John Williams' empty, spinning head

As you know, several faculty and students—including atheists, agnostics, and believers—are challenging the SOCCCD's embrace of prayers and religious messages during public occasions such as “opening sessions” and commencement ceremonies. It is, we believe, a violation of the principle of separation of Church and State.

The 2009 Fall “Chancellor’s opening session” (for video, see end of this post), which occurred in August, is cited in the case for at least two reasons.

First, after trustee John Williams was introduced as one who will offer the invocation, he paused to tell a "Biblical" joke-story:

Before the invocation, I thought I’d tell a little Biblical story. Today’s story is about Jonah. In grade school one day, a little girl spoke to her teacher about Jonah and how he was swallowed by a whale. The teacher said it was physically impossible for a whale to swallow a human because even though they’re a large mammal they have very small throats. The little girl said, “But how can that be? Jonah was swallowed by a whale, and the Bible says so.” Again the teacher said it’s physically impossible for a whale to swallow a human. Undaunted, the little girl said, “When I get to heaven, I will ask Jonah.” To this the teacher replied, “What if Jonah has gone to hell?” The little girl replied, “Then you can ask him.”

Second, at the end of the session, the Chancellor played a video that showed numerous patriotic images to the sappy country song, “God Bless the U.S.A.” Toward the end of this video (or slide show), some such words as these are displayed:

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you—Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Well, all of this came up in my recent depo. Here are some excerpts.

The questioner is the district’s attorney, Mr. V. Naturally, I am answering the questions. Occasionally, I’m referred to as the “witness.”

DID TRUSTEE WILLIAMS WRITE HIS LITTLE JOKE?

Q …Do you know who wrote this joke? Do you know if Trustee Williams actually wrote this joke?
. . .
A I would be very surprised if he could string two sentences together without screwing them up. So, no, I don't think he wrote it.

Q … When did you begin holding that belief?
. . .
A Well, I was joking when I said that, but he, I don't think, is a person I would ever expect to be able to produce this paragraph.

Q Okay. So you understood at the time that Trustee Williams was not the author?

A That is my belief.
. . .
Q When did you hold the belief – when did you form the belief that Trustee Williams was incapable of producing a paragraph such as this?

A I have seen much of his writing. … I remember looking at his writing during the suit of 1998 and he's a very poor writer and he often engages in malapropism during meetings. You know, “don't stay in your ivory castle,” … things like that. And so I have a pretty good idea of what he's capable of.

… I would just say that this is so much the kind of joke that is said in those settings [church] and when I combine that fact with the, oh, lack of imagination with this particular fellow, I'm guessing he found this on some Christian site. … Or maybe he heard it at his own church.
. . .
Q Okay. Is there anything that John Williams could say to you that would affect your religious beliefs, Professor?

A Well, I will acknowledge that he is not an authority for me, so I don't know exactly what you're asking.

Q You think John Williams is an idiot?

A Well, only in the loose sense of idiot….

Q So do you believe an idiot could affect your religious views, Professor?

A It's unlikely.

Q Probably would be impossible, right?

A If his head started spinning I'd be interested.

Q Okay. Short of that?

A No. … But, you know, the situation is that I'm sitting in this room where suddenly we're all told to stand without any sensitivity to the possibility that there are people who do not wish to invoke the Lord, but nevertheless he does that, and I find that offensive even though it is unlikely that anything he says will change my mind about the issues of religion.

THE “GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.” VIDEO:

Q … Okay, let's go to the video, the “God Bless the U.S.A.” video. … Have you ever heard -- well, you saw the video; right, you were there [for the opening session]?

A I did see it.

Q And what was the song that the video was -- the slideshow was set to?

A I believe it is a song by a well-known country singer. I don't know who that is but I think the song is called “God Bless the U.S.A.”
. . .
Q In fact, you've heard that song at, you know, Republican or Democratic Conventions?

[Yes]

Q Now, and the slideshow was largely patriotic?

A Yes.

Q But then you get to the – your problem is with the last slide?
. . .
THE WITNESS: If I had the opportunity to do a critique of the video, it would not restrict itself to the last slide but with regard to issues of religion and prayer pretty much it was the last slide.
. . .
Q And were you offended by any of the other slides when you saw them?

A I don't know if “offense” is the right word. I don't – I feel uncomfortable with the kind of sappy patriotic display involved in that kind of video.

Q Let me ask you this: Would you be objecting to this slideshow in this case if it wasn't for the final slide in this presentation?

A Probably not. … Except to say they have very bad taste in music.
. . .
Q Do you know how the district got a copy of the “God Bless the U.S.A.” slideshow?

