Monday, May 5, 2008

Washington U to honor Phyllis Schlafly

In this morning’s Inside Higher Ed: Is Phyllis Schlafly Worthy of an Honorary Doctorate?:
.....Most of the graduating seniors at Washington University in St. Louis weren’t even born when Phyllis Schlafly led the successful campaign in the 1970s to defeat the Equal Rights Amendment. But they will get to learn about her at commencement ceremonies next week when the university awards her a doctorate of humane letters.
.....Some at the university find the choice offensive, given Schlafly’s career. She turned her opposition to the ERA into a national organization called the Eagle Forum through which she has campaigned against gender bias laws, Title IX, the teaching of evolution, and immigration reforms designed to expand the pool of foreign scientific talent allowed into the United States.
.....Schlafly continues to write columns in print and online, and to speak on college campuses nationwide — frequently setting off controversy with her open call for legal distinctions between the rights of men and women. At Bates College last year, for example, Schlafly called for bans on women holding the positions of firefighter, soldier and construction worker and argued that a woman cannot be raped by her husband. “By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don’t think you can call it rape,” she said, according to an article in The Sun Journal.
…..
.....Mary Ann Dzuback, director of women’s and gender studies at Washington University, and an associate professor of education and history, said that professors were stunned and angered to learn of the planned honor last week. “The university has completely disregarded the concerns about anybody who cares about full and equal rights for women, who cares about the intellectual quality of feminist debate, and who cares about women’s desire to enter the work force,” Dzuback said….

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Honorary doctorate in what? Abject Republican whoredom?

Anonymous said...

Maybe she should be invited to serve in one of the open district positions--a vice chancellor of some sort. She'd fit right into some of the activities the 3rd floor of district has become famous for.

torabora said...

Dirka dirka muhammed jihad!

Schlafly!!!!....Get your burka on woman!

You've been missing the religion of your dreams! Islam...it's where womens rights ain't at baby!

Anonymous said...

Similar to the two most spineless Demoncrats in history, Carter and Gore, getting Nobel's. What a friggin joke!

Anonymous said...

Yes, Carter and Gore, compared to Schlafly. How does it feel to survive on only motor function?

If you want spinelessness, look at all the Repukes who dodged the draft, and now claim to be patriotic.

torabora said...

10:52 Do you mean like Bill and Hillary Clinton?

Anonymous said...

Hillary dodged the draft? No, more like Cheney, W., (he did in a constructive sense) Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Gingrich, etc. Except for George the first and McCain there seem to be no other repubs who served.

torabora said...

12:49 I did.

That's three of us.

torabora said...

12:49 I can't believe you didn't get that part about Hillary and the draft. I was being cute. Sheesh.

BTW "W" served too (but a case can be made that he is not really a Republican). He was checked out in F102's and apparently pulled a get out of jail free card to escape the last year of his obligation. But since he was drinking to excess in those days, it was probably a good thing they let him go. If you want to read about drunk pilots try "The Right Stuff" by Tom Wolf.Or "Black Sheep Squadron" or "Catch 22". Back before military aviation adopted the near Boy Scout ethics they promote today, drunk pilots were common. And so were crashed aircraft and dead drunk pilots and crew.

So with "W" being a veteran, that's four of us.

And oh yeah, William Jefferson Clinton...Draft Dodger...Come on now, admit it. Just say "Bubba was a draft dodger" then say "he stayed home so he could be President some day while some other smuck took his chances in the military in his stead".

Anonymous said...

To say W is a veteran is to insult the real veterans, which means you, TB.

I don't care if Clinton got out of going to Vietnam, and it appears he was more honorable in that than W was with his fake air force crap.

The issue is the "patriotic" Republicans who wave the flag but then sacrifice as little as possible, while the contractors make a fortune and the underprivileged who really do serve get screwed.

No one dodged the draft better than JOhn Wayne, though, as a symbol of the truly hypocritical patriotic Republican.

torabora said...

BILL CLINTON GOT AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE!!!!


HA HA HA HA HA HA ! Yuck Yuck YUCK.

9:30 You are TOOOO funny.

BTW Walt Disney got a dishonorable discharge from the US Navy.Lore has it that he framed it over his desk.

Anonymous said...

Don't be disingenuous. No one was talking about Clinton and any role in the military, especially with during a blatantly corrupt war.

Talk a little more about W and his brave service, protecting Texas from the Mexicans in his flight suit. Now, there's a worthless piece of shit for you.

torabora said...

So when Clinton was draftable who did he protect us from?

Oh that's right! Nobody...because he was too special to be available for military service.

Nope that wasn't true either...it was because he loathed the military.

That is just too sad.

BTW I am the son of a career Regular Army Master Sergeant. When I enlisted I didn't do the Army...I had spent my childhood shining combat boots and polishing brass.I polished more boots than any conscript ever did. I helped mom with the starching and pressing of pops Kackis. So I answered JFK's call and chose to serve in the Navy. Not much boot polishing goes on there. There is just too much America pressed into my psyche to allow the likes of WJC to get a pass. Ever. Rich kids like W are always getting away with crap but at least he wore the uniform. The key here Sir, is that people CHOOSE to serve or not. Clinton chose to not serve.

Anonymous said...

The reason for the choice to serve or not is, of course, absolutely crucial to any moral judgment of it.

TB, I tire of hearing too much about you. Can we keep the commentaries focused on broader issues and questions--more, dare I suggest, academic in the sense of focusing on ideas and less on personal battles of words?

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...