Thursday, July 16, 2020

The Celebrated Boiling Frogs of Orange County, California (Red Emma)

Red Emma

     Recall the classic tale of Jim Smiley, celebrated con man of Calaveras County, real or mythical, but outsmarted, or out-conned, by an even more clever and duplicitous flimflammer. Now substitute, for the stranger-feller who came to town the slickest civic grifter we reckon has come up in these-here parts, our very own 3rd district Orange County Supervisor. He’s that local elected official whose bait and switch – Wagnerian, you might call it – makes celebrated boiling frogs of us all, his unconstituents.
     Now that I’ve commenced to a-doin’ some first-rate bowdlerizin’ aimed in the direction of the great Mark Twain, why not introduce this nearly unbelievable updating of his famous ole yarn by reminding all who read this tall tale that, yes, reports of the demise of Super-dupervisor Donald Wagner’s OC Republican party are indeed greatly exaggerated. This, friends, neighbors, and fellow frogs a’boilin’, is easily evidenced in the local GOP’s impressive contribution to the rising temperature in the pan-demic (read: boiling frog contest) administered by Chef Don, who never held an elected position where he could accomplish either a whole lot of colorful nothin’ or, as of late, worse than nothin’.
     Yup, Don and his pardner Michelle Steel are doin’ what they do best: turnin’ up the heat. Not just on the big kettle o’ COVID, which the miserable and pitiful Democrats and the Blacks and the gays and teachers and pointy-headed intellectuals and them scientist-types say is a darn-tootin’ real life-and-death public health crisis but, in what you might call further ironing, on the whole idee of governification itself! Why, it’s a sure-fired GOP two-fer: Holler out to the Trumpy, Q-Anon, anti-vax, anti-tax, Boogaloo, Tea Party and John Birch crowd, feedin’ ‘em what them Sunday morning jawers call “red meat,” then sit back and watch while they go a protestin’ agin Doc Nichole Quick, the county’s public health boss, about how she’s takin’ away their bidness, flags and guns.
     Never you mind that two months ago most of these good folks couldn’t have picked out Don Wagner in a crowd, not even a line-up of B-1 Bob Dornan, Bill Dannemeyer, Surfin’ Dana Rohrabacher, John Briggs (look ‘em up!) or even Ronald Reagan, who had trouble sayin’ the letters “AIDS” and “HIV” aloud so long that somebody had to write it down for him on a cue card and give him time to practice.
     And why’s that, you wonder, with us all cookin’ together, the virus spikin’ higher? It’s on account of what them newspaper and internet scribblers call a “down-ballot race.” Which leads to frog hoppin’, frog boilin’ and the mystifyin’ Mr. Wagner. See, friends, it begins when the ambitious founder of an outfit called the OC Federalist Society, so right-wing it flies in circles, gets to runnin’ for a community college race, of all things.
     Sure enough, after winnin’ a seat at South Orange County Community College District, he’s elected president, by golly, then commences to tantalizin’ voters with attacks on a suspect crew called the American Association of University Women and cancelling the district subscriptions supportin’ another unlikely gang callin’ themselves the American Library Association or some-such, all while gettin’ endorsements and lucre aplenty from a rival bunch called the Education Alliance, funded by a crazy millionaire. 
     Then it was on to the California Assembly, advocatin’ with considerable uselessness but plenty of hoopla and no-cost mailers, to the folks back home pro-gun, anti-immigrant, anti-same sex marriage and LGBTQ rights laws, and, just for the heck of it, speechified agin’ birthin’ control for women-folk and those gosh-darned uppity teachers’ unions.
Why, the next thing you know, Don W. is on the Irvine City Council, then mayor. His amazin’ trajectory is blessed all along with complete unscrutinization by the press, voters, auditors or investigative-type journalists, with his curriculum vitae – Spanish for resume – just listing all them other positions where he’d showed up only to vote for whatever that feller Shawn Steel – yup, Michelle’s hubby – or Devin Nunes, Mitchell McConnell or them good old boys at the NRA told him to until Irviners got sick and tired of him but then got a job where he could, with a straight face, tell good Judge Carter it’d be a winning idea to erect a homeless shelter in the canyons, havin’ forgot to check via the Googlizer that there was already a public library there, far from bus stops, provisions, health services or other accoutrements of civilization. 
     Here’s what you might call the funny part, if you didn’t know better, and plenty voters don’t. With the legislature and Congressional reps gone blue, the real power in this county – funding, policy and infrastructurin’ – still falls to the red side. All that historical ballot-casting for Sacramento and D.C.? Why, those same voters plum forgot to vote for judges, water district officials, community college board members and Supes. I swear, most of the good people I talk with can’t tell you what them Supervisors even do until they hear on the national news that one of them is acting like the biggest con man of all, a feller named Trump. 
     That’s the tale of Don Wagner, a real character. He’s a-fixin’ to reopen the County, cuz he don’t like masks and what you call social distancing. Why, he’s just like that stranger who forced buckshot down the gullet of a famous frog, and won the bet. Ceptin’ for that amphibious critter lived, and the stranger-feller weren’t never seen again. Meanwhile, you and I set and figger how much longer Don Wagner’s gonna turn up the flame, murderize more of our kinfolk and then get hisself re-elected! —RE

