Sunday, January 7, 2007

Coming Home: Dreams for the New Year

"And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."

--Antoine de Saint Exupéry's The Little Prince
We spent our last night in the port town of Ensenada, after seven hours on the two lane highway that took us from the Sea of Cortez (or Gulf of California, if you wish) through the blooming Sonoran desert, then down to the Pacific and northward through the string of dusty agricultural pueblos, booming with the entrenchment of agribusiness which has bestowed a vaguely pesticidal haze over all.

Ensenada was deflated. Christmas was over and so was New Year's. The big cruise ships had steamed away. It was Tuesday January 2. King's Day wasn't near enough to fill the panaderia windows with cakes and breads yet.

We were tanned and rested but ailing a bit too. So while we walked to dinner, we stopped by one of the fabled pharmacias and bought a potent cough syrup. I blame that and the beer (Bohemia) and grilled octopus I ate for the dreams that followed that night. That, and the general state of this sorry world.

The First Dream:

The department of English met and decided to give a party to show our appreciation to our underpaid and often unrecognized part-time colleagues. It was decided by unanimous vote that the best way to do this was to give each part-time instructor a manicure and pedicure at the party. Funds were donated to me to hire a friend of mine, D.W., a screenwriter/professional waiter, to assist with the treatments. Previous to this, I had no idea that D.W. had expertise in this area, especially judging from his own gnarly toenails that peek out of his flipflops. But D.W. arrived, well-equipped with emollients and creams, tiny scissors and trimmers and buffers, ready to work. My colleagues brought platters of food. The part-timers showed up and started taking off their shoes.

You can see why I woke up.

Upon awaking, I chugged more of the cough syrup and flipped on the television.

It was the funeral of Gerald Ford. Pomp. Circumstance. Flags. Henry Kissinger at a podium. Kissinger cited Ford's "artless decency.” Henry Kissinger. Artless decency. Kissinger. It was too much, really. He shouldn't even be allowed to say those words, I thought.

Back to sleep.


The Second Dream:

A month and a half ago, my friend, E.Z., was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme, a aggressive brain cancer (This part is true). In the dream, me and my sweetie pay a visit to E.Z. in his house in Echo Park. Since his diagnosis, a group of friends have come together to help them manage their lives, donating time and money to make things work as best they can (This part is true too).

In the dream, his lovely wife D. doesn't seem to be happy to see us, though E.Z. is. He seems fine enough, and likes whatever it is we have brought him. I look around for the kids, - their eight year old boy, the 6 year old twins. E.Z. and D. were so happy to become parents. Before the first child was born, E.Z. had the nursery furniture painted pale yellow, with wistful scenes from Antoine de Saint Exupéry's The Little Prince.

But now, I can't locate their children though the house seems full. Young people I don't know are hanging about, here and there, lounging on the sofa, sitting at the kitchen table. Other visitors, I think, people from his life as a public defender, maybe. Maybe that why the wife is acting that way - there's too many people around, there's too much commotion. We should have called. We should have come another day. As we make our leave, I discover the secret though, through the oddness of dream logic, I don't know how is it that I learn it.

But this is it: most of the money raised by the circle of friends has gone to help their three children grow quickly to adulthood so that E.Z., their swiftly dying father, can see who it is they will become. The young adults I don't recognize are the missing children, having grown years in a matter of weeks.

It's not that D., the wife and mother, doesn't want us around, it's that they need to keep this a secret, this gift, these grown children. And they need their time together. All they have is now. We understand. We leave them there in the house with their lives moving so fast.

This time when I wake up it is near dawn. The two people who make up my immediate family are breathing deeply, still dreaming. Their breath sounds like the ocean, one wave after another.

When they wake, I will tell them my two dreams. Then, we'll eat breakfast: oatmeal for my husband, pancakes for the little guy and chilequiles verdes con huevos revueltos for me. Lots of coffee. Then we'll get in the car and drive home to the new year. Lots will happen. It always does.

~ RG

The man who sued his own mother

Site Meter

IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL about OC Republican politics, then you know that Friend-o-Fuentes MICHAEL SCHROEDER is among the most powerful people in the county.

He’s also among the most ruthless, evidently.

This morning, the Times has turned the spotlight on Schroeder: The OC Republican politicos love and hate.

And get this! Our own NANCY PADBERG appears! Evidently, she is not a member of the Mike Schroeder fan club.

Some excerpts:
[HE EVEN SUED MOM:]

…Schroeder, 50, revels in his reputation as the enforcer of Orange County Republican politics, acquaintances and party insiders say…. And for the last decade, he has been the power broker Orange County candidates must appeal to if they want the Republican Party's blessing — and the big-business campaign contributions that come with it, [insiders] say. Schroeder can also be ruthless when crossed, say those who have stepped outside the party leadership's good graces.

A USC-trained lawyer who made his fortune selling malpractice insurance to chiropractors, Schroeder isn't hesitant to file lawsuits when he believes he has been wronged…. A decade ago, in a dispute involving a family business, he sued his own mother.
…..
At the local government level, Schroeder has focused on law enforcement races. Eight years ago, he helped Sheriff Mike Carona and Dist. Atty. Tony Rackauckas win office. Since then, he has served as a political advisor and sometimes spokesman for both men, helping them weather a series of controversies....

