Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Professor fired by university for having standards

.....From this morning’s Inside Higher Ed: Students Fail — and Professor Loses Job:
.....Who is to blame when students fail? If many students fail — a majority even — does that demonstrate faculty incompetence, or could it point to a problem with standards?
.....These are the questions at the center of a dispute that cost Steven D. Aird his job teaching biology at Norfolk State University. Today is his last day of work, but on his way out, he has started to tell his story — one that he suggests points to large educational problems at the university and in society. The university isn’t talking publicly about his case, but because Aird has released numerous documents prepared by the university about his performance — including the key negative tenure decisions by administrators — it is clear that he was denied tenure for one reason: failing too many students. The university documents portray Aird as unwilling to compromise to pass more students.
.....A subtext of the discussion is that Norfolk State is a historically black university with a mission that includes educating many students from disadvantaged backgrounds. The university suggests that Aird — who is white — has failed to embrace the mission of educating those who aren’t well prepared. But Aird — who had backing from his department and has some very loyal students as well — maintains that the university is hurting the very students it says it wants to help. Aird believes most of his students could succeed, but have no incentive to work as hard as they need to when the administration makes clear they can pass regardless.
.....“Show me how lowering the bar has ever helped anyone,” Aird said in an interview. Continuing the metaphor, he said that officials at Norfolk State have the attitude of “a track coach who tells the team ‘I really want to win this season but I really like you guys, so you can decide whether to come to practice and when.’ ” Such a team wouldn’t win, Aird said, and a university based on such a principle would not be helping its students.
…..
.....Aird points to a Catch-22 that he said hinders professors’ ability to help students. Because so many students come from disadvantaged backgrounds and never received a good high school education, they are already behind, he said, and attendance is essential. Norfolk State would appear to endorse this point of view, and official university policy states that a student who doesn’t attend at least 80 percent of class sessions may be failed.
.....The problem, Aird said, is that very few Norfolk State students meet even that standard. In the classes for which he was criticized by the dean for his grading — classes in which he awarded D’s or F’s to about 90 percent of students — Aird has attendance records indicating that the average student attended class only 66 percent of the time. Based on such a figure, he said, “the expected mean grade would have been an F,” and yet he was denied tenure for giving such grades.
.....Other professors at Norfolk State, generally requesting anonymity, confirmed that following the 80 percent attendance rule would result frequently in failing a substantial share — in many cases a majority — of their students. Professors said attendance rates are considerably lower than at many institutions — although most institutions serve students with better preparation.
.....One reason that this does not happen (outside Aird’s classes) is that many professors at Norfolk State say that there is a clear expectation from administrators — in particular from Dean Sandra J. DeLoatch, the dean whose recommendation turned the tide against Aird’s tenure bid — that 70 percent of students should pass.
.....Aird said that figure was repeatedly made clear to him and he resisted it. Others back his claim privately. For the record, Joseph C. Hall, a chemistry professor at president of the Faculty Senate, said that DeLoatch “encouraged” professors to pass at least 70 percent of students in each course, regardless of performance. Hall said that there is never a direct order given, but that one isn’t really needed.
…..
.....DeLoatch … rejected the relevance of 16 letters in Aird’s portfolio from students who praised him as a teacher. The students, some of whom are now in medical or graduate school or who have gone on to win research awards, talked about his extra efforts on their behalf, how he had been a mentor, and so forth. DeLoatch named each student in the review, and noted their high grade point averages and various successes. Some of the students writing on his behalf received grades as low as C, although others received higher grades.
…..
.....Aird stressed that he does not believe Norfolk State should try to become an elite college. He said he believes that only about 20 percent of the students who enroll truly can’t do the work. He believes another 20 percent are ready from the start. Of the middle 60 percent, he said that when the university tells them that substandard work and frequent class skipping are OK, these students are doomed to fail his courses (and not to learn what they need from other professors).
.....“I think most of the students have the intellectual capacity to succeed, but they have been so poorly trained, and given all the wrong messages by the university,” he said.
.....The problem at Norfolk State, he said, isn’t his low grades, but the way the university lowers expectations. He noted that in the dean’s negative review of his tenure bid, nowhere did she cite specific students who should have received higher grades, or subject matter that shouldn’t have been in his courses or on his tests. The emphasis is simply on passing students, he said.
.....“If everyone here would tell students that ‘you are either going to work or get out,’ they would work, and they would blossom,” he said. “We’ve got to present a united front — high academic standards in all classes across the institution. Some students will bail, and we can’t help those, but the ones who stay will realize that they aren’t going to be given a diploma for nothing, and that their diploma means something.”….
.....It seems to me that many of us in the community colleges, as instructors, face some version of Aird's dilemma. Many students do not attend classes regularly enough, and they don't do the work they should be doing for their courses. If we were to apply the standards that we in some sense ought to be applying, most of our students would receive Ds and Fs. Meanwhile, the colleges encourage (or they do absolutely nothing to discourage) the idea that students can hold jobs and have active social lives while taking perhaps 4 or 5 courses. There is indeed something wrong with the "system."
.....I try to encourage good attendance and homework by assigning semi-weekly written assignments. (Naturally, these take many hours to grade.) I tell students that they must complete the assignments (adequately) in order to receive a non-F grade in the course. (80% is where, supposedly, I draw the line.) I constantly remind them of this rule. I even give them chances to make up assignments they've missed.
.....I would estimate that the average rate at which students complete these assignments is below 50%.