Andrew Tonkovich

The Board of Ed Recs FIASCO!


Wagner, Chau back away from controversial Orange County School Board recommendation

OC Register

 

Though they support the idea of local students returning to classes, they note that they did not have direct input into a report that has drawn national attention and criticism.

     Supervisor Don Wagner and acting county health officer Clayton Chau issued a statement Wednesday that put some distance between themselves and a controversial recommendation from the Orange County Board of Education that students should return to school, in class, without masks, during the pandemic.

     While Wagner and Chau wrote that they “applaud the efforts” of the Board of Education to “bring children back to school,” they also pointedly noted that they did not “write, edit or review” the report. [Wagner was on the panel that supposedly produced the report.]

     Since Monday, when the county Board of Education issued its symbolic recommendation to 27 local school districts it doesn’t oversee, the report has drawn national media attention and often angry criticism.

     Among other things, the report suggests that students would be better served to attend school without masks, and that social distancing isn’t needed.

     On Wednesday, Orange County reported 911 new cases of coronavirus and 22 deaths.

     Wagner and Chau were among several public officials and health experts whose names were attached to a report approved by most of the five-member elected panel that comprises the Board of Education. [4-1]

     The report from the Board of Education differs from recommendations made by the agency it’s connected to, the Orange County Department of Education. The Department recommends that schools should follow public health officials, and that any in-class education should include social distancing and masks for students and staff.

. . .

     Wagner, who represents the Third District, said in a brief interview Wednesday that the county isn’t connected to the Board of Education or its report.

     “I want to make sure there isn’t any misunderstanding about the county’s role,” Wagner said. “Ultimately, it’s the school districts’ decision. As a county supervisor, it’s not my call.”

     Still, Wagner said he would prefer to see kids in school and not learning online.

     “I’m not convinced, personally, that online education is sufficient. And I hope they find a way to get back to in-person teaching as soon and as safely as possible.”

. . .

     The Orange County Board of Education got pushback from districts.

     “We will not be operating in the way that OCDE’s Board has suggested,” said Bob Pletka, superintendent of the Fullerton School District. “Their recommendations contradict legal mandates such as the governor’s executive order for people, including students, to wear masks in public. We will be following O.C. Health department’s regulations and California Department of Health directives”

. . .

     The broad outline for the report issued Monday, July 13, was set during a June 24 forum convened by the Board of Education, board members said.  Wagner, Chau and nine others were invited to participate as forum panelists.

     The June forum’s official agenda included a set of “first principles,” which stated that requiring children to wear masks at school “is not only impossible to implement but not based on science and could be potentially harmful.”

. . .

     Wagner, who was interviewed Wednesday on CNN, said the June forum was skewed to one point of view, and that he would have liked to hear all sides represented…..

