The sinking of the Shooting Star, part 6: an 11th passenger?

The entire “Fuentes/Shooting Star” saga can be found here.

Ronald Caspers, 1973

[See UPDATE below] [See also Part 7, where it is revealed that the mystery passenger likely sailed from La Paz (with the Klein brothers) to Cabo, where he disembarked. Hence, there is no "11th passenger."]
     Recently, I’ve posted a series of articles about the odd 1974 disappearance of the yacht “Shooting Star” off the coast of Baja California. Ten people disappeared with that boat, including OC Supervisor Ronald Caspers and political consultant Fred Harber. (Our own Tom Fuentes was Caspers' "executive aide" at the time.)
     Harber and Caspers were linked to the Orange County "shadow government”—DA Cecil Hicks’ term—allegedly masterminded by Dr. Louis Cella, who, not long after this episode, was tried and then sent to prison for corruption concerning campaign contributions to officials across the state. Cella's partner in the giving of huge chunks of money to key state politicians (including Jerry Brown) was South Orange County land baron Richard O’Neill, who died in 2009; Cella died in 2011.

John Klein

     In most of these posts, I have relied on two long-unavailable articles that appeared in the November and December, 1974, editions of the defunct Orange County Illustrated (many editions of that magazine were recently acquired by the OC archives). I was sent copies of the articles by the daughter of one of the victims of the tragedy (John Klein).
     The articles really are well-written, but they do raise questions.
     I decided to contact their author, Wayne Clark, who, at age 84, is still a busy man. He is Associate Executive Director of the Urban Water Institute in Irvine. (I do believe he holds other offices as well.)

Tony Moiso of Rancho 
Mission Viejo

     Clark is an interesting guy. After participating in the military occupation of Japan after WWII, he went to college and then studied the law. He seems to have spent many years as a journalist, working for the LA Times, among other organizations. From about 1963 to 1973, he was UCI’s Public Information Officer. After that, he worked as a “deputy” for one of the supes on the OC Board of Supervisors (I recently speculated that he had held that position at about the time that the “Shooting Star” episode occurred). He then started a successful PR firm and then, starting in the early 90s, he held various positions on local water boards. The politics of water seems to have kept Mr. Clark occupied in the last twenty.
     As we'll see, Clark was in fact the aide to someone (according to one reporter) very much caught up in infamous OC 70s corruption free-for-all. More on that in a moment.
     I left an email with him last night, asking about the old OC Illustrated articles. This morning, he got back to me by phone. Here are my notes (not verbatim unless quotation marks are used) of our twenty-five or so minute conversation:

Conversation with Wayne Clark, March 12, 2012

Wayne Clark

     Clark: “I’m 84, and my memory’s not always so good.”
     I told him I was impressed with his career and accomplishments. Then I zeroed in on his work in the seventies with a member of the OC Board of Supervisors. He said: I started to work as deputy to Supervisor [Laurence] Schmit – probably, the “worst Supervisor of all time.” (Laughs, not unpleasantly.)
     I asked: You were a deputy? Is that the same as an executive aide? Yes. [In ’74, Tom Fuentes was the executive aide of Ronald Caspers. A victim of the SS disaster, Tommy Klein, was the executive aide to Supervisor Ralph Clark.]
     I asked: Did you work for Schmit at the time of the Shooting Star incident in 1974?
     No, a bit later, about 1976, after I worked for Orange County Illustrated. I left them before they went out of business. [Schmit appears to have served as a Supe from 1975 through 1978, one term.]
     The people who hired me [for the exec. aide job] told me that my job was to “keep him out of jail,” which I did, more or less (laughs).
     I [Roy] asked what sort of questionable or illegal activity we were talking about, but Clark was either unwilling to tell me or he didn’t remember.
     We talked about the ill-fated trip of the Shooting Star. I asked whether he knew who flew down to La Paz for the trip. Was anyone along who didn’t get on board the boat? Is it true that Tom Fuentes was supposed to join the group but backed out at the last minute? Clark couldn’t remember such details.
     But then he said something remarkable:
     Clark: One passenger got off the boat. . . –wasn’t that in the article?—can’t remember his name. [I said that that certainly was not in the article. Note: as far as I know, there has never been any mention of an 11th passenger who got off the boat in any news stories or official reports. See Part 5 of this series: Coast Guard report, etc.]
     I mentioned that the SS stopped at Turtle Bay to refuel. Did the passenger got off there? Clark didn't seem to know or to remember.
     Clark: He [that passenger] is still around. He works as a consultant. Works for O’Neill down in South County [Rancho Mission Viejo]. Worked for Tony Moiso [President and Chief Executive Officer of Rancho Mission Viejo, which is associated with the O’Neill family. Moiso and O’Neill have run RMV since the 60s]. Clark just couldn't remember the guy's name.