[THE "REPUBLICAN MAFIA"]

Despite his many political victories, Schroeder has deeply divided the Orange County GOP leadership, many Republicans say.

Detractors say Schroeder leads a small cadre of party officials who effectively control who runs for office in Republican-dominated Orange County, shutting out credible and respected candidates who aren't in lock-step with his wing of the party.

Former Assemblyman Gil Ferguson (R-Newport Beach), who retired in 1994, is one of many old-line Republicans who view the Schroeder-led "Republican mafia" with distaste. "He can kill you if you are a politician or a candidate," Ferguson said....

[DON'T SCREW WITH MY MACHINE:]

[County Sheriff Mike Carona’s] tenure had been marked by controversy, including allegations of sexual misconduct and political cronyism, both of which Carona has denied. Many Republican leaders thought it was time for a change, and so were backing Lt. William Hunt, a 22-year deputy who also had the backing of rank-and-file deputies.

Hunt's supporters successfully urged the committee not to endorse anyone in the primary, a clear defeat for Schroeder and Carona.

But Schroeder refused to go down without a fight. He lined up enough votes to secure the endorsement for Carona and called for a second vote the following month. With the committee's stamp of approval, Carona went on to defeat Hunt and two other challengers in the primary with a 51% vote, thus avoiding a runoff.

The morning after the election, the sheriff put Hunt on administrative leave and later told him he was being reassigned as a patrol officer, with a substantial pay cut….

"It's not about whether a candidate is the best candidate," said NANCY PADBERG, an Orange County lawyer who sits on the committee. "Schroeder's whole motivation is to keep his powerhouse going."

[A SCENE FROM THE GODFATHER:]

…..
Wally Wade, a former prosecutor who twice challenged Rackauckas, knows what it's like to feel Schroeder's sting. He was demoted and ultimately transferred out of the district attorney's office after his unsuccessful runs.

…The morning after he lost to Rackauckas, a messenger delivered an envelope to Wade's home. The only thing in it was Michael Schroeder's business card, he said. "Nothing else," he said. "It was like something out of 'The Godfather.'"

Saturday, January 6, 2007

Catch-23


ACCREDITATION NEWS: CATCH-23. A few weeks ago, the Accrediting Teams visited our colleges, maintained their best poker faces, and then went off to write their reports, quickly. The relevant parties (the college presidents, primary authors) received the teams’ drafts back on the 18th or so of December.

Those parties have an opportunity to correct factual errors and whatnot. The Teams’ corrected reports, which amount to recommendations, will eventually go to the ACCJC decision-making body, which will meet later this month. That body will decide on the appropriate actions re our two colleges. Then they’ll issue letters to the two colleges reporting those actions. That should occur on January 31.

Remember that colleges get accredited, not districts. But among the problems that can be cited during the Accred process are those created by, not college, but district persons—e.g., the chancellor, the board. For instance, each of our colleges has been told that trustees, those district authorities par excellence, should stop micromanaging.

What will the ACCJC do? It seems likely that the Accreds will inform each college once again that Mathurian despair production and trustee micromanagement must cease immediately!

How are the colleges supposed to see to it that their Higher Ups--the Chancellor and the trustees--behave themselves? IVC and Saddleback are in a dilemma, a catch.

This doesn’t seem to be a Catch-22. It's some other catch, though no less wacky-pestiferous. I’m gonna call it a Catch-23.

I can hear Yossarian now: "That's some catch, that Catch-23!"

INMON: NOTA BENE & HEADS-UPPERY. During Wednesday’s Faculty Association (union) luncheon, CAROLYN INMON (President of CCA, the community college part of CTA) blasted the recent OC Register article and editorial concerning community colleges’ allegedly low transfer and degree completion rates. She spoke of ongoing and nefarious efforts to “redefine” the mission of the CCs. She noted that the “retirement discussion” is coming back. That is, those looking to trim the state budget are sniffing around our retirement bucks yet again! Inmon emphasized “solidarity,” which is more important than ever, she said.

NEW CONTRACT. Also during the luncheon, contract negotiator LEWIS LONG reminded us that the current contract expires in June! So it’s back to the negotiation table. I KID YOU NOT. Toward that end, faculty will soon be filling out surveys. Expect crayons in your mailbox.

NO MO’ GOLDEN GOOSERY. During his luncheon presentation, the CCA's budget expert, the cantankerous ALAN FREY, explained that our state's “archaic and complicated” program-based funding system is being replaced at long last. As you know (or maybe not), years ago, the Supreme Court determined that students should benefit from state funds equally. Nevertheless, “equalization” has not yet occurred. In the case of CA community colleges, equalization progress will be made in the transition to the new & improved funding system. It appears that the new system, and the transition, will not threaten us. (So said Frey: maybe he said that on the assumption that districts rely on state funds. But of course some rely primarily on local property taxes.)

