They care

 

"Control" in Florida; Solidarity in Connecticut

Florida Asserts Control of Public Universities’ Curricula 

Scott Jaschik - September 26, 2022 – Inside Higher Ed 

The state of Florida, in responding to a lawsuit, asserted that it has near total control of the curriculum at public universities. 

Six professors, one retired professor and a student have sued to challenge the Individual Freedom Act, which bars them from endorsing eight concepts of race or racial superiority. The professors say the law unfairly restricts their freedom to speak out. 

The state’s response: “Plaintiffs’ First Amendment challenge fails because the Florida Government has simply chosen to regulate its own speech—the curriculum used in state universities and the in-class instruction offered by state employees—and the First Amendment simply has no application in this context.” And: “All it says is that state-employed teachers may not espouse in the classroom the concepts prohibited by the act, while they are on the state clock, in exchange for a state paycheck.” 

A Show of Solidarity 

Faculty members back a K-12 teacher who distributed a list of terms about race and gender to high school students. Some say more of this kind of allyship is needed as public education faces divisive concepts and book bans amid teacher shortages. 

Colleen Flaherty - September 26, 2022 - Inside Higher Ed 

Professors at Southern Connecticut State University are rallying behind a local teacher investigated for sharing a list of terms about race and gender with 10th-grade students. 

“We urge the Southington Board of Education, and all Connecticut Boards of Education, to resist attempts to divide us, and to stand firmly on the side of academic freedom and free speech in the classroom,” says a letter to the Southington Public Schools board signed by more than 60 Southern Connecticut State professors. 

‘Voicing Support for Teachers’ 

“We reiterate our support for all teachers, regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, age, ability, or creed,” the letter continues. “And we call on Connecticut legislators, the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities System, and the Connecticut public to join us in voicing support for teachers who wish to discuss racism in the classroom.” 

The glossary in question contains such terms as explicit and implicit bias, bigotry versus prejudice, cisgender, cultural appropriation and cultural appreciation, structural racism, and white privilege. White privilege, for instance, is defined as “societal privilege that benefits white people over non-white people in some societies, particularly if they are otherwise [of] the same social, political or economic circumstances.” 

The glossary reportedly was adapted from an inclusive vocabulary guide for students at the University of Arizona. A 10th-grade English teacher at Southington High School shared it with students to prepare them for conversations about race and other complex themes in the literature they’ll read this academic year. 

The teacher, who remains publicly unnamed, was criticized indirectly by parents and at least one board member at a board meeting earlier this month. 

Mr. Baczewski

“I read the worksheet. Do I agree with it? Absolutely not,” Joseph Baczewski, board vice chair, reportedly said at that meeting. “For all of the crap going on in the world right now, this is it? The first week of school to start off negatively. It’s troublesome.” 

Regarding such comments, the Southern Connecticut State professors wrote in their letter that “we are having a hard time construing this as anything other than a politically motivated attack on free speech. As parents, professors and teachers of teachers, we write to let you know that we are dismayed by the fact that the board seems to be engaging in partisan politics, restricting the free speech and academic freedom of teachers who are struggling to teach in remarkably complex and difficult times.” 

The letter continues, “What, exactly, is wrong with a worksheet that provides simple straightforward characterizations of concepts such as ‘marginalization’ and ‘white privilege’ as a way to help students contextualize literature? Sure, these concepts are difficult. So are discussions about genocide, the Holocaust, sexual assault, cyber bullying, suicide and many, many other social ills. This does not mean that we avoid them. To ban the concepts is equivalent to antiquated practices such as banning books like To Kill A Mockingbird in the 1960s. We trust that you are not interested in engaging in censorship.” 

The Connecticut teacher in question reportedly was put on paid administrative leave while the district investigated the glossary…. (continue reading)

How did the pandemic disrupt learning for America's K-12 students?

6 things we've learned about how the pandemic disrupted learning  

NPR, updated June 22, 2022 

     How did the pandemic disrupt learning for America's more than 50 million K-12 students? 

     For two years, that question has felt immeasurable, like a phantom, though few educators doubted the shadow it cast over children who spent months struggling to learn online. 

     Now, as a third pandemic school year draws to a close, new research offers the clearest accounting yet of the crisis's academic toll — as well as reason to hope that schools can help. 

1. Surprise! Students learned less when they were remote 

     But really, this should surprise no one. 

     Most schools had little to no experience with remote instruction when the pandemic began; they lacked teacher training, appropriate software, laptops, universal internet access and, in many cases, students lacked stability and a supportive adult at home to help. 