Phil Anthony

     I asked about the article that appeared in Orange Coast Magazine in 1984—the one that focused on the political aftermath of the SS disappearance and that mentioned an ex-Chicago cop’s investigation and his view that the Shooting Star was destroyed by a bomb. (You don’t find body parts if they’re blown to bits; they then become fish food.)
     Clark: No, I didn’t know about the ex-cop and his theory. (Evidently, Clark didn’t follow the case.)
     I mentioned Dr. Louis Cella, the remarkable political donor and political machine kingpin. Clark had interviewed him, he said. He was doctor, said Clark. Clark remembered that Cella had gone down to Mexico to try to find Caspers and the others.
     Clark: The rumor was that he was in the mafia, but I don’t think so. [No longer referring to the Shooting Star:] He had a plane and he’d go off once a week, pretty mysterious—maybe on a Thursday—but, as it turns out, he didn’t go where he said he was going. Clark seemed to suggest that there was some funny business there. No doubt some of the mystery was uncovered during the criminal investigation of Cella and others, though, as I recall, journalists who reported the story have opined that they never got answers to where all the money was coming from.
     Clark: I remember interviewing him. It was odd. There was all this printing equipment (I think at the hospital). It was “strange.” (Clark seemed to use the word “strange” for Cella himself, not just for the presence of the equipment.) You might want to talk to Phil Anthony, who was a Supervisor and who’s on the OC Water District board these days. At the time, I seem to recall he resigned to avoid indictment.
      Clark: You should talk to Tom Fuentes. He’d know all about this.
      I explained that Fuentes is now dying of cancer. I said I knew him and that I wasn’t going to contact him.
     Clark laughed that I knew his background so well. How do you know all this about me? I read his bio, I said. Yes, I was UCI PIO for about ten years, said Clark. Worked for the LA Times at the OC office before that. 

[UPDATE: Just heard back from Mr. Clark:

Roy - L... O... [email address given] is the person I remember as having got off the boat in Central Baja before it being lost at sea. I believe he is still engaged as a consultant to the Ranch. - Wayne 

He gave me the guy's full name, but I want to contact him and discuss his own recollections before I say more. --I've contacted Mr. LO. It'll be interesting to see what he says, if he responds.]

Laurence Schmit, giving a speech

     —Well, that’s about it. Clark is an old fellow and seems nice enough. I didn’t want to bother him further. He said he might be able to remember the name of the “passenger” who got off the Shooting Star. “If you remember the name,” I said, “you can call or email me. I’d very much appreciate that."

* * *

     I did a little digging after the phone call, and now I’ve got new questions. Evidently, Supervisor Schmit, the guy Clark worked for for several years, was very much a full member of the OC “shadow government,” as DA Hicks used to describe it. (See Peterson's article below.) He took office in 1975. After his 1978 reelection defeat, he moved to Northern California.
     Phil Anthony started out on the Westminster City Council, became mayor, and then served as a Supervisor from 1976 to 1981. He’s served on various boards since then. (See.)
     You can read about Moiso here and here. He’s still very much a player also (he’s only 72).
     I’ll close with this excerpt from the 1984 Orange Coast Magazine article: The Sinking of a Political Machine by Larry Peterson:

Larry Peterson (1984)