Well, yes: ours is among the few districts that acquires funding largely from local property taxes, which are high. This mechanism, known as “basic aid," is our Golden Goose, our Gravy Train. Basic aid, said Frey, will likely be eliminated within a couple of years. (Because of equalization? Not sure.)

Frey explained that community colleges get money from the state, from the Feds, and from their “beginning balance”—i.e., money left over from their budget of last year. Notoriously, the community colleges perpetually beg for greater funding, claiming poverty and injustice. (Consider the Chancellor’s remarks on Wednesday.) The problem, said the Freyster, is that community college districts routinely fail to spend all of their budgets. The SOCCCD, for instance, started the year with $26 million in the bank (I think I got that right). Apparently, starting with money from last year is typical.

Hence, when we go begging to the legislature, lawmakers just point to our unspent bucks and scream, “You're desperate for money, are you? Then how come you've got piles o' cash squirreled away? ANSWER ME THAT!"

SALARIES. Frey noted that SOCCCD is now 6th in the state for starting salaries (full-time faculty). You’ll recall that, during the Old Guard days (six or so years ago), faculty salaries rose, but the bucks were slathered all over senior faculty, leaving starting faculty in abject Dickensian paupertude. (We should hunt down those Old Guardsters and pants 'em, I say.) Evidently, the newer leadership has undone that. Somebody has.

But what about part-timer salaries? Are they high too? Well, no, they're WAY DOWN on the state list.

Once again, I must say: that really sucks.

Meanwhile, the general trend in higher ed is a gradual decrease in the proportion of instructors who are tenured and full-time. Hey, in a few years, we’ll wake up and realize that higher ed will be staffed by academics who lack tenure, lack a decent income, and lack effective mechanisms of representation!

One way to look at this: Gee, we’d better improve conditions for part-timers. Of course, we always had a reason to do that!

WHO GETS ACADEMIC FREEDOM? We all know what Academic Freedom is. We know that it is threatened. But here’s another issue: is there a difference between full-time & part-time, or tenured & untenured, with regard to faculty Academic Freedom?

In practice, the answer seems to be “yes.”

And yet we’re moving away from a Higher Ed that is staffed by full-time and tenured professors.

You might want to check out ”A Freewheeling Academic Freedom Debate” in yesterday’s Insider Higher Ed.


THE A200 FACULTY LOUNGE: OUR NEW FURNISHINGS. DtB readers know that faculty in IVC's A200 building have the world's shittiest faculty lounge--a lounge (to paraphrase St. Anselm) a more shitty than which cannot be conceived. About a year ago, faculty were promised new and loungy furniture to replace the ratty and nonexistent furnishings.

Well, to paraphrase the Chancellor, "we ain't seen nothin' yet." It's stunning.

Actually, new furnishings have appeared in A200 recently--namely, rodent traps. They are everywhere. Near as i can tell, they effectively repel rodents: each one has remained pristine and entirely rodent-free. Here's a pic:

Thursday, January 4, 2007

The Faculty Association luncheon

Actually, this picture was taken in my office, not at the union luncheon. Rebel Girl bought these socks in London, I think, twenty years ago (she was a baby)! And, no, they are not for sale!



Well, here are some pics. The luncheon was well-attended. Good speakers. One guy--his name was "Fry," I think--talked about salaries and such. Looks like we've really come up in the world with regard to entry level salaries. The bad news: SOCCCD part-timers are like 50th in the state in salaries. That really sucks.

The Chancellor was given an opportunity to speak, briefly. He said negotiations on the new contract won't take three years this time. Gee, I wonder why they took so long last time?

I just can't imagine why.

Wednesday, January 3, 2007

The Chancellor's opening session


Site Meter

...Oh let our love survive
Or dry the tears from your eyes
Let's don't let a good thing die
When honey, you know
I've never lied to you
Mmm yeah, yeah


WELL, I'LL SAY THIS MUCH: this was one of the better "opening sessions" I've attended at the South Orange County Community College District. The speakers were great, and the entertainment--supplied by Mr. Scott Robertson--was great kitschy fun.

That's Mr. R above. He pretty much maintains an "over the top" vibe. What can I say? He can sing. Not sure that matters, though.

Here's Chancellor Raghu Mathur, who "discovered" Mr. Robertson while bar-hopping or something--in Laguna Hills, no less!

Dave Lang, John Williams, Marcia Milchiker, and Bill Jay were on hand. Dave came up to ask, "If swimming is so good for your figure, how do you explain whales?" Dave counts beans for a living.

Pretty soon, Chancellor Mathur introduced Robertson, who, armed with leather pants, crooned Neil Diamond's Cracklin' Rosy, Sweet Caroline, & Solitary Man. It's not the sort of entertainment one might expect at a college function, but it was fun, and the crowd seemed to lap it up.

Like I said, during his Neil Diamond medley, I thought Robertson was way over the top. Later, I discovered that his "Cracklin' Rosy" stuff was the subdued half of his performance.


After this trip down Memory Lane (God we're old), Mathur announced: "You ain't seen nothin' yet!" And it was true.

Tracy D went through a quick and entertaining slide show chronicling the Chancellor's early years in OC. Did you know that Raghu started as a part-timer at Saddleback College? Did you know that he once sported a mustache?

