Thursday, September 6, 2007

Rat bastards & pesky fortuities

THAT INSIDIOUS ALA! As you know, the two colleges of our district have the rare distinction of not being members of the venerable American Library Association.

In some circles, this state of affairs is scandalous, absurd—even unAmerican.

The Board Majority, and especially Trustee Don Wagner, have opined that the ALA are a crew of meddlesome, pornography-loving, child-endangering "liberals," and so, nearly two years ago, they undid the memberships. There was an effort by some trustees to undo the undoing, but it came to grief, owing to a pesky fortuity (namely, Nancy stepped out of the room to answer her phone).

I wonder if Don Wagner and his pals know that, despite our two colleges’ official dissociation with the ALA, the organization’s posters remain prominent on our classroom walls?! I’ve included pictures I took today of some these posters. I found them at Irvine Valley College.

Can someone direct me to similar posters at Saddleback College?

I think I like these posters. They feature celebrities: Orlando Bloom, Keira Knightley, Denzel Washington, Margaret Cho, Stephen Hawking, et alia. These people are depicted reading.

Not one of these celebs is depicted reading pornography. In fact, Denzel is shown reading Dr. Suess!

STINK BOMBS. Among a Chancellor’s jobs is keeping the trustees out of trouble. On that score, too, Mathur is a shitty leader.

At last week’s board meeting, Chancellor Mathur and Trustee Wagner tossed a big stink bomb in the middle of the process whereby the colleges write progress reports to the Accreditors in order to, well, convince the latter that we’re fixing what needs fixing—that is, that the trustees are cutting back on their meddling, that those in despair are less despairing, that administrative flux is giving way to stability, etc.

At last week’s meeting, the authors of the duly written progress report drafts listened in stoic silence to the board discussion of the stink bomb. They watched as the bomb was tossed into their laps. They were told to “incorporate” these seven pages of peevish and incompetent verbiage that, allegedly, represents the trustees’ perspective on the Accreditors’ criticisms and on the views and actions of faculty leadership. In fact, the verbiage at most represents the perspective of four of the seven trustees. It is poorly documented and riddled with confusion and error. It should have surfaced months ago, if at all.

Neither of the colleges knows how to go about the task of incorporation. The whole accreditation effort has been thrown into chaos. The trustees look like total assholes, and it is difficult to see how this episode can avoid worsening our chronic accreditation troubles. That means that we’ll likely be producing more reports.


Meanwhile, it appears that Mathur managed to throw some stink bombs around late last week at a meeting of administrators in which he preached, yet again, that “if you point a finger at someone, three fingers point back at you.”

God, he’s an idiot.

Further, evidently, he distributed some sort of goofy tie clasp to each administrator. Everyone is required to wear it. Administrators are glum, pissed off, demoralized.

Mathur is obviously going through one of his periods of intense peevitude brought on by recognition that no one likes or respects him. Leaders of the various governing groups think that he’s a despot and an asshole. Administrators think he's a duplicitous weasel. Nobody has anything good to say about him. Nobody asks for his advice. People keep leaving burning sacks of sh*t on his doorstep.

His only friend, I think, is Tom Fuentes.


CLUB DAY AT IVC. Well, once again, the atmosphere was decidedly festive today at Irvine Valley College, what with Club Day. I’ve included some photos of the event.

I liked the band. The balloons were fun. Students seemed to be having a good time.

It’s still a good thing to be young and silly and hanging out at IVC or Saddleback.

Now, if only we could get rid of those rat bastards!

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Chunk - can you snap a picture of the tie clasp and post it so that all can see?

Anonymous said...

Who gets the clasps? Will the faculty get to wear them too?

Anonymous said...

If Raghu gave me a tie clasp, I'd wear it but I won't say where.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't posting those ALA posters violate some Board Policy?

Anonymous said...

We have the best balloons at IVC.

Anonymous said...

And just how do the non-male administrators wear THEIR tie clasps? Doesn't anyone else see Ragu's blatant misogyny in all that he does? I hope that information goes in the darned accreditation report!

Anonymous said...

Faculty get SERVICE PINS.

Administrators get TIE CLASPS.

Female Adminstrators can wear their tie clasps where they wish. Perhaps as a hair ornament or a brooch or even a frisky earring.

Anonymous said...

Not tie clasps, folks - just "SOCCCD" pins - and goofy ones at that - Stick them where the sun don't shine!

Anonymous said...

The Service Pins ARE set with gemstones.

Be grateful.

What do the staff get?

Nada.

Anonymous said...

Nipple rings would be a good gift.

Anonymous said...

Ouch.

Anonymous said...

I wish MY classroom had such fine posters.

Where can we get them?

Anonymous said...

One dean had to go home to pick up the pin, having forgotten it. This took me back to childhood days: I got a bunch of demerits once for being out of uniform during a visit from a bishop; I guess the dean didn't want to risk any. Ovaltine for everybody!

Anonymous said...

Depends on whose nipple it is!

Anonymous said...

There's nothing on the walls of my classroom unless I pay to put it there.

I like the ALA posters and commend the folks who chose them and no doubt PAID for them out of their own pockets.

I think it is foolish for our board to discontinue the institutional membership in such an organization - it's not the money at stake for the membership doesn't cost that much. It's the principle. And Wagner and the rest know it. They're being dishonest. They spend more money on SNACKS than on an annual ALA membership.

The librarians should make this decision - not the board. It IS micromanagement of the worst sort.

These literacy posters probably cost less than board spends on snacks, certainly less than the chancellor spends on service pins and tie clasps.

How do service pins and tie clasps that no one wants to wear serve our students, indeed?

Anonymous said...

1:00 am, you're confused. The board never said it was about the money. They always said it was about the principle: tax money spent on a group with a clear left wing bent. There's nothing "dishonest." Re-read Chunk's account again and try to pay more attention next time.

Anonymous said...

Point taken, 8:36 am - but take a look at the board majority's accreditation response where they cite TWO areas of concern about the ALA:

1) yes, is the dastardly nature of those despicable lefty librarians (hmmm, doesn't LAURA BUSH support the ALA? Check it out.)

2) is the $$$

But of course, it IS all grandstanding, ain't it? that's the dishonest part.

Yes, the posters are grand - and oh so subversive. Imagine having posters proclaiming READ at a college!

Anonymous said...

So, whose nipple are we talking about?

Anonymous said...

They may have been interesting on Dot F., but now we'll never know.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...