     …The voyage was supposed to be a celebration of Caspers’ re-election only a few days before. The victory was engineered by [“Shooting Star” owner Fred] Harber, who had close links to Dr. Louis Cella and other political figures who later were to be indicted on charges ranging from fraud and embezzlement to campaign-finance cover-up and bribery.
     At the time, Cella headed the closest thing Orange County has ever had to a political machine. [Please note: Fuentes’ turn as county GOP chair started in 1984 and lasted about twenty years. He also is often described as having constructed and maintained a “machine.”] In the mid-seventies, Cella and south Orange County land baron Richard O’Neill teamed up to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to dozens of candidates.
     District Attorney Cecil Hicks, close to the country’s Republican establishment, fought a running battle with Cella. Hicks once publicly accused the doctor of heading a “shadow government” that controlled the county Board of Supervisors. Cella responded by accusing Hicks of alcoholism. In any case, a majority voting bloc [including Caspers], usually consisting of recipients of Cella’s political largesse, repeatedly helped stymie Hicks’ attempts to investigate Cella and his allies.
     Within four years after the sinking of the Shooting Star, most members of the shadow government had been driven into political exile. Some, indeed, were behind bars, and others were fighting rear-guard legal battles that would end in their incarceration.
     Cella was convicted in 1978 of using a hospital he owned to defraud the federal government of hundreds of thousands in Medi-Cal funds, much of it used to underwrite his campaign contributions. After serving time in federal prison, he moved to Coachella. County Supervisor Robert Battin, for whom Harber had been an aide, was convicted in 1976 and briefly jailed for illegally using county funds to help his unsuccessful 1974 bid for the Democratic nomination of lieutenant governor. He now practices law in Santa Ana. Supervisor Laurence Schmit, a Cella ally and a major beneficiary of his political influence was defeated in his 1978 re-election bid. He moved to Northern California. Supervisor Ralph Diedrich, who tried to reassemble the shattered machine, was convicted in 1979 on bribery charges. Recently released from prison, he, too, has left the county. [Land baron Richard] O’Neill—never accused of wrongdoing—eventually became chairman of the state Democratic party. But that was only after years of virtual political hibernation during which he lived down the onus of his alliance with Cella.

Moiso and Governor Brown in January

     Cella, interviewed last year in Coachella, where he practices medicine at a farm workers’ clinic, said the sinking of the Shooting Star marked the “death knell” for his role as a power broker.
     The loss of Harber, he said, deprived him of his political allies of a “political genius,” who, had he steered the boat safely home, could have helped pilot the shadow government through troubled political waters.
     And, in Caspers, Cella added, the group lost a reliable ally who could have helped push through a Cella-backed move to investigate the district attorney’s office and blunt any possible probe of the Cella-O’Neill combine.
     “If Caspers had lived, we would have had the votes to stop Hicks,” said Cella. “He was a very strong vote against Cecil and he disliked Cecil even more than Fred did.”
     Battin agrees with Cella’s assessment, calling the loss of Harber and Caspers “the beginning of the end.” [END] 

      So, if Peterson has his facts right, our guy Wayne Clark was the executive aide to someone very much tied to Cella’s “machine.” And his job was to keep him out of jail? Well, he seems to have accomplished that.
     And the mystery passenger? He went to work for Tony Moiso and Rancho Mission Viejo—the company of Richard O'Neill, Cella's partner? [L.O.?]
      It’s all very odd.

* * *

ANOTHER EXCERPT FROM  The Sinking of a Political Machine
by Larry Peterson:

[WAS IT MURDER?]

     ...Neither bodies nor pieces of the wooden hull of the ship were ever found....
     The Coast Guard investigation failed to determine why the life jackets apparently were not used or why radio reports before the sinking indicated different positions.
     Also still a mystery is why no one, according to the official report, apparently was able to transfer from the Shooting Star to the lifeboat. 

Robert Battin

    Another discrepancy that remains unexplained is that a mayday message picked up by a research vessel in the area said there were nine persons aboard.
     And still subject to guesswork—and not addressed by the report—is why, according to witnesses, the party on board suddenly forsook plans for two days of leisurely marlin fishing and headed—apparently in a hurry—for San Diego.
     The Coast Guard said it found no evidence of fire or explosion aboard the lifeboat. But at least one person believes there was an explosion aboard the Shooting Star and that it was set off deliberately.
     Private detective Neal Graney, who conducted his own unofficial probe, went so far as to publish a 200-page fictional account—Mayday! Mayday! Morningstar—a thinly disguised rendition of his speculations about what happened. The names, of course, have been changed. Currently, he is trying to market a screenplay based on the same theme. “I know I don’t have a smoking gun,” says the former Chicago policeman. “But, in my gut, I’m sure it was murder.”
     Though long on conjecture and short on proof, he also theorized that one of the men aboard knew the yacht was about to blow up and left in the lifeboat before the explosion. That, he argues, explains the mayday report of nine aboard and the great distance between the discovery place of the lifeboat not only from the sinking site but also from the other debris.
     And the bodies? “There are many reasons,” explains one of Graney’s fictional characters. “When bodies go down to the bottom of the sea, they usually float to the top within two or three days. That is, unless they are in small pieces. Then they are fish bait.” As for the condition of the life preservers, some of them damaged but none demonstrably bloodied, Graney attributes that to the impact of metal or wood fragments from the explosion.
     There is some support, however slender, for Graney’s belief that someone got off the boat alive. One former west Orange County elected official told me he thinks he saw a member of the ill-fated party about three years ago in Hawaii.