For TRANSCRIPTS of the CNN interview (Don Wagner) go here.


Panel Experts Walk Away From Controversial OC Board of Education Reopening Guidelines

Voice of OC

 

   …The report was originally hailed in public by the board majority that ultimately approved it as a group analysis from an 11-person panel in June that included multiple education and health experts, as well as county health care agency director Dr. Clayton Chau and County Supervisor Don Wagner

. . .

     But now, multiple members of that panel have disavowed the report, saying it does not represent their views and that they were never consulted on the document

     Instead, the report was written by Dr. Ken Williams Jr., president of the Board of Education, and Will Swaim, president of the nonprofit California Policy Center, who also moderated the panel.

     Neither were identified as authors within the report, with one small note thanking Swaim for his “assistance and input in the preparation of this document.” 

     Members of the panel were all listed on the title page, with short bios at the end of the report. 

     In an interview, Swaim said he was approached about a month before the panel met by Williams and Mari Barke, the board’s vice president, and asked to write the report and serve as a moderator for the panel. 

     “I’m not a doctor. They said we’re not looking for a doctor, we’re looking for someone to manage the town hall circus,” Swaim said. “They wanted to limit the conversation to are kids at risk, and looking at the data it was pretty clearly no.” 

     Swaim said he examined the data himself from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and at the Orange County level, and said the narrative that a return to schools would be harmful was largely propagated by teachers unions. He also brought up concerns that keeping kids home could lead to long term damage as well. 

     “I knew from just looking at OC data, the kids are not at risk, they’re almost supermen. I’m not saying they’re invulnerable, but almost,” Swaim said. “Kids have more to risk from the adults in the room and the adults have much more to risk from other adults in the room.” 

     The report’s statement that the use of masks are not based on science was contradicted by the CDC earlier this week, with the agency saying that even the use of cloth face masks can help protect others and the person wearing it, with a recommendation that children under the age of two not wear masks

     Swaim said he was not paid for his work, which he said was largely on his own time but called it consistent with work done by the California Policy Center. He also hosts a podcast called Radio Free California, which is produced by the National Review [a conservative journal]. 

     Swaim took issue with those that disputed panel experts participated in the report, saying it was written as an honest summary of the deliberations of panel members he witnessed. He said he included a note about that fact, which he shared with Voice of OC, in the draft of the report he submitted.

     But Swaim also acknowledged the report’s final version ultimately didn’t include that kind of language. 

. . .

     “In this white paper, we have done our best to capture the general assessment of the various expert opinions. And, of course, some panelists were careful to say that they were speaking only for themselves and not necessarily for all colleagues or organizations with which they work in their professional capacities (see e.g. Appendix A.).”

     Swaim stands by the draft he wrote. 

     “I did my best to summarize the general sense of the panel’s discussion. Fortunately, there’s a record of this, a recording on the board’s website. I would encourage those who are interested to listen to the audio,” Swaim said. 

     When pressed, Williams ultimately described the role of panel members in writing the report as “inconsequential.” 

     “The expert panel neither approved of the paper or was involved in writing it. For my knowledge, I have had virtually no contact with our panel since the special community forum in June,” Williams said in an email to Voice of OC. 

     According to Swaim, around 80% of the report was written before the panel ever met.

. . .

     Some experts whose names were associated with the report disagreed so strongly with its findings that they asked to have their names taken off entirely. 

     Dr. Steven Abelowitz, a former pediatric chair at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presybterian, said that aside from speaking at the panel he was never contacted in regards to the final guidelines. 

     “Besides being present as an expert, I had no involvement in what was written or prepared,” Abelowitz said in a phone call with Voice of OC. 

     Abelowitz asked that his name be removed from the report, and released a statement that he is in strong support of both masks and social distancing, and that he would follow the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatricians.

. . .

     Multiple members of the county government also distanced themselves from the report. In an interview with CNN on Wednesday, Wagner said his only role was to share the county’s perspective, and that he had never endorsed returning to the classrooms with no additional safety measures in place. 

