Friday, February 4, 2011

The flight of the Williams

     JOHN WILLIAMS' PORCH FLIGHT. After Kimberly Edd’s disturbing Jan. 20 article about Public Administrator/Guardian John Williams, one of John’s former colleagues wrote a peevish letter to the Reg, complaining that Edd’s story was sensationalistic: "Exposes should focus on facts not on sensationalism."
     At one point, Mr. Peevish writes:
…Edds … tells us Williams took a medical retirement from the Marshal’s Office. Does this further our idea that Williams … has county connections? Of course, if Edds knew of the medical retirement, then she also knew that he suffered the qualifying injuries by being completely blown off the porch of a South County home by a house-leveling explosion from a suicidal individual. …[N]one of this filler material is germane to the important and factual aspects of the Register article.
     Yeah, whatever.
     Does anyone know about this porch incident? Was Williams really “blown off” a porch by an explosion?
     I did some looking, and I can find nothing about this. I even searched through the OC Reg archives, and I actually bought an old (1992) article that looked like it might have the desired info. But nothin’ doin’.
     Does anybody know just what happened to Williams that led to his retirement?

This is gonna hurt, but that's OK, 'cause of that big fat pension.
     WILLIAMSCARONA. Here’s a factoid for you: from 1988 until 1998, the O.C. Marshal was—you guessed it!—Michael Carona. (The Marshal was appointed by judges.) In 1998, Carona was elected OC Sheriff. Soon thereafter, the Marshal's Dept. was collapsed with the Sheriff's Dept.
     And so Bailiff Boy and Carona are pals. They go way back.

     THE P.A.'S COLORFUL HISTORY. Another curious factoid: I ran across an old article about William A. Baker, Williams' much respected predecessor. At one point, the article notes this bit of fascinating history:
Few voters know of the public administrator's office. That has not always been the case: About 30 years ago [i.e., the mid-60s] Orange County's public administrator was convicted of embezzlement and sent to prison. It's a position requiring someone who can be trusted to work in the people's interest out of the limelight.
     Later on, I’ll try to dig up that 60s story.

     ENDORSEMENTS MATTER, I GUESS. When Williams ran for Public Administrator in 2002, he was opposed by Vicki Landrus, then the assistant public administrator. She received the endorsement of the respected William Baker, her boss.
     But that didn’t matter. Williams had the endorsement of his old pal Mike Carona, "America's Sheriff."

In my mind, Williams was Rocket Man, if only for a second.
     NANCY AND THE PA/PG. Back in 2004, the LA Times noted the apparent conflict of interest entailed by Nancy Padberg's role as Williams' chief of staff (2 Trustees' Job Status Is an Issue). Naturally, the experts said, well yeah, it doesn't look good. Meanwhile, two of Williams' Republican pals on the board—Wagner and Fuentes—insisted that everything was cool.
     "Honest to God," said Wagner, "I've seen nothing to see there is a problem."
     A few years later, Williams suddenly fired Padberg. She was hopping mad. And she stayed that way. Ever since, during board meetings, Padberg has made a point of opposing whatever Williams is in favor of. Evidently, Fuentes was somehow implicated in her firing, and so Fuentes, too, has received Padberg's "insta-contra" treatment.
     Lovely, isn't it?

     P.S.: I came across an old post in which I reported that, back in 2002 when Williams first ran for Public Administrator, he was endorsed by the Faculty Association! That's right. That would have been the post-corruption FA. Sheesh. No doubt I complained about it at the time, but to no avail. I may even have quit the union for a while--until Brenda hounded me until I gave in and rejoined. How come our union is so often so freakin' clueless?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

You people truly believe you know it all and have an answer for everything, huh?

FYI: Looks like you’ve just lost your anti-invocation Westphal v. Wagner lawsuit!

“The Trustees, Chancellor, and Saddleback College President are pleased with this outcome. They consistently have maintained that the practice of including a brief, non-sectarian ceremonial invocation at significant District and college events—a tradition that traces its roots to the first graduation ceremony at Saddleback College over 40 years ago—is well-grounded in Establishment Clause jurisprudence, as well as our nation’s rich history and culture. Like the invocation given at the annual Army-Navy football game or our presidential inaugurations, the invocations that have been given at district and college events are not used to proselytize or advance one (or any) religion, but instead, to bring about a dignity, solemnity, and gravitas to these important ceremonial events.”

Anonymous said...

I hope the district done blew through a huge chunk of that $2 mil they put aside for their defense, cuz it now seems in order that you’ll pay them back, don’t cha thunk?

Perhaps now the state ought to add ya to their vexatious litigant list? Gest thunk, you’d be right up there with Coyote Shivers! Hehe!

Roy Bauer said...

I see that morons have wandered onto the blog again. We posted about all of this on Monday: The latest on the prayer lawsuit. The case is by no means over, which is why a settlement hearing is scheduled for the 17th. Why do you suppose that hearing hasn't been cancelled?
You might want to read my earlier post and the even earlier post concerning the appellate trio. This thing is not over yet.
And BTW: one does not sign up for this kind of litigation because one supposes that one will "win." We are fighting for a principle, and, win or lose, we'll have done our best to uphold that principle. I have never supposed that we would win this case outright, though, in my view, if justice were to prevail, we would.
And some day we will.
Stay tuned.

Anonymous said...

Is Dissent failing to report an important legal ruling in which Bauer and Westphal lost their case in the prayer litigation? Maybe the Dissent would rather focus on other things? Hummm. What's up?

Anonymous said...

How is it that when somebody posts a dissenting opinion on Dissent the Blog, Dissent authors call them "morons". Isn't dissent about dissent? Or do you have the market cornered on what is considered "dissent". Dissenting minds want to know. Who are the morons?

Roy Bauer said...

One Dissent reader wrote: "Gest thunk, you’d be right up there with Coyote Shivers! Hehe!"
The other blurted: "You people truly believe you know it all and have an answer for everything, huh?"
I called these people "morons."
Are we clear?

Anonymous said...

Yo! I think youz peeps @ DTB are a bunch-o-flamers & trolls.

Anonymous said...

Gee, I wunder werz Roy Bauer is at?

Why hez over thar wit da ACLU, near dat big shitload of money!

Anonymous said...

The ACLU has never been involved in this lawsuit.
The plaintiffs in this case, which comprise students and community members (as well as faculty), will receive no money whatsoever should they prevail. Despite prevailing in his lawsuits (none of which involved the ACLU), Bauer has never requested or received money, aside from costs and attorney fees. -BvT

Anonymous said...

Legend has it that one day, Williams and Fuentes were sitting on a front porch having a few drinks and smoking stogeys (Williams was pretending with one of those candy kinds). They were talking about LFC and how they both could make lots of money. Fuentes says he has to be careful to hide any money he might make because he is listed as a Senior VP with LFC, and since he fabricates his FPPP forms, he would have to hide the money in some off-shore account. At this point, Williams lifts one of his legs to release some gas (we all know how full of shit Williams is). The gas wafted up and was ignited by an ember from Fuentes' stogey - and boom! Nearly blasted Williams across town!

Roy Bauer said...

A new kind of flamer, I guess.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...