A I have no idea.

Q Do you know who the author of the slideshow was, who actually prepared the slides?

A I do not.

Q Do you know who the speaker of the slideshow – who do you view the speaker to be of the slideshow?

A Do slideshows have speakers?

Q That's my question, do you view the district itself to be the speaker or one of my clients?
. . .

THE “OOPS” THEORY:

[The district’s attorney begins to push the idea that the video had not been previewed, and so the “Jesus” message was inadvertent.]

A I'm aware that these opening sessions are taken very, very seriously by the chancellor and some members of the board and that they are usually very careful about how they choreograph it and what they do in it. So my guess is they were involved in – at least one or two trustees and the chancellor were involved in choosing the elements, including the video.

Q Do you – have you ever been involved in the planning of a chancellor's opening session?

A No.

Q Have you ever attended meetings where a chancellor's opening session was planned?

A Never been invited.
. . .
Q Do you know if any of my clients watched the slideshow before it was played? … Do you have any factual basis to say “yes, I know that this person watched it before it was played”?
. . .
A I don't – I don't know that. I do know that they are very careful usually about what they present and so it would surprise me if they hadn't viewed it.

Q Do you know if – let's leave Chancellor Mathur aside, do you know if any of the other defendants in this case besides Chancellor Mathur, had seen even a second of the slideshow before it was played? …

You don't know how my clients got a copy of the slideshow?

A I do not.

Q Okay. Any basis, in fact, to say they got it – someone from the community, Orange County community sent it to a whole bunch of people including Chancellor Mathur on the Fourth of July?

A I did not know that.

Q Okay. And do you know if the e-mail that was sent to Chancellor Mathur and 25 other people said "A fitting video for the Fourth of July"?
. . .
THE WITNESS: I'm not aware of any of these facts.
. . .
Q …Do you know what day Fourth of July was in 2009? Do you know if it fell on a workday or on a weekend?

A I don't recall.
. . .

Q Do you know what he did, assuming Chancellor Mathur got an e-mail that was sent to him and 25 other people on a Saturday, the Fourth of July with a subject line, "A fitting video for the Fourth of July," and it had the attachment “God Bless the U.S.A.,” assuming all of those facts to be true; right, do you know what Chancellor Mathur did at that point? … Do you know if Chancellor Mathur ever viewed the entire “God Bless the U.S.A.” slideshow?

A No, I don't know that. I know that he's historically, obviously, very very careful about what he presents during these opening sessions and, of course, it's possible that he slipped up once.

Q All right. Do you know what religion Raghu Mathur is?

A I – I think he is – I'm sure he is religious. I couldn't tell you what religion it is.

Q Do you know if he's Hindu?

A I don't know that.

Q Do you know if – do you know if Raghu Mathur believes that Jesus Christ died for his soul or anybody else's soul?

A I don't – I really don't know. I mean, I have some factoids available to me about his religiousness but they don't paint a very clear picture. I know he is religious but I couldn't tell you anything beyond that.

Q Okay. But my question is do you believe that Chancellor Mathur believed that Jesus Christ died for his soul or anybody else's?
. . .
THE WITNESS: I have no idea.
. . .

BAUER’S CASE AGAINST THE “OOPS” THEORY

Q Were you ever informed that the showing of that slide, the final slide of the “God Bless the U.S.A.” presentation was unintentional?

A I have heard the claim made, but at the board meeting immediately after the August opening session there was reference made to the video. And as I recall it was discussed and praised, and there was an opportunity to explain if it was a mistake and no one took [that opportunity]. All of the board members were there, Raghu was there, and as I recall people expressed the idea that it was very good opening session, and they had only praise.

And when they made those comments they had already heard from, I think, Karla Westphal and possibly Margot who had objected to that video. That's right, that's what happened. They had already objected to the video and that “Jesus” line in particular and after that when the board discussed the opening session, they had an opportunity to explain any error that might have been made. They did not say anything about failing to preview the video. They didn't say they made a mistake. They heaped praise on the session and that was it. So at that point I believed that they were endorsing that video.

Q And they didn't do anything else…after the board meeting?

A Yes, at some point after that board meeting. mysteriously, we hear about a mistake, an honest mistake made. Well, the problem with that is they were at a board meeting in which explicitly Karla and Margot, who are very articulate people, explained the objection to that very video and that very slide. And if ever there was a time to say “sorry we screwed up,” it was just a few minutes later when the board did its reports and Mathur does his report. And they did bring up the opening session, but all they had to say was praise. If there had been a mistake, why didn't they say it then?