     “I never said that, and most of the folks that came from the county…were never saying that,” Wagner told CNN’s Brianna Keilar. “The panel itself never wrote this, I never saw or drafted it.” 

     Wagner did not respond to requests for comment from Voice of OC. 

     Dr. Chau was the fourth member of the panel to condemn the board of education’s decision in a statement sent to Voice of OC Wednesday evening. 

     “I believe that schools should follow guidelines set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the California Department of Public Health,” read a statement sent by Chau on Wednesday night. “I continue to be a strong proponent for public health prevention measures.” 

     After the issue drew national attention, Chau and Wagner also issued a joint statement praising the efforts of the department of education, which just days before had put out a statement that flew in the face of the primary recommendations of the panel, which included both of them as members

     “Orange County Supervisor, Don Wagner, and Health Director, Dr. Clayton Chau, applaud the efforts of the Orange County Department of Education to bring children back to school with safety measures in place,” the statement said. 

     In the same statement, Wagner and Chau – in a seeming about face – issued a statement backing the county department of education plans and had different words for the Board of Education members. 

     “Both Supervisor Wagner and Dr. Chau encouraged the Orange County Board of Education to remain guided in their plan by the medical professionals,” the statement said. “It is important to reopen safely when the epidemiological data makes sense.”

Today's 7-day average (cases/day): 912 cases

You Coronavirus: Breaking down the outbreaks in Northern and Southern California

Southern California has fueled the state’s spread but NorCal is beginning to catch up

The Mercury News

 

Pace of California schools planning to open with distance learning accelerates

EdSource

…State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond said he recognized the health realities that many districts are facing, and applauded districts for “putting safety first.”…..

 

Back to school in Orange County without masks and social distancing? Many call that reckless -- Recommendations approved by the Orange County Board of Education to welcome students back to campuses without increased social distancing in classrooms or the mandatory use of masks were met with a fierce backlash from educators and parents Tuesday, highlighting the larger divide in the county over the use of face coverings and other coronavirus protections. Anh Do, Sara Cardine, Hannah Fry in the Los Angeles Times$ -- 7/15/20

 

Smith: The latest rallying cry of coronavirus deniers, brought to you by Orange County -- If we’re indeed only as strong as our weakest link, we’re in trouble, California. Big trouble. For proof, look no further than the Orange County-inspired lunacy that went down hundreds of miles away on the rustic streets of Nevada City. Erika D. Smith in the Los Angeles Times$ -- 7/15/20

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

7-15: hospitals bracing; 22 new dead reported

     Orange County hospitals are preparing to enter surge mode as the county saw another bump in coronavirus hospitalizations, while the virus continues to spread.

     “Hospital Surge Plans are already activated to an extent, as conditions worsen,” reads a Wednesday situation report from the county office of Emergency Medical Services. 

     “The trends are very concerning and we can continue to expect the impact on the healthcare system to get worse in the coming days and weeks,” states the report. 

At the beginning of June, 292 people were hospitalized, including 121 in intensive care units. There were also 226 dead out of 7,767 confirmed cases. 

     Since then, cases have more than tripled, while hospitalization and death counts keep climbing….

An attention-grabbing "political gesture"

✅ OC school board’s symbolic bid to put kids in class grabs attention (OC Reg)

Orange County’s Congressional delegation “deeply concerned” over advocacy by the Orange County Board of Education in support of a full return to campus, without face masks or social distancing.

Ken Williams
     The Orange County Board of Education, a five-member body with little power, on Monday voted 4-1 to issue a document saying students should return to traditional classrooms, without masks, when local schools resume next month.
     A day later, that symbolic vote – which urges a plan that, if implemented, could run counter to federal and state health guidelines – drew national media attention and a letter of rebuke from the county’s congressional delegation.
     “We are deeply concerned by the Board’s decision to not address the health threats that COVID-19 poses to our community with its recommendations to reopen schools without the use of face masks, social distancing or reduced class sizes,” wrote House members Linda T. Sanchez, Harley Rouda, Katie Porter, Alan Lowenthal, Gilbert Cisneros, Lou Correa and Mike Levin, all Democrats.

