politics at the time told me. “But it is very hard to imagine,” he said, “that Fuentes was unaware of it.”

     THE "BAGMAN" MOMENT. A dozen years after Caspers’ death, Fuentes had become the Chair of the OC GOP. When one impressive and ambitious young man, Nathan Rosenberg, who had been a leader in the local Young Republicans, dared to run for local office against a GOP incumbent, he encountered considerable push-back from Chairman Fuentes. During a TV debate, he was reminded of one of Fuentes’ criticisms. Rosenberg shot back with, “Coming from Ron Caspers' bagman, I don't feel bad about Mr. Fuentes' comment” (see).

* * *
     "[Fuentes] said my business would be ruined, and that my husband's business would be ruined," said [former Superior Court Judge JudithRyan, a [Republican] challenger to U.S. Rep. Robert K. Dornan for his seat in 1992. "I was taken aback." 
LA Times, 1996

     I've spoken with some Orange County reporters who take seriously, or are at least intrigued by, the "rumor" that Fuentes, who was supposed to be on the Shooting Star's ill-fated trip, may have had something to do with the ship's sinking.
     The evidence for that is pretty shaky, I think. But reporter Peterson, for one, seemed to think the "murder" hypothesis (not necessarily by Fuentes) was worth exploring.
     More on that in future installments....

SEE ALSO: What sank "Shooting Star"?
I teach philosophy at Irvine Valley College. My training (at UCI) emphasized ethics (and political philosophy).
** Ever the cheerleaderMr. Fuentes established the Republican Party of Orange County Lee Atwater Award. Not sure if he also established a Roy Cohn prize.
*** Note to self: Arlene Hoffman's murder. Her husband.
**** The excellent Agents' Orange (2000), by Tom Rogers; no longer in print. I approached three libraries that supposedly possessed the book. Curiously, in each case, it was missing from library shelves. I finally found a copy at IVC of all places!

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...