Richard O'Neill and family, 1950

     At the time, the former official says he was on the beach near the Pacific Beach Hotel in Waikiki, and the supposedly deceased man crossed the street nearby.
     “It looked so much like him that I just yelled his name without thinking that he was supposed to be dead,” said the vacationer, who was well-acquainted with the Shooting Star passenger he thinks he saw. “He took off and disappeared into the crowd….I’m sure that, when I yelled out, he would have recognized me….It seemed deliberate.”
     Scenarios just as bizarre as Graney’s based more on conjecture than provable fact, have been widely circulated and are passed on by Cella, Battin and others to anyone who asks.
     Details vary, but the essentials are this: Somebody hired either organized crime-related figures or a right-wing paramilitary group to blow the Shooting Star out of the water.
     Implausible as that may seem, there is some evidence that the boat would not normally have sunk, even with the pounding it took from heavy seas. Louis Fallows, co-owner of the Wilmington-based firm that was one of the government’s contractors for the type of naval rescue boat that was rebuilt to create the Shooting Star, is graphically emphatic on that question. She said the boats were built with air-tight compartments that would have buoyed themselves so much that it wouldn’t have sunk completely even if there were a big hole in the hull. “The only thing that would have sunk it would have been if it were blown apart,” she said, without being prompted by being told of theories about an explosion.
     Why anyone would want to deep-six the Shooting Star, especially in the manner Graney suggests, is unclear.
     But evidence that Harber and Caspers were up to potentially dangerous mischief at the time surfaced four years later. In 1978, developer Richard V. Jordan alleged in a suit against the county that the two were trying to shake him down for a $10,000 payoff plus $2000 a month for approval of a project he wanted to build near El Toro, in Caspers’ supervisorial district.
     The county settled out of court on Jordan’s claim that the county illegally revoked his building permit, paying him $700,000. The matter was investigated by the district attorney’s office to determine whether persons still alive might be criminally liable, but that probe ended inconclusively.
     As it turns out, preliminary discussion concerning the alleged deal took place in Mexican waters aboard the Shooting Star, Jordan said in papers filed with his lawsuit.
     Before the arrangement could be consummated, however, Caspers, Harber and the others departed on the fateful trip. Ironically, Jordan said, he was invited along, but declined because he didn’t think the Shooting Star was seaworthy. But the Coast Guard cited reports that deficiencies on the boat had been corrected prior to the trip.
     Jordan, the record shows, knew how to seek and obtain remedies for his grievance in a court of law. But one is tempted to ask: Were Harber and/or Caspers using the same routine on anyone else, perhaps someone prone to resort to different—and more violent—remedies?
     That might be a point of departure for any resumed investigation of the disaster. For years, however, there has been no evidence of any official interest in the matter—with one exception. In the past year or so, the FBI, questioning a politically connected Orange County person on a different matter, slipped in some questions about the Shooting Star. That doesn’t amount to a new probe, of course. But ten years later, even a residue of official curiosity at any level is intriguing.
     Still, until the questions left hanging by the official report are answered, who is to say that Graney’s explicit but seemingly farfetched version is wrong? Those questions, of course, may never be answered. And the tale of the last voyage of the Shooting Star may make as good a whodunit ten years from now as it does today.

SEE Part 7

SEE ALSO What sank the "Shooting Star"?

The Evangelical right reveals itself

Effort to reach out to Muslims stirs outcry (OC Reg)

     An outreach effort to Muslims initiated by Saddleback Church in Lake Forest has sparked a national uproar among evangelical Christians, with some accusing the Rev. Rick Warren, Saddleback's pastor, of betraying core Christian principles and Warren responding that his beliefs and intentions have been misrepresented.
     Since an Orange County Register article published Feb. 26 detailed the outreach effort, evangelicals across the country have taken to blogs, social media and Christian news outlets to debate whether and how Christians should forge relationships with people of other faiths.
     Longtime critics of Warren have published lengthy online accusations that the influential pastor, who delivered the invocation at President Barack Obama's 2009 inauguration, has gone too far in seeking theological common ground with Muslims.

