Monday, February 11, 2008

They're making a list, they're checking it twice

SH*T LIST. The big news around campus is our receipt of the action letter from the accreditors. It looks like the DOE climbed all over ACCJC/WASC and is forcing the latter to stick by the rules. That’s not so good for our colleges, since the rules are that colleges that remain “out of compliance” for two years get their ticket pulled. Guess what? Yup. Thanks to Raghu and his board pals, both colleges have been out of compliance for three years. Hence the letters (one per college). Luckily, we’ve been given some breathing room. Our next reports are to be filed in October. But can we bring about the cessation of trustee micromanagement, the overcoming of despair, the defining of the undefined and the stabilizing of the unstable in SEVEN MONTHS? The accreditation commission meets in January ('09). If we don’t satisfy them (with our October reports) at that time, they'll pull our ticket. See The Accreditation Letter Arrives.

ENEMIES LIST. On Friday, the OC Reg (Judge sets trial date in CUSD 'enemies list' case) reported on a case concering the former chief of the Capistrano Unified School District:
A trial date has been set for a felony case against retired Capistrano Unified Superintendent James Fleming and former Assistant Superintendent Susan McGill.

…Fleming and McGill were indicted last May by a grand jury over the alleged creation of an "enemies list" of political opponents during an attempted recall effort of all seven members of the Capistrano Unified board of trustees.

Both Fleming and McGill have pleaded not guilty….
Perhaps you’ll recall that our own Raghu P. Mathur is fond of enemies lists. Check out Raghu’s enemies list.

CONTRIBUTORS LIST. There’s an odd little piece in the OC Reg this morning about presidential campaign contributions by UCI and Chapman U professors: O.C. professors spread money among presidential candidates:
Political commentators say you’ll find a lot of liberal professors and executives at colleges and universities. It’s true. But you’ll also find moderates and conservatives at such schools as UC Irvine, Chapman University and Cal State Fullerton, as we learned by examining public online donor records maintained by the Federal Elections Commission.

The donors range from famed UCI economist-mathematician Duncan Luce, who gave $1,250 to Democrat Bill Richardson, to Chapman President and economist James Doti, who gave at least $6,600 to Republicans Rudy Guiliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney.
The article provides a list of professors and administrators and to whom they donated. Check it out.


COMPLAINT LIST. This morning’s Inside Higher Ed reports on the most recent effort to draw attention to the “equity” issue re community colleges and higher ed (Call for Equity for Community Colleges):
American higher education “is not sustainable,” and risks a growing detachment from reality if it does not come to grips with the needs of community colleges and the way higher education and government consistently mistreat the sector.

That unsettling argument was put forth Sunday night in the introductory talk of the annual meeting of the American Council on Education, by Gail O. Mellow, president of LaGuardia Community College, of the City University of New York. Mellow’s critique probably wouldn’t surprise most people who work in community colleges, but it was an unusually public rebuke for the rest of higher education at a meeting of the higher education umbrella group that represents two-year and four-year, public and private colleges.

Mellow argued that the way higher education is categorized, defined and financed have all worked to the detriment of community colleges, even as they educate nearly half of all undergraduates, and significant portions of those who will later graduate with bachelor’s degrees from four-year institutions.

“We must stop giving community colleges straw and expecting spun gold,” she said. “The fact is that what happens to community colleges affects all of higher education. As higher education leaders, we have allowed the baccalaureate and community college systems to develop separately and unequally, with tenuous points of integration and inadequate financial support.”

Added Mellow: “Higher education funding and quality assessment is still premised on what are now nostalgic memories of traditional-aged, upper-middle class college students. Unless we let go of this myth and realistically face the modern demographics of the U.S. college population — who goes and who should go to college — the relevance and status of American higher education in a competitive, global education market will erode.”….

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

Pull our ticket?

Don't we get probation first?

can't they just pull Raghu?

Anonymous said...

Great NOW Glenn and Raghu will demand that everyone rally round - only to screw us afterwards. NO DEAL.

Anonymous said...

I love it when they get that pleading, desperate look in their eyes (and their memos!)...come on, help us, it's for the college..for the students...RIGHT. YEAH. UH-HUH.

I can't WAIT to meet the team when they come back in October! They DO come back don't they? Or do we just send a letter?

Anonymous said...

hee hee hee

Anonymous said...

There's no probation this time. No more game-playing.