. . .

     On Tuesday, Santa Ana Unified said it will offer only online instruction when education resumes in the district, possibly next month. And trustees for Anaheim Union High School District will consider a similar online-only plan when they meet on Thursday.

     Meanwhile, lawmakers who wrote to the Orange County Board of Education requested a briefing and asked a number of questions.

. . .

     The board’s specific responsibilities include approving the Orange County Department of Education’s annual budget and serving as an appellate board for cases of expulsion and transfer requests….

     But the board has no control over the county’s 27 school districts, and it doesn’t set policy regarding school re-opening plans during the current health crisis.

     It’s why some observers on Tuesday described the conservative board’s push for in-class education – something also urged by President Donald Trump and many national Republicans – as a partisan move.

Fred Smoller
     “It’s clearly a political gesture,” said Fred Smoller, Chapman University associate professor of political science.

     It also got attention. News of the School Board’s push for no masks and no social distancing in schools … was picked up by CNN and National Public Radio, among others.

     Smoller said this is the type of attention that paints Orange County in its former conservative mold,  pushing back against experts who say resuming in class instruction could boost the pandemic and possible endanger teachers and at-risk students.

. . .

     Though some parents support the board’s push for in-class instruction, many others do not. A recent survey by Santa Ana Unified found one in four parents in that district support putting kids back in classrooms full-time next fall, while about half want a hybrid program and another 24 % prefer going strictly online. And a national survey posted Tuesday by CNN found 71% of American parents don’t want in-class schooling in the fall.

     Also, a local online petition critical of the school board’s white paper collected more than 51,000 signatures as of Tuesday.

     Still, at least one board Trustee, Ken Williams, argues it’s the push for online instruction during the health crisis that’s the more political path.

     “This public effort is political and consistent with the narrative that governors from blue states and unions want to keep schools closed (as a way) to protect union power. They disregard the concept of doing what is in the best interests of the children,” Williams said….

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Board of Ed's Lisa Sparks interview

Sparks seems unable to answer the reporter's tough question: aren't your recommendations going against the science? 
(Sparks is one of the 4 Republicans on the 5-member board. Only Gomez is a Democrat—and she voted against the recommendations.)

Voting like daft Trumpians

✅ OC Board of Education Recommends Return To School Without Masks Or Social Distancing

Voice of OC

 

     The Orange County Board of Education approved guidelines for returning to school that advocate for the use of no masks or social distancing in a 4-1 vote on Monday night. 
     Those recommendations run directly against both the state and the county’s own education departments as teachers and students prepare to return for the fall. 

     The guidance came from a panel of medical experts and education leaders, and also included Orange County Health Care Agency Director Dr. Clayton Chau and County Supervisor Don Wagner

     In a 36-page report to the Board of Education, the panel laid out concerns over the use of masks and social distancing, stating it was “not acceptable” to delay the reopening of schools and that the use of masks would be “impossible to implement.” 

     The report did not delve deep into online instruction, but called it an “utter failure,” and that its reliance on parental oversight was a “fatal weakness.” 

     Beckie Gomez, the only board member to vote against adopting the recommendations and the only one wearing a mask on the dais, said the report and the board had failed to discuss the issue properly with the public. 

. . .

     She … took issue with the report’s short analysis of distance learning. 

     “For distance learning, in some cases yes, it was a failure, because we didn’t equip our teachers quickly enough. We shut down our schools with 24-48 hours notice. We can’t train someone in that time,” Gomez said. “Somebody that says it’s an utter failure doesn’t know about online teaching. We need to give our teachers tools.”  

. . ..

     The board’s decision runs counter to actions taken by school districts in neighboring counties, including announcements earlier Monday by the Los Angeles Unified School District and San Diego Unified School District that they would be starting the school year virtually.


     The move also comes on the heels of an order by Gov. Gavin Newsom again shutting down churches, indoor malls, barbershops and gyms in all counties on the statewide watch list, including Orange County.