"Our God is Jesus, not Allah"

     In a series of phone conversations Feb. 27, David Chrzan, Warren's chief of staff, told this reporter and a Register editor that the story was factually correct except in its statement that Warren believes Christians and Muslims worship the same God. It would be more accurate to state that Christians and Muslims both believe in one God, Chrzan said.
. . .
     Warren said he does not believe Muslims and Christians worship the same God. "We worship Jesus as God. Muslims don't," he wrote. "Our God is Jesus, not Allah."
. . .
     On Saturday, Saddleback emailed to church members a statement from Warren entitled "On Responding to False Accusations." The statement summarized what it called "many errors and false assumptions" in the Register's Feb. 26 story.

Damage control out of control

     The statement said Saddleback has not entered into a partnership with any local mosque, has not agreed not to evangelize Muslims and has not entered into any theological agreement with Muslims.
. . .
     David Mitchell, senior pastor at Calvary Church in Santa Ana, said he also was confused about the outreach effort's intentions after reading about it in online publications.
     Told about the King's Way Agreement's claim that Christians and Muslims "believe in one God," Mitchell replied: "I would not sign my name to that or support that. It implies that Muslims and Christians have the same beliefs. ... To say Muslims and Christians believe in one God could lead to an incomplete or false view of the God of the Scriptures."….

The sinking of the Shooting Star, part 5: psychics & shadow governors & seriously special executive aides

Just what happened on the night of June 13, 1974?

The entire “Fuentes/Shooting Star” saga can be found here.

     THE SECOND VOLUNTEER SEARCH. By Tuesday, the 18th of June, 1974, the disappearance of the Shooting Star and her crew of ten, including OC Supervisor Ron Caspers, was a big news story, and, though it had been nearly five days since the SS’s MAYDAY (late Thursday night), there was considerable interest among the public in launching another civilian search, even as it was clear that chances of finding any survivors were almost nil. A large prayer meeting occurred in the Supervisors’ meeting room. Meanwhile, plans were made.

Ron Caspers

     Even more aircraft were involved in this second effort, including planes to ferry personnel to and from Guerrero Negro. Early Wednesday, at OC Airport, there was a briefing, and then the squadron headed south, commencing a search of Vizcaino Bay (the waters between the Baja coast and Cedros Island) by noon. This time, there was considerably more ground support as well, including a tanker with 4000 gallons of aviation fuel and a radio network, linked to the Supervisor’s office and command post back in Santa Ana (Orange County). There was even a massive effort to photograph and search the Baja beaches, using planes and four-wheel-drive vehicles.

Way out west: Guadalupe Island

     GOOD LORD, PSYCHICS! Plus: psychics got involved:

On Wednesday, a well-known psychic was flown to the search area, meeting with the volunteers at the El Presidente [hotel in Guerrero Negro] that evening to give his impressions of the voyagers washed up on a rocky island and huddled in caves. He was flown next morning to scan islands where he felt survivors might be found. One of the photo planes was dispatched to Guadalupi Island, 200 miles to the west, to photograph its shores after another seer had a vision of the men clinging to rocks there. (From "The Last Voyage of the Shooting Star, part 2," by Wayne Clark; Orange County Illustrated, Dec., 1974)

     Gosh, I wonder if they tossed chunks of cash into the ocean, too? That would have been more useful.

Guadalupe Island: psychic misdirection

     THE COAST GUARD (TRIES TO) PULL THE PLUG. On Wednesday night, the Coast Guard, a more objective player, decided to give up the search, but the usual suspects got to California Senators Tunney and Cranston, who pressured Coast Guard bigwigs in Washington, and so the Venturous and search planes, already heading home, turned back to the search area. On Thursday, they resumed a search “southeast along the drift line from the debris area, offshore from Turtle Bay.” Meanwhile, the civilians scanned 75 miles to the south in a strip of ocean from the coast to 50 miles out.
     Nothing was found.
     Thursday evening, a week after the sinking, the Coast Guard finally headed home, but the volunteers back in Guerrero Negro planned for yet another day of searching, this time further south another 100 miles.