     Even students who spent the least amount of time learning remotely during the 2020-21 school year — just a month or less — missed the equivalent of seven to 10 weeks of math learning, says Thomas Kane of the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University. (Continue reading)

Waiting for the queen

 

Roy and Anni, waiting for the Royal Motorcade, British Columbia, 1959.

1959, June 18 to Aug. 1: Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh visited several cities on their journey through B.C. on the royal train.

     Natch, I have no memory of the Big Day when the Queen came to town (it sometimes occurs to me that I have no childhood memories at all). Anni, of course, invariably has loads of memories, although I have not yet asked her for them for this particular occasion. She's the sort who, in all situations in which it is conceivable that one might remember something, will claim to remember everything and more.

     If I ask her, I will gird my loins.

     Mom and pop moved to Canada—first to the east coast—in 1951 when they were 17 and 18 respectively. They met on the boat from Germany. They each had, like, a hundred bucks (courtesy of the nation of Canada, which, it seems, is officially a "federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy," with the Chuckster as King!).

     Anni came along in '54 and I came along a year later. By then, we lived in BC, on the west coast. That's where the jobs were for electricians like pop. We lived mostly in the backcountry, at construction sites way up in the mountains. Hydroelectric plants, I think.

     I recall—years later—my mom speaking fondly of the Queen. "She's a nice lady," mom liked to say. My dad offered similar utterances: "I don't think she's too bright, but she's a nice lady." 

     I think pop shook Philip's hand at some construction site. I've got pics somewhere.

     My folks are gone now, like the Queen. All nice. Only photos remain.

Philip visits pop's workplace

The little family: Pop, Roy, Anni, Mom

Living in a trailer way up in the Canadian Rockies

Pop (4th from left) and his pals, c. 1957

"A nice lady"

God save the Queen 

The fascist regime 

They made you a moron 

Potential H-bomb 

God save the Queen 

She ain't no human being 

There is no future 

In England's dreaming

Sex Pistols live, Phoenix

"Pass the Harasser"

It's an old sad story but perhaps a change is gonna come. Maybe. Professors charged with harrassment or inappropriate behavior with students suddenly disappear from the classroom and then appear in other classrooms, sometimes with cushy settlements, often, most often, with nothing said to future employers about the nature of their separation. This is known as "pass the harasser" or "pass the trash."

Alexi Timko, writing this summer in the LA Times, profiles two recent cases at CSUSD which resulted in separation from the university and swift re-employment at other instituitions:

excerpt: 

Both professors denied the claims but investigations conducted by the campus Title IX office concluded the professors had engaged in egregious sexual harassment and misconduct in violation of university policy. The professors’ accounts of the events were found to be not credible.

Instead of pursuing disciplinary action, however, the university agreed to generous settlements with the professors, Roger Morrissette and David Bwambok, which included voluntary resignations, paid administrative leave and, in one case, expunging records of disciplinary action from his personnel file, according to university reports obtained by The Times that detail the investigations and settlements.In both cases, the university agreed to only confirm the professors’ position and dates of employment if contacted by prospective employers and would not volunteer any additional information.

....

“The university’s priority was protecting its student and employee community and the quickest and, more importantly, most assured route to these individuals no longer working for the campus was via settlements,” said Margaret Chantung, chief communication officer at the university. “This route also avoided placing the complainants in the situation of being questioned about their testimony and going through the painful experience of reliving their experiences.”

...

“It is a legal gap,” said Nancy Cantalupo, assistant professor of law at Wayne State University. “There’s no legal obligation for one institution to tell another institution of the fact that this person has been found to have harassed someone on campus.”

Absent a legal obligation, institutions prioritize safety within their own campuses and communities, Cantalupo said.

In a statement to The Times, Chantung said San Marcos is “extremely committed to providing a campus environment that promotes respect, human dignity and an environment where everyone can thrive in their academic, professional and personal pursuits.”

Experts said settlements such as those reached with Morrissette and Bwambok are not uncommon.

To read all about it,  inlcuding details Rebel Girl elected not to share (Timko can write a lede!), click here:

Cal State agreed to keep sexual harassment findings against two professors under wraps

Shermer on Wokeness, etc.

 

SOCCCD trustee candidates: statements

BACKGROUND: See The Trustee Area 4 Mess (Whitt Rydell v. Reeve!) 

AREA 4: Whitt Rydell, the incumbent, will be opposed by one Derek Reeve:

Whitt Rydell's statement is predictable; Reeve's statement, however, is a doozy:

 

AREA 5: Milchiker, the incumbent, will run unopposed:

AREA 2: Prendergast, the incumbent, will run unopposed:

AREA 6: Dack and Kunju are running for the seat vacated by James Wright:

Ryan Dack

James Wright