Yes, we saw pics of Raghu's lovely wife and kids. Did you know that his two boys were named after Neil Diamond and Sean Connery? Now, THAT'S assimilation!

During his address, Raghu spoke of the challenge we face in trying to remain competitive. He noted Secretary of Education Spelling's recent report and its recommendations, including the notion that American colleges and universities must embrace a "culture of continuous innovation and improvement." In the course of the presentations given during this session, that point, it seemed, was driven home in fifteen ways.

Raghu once again bemoaned "the greatest injustice in education" in the state, namely, that the community colleges get far less money per student than UC, CSU, & K-12. He tossed us various alleged pearls found in the new Toeffler book, the Friedman "Flat Earth" book, and some other book, I remember not.

We're affluent, while other countries are "hungry," he said. I think the point was that we'd better develop an appetite. Luckily, I had one.


The first guest presenter was Dr. Wallace Walrod, VP of Research and Communications, OC Business Council. The Wal-man offered some eye-opening info, including a projection of OC in the year 2025. Looks like your home is gonna be worth nearly 2 million bucks then. Sheesh.

Essentially, Walrod presented facts and figures regarding the challenge of cultivating a "fit" workforce here in OC relative to the demands of a globally competitive environment. There's some good news and some bad news, he said.

He walked us through recent OC history as it regards the economy. We used to be players in the defense and aerospace industries, but no longer. We're moving toward "services." We've got to do better, training young people in math and the sciences.

Then there's the Latino population: it's lagging in educational achievement, and, especially since Latinos will become the largest group in the county, we've got to address that. We may end up importing workers. Etc.

Unsurprisingly, Walrod noted the enormity of the problem of housing affordability in OC--only the Bay Area has it worse than us on that score.

After a brief and funny introduction by VC Andrea Serban, we heard from Dr. Robert Bramucci, District Dean, Open Campus, Riverside Community College District. The Bobster clued us into the big picture concerning distance ed. Funny guy. I do believe he convinced me to push for some online logic courses.

He went through a series of distance ed (DE) "myths." One is that it will "take over." Historically, though, we tend to exaggerate the specter of new technologies. Remember TV? They once thought there'd be one in every home! Myth 2 is that DE is a fad. Nope. It's an unstoppable force, like roaches. Myth 3: it's terrible. Obviously, it can be. But the data suggest that it can be just as good as any other approach to teaching. Amazing, but true.

Bramucci emphasized that the internet and all of this new technology is "just a tool." That is, it is not intrinsically bad, though it can be used badly. The Bobster seemed to think that, potentially, these new tools are wonderful. He even suggested that, ultimately, computers will "re-humanize education." This guy's good. He had me convinced.

Next came Jim Gaston, SOCCCD's Associate Director of IT. He entertained us while making us feel like Old Farts and cyber nincompoops. He had his daughter along. She was hanging from the rafters, solving equations.

I'm running out of time again. So I've got to cut this short.

Eventually, everything stopped and we heard Strauss's absurdly dramatic Thus Spoke Zarathustra. The stage remained empty. Tension mounted! What could it all mean?

It meant ELVIS WAS IN THE BUILDING:





--Fabulous.

Tuesday, January 2, 2007

The DISSENT the BLOG year in review, Part I

“Those who cannot remember the past obviously have some sort of dementia.”

--George somebody
January 1

EXACTLY one year ago, we reprinted an interview of Linguist/Philosopher Noam Chomsky concerning the state of ACADEMIC FREEDOM. Right-wingers have promoted the idea that conservatism and conservatives are oppressed at American colleges and universities. Not so, said the good professor. In fact, it's the other way around, he said.

Subsequent events (see below) seemed to illustrate the Noamster's point.

At the time, I decided not to mention an amusing fact: that a certain notorious conservative operator (and Friend-o-Fuentes) signed up for one of my summer philosophy courses.

Was he lookin' for dirt? Did he have a secret tape recorder? Who knows. He stopped comin' after a while.

January 4

It was during the Chancellor’s Spring ’06 “opening” session, you’ll recall, that Chancellor Raghu P. Mathur offered his impersonation of “Carnac the Magnificent”—the old Johnny Carson routine—complete with an Ed McMahan-type 2nd banana.

You know the skit: Ed holds up the sealed envelope; Carnac divines the answer to the question it contains; Carnac opens the envelope and reads the answer; hilarity ensues.

The Raghu Players’ version went like this:
Carnac: “Piggly Wiggly.”

Ed McMahon: “Piggly Wiggly!”

(Carnac now opens the envelope and reads the question:) “Describe Kermit the Frog’s wedding night.”
Har har har! Well, it was a nice try, truly, but the routine was more embarrassing than entertaining. Well, no, it was so embarrassing that it was incredibly entertaining. Let’s hope Raghu revives it for tomorrow morning! More Piggly Wiggly!

January 6

As we reported two days later, during the Faculty Association (union) luncheon that followed the Chancellor’s session, CCA President Carolyn Inmon spoke, alerting everybody to the "hidden tidal wave" of students who failed to receive High School diplomas owing to their performance in the state’s new exit test.