. . .

     The report the Orange County education board approved set off a massive response from county residents, with advocates on both sides coming out to share their opinions. The board meeting received over 2,500 written comments on the proposed guidelines, a record for the body, according to Nina Boyd, the board’s assistant secretary and an associate superintendent. 

     None of those comments were read at the meeting, with the board accepting less than 25 in-person commenters over 40 minutes who were overwhelmingly in favor of the return to schools leading to immediate social media condemnation Monday night of the board’s decision to not make available the written comments.

     It wasn’t immediately clear where or how the public could view those comments or which way the commenters leaned. The Voice of OC has requested copies of all comments submitted. 

     The board pushed the decision on how to handle the comments to the panel’s next meeting on Aug. 5….


Don believes in strong leadership.


Today's data: the 7-day average: 1033


Monday, July 13, 2020

A disaster grounded on incompetence

     As a society, we’ve experienced many disasters over the years: wars, pandemics, economic downturns, natural disasters, etc.
     Aside from war—Iraq, etc.—these calamities have not derived from incompetence.

     That’s what we’ve got this time with Covid-19: disaster built upon, and fueled by, incompetence.


* * *

     The 5-member (4 Republicans, 1 Democrat) OC Board of Education has organized a “panel of experts” who, today, will recommend that public “schools should return in fall without face masks, social distancing, reduced class sizes” (see OC Board of Education Panel Calls for a Fall Return to Classes with No Masks or Distancing. Voice of OC).

     These recommendations contradict the best science.

Wagner

     Among the members of that panel is Don Wagner, Supervisor for OC’s 3rd District. It's no surprise that he favors such recommendations. As you know, he's pushed back against mask-wearing mandates.

     These recommendations contradict the recommendations of the OC’s Dept of Education, which endorses the recommendations of the California Department of Education. They contradict the best advice available.

     According to the Voice of OC, the California Department of Education “recommends all staff and students should wear cloth face coverings or face shields while at school or on a bus, and maintain 6 feet of physical distance during school activities.”

     OK, so the OC Board of Education is blowin’ off the state’s experts and even the County’s own Dept of Ed.

     The Board of Education’s panel’s report is dishonest to boot. According to the Voice, “Some of the panel’s … sources … explicitly recommended guidance that they [the panel] chose to go against multiple times, or featured contextual details that were left out [by the panel] in the county’s presentation.”

     The panel cites an NPR story about a school district in New York that managed to continue in-class instruction without seeing a rise in Covid cases. But that school district “implemented strict social distancing protocols, including breaking the kids off into small groups and keeping them separate from one another, and that face masks were mandatory for all staff and kids.” That is, it implemented the steps that the panel rejects.

     The panel fails to mention that.

45th Congressional Dist.
    The panel also appealed to a study by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which acknowledges that “children and adolescents are much less likely to spread the virus.” But the panel failed to mention that the AAP’s study “advised face coverings for elementary school children ‘when harms do not outweigh benefits,’ and said that desks should be placed three to six feet apart if feasible. It also endorsed the use of masks in all secondary schools, and said that physical distancing could have a greater effect there.”
     The panel’s report, which recommends schools carry on as usual, reasons that, since children represent a low risk Covid-wise, it follows that major changes need not be implemented in schools. But, obviously, the matter is not that simple, for these children can transmit Covid even if they do not suffer from the condition or bear symptoms. C'mon!

     The panel seems to emphasize financial considerations. As we know, districts acquire state money per registered student. Unless local school districts carry on as usual, they’re liable to experience less registration and thus acquire less money.

     But money isn’t everything, is it? Surely the lives of citizens is more important.

     The panel notes that, partly because of poor parent cooperation, remote learning in local public schools has been an utter failure. That might be true. But clearly it is not true necessarily and it is not true everywhere. Remote learning is often done better than it has recently been done in Orange County public schools. Why ignore the option of making an effort to do better, as other districts and parents do?


