Friday, March 23, 2007

Eat pizza, then squawk



● THE FACULTY UNION wants faculty's presence felt at next Monday’s board meeting. The Faculty Association website informs us that

The [union] is delivering its initial contract proposal to the Board on Monday, March 26th, to begin the negotiations process. To encourage faculty participation, the FA is hosting a pre-board meeting pizza party at Boosters on Marguerite Parkway … at 5 p.m. After the pizza, attend the public comments portion of the Board Meeting at 6:30 p.m. We need to send a message to the Board that the faculty [are] united, and supports ou[r] negotiating team in securing a new contract.

I’ve been to some of these union pizza parties, and they’re pretty good. I’m not a member—I quit when the FA endorsed John “Junket” Williams for Public Administrator—but I do like to see faculty from the two colleges get together, laugh, eat pizza, drink beer, and then march boisterously up the hill with torches to set fire to an enormous Tom Fuentes effigy out in front of BGS.

You don’t wanna miss that.


● Recently, Chancellor Raghu P. Mathur and his board enablers adopted changes to the monthly board meetings—supposedly, for the sake of “streamlining.” These innovations don’t seem to be working thus far: the last meeting went on for days.

But you can still make comments at the head of the meeting, and they end up on local cable TV, too. Now, I know that you don’t care about that audience, but the trustees do.

If you speak, do try to sound like a Republican. Wear one of those little flags. Mention that you love freedom and you hate people who aren't willing to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people just for a chance to thrust it on their society.

● I checked out the meeting’s agenda (available here), and there isn’t much there’ ceptin’ for one or two things.

Trustee TOM FUENTES will do the invocation. You never want to miss that. It’s like time travel to listen to the fellow invoke the Lord. Or maybe it’s like gagging on a maggot. One time, the Reb heard him thank the Deity for "the taxpayers." He never thanks God for faculty. He hates ‘em. I think he wants 'em all to burn in hell. He's very pious.


She's a kind hearted woman,
she studies evil all the time.
She's a kind hearted woman,
she studies evil all the time.
You're best to quit me baby
as just to have it on your mind.
—Rob't Johnson

● Near as I can tell, the only interesting agenda item is “discussion item” 6.2:

Saddleback College and Irvine Valley College: Outcome of November 2006 Accreditation Progress Visits and Implications for October 2007 Accreditation Midterm Reports
Recommendation that Board of Trustees discuss and identify strategies to conduct a Special Board meeting on April 5 2007 with focus on addressing the accreditation recommendations.


OK, it’s like this. The “outcome” of the visits was that, according to the Accreds, there’s still a plague of “despair” at the colleges, and the trustees are still micromanaging. (So is the Chancellor.)

Naturally, trustee Don Wagner, a notoriously prickly and peevish fellow, recently proclaimed that the notion that HE micromanages (as the Accreds had in fact charged) is absurd. He even seemed to say that, whatever he was doing that counted as micromanaging to the Accreds—well, gosh darn it, he’ll do it again, if he feels moved to.

At least in the past, his pal Tom Fuentes, too, has made it pretty clear that, in his fevered mind, the whole Accreditation process is rigged by, or at the behest of, faculty. The fellow seems to embrace conspiracy theories—you know, as did Steve "What Holocaust?" Frogue, whom Fuentes replaced nearly seven years ago. I think nutty people shouldn't be entrusted with hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, don't you?

Plus, according to Tom, the Accreds won't pull our ticket, and only a fool would think they might. So he explained to the student trustee last year.

That sort of talk makes Chancellor Mathur nervous. Mathur obviously wants the trustees to just give the Accreds what they want. You know, just jump through those goddam hoops, make this thing go away.

Hence this agenda item. At least there's a paper trail. "See, we fretted about it in March, then again in April!" he'll tell 'em.

So it will be interesting to see what comes out of these people's mouths. I think. They're not all on the same page, and they're mostly mean and plug-ugly. Maybe somebody's head will pop.