January 17

We unveiled our blog’s theme song: “You Did a Raghu Thing.”

January 19

On the 19th, we offered some updates. Months earlier, Rebel Girl had highlighted the district’s miserable accommodations for part-timers. We showed pictures of their squalid little room in IVC’s A200. But, on this day, we were able to report improvements! We showed pics.

Further, Chunk offered photos of the less-than-honest signs appearing at the IRWD facility across the street from Irvine Valley College, where, contrary to signage, they’re cleaning up toxic waste in the water table below us.

Have you ever noticed that IVC glows in the dark? Further, it is redolent of formaldehyde. It's a modern college, preserving the corpse-like past.

January 25

DtB reported on some stolen art-work at IVC’s Humanities Center. Evidently, the work was too LIBERAL for some right-wingers. It was never recovered. There was no outcry. Nothing. Bupkes.

Nevertheless, as you know, our colleges are hotbeds of mindless left-wing radicalism and liberal cardio-exsuanguinatude.

We reported, too, on the story of the CLUELESS organization at UCLA that offered cash to students who would provide recordings of instructors who were “abusive, one-sided or off-topic.” It was part of a larger effort to expose UCLA’s “radical professors.” You know, they were huntin' witches!

As you are no doubt aware, conservatives (Christians, Druids, et al.) are a stifled and oppressed minority on college campuses, like classicists. It’s like McCarthyism or something.

YEAH BUT you’ll recall that the whole thing blew up in the right-wingers’ faces, like a Republican war. The cash payment angle was a tad too much for people, and, amid talk of unamericanism and worse, righties washed their hands of the little group, joining in the chorus of condemnation and righteous peevitudinal indignation. (Shawn Steele, a Friend-of-Fuentes [FOF], continued to defend them. But of course!)

We’ve got some right-winger profs it Saddleback and IVC, y’know. Some of ‘em aren’t bashful about spouting their views neither. OK, so how often do you hear about leftists and Democrats recording 'em and making a stink about their “one-sided” rhetoric and their “abuse” of, say, Noam Chomsky or The Hillary? That would be: NEVER.


FEBRUARY

February 1

We reported on the board meeting that occurred the night before. Trustee Don Wagner motioned to remove the AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, that refuge of pornographic child-abusers and “liberal busybodies,” from the list of institutional memberships. He really seemed to say that the ALA is in favor of letting kids view porn! Um, evidently, those librarians were desperately trying to stop something called the "Keep Porno from Tykes" Act, if I remember correctly. Plus they supported the "Unamerican Act," the curs.

Amazingly, Don got his way. State-wide ridicule soon ensued, at least within the college circuit.

February 2

By this time, the Accreditors (ACCJC) were breathing down our necks, having already recommended that we deal with trustee micromanagement, a plague of despair, hinky exec hiring procedures, and violations of the Thespian Apiary Act.

On the 2nd of February, we reported that the Accreds had just finally responded to our two colleges’ recent reports, which were supposed to describe progress made re those troubling recommendations.

Alas, according to these new “action letters,” our efforts were judged to be inadequate. Uh-oh. (But wait! Can't you see? It is all part of a conspiracy of South County Anthro instructors who seek to teach polyandy with impunity and Reassigned Time!)

Essentially, the whole ACCRED situation pointed a finger of blame, not at the faculty or staff, but at the chancellor and board. So you’d think the trustees would try to give the Accreds what they wanted. But no. At least some trustees (well, Mr. Tom Evil) soon settled into a pattern of open defiance.

In the meantime, the Accreds were expecting another progress report (in the fall)! It was like a cliff-hanger!

February 7

During the January board meeting, Trustee Nancy Padberg questioned a request for $20,000 to pay for a “junket” by trustees + Chancellor to Orlando, Florida—where trustees were to stay at the lovely and opulent “Peabody & Donald Duck Orlando” (see http://www.peabodyorlando.com/).

The discussion seemed to suggest that trustee John Williams goes to this Peabody place on the district’s dime every chance he gets, even when there are local conventions that offer the same crap (you know, “good trusteeship” and all). Johnny Boy won’t go to those. Nope.

Williams responded by attacking Padberg (something about frequent flier miles!) and suggesting—get this!—that it would be unethical for him not to go to Florida!

You gotta love Johnny. It's like he's from a movie!

February 8

The Reb pointed out that the Saddleback College “Gaucho” icon is, in fact, a sombrero-wearing Mexican, not a Gaucho, which, as literate persons know, is an Argentinean cowboy with a totally different sense of style, plus a different continent.

We dutifully reported on a “BOMB SCARE” at IVC. In fact, the knucklehead IVC Chief of Police mistook a simple camera weight (i.e., sand in a bag) for a bomb. So, naturally, he and Rocky, having reflected carefully on the bag-o-sand, called in the bomb squad, and those guys brought in their little robot, B9, which commenced grabbing and dropping the “bomb” and sputtering aimlessly.

Students sold tacos in the parking lot. I giant pumpkin was rolled onto the lawn. Everyone had a good time.