* * *


Always clumsily refers to his service
     Let’s turn to another case: Greg Raths, who is on the Mission Viejo City Council. He’s running against Democrat Katie Porter for her seat in the House of Representatives (the 45th congressional district).
     I looked him up, read his views.

     According to the Voice, Raths “is calling for Orange County to reopen at a rally planned for July 25 at a park [in Mission Viejo] in direct opposition to the city’s current policies.” (See Mission Viejo Councilman Plans to Host Reopen Rally in Park Against City Guidelines.) 

     A rally?

     According to Mission Viejo’s City Attorney, “The city’s overall position is we want to minimize concentrations of people, minimize situations that don’t lend themselves to social distancing … The city is taking all efforts to not encourage crowds and socialization.” 

     There’s a Facebook page promoting Raths' event. According to the Voice, “The page says that masks at the event are optional and hopes to see a turnout of at least 100 community members.”

     According to Raths, “We stand on the side of the silent majority [Nixon's infamous phrase] who closed their businesses only to see them reopen for days — before being shut down again. I stand for the people in this country who know something is wrong and will no longer take it,” Raths wrote in the article (posted on his LinkedIn page).  

     Well, nonpartisan medical experts (CDC) are clear that we should engage in social distancing and should wear masks. What is it, exactly, that “people in this country” know is wrong? He seems to be alluding to some dark conspiracy. Or lies. But which conspiracy? Which lies? What on Earth is he talking about? The pandemic is happening and it is getting worse! We need to take strong steps to fight it!

     The Voice recently reported that “Raths blocked constituents with dissenting opinions on his campaign pages.”

     Yeah, he's blocking expressions of reason. What kind of a leader is that?


* * *
     
Elsewhere, I found Raths' opinion of the Governor’s recent decision temporarily to close Orange County beaches. “I strongly believe that Governor Newsom's ill-advised decision to close our Orange County beaches is wrong,” he wrote. He goes on: “Science, and those in the field of medicine, have documented for decades the importance of sunlight and fresh air to the proper functioning of the needs of the human body. Importantly, new scientific lab results from the Department of Homeland Security suggest that heat, humidity and sunlight slow and even kill the coronavirus. … If the sun, fresh air, and our beautiful beaches have been found to fight and win against the coronavirus, what reason is there to shut down the beaches?”
     Wow. This guy has shit for brains. (Do I gotta spell it out?)

     Many in Orange County, and across the country, are similarly brained.

     And we’re goin’ down the tubes, man.


P.S.:

...‘Some activities hold up fairly well when moved online. … Education isn’t one of those activities. We now have overwhelming confirmation of something we already suspected: For many, perhaps most students there is no substitute for actually being in a classroom.

     But rooms full of students are potential Petri dishes, even if the young are less likely to die from Covid-19 than the old. Other countries have managed to reopen schools relatively safely — but they did so with much lower infection rates than currently prevail in America, and with adequate testing, which we still don’t have in many hot spots.

     So we’re now facing a terrible, unnecessary dilemma. If we reopen in-person education, we risk feeding an out-of-control pandemic. If we don’t, we impair the development of millions of American students, inflicting long-term damage on their lives and careers.

     And the reason we’re in this position is that states, cheered on by the Trump administration, rushed to allow large parties and reopen bars. In a real sense America drank away its children’s future.

     Now what? At this point there are probably as many infected Americans as there were in March. So what we should be doing is admitting that we blew it, and doing a severe lockdown all over again — and this time listening to the experts before reopening. Unfortunately, it’s now too late to avoid disrupting education, but the sooner we deal with this the sooner we can get our society back on track.

     But we don’t have the kind of leaders we need. Instead, we have the likes of Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, Florida’s governor, politicians who refuse to listen to experts and never admit having been wrong.

     So while there have been a few grudging policy adjustments, the main response we’re seeing to colossal policy failure is a hysterical attempt to shift the blame. Some officials are trying to besmirch Dr. Fauci’s reputation; others are diving into unhinged conspiracy theories.

     As a result, the outlook is grim. This pandemic is going to get worse before it gets better, and the nation will suffer permanent damage.


Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...