See you all Monday afternoon.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I work at a community college about a hundred miles down the road from you and happened across your blog a couple of weeks ago. I've been reading it ever since. You're doing a great job!

Two things:

1. Micro-managing isn't always all bad. Accreditation teams, in my experience, are dominated by ex-administrators and ex-presidents, none of whom want any Board to do anything other than rubber-stamp their decisions.

Your Board is pretty clearly bonkers, but when we had a president who was equally nuts, and the Board decided to get rid of him (after nearly six long, long years), the accreditation team criticized our Board for--you guessed it--"micromanaging." When the head of the accreditation team returned to our campus for a re-visit, Academic Senate and union people told him that the Board had done a good thing by getting rid of a bad president and that some kind of management from the Board, either micro- or macro-, was long overdue. He flew into a presidential huff, and the accreditation team's recommendations were unchanged.

2. Can you give me a little more SOCCCD union history? I heard rumors about the homophobic fliers (the same domestic partner medical coverage didn't raise an eyebrow down here where the political climate is equally conservative), but I can't understand why union leadership went off the deep end. Who's running the union now? What happened to the Old Guard?

Anonymous said...

"homophobic fliers" - you mean the faggot flyers?

Anonymous said...

Chunk, I'm shocked to read your not a member of the Union just because of one decision you didn't like. The Union has done a lot for the faculty. Look at your pay check.Since the removal of the old Union much has changed. It's not fair that you and others reap the benifits of my dues.

Anonymous said...

anonymous 7:06: Shut up.

anonymous 8:29: I agree with you. Chunk needs to join the union. SB 60 gave locals the right to impose fair-share dues (aka agency shop fees) on everyone, so why doesn't your leadership do it?

Please tell me the story about "the removal of the old union," won't you?

--CC teacher about a hundred miles down the road from you

Anonymous said...

One upon a time, in a glaxy far far away...

Roy Bauer said...

1:25--

For an overview of the union's sad history, the obvious place to start is: Dissent’s short history of the district’s troubles

For the same-sex fliers, go to Same-sex fliers

For a news article on the Old Guard’s inexplicable and unexplained efforts to pack the board with rightwing anti-unionists (Wagner/Padberg): The board’s unlikely secret allies

For a brief article adventures on the day after the disastrous November 1998 election (seating Wagner & Padberg): The character of the opposition

For an article concerning the Old Guard’s brief attempt to counter Dissent with it’s own publication: The Anti-Dissent

You can find lots more, especially if you peruse our archives from the beginning. The titles are usually fairly self-explanatory.

The only Old Guard character who's still around is Ken Woodward, who appears to have entirely seen the error of his ways.

8:29 & 11:22--

Well, I was in the trenches BIG TIME for many years, working month after month on trustee candidates (in '98, then '00), on reforming the local (writing innumerable letters, attending special meetings in Orange, battling obnoxious unionists at local meetings, etc.).

We're talking many hundreds of hours. Most of the time, it felt pretty lonely.

So don't even get me started about people taking free rides.

Mr. Williams was among the unscrupulous bastards who happily exploited the Same-sex fliers and similarly appalling fliers and ads (e.g., his deceptive ads re Harriett Walther). Further, he worked to try to get some of us (e.g., me) fired.

If you were to read court documents and news articles about the fellow, you will discover that he is utterly unscrupulous and as stupid as a stick.

I'm willing to compromise. But only up to a point.

Anonymous said...

wbggzzChunk--

Thanks for the links, but I'd read them already.

How's the new union leadership? Are they doing a better job than the Old Guard?

I'm going to a CTA conference later this month, and I need to know whether to be polite or not.

--100 miles down the road

Anonymous said...

Yep, the new guard is made up of good folks.

Tell them that you read DISSENT.

Anonymous said...

I sure will.

--100 miles down the road

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...