Tom Fuentes, 1973

     YOUNG TOM FUENTES PULLS THE OTHER PLUG. On Friday morning, however, just as the squadron was ready to set off, they got a call from the Santa Ana command post, which

insisted they abandon the plan and return home. Caspers’ executive aide, Tom Fuentes, reasoned the risk of one of the volunteer planes going down at sea was too great, now that the Coast Guard had withdrawn. The chance that any of the Shooting Star party still survived was also very slim. Reluctantly, the volunteer squadron returned home. (LVSS)

     I find this odd. —Not the decision, but who seemed to make it. Fuentes could not have been senior among the crew back in Santa Ana, which seemed to count some fairly powerful county figures among its members. He was a mere Supervisor’s aid and at most 25 years old. He had no military or rescue experience.
     Why was this green kid making decisions for the search effort? Why would he be even advising the éminences grises huddled in that office in Santa Ana?
     I’ve got other questions.

Tommy Klein, Supervisor
Clark's "executive aide"

     Keep in mind that the writer of the account I am here relying on—Wayne Clark—had been or was at the time a Supervisor’s deputy, whatever that is. I’m not entirely sure about the chronology, but Clark seemed to have ended his PIO job at UCI in about 1973 or 1974, and the next job listed in his bio is the “Supervisor’s deputy” gig (I haven’t determined which Supervisor). If Clark had that job at the time of the SS disaster, it seems likely that he was friendly, or at least acquainted, with some of the principals of this story. Consider the Shooting Star crew: Caspers, of course, was a Supervisor, and Fred Harber, the yacht’s owner, was the mastermind of several recent election victories (including Caspers, I believe). Tommy Klein, like Fuentes, was a Supervisor’s (viz., Ralph Clark’s) “executive aid.” (You'd think the five executive aids--and deputies?--would be chummy, but who knows.)
     Was Clark acquainted with some of the victims of the Shooting Star disaster? And was he close to Fuentes or to others directly involved in commanding or executing the search efforts?
     And, again, why does Fuentes have so prominent a role?
     Possibly, Fuentes was close to Caspers’ family and to Caspers’ wife. I came across an article about the SS disaster (dated 6/24/74) that reports:

   Fuentes said he and Caspers’ wife, Ann, had asked Caspers not to make the trip. “Premonition is perhaps too strong a word to use here,” Fuentes said, “but Ann and I had a bad feeling about the whole thing. Neither of us liked the boat.”

     I dunno. Maybe Fuentes was close to the family and that gave him special authority with regard to whether the search effort should continue.
     No doubt there are perfectly good answers to my questions. I wonder if Clark is still around? I might give ‘im a call.

* * *

Cella's search heads south

     POLITICAL BOSS CELLA, HOWEVER, WON'T GIVE UP. So, on the 21st, based evidently on Fuentes’ concerns for the safety of searchers, the large volunteer search effort was called off.
     But Dr. Louis Cella, a close associate of Caspers and Harber (and the boss of OC’s then political machine—aka the OC “shadow government”), pushed on with great determination. He hired four airborn spotters for the tuna industry to scan the area south of Cedros Island all the way to Magdalena Bay, 300 miles away. They found nothing.
     Cella also hired (through a Mexican go-between) perhaps as many as 200 villagers to search the beaches. That effort was continuing as Clark was writing his articles (in late 1974).
     As I indicated earlier, the SS’s Boston Whaler was eventually found on July 4 by a Swedish freighter, 60 miles south southwest of Magdalena Bay. (That’s 350 miles south of where the other debris was found.) The whaler was “awash” with its outboard motor “attached.” There “were no signs of fire or explosion,” writes Clark. The Coast Guard examiner was convinced that none of the crew had been aboard.
     According to some calculations, the Coast Guard searchers likely passed over the whaler several times without spotting it.

* * *

     Clark ends his story with the conclusion of two court hearings:

Ronald Caspers, Fred Harber, Caspers’ two sons, Erik and Kirk, Leonard Bashor, his nephew, Robert Bashor, and son-in-law, Richard Tully, Thomas Klein and his two brothers, Timothy and John, died at sea June 14, 1974, in the vicinity of the San Benito Islands, off the coast of Baja California. (LVSS)

John Klein and his daughters (not long before the Shooting Star disaster)

* * *

     THE COAST GUARD REPORT. I’ve looked over the Coast Guard report of the Shooting Star case. Below are some elements of that report that strike me as interesting.