4 comments:

Bohrstein said...

I mean no offense to the group that follows Dissent, nor to the Dissenters themselves, but I've always been a little curious as to what the purpose of a teacher is. They're great for solving little inconsistencies in understanding, great for drawing role models from, but at the end of the day it appears to be that generally (in my experience at least) they assign a chapter of reading the night before, then the next day come in and recite from the book.

I for one had a TERRIBLE summer Calculus class because I was a dumb student, I often didn't show up to the class, and then on top of that never bothered to study - so its no surprise that I pretty much "C'd" the class (near failing at UC level - imagine a D at community college). I then jumped in to a giant lake full of a sharks (i.e. I took a Physics class) and again, because of my previous short comings in my understanding in Calculus I actually did burn my records with that class. Giving myself ONE last chance (shrugging off my D grade in Physics, knowing full well I could retake it in the future), I spent my christmas break restudying calculus from the beginnings.

I enrolled in calc 3b for the following semester and when I did I was riding easy with the rest of the students, and at times, I felt I was ahead of the curve. This isn't the first time I've experienced success because I decided to take my own learning in to my hands.

When I was way younger I learned to program all by myself, over summer and christmas breaks. In fact, I think it's this self teaching that really taught me that I don't need to rely on the teacher - I'm so familiar with this subject (Computer Science) that it is the reason why I honestly abhor the teachers at IVC who teach the programming languages, and worst of all Dachslager who teaches the assembly class - these people are the reason that the Computer Scientist breed is dying. They are these non-scientists literally demotivating loads of students at a time out of computer science. SCARING them away. The ironic thing is that in order to get that sense of "science" I have to go ACROSS campus and AWAY from the science building to feel like I am with open minded professors or students.

I assume that this is why I feel so conflicted about this subject at all. Because I want to hold bad teachers responsible for their actions, I try to express my gratitude towards the good ones, but I completely understand that learning starts and stops with the individual.

I don't know - I wrote this out hoping to come to some conclusion about this matter but I don't really know still. The system is broken, and I'm pessimistic about it ever fixing itself - I see a new generation of kids at the theater I work at and it is scary shit the way they think. I'm reminded of idiocracy way too often.

Anyone have any clarity I can borrow?

torabora said...

Bohrstein... Clarity? There's one wag here who'll criticize you for being wordy, tell you that he doesn't want any perspective from your experience and that you should get your own blog. He's a real demeaner.

My experience with the Calc/Phizziks double team smashdown was similiar except that I didn't try to have a life when I immersed myself in it. I got C'ed in 9A/B Calc and got a B in 4A and quit. There was no way I could work at the relentless pace in those classes, take the other classes for a full load, and succeed. I could do the work if I could shed the time constraints. These classes are washout classes...to pass you have to be smart enough AND FAST ENOUGH. No one explains this to the prospective students and countless D/F & incompletes are issued and of course the attendant drop out rate accompanies these classes.

70% of transfer intending CC students drop out. This costs the system billions. We need to revamp this sad waste of resources to divert CC's into job training facilities....of course the politicians of both parties are more interested in exporting our jobs and importing foreigners to keep labor costs down....after all, you can't have a top without a bottom!

Anonymous said...

As a MD friend asked me once, "What do they call the med school student who has the lowest GPA coming out of his or her training?"

Answer.: Doctor

Who doesn't want the best in an MD, teacher, mechanic, builder, bridge engineer, pilot? Students and teachers should have a high set of standards. That brings our, I suspect, the best in us.

Anonymous said...

High standards are great but you have to know what people are starting with, how much can actually be done in one term (with hard work), and what the precise learning goals are.
These things are not always easy for faculty to agree upon.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...