"The fairest blog in all the land" - where the true/false distinction is proundly maintained
"Animosity": written comments on the November 2014 SOCCCD "climate survey" (unedited, unabridged)
Both IVC and SC WILL be closely reviewing the Climate Survey. It should have been vetted. Going to be difficult to explain to the visiting teams why it wasn't.
all is well, remain calm, all is well.......
8:07--what does that mean "it should have been vetted"? Its results should have been publically discussed and acknowledged. That is, that there is significant dissatisfaction and worse should be recognized. They've done nothing but bury it, as far as I can see.
That's what vetted means--to examine, discuss, debate, whatever. Since the colleges and the district did not, expect this to appear on the radar of the visiting team come Spring 2017, and perhaps before.
To vet something is to examine it. The survey does not require examination. It IS the examination.
vet1vet/Submitverbpast tense: vetted; past participle: vettedmake a careful and critical examination of (something)."proposals for vetting large takeover bids"synonyms: check, examine, scrutinize, investigate, inspect, look over, screen, assess, evaluate, appraise; informalcheck out"press releases are vetted by an executive council"BRITISHinvestigate (someone) thoroughly, especially in order to ensure that they are suitable for a job requiring secrecy, loyalty, or trustworthiness."each applicant will be vetted by police"synonyms: check, examine, scrutinize, investigate, inspect, look over, screen, assess, evaluate, appraise; informalcheck out"press releases are vetted by an executive council"
The point is that the report does not require vetting (critical examination). It IS the critical examination. What it needs is promulgation. Not vetting. Don't confused matters.
take it to the Vet Center.
Post a Comment