* There’s a cover letter, dated 8/2/74, from J. M. Bowen, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Search and Rescue Branch TO an attorney in Ogden Utah (the Klein brothers were from that area). The letter explains the Coast Guard effort. It ends with this: “The names of the reported ten persons on board, including John and Tim Klein, were provided to the Coast Guard by Mr. Tom Fuentes, of Supervisor Ronald Casper’s [sic] Office.” It then provides Fuentes’ phone number.

* According to the Coast Guard report, the Shooting Star was constructed in 1947; it had a 340 hp diesel engine; it was 63 feet long and it had a wooden hull.

* The CG estimates that, at the time of the MAYDAY, the SS was “approximately fifty miles northwest of San Benito Island….”

* There’s a “record of missing.” Ronald Caspers is listed as living on Lido Isle, Newport Beach.

* All three Klein brothers are listed as living in Roy, Utah.

* “Weather on 13 June … in the area of San Benito Island … was overcast, visibility unknown; wind was fifteen to twenty-five knots, gusting to forty knots; seas and swells were running from the northwest at ten to fifteen feet….”

Roy, Utah, is in the Ogden area

* “The vessel Scandia, while anchored in the Gulf of Baja, Mexico, was attempting to contact KMI Oversees Radio when the distress call from the Shooting Star came over the air. The Scandia copied the message as “Mayday/Mayday, this is the Shooting Star, fifty miles south of Turtle Bay, sinking, nine people on board.” The Scandia then contacted KMI Radio and informed them that they had also heard the distress call. KMI acknowledged at that time but also stated that the position that the Scandia had copied was not the one that KMI had heard. KMI stated that the radio station had copied fifty miles out but could not hear anything else for the position. The Scandia stated that they heard fifty miles south of Turtle Bay.”

* “The two life jackets that were recovered from the debris were in a torn and semi-mutilated condition. The life jacket that was in the worst condition [difficult to read] was delivered to the Long Beach [illegible] criminology laboratory for testing of traces of blood or of any other substance. All tests and reports were negative. The life jacket check [ties?] were [tied?] at the time of recovery. One life jacket tie was tied in a bow and the other tie was tied in a knot. The lower straps on the jacket were clasped closed, although the straps were ripped, torn and/or severed. The body of the jackets were ripped and torn in several places with one [illegible] chest pad missing entirely from one of the life jackets. It is not known in what manner the life jackets were [stowed?] prior to the casualty. It is known that some of the life jackets were new and were stowed while still in the original plastic bags prior to the vessel’s departure from the United States.”

Tim Klein on the Shooting Star, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico

* “The thirteen-foot Sea Witch (i.e., the Boston Whaler) that was recovered by the ... Nihon [i.e., the Swedish ship] was examined by the U.S. Air Force Investigators … This investigation revealed the following:

When the small boat was located, it was awash with [seas?] boarding the small craft over the stern. … The outboard motor, a 30-horsepower Evinrude, was still attached to the vessel but the controls, including the fuel lines, were all torn loose and adrift in the bottom of the vessel. There were no portable fuel tanks in the boat. … The Master of the Nihon stated that when the boat was recovered there were no signs of fire or explosion. … The investigator from the Canal Zone stated that it was his opinion that the craft did not contain any survivors prior to the time it was picked up by the Nihon. … Upon inspection of the debris when returned to the Coast Guard Base, Terminal Island, California, it was noted that the cradle which housed the small boats was undamaged. The crome padeyes that a nylon grip[e?] attached to were undamaged. There was no evidence of forcible separation of the small boats from the Shooting Star.” 

. . .

Shooting Star crewmen John and Tim Klein: proud Marines

* “The last insurance survey [after the near casualty in 1971] was conducted on the vessel Shooting Star on 17 March 1972…. Applicable sections pertaining to the condition of the hull of the vessel are quoted from the report:
     “Inspecting the vessel externally found topsides to be in fair condition… at this time we do not deem rework necessary.”
     “Inspecting the vessel internally in all accessible areas found structural members to be in fair condition with no apparent fractures noted….
     “…The vessel Shooting Star was hauled from the water at Windward Yacht and Repair, Inc., in Marina del Rey on 21 Sept. 1972 and … repair was accomplished…. Mr. G[illegible] stated that the vessel, to the best of his knowledge, was in good shape.”