If Fuentes pulls another "the problem isn't micromanagement, it's faculty macromanagement" move, we can wave our accreditation status goodbye.

If Wagner pulls another "last-minute additions" to the report maneuver, again, we can wave our accreditation status goodbye.

Think about this. After a decade of trustee micromanagement, how do you bring it about, in seven months, that there's no reason to fear trustee micromanagement?

And after a decade of administrative instability, how do you bring it about, in seven months, that you've got "stability"?

And, unless they plan to hand out fabulous cash prizes and sincere thank-you notes, how are they gonna overcome the "plague of despair"?

I KNOW! FIRE RAGHU!

Yep, that would do it.

Anonymous said...

hmm, that has a nice ring to it but I predict that they'll go down with the ship.

they're like that: waist deep in the Big Muddy and the big fools say to push on.

Anonymous said...

They did it to us - not the other way around. I used to sit on committeews and advisory groups and focus groups, etc. acting in good faith - until I realized THAT NONE OF IT MATTERED. IT WAS ALL TOP DOWN. THEY DON'T CARE WHAT WE THINK.

I WON'T DO IT AGAIN. My time and energy is worth more.

Anonymous said...

Let's take the high road, folks.

Stay cool. The faculty have bent over backwards to write honest and fair accred reports. They refused to play games and left that sort of thing to Mathur, Fuentes, Wagner, et al.

Let's not give the accreds a reason to think that we're on some new tack.

As a faculty. we're just doing the best we can under difficult circumstances and we will CONTINUE to do so.

Your move, Don.

Anonymous said...

We've been living on the damn high road.

People are tired of the elevation.

What's going to happen is this: people will work really really hard to do something then Raghu will appoint Dale Carranza or Ray Chandos to undo it and then the board will rattle their sabers in the hopes of scaring the ACCJC.

Anonymous said...

The board has saber? Are they light sabers? Is Tom Fuentes Darth Vader?

It's worse than I thought.

Anonymous said...

The admin has been curiously silent today - this blog has been busy -- but no emails from the chancellor or the presidents...

What's going on?

Anyone know?

Anonymous said...

I saw Raghu!

He was flying a kite.

Jonathan K. Cohen said...

It may just be a function of the number of years I've spent reading this blog, but I'm beginning to forget what great apotheosis lies at the end if the accreditors pull the colleges' ticket. Assuming that no one changes a thing over the next six months, and that the colleges are deaccredited, who is going to lay that at the feet of the Chancellor and trustees? They may look bad, depending on who's looking, but they're not going to be fired or recalled, are they? Who would do that?

In the absence of such a deus ex machina, who would be hurt by deaccreditation other than the students, whose work would no longer be recognized by transfer institutions?

Anonymous said...

Jonathan:

insofar as the trustees have political aspirations, ticket-pulling would be disastrous for them. It would not likely mean much for students, aside from some useless anxiety, which may or may not build character. When Compton got its ticket pulled, a contiguous community college district in essence took on Compton as a satellite campus, and thus courses taken at Compton transferred as per usual. True, that jewel that is Compton was vaguely tarnished.

Faculty, et al., are doing the only thing they can do: continue to participate in the process honestly and with integrity. If, in the end, Fuentes and crew decide to continue their finger-flippage at the accreds, there's little anyone can do--aside from making friends fast with the folks in Orange and Santa Ana.

Anonymous said...

Maybe the taxpayers of Orange County would revolt if accreditation is pulled and see public education for what it really is - nothing but a scam that sucks up dollars to pay for a bankrupt liberal agenda.

torabora said...

8:27 You mind explaining how how students who become LVN's, or transfer to a four year college to become engineers, or go to work as welders further the liberal agenda?

There is something disconnected about you. Your hurt is seething rage. Who damaged you?

Anonymous said...

I saw Raghu!

He was digging a hole!

Anonymous said...

I think there's a clearly documented pattern of faculty attempts to work within the process that is years in length - and another clearly documented attempt by Raghu et al. to ignore this.

The Accreds have seen this time and time again.

We've done what we can do and no doubt we'll do it again - but it isn't up to faculty and staff - it's really in the other court.

Anonymous said...

Tuesday morning and still no news.

What's up?

Anonymous said...

I saw Raghu!

He was packing a small suitcase!

Anonymous said...

I saw raghu!

He was frosting a cake!

Anonymous said...

I saw Raghu!

He was pointing at his reflection in a mirror!

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...