February 9

On the ninth of February, we reported on the first “Technical Assistance” (T&A) shindig, an attempt to bring together the various governance groups—the board, the faculty, et al.—to make progress on the Accred’s recommendations. On hand was Ian Walton of the State Academic Senate, representing faculty, and Dianne Woodruff of the CCLC, representing Satan.

We offered extended cyber-yappage about this so-called T&A shindig. Fuentes was defiant. When someone suggested that the parties were there to come to some kind of agreement, Fuentes stopped the whole show, saying, “It’s not an evening of agreement!” He was really saying: hey, nobody tells US what to do. He was very nearly out of control!

People took turns offering suggestions. The always hate-filled Fuentes, in full eye-rolling mode, looked to the heavens and suggested that everyone should be “guided by love.” My head popped.

February 14

We had fun noting the utter inanity of the “be nice” and “respect others” IDEAS that Chancellor Mathur brought to the T&A. UnFRICKINbelievable. And yet charming.

February 20

At one point during the T&A, trustee Fuentes tired of hearing about board micromanagement. Stop stop stop! What about the “macromanagement” of others?!, he roared.

As we reported, during the February board meeting, the Academic Senates read a resolution asking the board to keep out of the faculty’s business. They were referring, of course, to the decision to cease institutional membership in the American Library Association.

The classified contract was finally approved.

Fuentes and Wagner objected once again to the Santander, Spain “study abroad” program. Nothing about “abandoning our fighting men and women” this time. Nope, it’s too costly, they said. Plus you’ve got kids sleeping with goats and Gypsies.

Luckily, Tom and Don were outnumbered. So it's back to Spain and the goats!

The board was feeling pressure to deal with the Accreds’ nasty old recommendations: all that stuff about board micromanagement and all.

Pressure? Fuentes got pissed. "We don't need no stinkin' pressure," he seemed to say. So a discussion of the recommendations was put off, not for the last time, despite the urgings of the Academic Senates.

Fuentes blathered about the ALA and its love of pornography. Creepy, man.


MARCH

In March, we reported on that month’s board meeting, which was a doozy! Some highlights:

• ILLIGITIMATE PROCESS. During public comments, IVC Academic Senate Prez Wendy noted that the district planning process (imposed by Chancellor Mathur) was illegitimate, given that it was developed without Academic Senate input. Hence the Academic Senate was forced to pursue a “minimum conditions” complaint with the State Chancellor’s Office.

• BOARD RESOLUTION? On this night, Mathur recommended the board’s adopting a (already-written) resolution re-committing it to addressing (i.e., taking seriously!) the Accreds’ recommendations (namely, ceasing micromanaging, dealing with despair, etc.).

• But the GREAT OBSTRUCTIONIST—Trustee Fuentes—objected to the resolution’s wording, complaining that it made no mention of the really real problem in the district, namely, the “macromanagement” of “others.” (Fuentes embraces some sort of WACKED OUT conspiracy theory according to which faculty control the Accreds plus they—or Wendy—seek to control or to run the district. I wonder who he thinks killed JFK? The ALA?)

• YEAH, BUT Trustee Milchiker expressed puzzlement, for, as she noted, the Accreds made no mention of “macromanagement” by anyone!

• IMAGINARY CRAP. No matter. The board modified the resolution as per Fuentes’ request, adding the imaginary crap about “macromanagement.” Absurdity ensued.

• A MEMORABLE MATHURIAN SPEECH. Chancellor Mathur insisted on making a speech, an obvious effort to seem “leaderly.” In it, he blamed certain “faculty leaders” for bad press and harm done to the district’s reputation. He asserted that the board was getting a bad rap (presumably from the Accreds) about micromanagement; that was really the sin of an earlier board, he said. (I’m not making this sh*t up.) Further, Mathur seemed to blame any trustee micromanagement on others (aka faculty). Those others, he said, should stop “inviting” board micromanagement. The room was bathed in red from the terrible glow of feminist fury.

• TEAT. At this meeting, the board discussed a report, requested earlier by Trustee Padberg, concerning trustee travel expenses. Reading between the lines, its findings were evidently embarrassing especially for trustee John Williams, a notorious beneficiary of the public teat. Padberg, looking slyly towards Williams, requested that the report now be expanded to include the last “five years.” Williams, Fuentes, Wagner, and Lang voted that down. Now why would they do that?

Well, I'm sure i just don't know!

• DUCKS BRIEFLY NOT IN ROW. The American Library Association was back on the agenda. There was an opportunity to reinstate it among institutional memberships. At the crucial moment, however, Padberg was called away on a matter concerning her run for judge. The reinstatement failed, 3/3.

DtB did a search of news articles over the previous three years. As Mathur suggested, the district’s reputation had indeed suffered owing to bad press. Horribly so! But, in truth, virtually all of the bad press was caused by the actions of Trustee Fuentes (his peculiar reasoning re the “study abroad” trip to Spain) and Trustee Wagner (his innovation of excluding the “liberal busybody” American Library Association from the list of institutional memberships).

So, Chancellor Raghu P. Mathur, "faculty leaders" had nothing to do with our shitty reputation, did they? Now, tell the truth!