So, yes, I did hear about a claim that it was some kind of honest mistake. It does not in my mind fit with the fact they had an opportunity to explain their mistake and, if ever there was an opportunity, that was it and they did not take it. On the contrary they only praised the opening session.

Q Do you know how resolutions are passed by the Board of Trustees?

A I think so. … I think that they have to be agendized.
. . .
Q In fact, … a resolution was agendized [as it turns out, for a subsequent board meeting] and passed concerning that video?

A Yeah.

Q Do you still want an apology or is the resolution not good enough?

[Note: I don’t recall ever asking for an apology. It is possible that, at the aforementioned board meeting, Karla or Margot had demanded an apology.]
. . .
THE WITNESS: I honestly don't remember when the resolution was. My memory was it was the next meeting or the meeting after, but, you know, it would be typical of me to conflate these. [No, my memory was correct.]

But I do remember that the meeting right after that opening session they had just heard very clear, very strong objections to that video during the opening session and I believe they objected to Williams' comments too. … They had just heard these objections, and if you have something to say in response like, well, “we can understand your – that you're upset but we are here to assure you that it was only an honest mistake,” that's when you would say it, but they did not say it….
. . .
…So, you know, in my memory it was a later date that, you know, “we need to come up with an excuse for what happened” and then there's this claim that it was an honest mistake.

Q Do you know when the wheels got rolling on generating a resolution addressing that video?

A I have no idea.

. . . I have every reason to believe that what happened is they showed this video, then very soon after, they had a board meeting where vociferous objections were made to what happened during the opening session. And a few minutes after that, the board gave its reports and Mathur gave his report and they did comment on the opening session. And they said nothing about a mistake and seemed to be uninterested in saying anything but positive things [about the opening session]. And you can watch the video yourself and see for yourself. And at that point I had absolutely no reason to think that these people had made a mistake. On the contrary, they must have thought – they felt pretty good about how it went and what happened.
. . .
Now, I know how the situation works. It probably became clear to them thereafter that they were in trouble now, because if they're going to come up with some kind of excuse after-the-fact it's not going to look too good and that's exactly what happened.
. . .

Q Do you know what religion Marcia Milchiker is?

A I do.

Q What is she?

A I believe she's Jewish.

Q How about Trustee Lang?

A I believe he's Jewish.

Q You believe that Trustees Lang and Milchiker believe that Jesus Christ died for anybody's souls?

A I'm confident that they do not believe that.
. . .


Q …When you saw the “God Bless the U.S.A.” video did you for a second believe that Jesus Christ died for your soul?

A That's a very very odd picture. You're asking me if I had this moment of belief that Jesus Christ died for my soul?

Q Yes.

A I did not.

To see video of the Chancellor’s Opening Session (August 2009), click here.

Williams’ “Jonah” story/invocation: go to 07:20. (video)

The “God Bless the U.S.A” video: go to 2:47:20. (video)

The message about Jesus Christ: go to 2:50:10. (video)

Don, having just seen the video, betrays no indication that anything is amiss with the video:   2:50:31. (video)

Colleen Callahan for Public Administrator

Even me

Last night, while we waited for the start of the March meeting of the SOCCCD board of trustees, a friend hipped me to the fact that Board President Don Wagner, who is running for state assembly, mentions little ol’ me in his campaign statement!

No way! I said.

Yes way, she said.

She showed me. If you go to the OC Registrar of Voters site, you’ll find info about the Republicans running for the 70th Assembly District, including the Wagster. Click on the link to Don’s campaign statement and up comes, well, his campaign statement, where he informs us that “We deserve better from government. I oppose reckless spending, job killing regulations, and ever more taxes and bonds.”

He goes on to quote Ken Mettler, of the California Republican Assembly, Larry Smith of Family Action PAC, and State Senator Mark Wyland. He mentions some endorsements, including “radio host Hugh Hewitt, columnists Michelle Malkin and Star Parker.”

Then he writes:

Even my long time adversary, liberal college professor Roy Bauer, knows I threaten his leftist ideology. He’s written that I’m “an anti-union, liberal-bashing, prayer-making right-winger. But he’s smart.”

Leaders you trust, and the radical left, know that I’m the proven conservative for Assembly.

OK, Don. Send your thank-you note—and, if you’d like more of my special “support,” a fabulous cash prize—to Roy Bauer, School of Humanities and Languages, Irvine Valley College.

P.S.: my niece Sarah likes Gumby and Pokey.

