Tuesday, August 24, 2010

"It's a political decision"

     Remember Republican challenger to Rep. Loretta Sanchez Tan Nguyen? Back in 2006, during the campaign, his senior political advisor was our own Tom Fuentes, SOCCCD trustee.
     But then the Nguyen campaign sent that infamous letter. It was kind of a "Fuentes" thing to do.
     After that, Tom got real scarce.
     Well, the case against Nguyen is still in the courts:

Prosecutor calls congressional candidate a liar (OC Register)
     Former congressional candidate Tan Nguyen was behind a controversial campaign letter to Latino voters from start to finish, federal prosecutor Gregory Staples told jurors Tuesday in opening statements during Nguyen's trial for obstruction of justice.
     Nguyen faces charges of lying to investigators about the letter and asking an uninvolved campaign worker to take responsibility for the mailing sent out to support his failed 2006 challenge of Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Santa Ana.. . .
     The Spanish-language letter, sent on a letterhead that mimicked the name of a prominent immigration reform group, was mailed to 14,000 voters with Spanish last names who'd been born abroad....
     That mailing had warned that "emigrados" could go to prison if they voted. "Emigrado" is ambiguous in Spanish. It can generally mean an emigrant – who may or may not be a U.S. citizen eligible to vote – or specifically a non-citizen in the country with a green card.
     The letter also warned that "a new computerized system" would track new voters and could be accessed by "organizations that oppose immigration.". . .
     During the investigation, Nguyen said he had read an initial draft of the letter in English but had no further involvement with it. He told investigators it was paid for and sent out by a long-time friend and campaign helper, Mark Nguyen, without his knowledge.
     Steward told jurors that the idea for the letter initiated with campaign advisor Roger Rudman.
     But Staples promised jurors he would produce a series of emails showing Tan Nguyen making decisions about the letter and the letterhead, and ordering the database of voters the letter was sent to.
     Staples described a meeting with Rudman, Mark Nguyen and Tan Nguyen, in which Rudman instructed Mark Nguyen on sending out the letter.
     "'Tan doesn't need to know about it,'" Rudman said, according to Staples. "Then both the defendant and Roger Rudman laughed."
     According to prosecutors, Tan Nguyen initially blamed the mailer on 23-year-old office manager Chi Dinh and asked her to take responsibility.
     Dinh was engaged to Mark Nguyen at the time, and they subsequently married. Both are scheduled to testify for the prosecution.
     "Why are you throwing my fiancé under the bus," Mark Nguyen asked Tan Nguyen, according to Staples. "What (Tan Nguyen) said was, 'It's a political decision.'"….

Big, pious apple at the rotten orchard

     Looks like the king of for-profits is claiming that it will be good from now on:

A New Leaf at Phoenix? (Inside Higher Ed)

    When it comes to marketing and recruiting, the University of Phoenix is turning over a new leaf, or so its executives said at a briefing here Monday.
    “We’re doing what we think is right,” said Gregory W. Cappelli, the co-chief executive officer of Apollo Group, which owns Phoenix and other for-profit colleges and schools. The company, he said, is shifting “from a recruiting mentality and culture into one of a long-term relationship” between potential students and recruiters, who’ve been renamed "counselors.”
    The briefing was framed as a discussion about Apollo’s position paper,“Higher Education at a Crossroads,” which touts the for-profit sector as playing an essential role in President Obama’s access and completion goals. But the scrutiny facing the sector, and Apollo’s attempts to push back, dominated the hour or so that Capelli, his co-CEO Chas Edelstein and Joseph L. D’Amico, president and chief operating officer – along with a cache of public relations people – spent with a few reporters.
    In the debate over the role of for-profit higher education, where the good apples/bad apples dichotomy has come to dominate discussion (though some Congressional Democrats have said they see something resembling a rotten orchard), Apollo is actively working to brand itself as an organization chastened and determined to do better, especially after being identified in the Government Accountability Office's "secret shopper" investigation of recruiting practices.
. . .
    In September, Phoenix will stop compensating recruiters based on the number of students they enroll and whether those numbers are on an upward trajectory, criteria that accounted for 32 percent of their evaluations. Instead, performance will be judged entirely on factors such as teamwork and attitude when interacting with students.
    “The purpose of marketing is to inform,” Cappelli said. Edelstein chimed in: “We feel there is an imperative … [in] reaching as many as we can who can benefit” from higher education.
. . .
    Though the executives wouldn’t say quite say that they were trying to frame the company as the good in a sea of bad, that was very much the subtext of what Edelstein and other Apollo executives told a small group of reporters. Going forward, Apollo seemed to be pledging, we’re going to do our best to be honest with you, our students, Congress, everyone. “Transparency is very important,” Edelstein said. “We’re trying to lead the industry.”….