APRIL

April 2

DtB described the content of the aforementioned report on trustee travel expenses. Among the report's highlights: during 2005, the "fiscally conservative" Mr. John Williams spent over $10,000 on trips, including two to Orlando, FL (likely at the Peabody Orlando—very pricey). Most trustees spent 2k or less. So I figure you owe the public 8 grand for that year alone, Junket Boy.

April 5

Glenn held a pizza party in A200. People even showed up for it. On the walls were signs saying, "Happy retirement Tom Delay!" We sensed the glacial deceleration, then stop, of the great Pendulum.

April 7

Rebel Girl poked her finger through the ceiling of one of the hideous, stinking temporaries. Ants emerged from the hole. We took pics. We made posters.

April 19

Jonathan carped about the inexplicable failure of librarians to stand up and fight the board’s American Library Association action. Where the hell were they?

Chunk had a simple suggestion: henceforth, the library should be known as the LIBARY. But of course!

April 22

Chunk and friends visited a famous local Polish utopian farm experiment plus monkey berry trees. Lots of pics.

April 23

Pressure from the Accreds continued. “Just what are you people doing about your trustee micromanagement? Your despair? Stupidity? Corruption? YOUR EVIL?

So, naturally, there was a 2nd “Technical Assistance” (T&A) meeting. It was MCed by a manifestly pessimistic Ian Walton (for faculty), a plainly discombobulated Dianne Woodruff (for board/Chance), and a palpably chirpy BIG BEANO (aka Babs Beano), representing the Accreds.

In truth, it was a snoozefest and a monument to the human capacity for unwitting RubeGoldbergian architectonic. Know what I mean?

But there was much verbiage. Somebody brought a huge pile of “ideas” unified by a extra large paperclip. Several persons noticed the smell of sulphur.

Trustee Fuentes said he was there to speak for the poor taxpayer. Members of the audience—classified & faculty—immediately responded by saying aloud, in unison “I’m a taxpayer.” Fuentes hissed and spit. The audience smiled hideously.

Babs craned her neck and seemed to say, “Gee, things are great. And I really like this building!”

It was HELL, I tell you.

MAY

May 3

In Santa Ana, over 10,000 gathered in the Plaza of the Flags to celebrate May Day, and Rebel Girl was there!

May 7

DtB reported on the Chancellor Mathur’s visit with the School of Humanities and Languages at IVC. Five faculty showed up, including the Reb, who got in the Chancellor’s face over the unavailability of reassigned time for academic chairs.

May 11

Nancy Padberg runs for Judge and she’s endorsed by an impressive group of prominent Republicans. Could it be, though, that she’s run afoul of the Schroeder “mafia”? All of her fellow trustees have endorsed her—except for one.

May 13

Amid a shower of praise from the Chancellor for its “excellence,” the Lariat alleged steroid use among student athletes at the two colleges. DtB was skeptical of the Lariat’s journalism in this instance.

Clockwork Orange picked up our story (namely, “Premature congratulation”) and, soon, the sh*t hit the fan. Athletics faculty at IVC were hoppin’ mad.

May 17

Rebel Girl reported that “the IVC Lasers are the 2006 California Community College Commission on Athletics Competitive Yoga Champions.” Wink wink.

May 19

DtB scholars have been at work on the SOCCCD “Lexicon Project.” Among the project’s entries:
“To Beno” – as in “The faculty were totally Benoed by ACCJC.”

Shockingly to be abandoned by a presumed guardian or watchdog….

“Going to Orlando” – as in “Is that rat bastard goin’ to Orlando again? Doesn't he have a job or something?”

"Going to Orlando" is junketing or otherwise contriving to receive perks in a manner that is of dubious value to the taxpayer, who pays for it.
Also, the Academic Senate presidents met with a highly peeved Chancellor regarding his new planning process. Title 5 and district bylaws say that the faculty (faculty senates) should be relied upon primarily in developing planning process(es). Nevertheless, Raghu unilaterally developed his own process and then showed it to everybody like it was a done deal. Then faculty told leadership that, if Mathur doesn’t back off, they’ll want to pursue a “minimum conditions complaint” with the State Chancellor’s Office.

Mathur did not back off. The senates pressed the point. Mathur was angry.

May 20

We observed the IVC Commencement Ceremony. Fuentes prayed, inspiring laughter when he thanked the Lord for “the taxpayers.” A gal there explained that she once danced with the Ziegfeld Follies. The fish taco guy spoke. There was a student speaker; he seemed utterly unprepared, or worse. (The Reb was pretty peeved about that.)

“The earth is flat,” said the Chancellor.

May 22

The Lariat retracted its earlier published claim that coaches knew about steroid use among student athletes. The paper had been “misled” by “sources,” and it erred by not seeking the coaches’ side of the story, it said.

Yet another Fuentes crony—Chriss Street, who is running for Treasurer—seemed to be in ethical trouble. Yet another one? What difference does it make? (Meanwhile, rumors flew that Dave Lang coveted the Treasurer position and was hoodwinked into thinking that Fuentes and his pals would come through for him.)

