Thursday, March 20, 2008

Now it’s USC—will they knuckle under?

Just posted in the OC Register: Little Saigon activists tell USC to take down Vietnam flag
.....Activists from Little Saigon say they are putting the University of Southern California on notice over a Socialist Republic of Vietnam flag that flies on campus.
.....Three activists – Hung Nguyen, An Son Tran and Tung X. Nguyen – approached an employee of the University Relations department on campus last week to make an official request that the school remove what is perceived as the communist flag by Vietnamese Americans or replace it with the red and yellow former South Vietnamese flag.
....."The red and yellow flag is the official flag of the Vietnamese American community," Hung Nguyen said. "The university has hundreds if not thousands of students from our community and they should honor our sentiments about the flag."
.....But USC officials don't plan to remove or replace the flag, said university spokesman James Grant.
.....USC is among the nation's most diverse campuses and has thousands of international students attending, Grant said. So far, no student has complained about this particular flag, he said.
....."The flags have been in our main building for a long time," he said. "They were made to conform to state and United Nations standards. We see no need to take them down."
.....The activists approached Irvine Valley College last month with a similar request. The college took down its entire exhibit of miniature flags from 144 countries after Westminster Councilman Andy Quach and Garden Grove Councilwoman Dina Nguyen and the activists objected to the presence of the communist flag in the exhibit.
.....Hung Nguyen said he and others intend to visit all California's campuses and urge them to remove the communist flag.
.....The Union of Vietnamese Student Associations, based in Garden Grove, also sent out a letter to USC two weeks ago after a Vietnamese American student there told them about the flag, said Bao Mai, a senior member of the student union.
.....“We have a good community of Vietnamese students, a few hundred, in USC,” he said. “We don’t want to see a large-scale protest happen there. We want to resolve the issue before that.”
.....But the students union would certainly join in a protest if it happens because USC has a Vietnamese Student Association on campus and is a member of the union, Mai said.
.....Hung Nguyen said community members from Little Saigon will attempt to have a discussion with top USC officials to make them see why the local Vietnamese American community is extremely sensitive to the issue.
.....The rapidly growing Little Saigon community is primarily composed of refugees who fled Vietnam in the '70s and '80s after the communist takeover in that country in 1975.
....."Our first step is to give them the information," he said. "The second step is to have a discussion between our Vietnamese elected officials and university officials to see if they will take down the communist flag. Our last resort will be to protest the university's approach to this issue."
.....Quach said he has not been approached by Nguyen to talk to university officials.
....."It is of course at the discretion of the university, but I don't think the university understands the political and emotional implications of their decision," he said.
.....Quach said he might send them a video tape of the 1999 protest of a Little Saigon video store owner who displayed a large banner of Ho Chi Minh outside his store. Thousands thronged outside the store in protest.
....."The video will show them how strongly anti-communist this community is and how strongly we feel about it," Quach said.
.....Grant said the university respects the community's sentiments about their flag.
....."They do have their right to express their feeling and opinions," he said. "But I don't think we did anything wrong by flying that flag. It is Vietnam's official flag."

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello! Trust me, no one is going to tell USC what to do, except those running the very expensive university & their donors.:-)

Anonymous said...

Has Glenn said BOO yet?

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. I like how they're going to show USC officials a video - can someone spell threat?

Maybe USC officials can counter and share them a video of how the LAPD often treats protestors.

Anonymous said...

I thought if we just gave them what they wanted that they would go away...?

Glenn? Glenn? Where are YOOOOU?

Anonymous said...

And I believe that's the first and last time IVC and USC will ever be mentioned in the same breath in a news story. Unless of course there are many more stories about this flag business, in which IVC will repeatedly be referred to as the college that folded under pressure!

Anonymous said...

These people are becoming tiresome boors. It must be nice to have so much free time to travel the state looking for offensive flaggage.

Anonymous said...

"Tiresome boors" - eliticism at its best!

Anonymous said...

12:10:

Uh, did you mean athleticism perhaps?

Anonymous said...

Go Trojans!

Anonymous said...

What's wrong with being elite?

torabora said...

There is one flag that should be flown right now...the Tibetan flag.

I NEVER thought there could be ANYTHING Speaker Pelosi and I could agree on and she is right on the money with this grief she is causing the Chicoms. Bully for her!

Free Tibet!

Anonymous said...

Chicoms? Sounds like you've been reading too much Tom Clancy.

I spent six weeks in Tibet back in the mid-80s, and there's no doubt that it's an Occupied Country. The Tibetans don't like the Chinese, and the Chinese don't like the Tibetans.

With that said, before the Chicoms got there, Tibet was a feudal theocracy with one of the world's lowest rates of literacy and one of the highest rates of infant mortality. About 80% of the land was controlled by the monks. Awe-inspiring wonders like the Potola Palace were built with slave labor, and it's no accident that the monastaries look like fortresses.

I agree that in the best of all possible worlds, Tibet would be returned to the Tibetans. But that's about as likely as the US government returning this country to its indigenous inhabitants.

Anonymous said...

Chicoms? Sounds like you've been reading too much Tom Clancy.

I spent six weeks in Tibet back in the mid-80s, and there's no doubt that it's an Occupied Country. The Tibetans don't like the Chinese, and the Chinese don't like the Tibetans.

With that said, before the Chicoms got there, Tibet was a feudal theocracy with one of the world's lowest rates of literacy and one of the highest rates of infant mortality. About 80% of the land was controlled by the monks. Awe-inspiring wonders like the Potola Palace were built with slave labor, and it's no accident that the monastaries look like fortresses.

I agree that in the best of all possible worlds, Tibet would be returned to the Tibetans. But that's about as likely as the US government returning this country to its indigenous inhabitants.

Anonymous said...

Shame on IVC!. USC officials will not be threatened by such ridiculous request.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...