CONCLUSIONS

     The Shooting Star sank … at about fifty miles northwest of San Benito Island…. This location was determined as the most probable position for the sinking by U.S. Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Center, Long Beach, CA.
     The exact cause of the sinking of the Shooting Star is unknown, although heavy weather may have been a contributing factor.
     The differences in the location as passed to KMI Overseas Radio and as overheard by the vessel Scandia cannot be positively resolved but it is felt that because of atmospheric conditions the words “south” and “but” were confused by either one of the involved parties. It cannot be determined which word is correct.

From the Coast Guard report

. . .
     It cannot be determined if the life jackets were or were not used by the persons on board the Shooting Star.
     It cannot be determined whether or not any persons were, at any time, in the thirteen-foot Sea Witch, nor can it be determined that the small craft was or was not forcibly removed from the Shooting Star.
     The cause of the damage to the life jackets and the small boat cannot be determined.
     The incident that occurred at Dana Point in July, 1971, did not contribute to this casualty.
     The work that was accomplished on the vessel after the survey … corrected all the deficiencies that were listed in the survey report….
     The deficiencies as listed in the survey of July, 1973, most probably were not contributory to this casualty.
     There is no evidence of foul play…. [For a brief discussion of Neal Graney's "murder" theory, see Part 1 of this series.]

RECOMMENDATIONS:

     It is recommended that no further action be taken and this case be closed with the submission of this report.

     L.P. Minott, Jr.

SEE Part 6
SEE ALSO What sank the "Shooting Star"?

The Coast Guard's Venturous

Of Horseheads and Scissors (Rebel Girl)

In this morning's New York Times, an essay on the Op-Ed page reminded Rebel Girl of horseheads and scissors and other recent occurrences.

Rebel Girl knew from the title, "Each Teacher Wonders, Is This the One?" exactly what the writer was up to.

Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, a part-time sociology teacher at various colleges in New York City writes about her classroom encounters with angry students and puts them in the context of violence on campus, the vulnerability of the classroom teacher and the absence of effective processes to assess threats.

excerpt:

But students have also gotten angry at me and blown up. I’m used to people crying when they don’t get the grades they think they deserve. A woman once threw an umbrella across the length of the classroom because I marked her late. When I told another student that he had been dropped from the class for nonattendance, he recorded the exchange and threatened to report me to my supervisor...

I know I’m not the only teacher who, facing down an angry student, worries that he could come back firing off more than snide comments.

The levels of trust and openness that are necessary for teaching are diminished every time someone opens fire in a classroom. Idle comments become vaguely menacing threats. Classrooms are no longer just about learning but also about observing — watching to see who seems upset, uninvolved, angry.

In the aftermath of the Virginia Tech shooting, schools were quick to institute (and advertise) new text-message alert systems and extra security measures. But in my experience they’ve been less clear on how to report worrisome behavior or determine if a threat is legitimate.

To read the article in its entirety, (and you should), click here.

*
image by Jing Wei (from the New York Times)

Irvine Valley College commencement speaker announced

Maxwell, pig

     This year's IVC commencement speaker is none other than Maxwell, the popular Geico spokespig.

Roquemore

    As per the college's procedures, a committee advanced three candidates to President Glenn Roquemore, who carefully weighed his options for several weeks. Evidently, this week, Roquemore settled on the porcine television personality.

     This year, the selection process was somewhat controversial. One faculty member on the committee was unhappy that none of the candidates advanced to the President was a scholar, writer, or artist. Instead, the forwarded candidates comprised successful business leaders or, in the case of Maxwell, a spokespig for a successful insurance company.
     Further, said the instructor, none of the candidates was a woman.

     "Only one woman has been chosen to speak at commencement at this college in the last twenty years," said the dissenting instructor, who asked to be referred to as "Rebel Girl."

     If that fact bothered Roquemore, he certainly didn't show it. In a press release, he is quoted as saying, "we feel that Maxwell represents the values and the vision that we want people to associate with IVC. Maxwell and IVC are a good fit."

     

 "Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Wee wee wee wee weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"

Vision

Thursday doodle

doodlin' during The Mentalist