May 23

Trustee Tom Fuentes was appointed to the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) advisory board (Dennis Hastert had nominated him). The EAC was created after the scandalous 2000 national election to assist in insuring smooth and clean elections. It has seemed more interested in promoting electronic voting.

At the May board meeting, IVC Academic Senate Prez Wendy G attempted to explain the faculty’s issue with the Chancellor’s district planning process. Dave Lang seems incapable of understanding the point.

May 30

DtB researched trustee Don Wagner’s rhetoric. Among the highlights: Don’s fulminations re the “liberal agenda,” the laws that protect “cross-dressers” or that “harass the Boy Scouts.” Then there’s Don’s desire to “greatly expand the right of law abiding citizens to carry weapons” and Don’s advocacy of spanking: “Corporal punishment in the lower grades works,” he once said.

JUNE

June 1

We reported on a NY Times story about the Feds’ abuse of the Patriot Act: “Four Librarians Finally Break Silence in Records Case.” During his ALA action, Trustee Wagner had suggested that the Patriot Act has proved unproblematic. The ALA had predicted government abuse.

June 7

Thanks to the hard-ball tactics and connivery of Michael Schroeder, the IVC Foundation’s “Hometown Hero,” County Sheriff Mike Carona, squeaked out an election victory against challenger Bill Hunt. The latter, a Republican, was immediately sidelined and ultimately demoted within the Sheriff’s Department. The moral: don’t screw with the “Republican mafia.”

Nancy Padberg comes in third for Judge (but not by much).

June 23

At the board meeting, trustees considered the proposed district “mission statement”:
Our mission is to facilitate opportunities for learning, cultural enrichment and social experiences to foster student success and contribute to a diverse community.
Trustee Tom Fuentes didn’t like the way the word “diversity” was used. Efforts to appease him failed. The matter was tabled.

During a grim discussion of the budget, VC Gary Poertner noted IVC’s “budget hole of $1.5 million.” Fuentes and others pressed for return to the rule that “basic aid” money not be used for ongoing expenses, but Poertner seemed to argue for a more gradual return to that principle.

June 27

The state budget was passed by lawmakers and would likely be signed by the governor. Among its provisions: a cut in community college fees from $26 per credit to $20 per credit.

New year, new semester

This morning, Sunny was disgusted with the ubiquity & eternality of the death of Our Ford

▲ YEAR IN REVIEW. Coming soon: Dissent the Blog’s (DtB) “year in review”

▲ TEXTBOOK RENTAL PROGRAM? As DtB readers know, SOCCCD trustees are aware of the high cost of textbooks. Some trustees (Tom Fuentes, Don Wagner) have pressured our bookstores and student government to try to lower costs. Well, that's one approach.

Another approach to the problem of high textbook cost, evidently, is a “textbook rental program.” Well, according to the North Coast Times, Palomar College faculty have rejected the rental program approach. They seem to have good reasons. Not sure. Check it out.

▲ BANISHED WORDS. For a laugh, take a look at Lake Superior State University’s annual list of "banished words.". Among the banished: “we’re pregnant,” “undocumented alien,” and “Gitmo.”

THOSE WONDERFUL PEOPLE OUT THERE IN THE DARK! I’ve got my own list. It’s a list of the peculiar ways in which Trustee Tom Fuentes refers to the dear taxpayers. Every time he talks about ‘em, you’re left with the impression that, in Fuentes’ world, those “good people” (imagine his deliberate and melodramatic articulation of each consonant, his odd verbal love-making) are a community of pious innocents in white. They've got donkeys.

And us? Well, we’re just Fred C. Dobbs. We're a bunch of greedy rat bastards.
I think I'll go to sleep and dream about piles of gold getting bigger and bigger and bigger.

--From The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
▲ Don’t know about you, but I didn’t get an INVITE to Governor Schwarzenegger’s inaugural ball. But the SPECIAL INTERESTS sure did. Check out today’s Wall Street Journal. According to WSJ,
Chevron Corp. maxed out on its permissible yearly political contributions to California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's re-election campaign…early in 2006. But that didn't stop the big oil company from chipping in $50,000 to be a "Gold Sponsor" of the governor's inaugural celebration. The contribution, one of the five largest that the inaugural committee received, gives Chevron officials access to the Republican governor at two events for sponsors and an invitation-only black-tie ball.
▲ MEAT MACHINES. It doesn’t often happen that what I discuss in my classes and what’s in the New York Times are the same thing! Check out “Free Will: Now You Have It, Now You Don’t” in this morning’s edition. The “free will” debate, if it ever goes mainstream, will undoubtedly become a part of the “culture wars.” You know, the wars that trustees Fuentes and Wagner seem to be waging. An excerpt:
“Is it an illusion? That’s the question,” said Michael Silberstein, a science philosopher at Elizabethtown College in Maryland. Another question, he added, is whether talking about this in public will fan the culture wars. “If people freak at evolution, etc.,” he wrote in an e-mail message, “how much more will they freak if scientists and philosophers tell them they are nothing more than sophisticated meat machines, and is that conclusion now clearly warranted or is it premature?”
One of Sierra's recent pots

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...