Jody Hoy

Jody Hoy - professor emeritus of Irvine Valley College, writer, photographer, activist, friend - died yesterday, March 25, 2010, at her home in Laguna Beach.




from The Power to Dream: Interviews with Women in the Creative Arts by Jody Hoy:

"There was a theme that was being played out on a daily basis in the lives of practically every woman I knew (not to mention my own): how can a woman satisfy the demands of the creative will and still preserve an intimate life? All the women I interviewed were driven in one direction or another by the fierce imperative of the creative will - whether to art, literature, psychology, or music. And all of them refused to sacrifice the private dimension of their lives: all were unwilling to give up the intimate and sexual rewards of a woman's life...These interviews document the joys and difficulties of being a productive human being in the shape of a woman."

More later.

(All photographs by Jody Hoy)

What happened at tonight’s board meeting, mostly

Sheesh. The board is thoroughly settled into a savage Four-to-Three-itude. The New Majority listens to the New Minority carp. Then they wait a beat. Then they do what they wanna.

I’ll have more details tomorrow (or when I get around to it). I’ll just report the big issue tonight: the hire of a consulting firm to help with the Chancellor hire.

VC Bugay contacted 32 consulting firms, got ten responses, and, in the end, five could show for tonight’s board meeting with a presentation.

Board President Don Wagner brought the item (dead last on the agenda) to the front, and so, first thing, we all sat through five—count ‘em, five!—presentations, each taking about twenty minutes, including Q & A.

First at bat was Community College Search Services (CCSS), represented by a fellow named Don (John?) Romo. He sounded like he knew what he was doing. CCSS evidently helped with the hire of the State Chancellor. Sounds like CCSS does the first interviews. They do all the reference checking. They usually help with a “public forum.”

Trustee Fuentes wanted to know if CCSS would be able to find candidates in the private sector and at four-year colleges. Well, said Don, we’ll advertise in the Chronicle, and, dang, everybody reads that. Yeah, said Fuentes, but are we rushing things? Well, no, said Don, there are always great candidates out there. This thing is “doable.”

Fuentes snorted.

Next up was McNaughton and Associates. Mr. Sperry McNaughton (aka Sharp McSlick) was sharp. And slick. After Riverside CCD went out a couple of times and got nowhere, Sharp swooped in and got the job done. He’s into the new technology—two-way live, long-distance interviews. No need to fly everybody around and waste money. Plus streaming video. Would have this thing done by September.

Fuentes asked again about soliciting candidates from the “private sector.” “That is a challenge,” said McSlick. More Fuentean snortage. McSlick seemed to imply that the search committee would work up the brochure/website, and that got Don Wagner worried. This guy was toast, despite his fine suit, expensive shoes, and smooth ways.

Next up was PPL. The only thing I remember about the name is that the “L” is for “leasing.” Mr. Don Averill (aka Mr. Bland Rumple) was as slick as rusty barbed wire, and not nearly as charming. I bet Fuentes brought ‘im in. He opined that quality candidates are not willing to leave their jobs in mid-term, so you’ve pretty much got to aim for a hire for August (maybe no-can-do) or for January. Fuentes purred. [UPDATE: a friend assures me that Mr. Averill, though unslick, has a considerable reputation for integrity. A really good guy, she says.]

Dr. Gary Owens of Academic Search was kinda slick, kinda not. His firm has 32 consultants, and they’re all ready to put in their 2 cents, which adds up to about 64 cents, and I don’t think anybody liked this guy. He reminded me of that guy who played "dirt" on those commercials twenty years ago.

At long last the ACCT gal got up there--I think her name was Judith Breadwine--and presented what that organization does. Gosh, did I hear her say that, usually, you’ve got two trustees on the search committee? Yep. “We’ve got the biggest ‘black book,’” she said. There’re ways of getting around the calendar problem, she said. Gosh, said Don, according to your schedule, we’re not even rushed to hire somebody by August!

I heard yet another snort.

I’ve gotta go, so let’s just say that Fuentes, Lang, and Williams did their predictable “slow down, you move to fast” routine while Padberg, Jay, and Milchiker did a pretty good, “Gosh, let’s get moving!”

Nancy liked CCSS. They’re a California firm. They hired the State Chancellor. Tom didn't like 'em. What else do you need to know!

Bill noted that, quite possibly, by the Fall, we’ll have three new trustees. So let's get moving!

“I call the question!” barked Nancy.

Boom! They hired CCSS.

Fuentes didn’t even bother to snort.

* * * * *
Tonight, a friend sent this:

Underdog candidate for county office takes on OC political machine (Orange County Local News Network)

Colleen Callahan is not a professional politician. By her account, she’s barely even a novice at the game.

