Anonymous 9:36 PM, June 05, 2013
Gustavo won't be our speaker next year. The [Commencement Speaker] committee met this year and forwarded three names to [President] Glenn [Roquemore] – all of whom will decline. Then Glenn will pick who he wants. That's the process. [T]hat['s] what happened this year and last year. Glenn is a big believer in his process. [I]t works for him. That's what it's all about.Anonymous seems to be suggesting that
A. The committee’s selections (for 2014) are of a sort that it is highly unlikely any will accept our invitationCan any of our readers confirm any of this? (How do you know what you know?)
B. Last year, upon the failure of the (or any of the) choices to accept our invitation, Glenn simply chose someone not recommended by the committee
C. This year, the same thing happened; he did the same thing
Is A true (if it is true) because, owing to the committee’s questionable “process,” the committee ended up recommending famous people (e.g., Hillary Clinton, Tom Hanks) who are unlikely to accept an invitation from an obscure college with which they have no connection?
Let us know!
Hope to see you at today’s Scholarship Ceremony (etc.) “debriefing” in the President’s Conference Room (2:00 p.m.).
A123 (the President's Conference Room)
Thursday, Jun 6, 2-3 pm
2 comments:
This year's address was awful. Students seemed a lot more enthusiastic about the student speaker. The current system does not seem to be working. Maybe student government should get the first crack at trying to get a speaker.
ASIVC IS involved in the process -and indeed they wanted someone from Disney because - as it was reported - they thought it would help students get jobs. SIGH. They need some guidance on this issue. The premise that having a commencement speaker from Disney will land anyone a job anywhere is beyond laughable. The idea that the adults in the room don't tell them so is ridiculous. Perhaps they believe it too? Anyway, very often the nominations from ASIVC are the ones that are unviable: movie stars, rock singers, CEOs of multinational corporations, high level politicians, etc. What we need is what we had for a few years before Glen (with the help of LDA) gutted it: a real thoughtful process which included all governance groups that looked at realistic and thoughtful candidates from the community. Helen Locke oversaw this and was just wonderful. Since DO's takeover it has been a sham. The result - finalists forwarded who will never, ever say yes - and then Glen, who doesn't really believe in collegial consultation, picks who he wants. Voila. That's how you got last year's speaker, a casual pleasing plagiarist,and that's how you got this year's.
Post a Comment