data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09c09/09c09c857f10c5097df73c91ee0916e59ca68119" alt=""
The email then refers to “continuing advice of the Accrediting Commission” that, allegedly, approves of the inclusion, faculty to the contrary notwithstanding.
But here’s the problem, Dissent readers. Mathur and Co. asked ACCJC officials whether the district’s response may be included in the report. Naturally, the answer they received was “yes.”
But, in asking the question, do you suppose that Mathur and crew mentioned such circumstantial factoids as that the inclusion occurred outside approved processes and that among the included elements are false, inflammatory, and undocumented assertions?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f47f5/f47f560cedf89cc308e2c83d5948eaac256abace" alt=""
Guess!
But it looks like at least some of these circumstances might be communicated to the ACCJC after all. So desperate are Lang and Mathur to entice the faculty senate presidents to sign these reports—the senates have directed them not to—that they have invited the colleges to add “any comments” about the inclusion:
At this point, the colleges are encouraged to add any comments about the inclusion of the District/Board of Trustees Response and make other minor changes in their reports, as deemed appropriate, particularly if such additions would enable the accreditation chairs to appropriately include their signatures on the reports.
My guess is that Mathur will get his signatures. But the price he’ll pay are Accreditation reports that make clear what he has struggled to obscure.
8 comments:
Don't sign!
What'll happen when the ACCJC figures out that Mathur's been blowin' smoke?
First the ACCJC has to grow a spine.
ATEP = Another Tremendously Expensive Project
. . . ACCJC grow a Spine?
Don't count on it.
The ACCJC are spineless and timid lot. If they were not, then they would have been tougher and more direct in naming exactly what and who are the problems in this district.
I think they are afraid of Mathur & Co.
I dare them to do something of qualitative documentable substance with regard to these people. Just for once? Perhaps they could humor us with the truth.
If not, then they are utterly useless, them and the State CCC Chancellor's Office alike.
Don't hold your breath.
Don't sign.
ATEP = Another Tremendously Expensive Project
We know Mathur once posed in a Leprachaun Outfit and looked splendidly moronic in doing so, but, with the Holidays coming up, does anyone have images his highness in a Halloween costume, a Turkey or Pilgrim costume, or as Santa Claus?
Post a Comment