But as a candidate for the obscure county office of public administrator, she finds herself taking on an incumbent who Callahan says is part of Orange County’s fabled political machine.
. . .
Callahan and two others – deputy public guardian Kevin Vann and former Orange school board member Steve Rocco – are running in the June 8 primary against incumbent John Williams, a former cop and longtime public official who has connections to many of OC’s top politicians.
. . .
Callahan worked her way up in the agency, eventually being promoted to oversee a clerical unit that handles the legal paperwork necessary to administer estates.

But she said the department took a turn for the worse when Williams was elected and took over in 2003. Williams, who also serves as a board member of the South Orange County Community College District, was often absent from the office and handed off day-to-day management to his deputy, Callahan said.

“I watched the agency deteriorate,” she said. “The way he reorganized the agency and doubled the management, which wasn’t needed … trickled down to where it started affecting the (staff). They had higher caseloads (so) they couldn’t go out into the field and see the mentally ill.”….

Yeah, like I said, only louder

Ah, the news business. I was telling a friend earlier today that, on a particularly slow news day—a glacial day—local reporters will sometimes pick up on some of our fine reporting here at DtB and then run like hell with it.

We laughed. I then briefly checked out the OC Weekly’s crew of bloggers. And waddyouknow. Not for the first time, our old pal Matt Coker did exactly that!

College District Board's Battle Cry: Send Lawyers, Hired Guns and Money

​The South Orange County Community College District … board votes tonight on whether to pay a private lawyer $25,000 in taxpayer funds for helping negotiate what the district calls the "Mathur settlement." Why the district must settle anything with Raghu Mathur, who in January was fired/didn't have his contract renewed/was lovingly told it's time to tackle new career challenges (depending on who is doing the spinning), is unclear. Why it's paying someone other than the lawyers it already pays to handle labor matters is equally murky. What is known is the lawyer in line to get the dough has more skeletons in his closet than a college anatomy department.

He's Phillip Greer, Orange County Republican politicians' attorney of choice.
. . .
Many GOP movers and snakers hire Greer at the recommendation of John Lewis, who is—how did Moxley put it? Oh yes—an "oily" Republican insider from disgraced, possibly prison-bound ex-Sheriff Mike Carona's old camp.

Greer also represents county Treasurer Chriss Street, who a federal judge earlier this month ruled had breached his fiduciary duty when he attempted to build an empire instead of protecting the assets of a trust he was hired to liquidate.

Street was ordered to pay more than $7 million in damages to the End of the Road Trust.
. . .
Irvine Valley College (IVC) philosophy professor and tenacious SOCCCD board critic Roy Bauer is … succinct in his summation of Greer on his Dissent the Blog:

Greer is the OC Republican mafia's consigliere. He's a total creep.
. . .
Your education tax dollars are at work, South County!

U. of California Leaders Call for Expanding Holistic Review in Admissions (Chronicle of Higher Education)

Leaders of the University of California apologized on Wednesday for recent incidents reflecting racial and ethnic intolerance on several campuses and proposed revising admissions policies systemwide to increase the enrollment of minority students. Speaking at a Board of Regents meeting in San Francisco, Mark G. Yudof, the system's president, said he had asked the Academic Senate to consider requiring all nine campuses to adopt consistent holistic-review practices that consider students' life experiences, as well as test scores and grades. The Los Angeles Times quoted Mr. Yudof as saying, "I want a system that is less mechanical and takes a serious look at a range of talents and skills and history, and takes into account poverty."

Mystery Solved!

As duly noted earlier this week, some were puzzled by the absence of requests for IVC Foundation Scholarship letters of recommendation.

Where had all the letters gone?

Now, there's an answer: computer glitch.

Though not really a glitch, per se.

New computer system + modules (podules?) + adaptation time + lack of resources = no letters of recommendation for this season.

Okay, we get it.

Still one wonders about communication. Why no announcement was made early on. Maybe folks thought faculty wouldn't notice or didn't really care.

Rebel Girl is inclined to imagine that we are at our best when we're asked to solve problems together. She thinks, given a chance, we could have worked it out. Maybe someone would have even suggested that we go back to our old ways for just this year. You know, stone tablets. Pen and ink. Letters printed on letterhead.

Too bad this opportunity was missed.

As someone commented earlier this week, faculty often anticipate the scholarship awards ceremony because of their student applicants - because instructors are asked to be part of the process through composing those letters. These instructors are, in a way, rooting for their students. And the students, when they are notified of their awards - are grateful and let their teachers know.

Rebel Girl has no idea of who among her many students applied for scholarship this year.

*