Monday, August 23, 2010

Don Wagner (not) in the news!

     Earlier today, our pal Vern Nelson reported on a recent Prop 19 rally (BOTH candidates for the 70th Assembly District show up to Prop 19 Rally!) in the mysteriously popular Orange Juice Blog.
     The wacky Mr. Nelson emphasizes that “both candidates” for the 70th Assembly District showed up for the rally. According to Vern, those candidates are:
Melissa Fox, a small-business attorney and moderate Democrat
Debbie Tharp …, a “Freedom Republican” in the mold of Ron Paul, with “compassionate libertarian” leanings
     Vern takes care to present each candidate’s views.
     But what about Republican Don Wagner? Isn’t he running, too? He sure is!
     Evidently, in Vern’s mind, Don’s not a major candidate.
     Curiously, Vern’s post ends with cryptic remarks, in paranthases, about “fringe candidate” Don Warner:
I would like to take the opportunity to dispel rumors that a fringe candidate & “social conservative” named “Don Warner” is being secretly funded by the Democrats to take Republican votes away from Debbie Tharp. The DPOC and Melissa deny this and Debbie is satisfied it’s not the case. Mr. Warner has no candidate statement, has less than $500 in his treasury and does not seem to be running a serious campaign or pose a real challenge to either Melissa or Debbie.
     If you’ve been reading DtB, you’ll know that Vern’s description of Warner is curiously similar to the facts about our own Don Wagner.
* * *
     Here’s the scene today at Irvine Valley College, which was buzzing with activity. Man, enrollments are way up and virtually all classes in our School (Humanities and Languages) are closed. Finding parking today was next to impossible.


     Rebel Girl has returned, of course, from her role as Big Cheese at the "Community of Writers" Writer’s Workshop in Squaw Valley. She comes bearing gifts. Some received a fine loaf of Schatt's bread, purchased in Bishop (ever been to that shop?). I, on the other hand, received a fine bumper sticker, which I immediately pasted to my door, where it can be appreciated by all. Below is Dean Feldhus admiring the thing earlier today.


     As we left campus today, the Reb and I came across two brand spankin' new faculty. We said hello and took a pic.


     English instructors, natch. They seemed very pleasant. I tried to tell 'em that the college was a great place to work, but the Reb kept bein' negative. That's us, boy. Heckle and Jeckle, Good Cop/Bad Cop. And, as usual, I was the Good Cop.
     It's a great start to what promises to be a great semester.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

An outrageous conflict of interest at Southwestern College

     Our old friend “100 Miles Down the Road” (aka “Miles”) sent us an article about Southwestern College administrators and trustees. It’s a real hair-raiser.
     You’ll recall that, last Spring, Southwestern College President Raj Chopra placed several faculty on leave, banning them from campus, after they participated in a student rally voicing objections to the board and administration’s massive cuts in course offerings. After considerable media attention and criticism, Raj and his Bullies essentially backed down. The faculty are back to work.
     But these thugs are still in power. And they’re still rotten.
     Now, some of these people are engaging in (or benefiting from or defending) outrageous campaign activities that feature a flashing neon sign that says, “conflict of interest.”
     And they aren’t in the slightest bit apologetic about it.

College VP raised money from contractors he oversees (San
Diego Union Tribune)

     The vice president of Southwestern College hosted a political wine-and-cheese fundraiser at his home, at which many of the invited guests represented companies that do business with the college under contracts he oversees.
. . .
     The fundraiser was to support two incumbents on the college district board who are facing a robust challenge from union-supported candidates displeased with the current administration.
     Nicholas Alioto, the vice president for business and financial affairs, said he invited a broad range of contacts to the May 20 fundraiser for trustees Yolanda Salcido and Terri Valladolid in an effort to get them re-elected.
. . .
     “I think it’s highly unethical for Vice President Alioto to host a fundraiser for contractors who are doing business with the college,” said trustee Nick Aguilar, who has clashed with the other board members and is supporting one of the union-backed challengers.
     “The incumbents have either approved or are going to approve contracts.”
     Donors included Seville Construction Service, which has been awarded $2.7 million in construction management services for a $55 million Southwestern bond project. Seville contributed $2,500 to each candidate.
     Christopher Rowe, who owns Echo Pacific Construction and attended the Chula Vista fundraiser, donated $1,000 each to Salcido and Valladolid. A month later, the two joined a unanimous board vote to approve a $4 million contract with his firm.
     Both trustees raised the same amount from Jan. 1 through June 30: $17,550. All of the contributions landed on May 20, May 21 and June 2 and included the same donors. Of 24 donors, at least seven have or had contracts with Southwestern College, according to a review of campaign forms and district documents by The Watchdog.
. . .
     Alioto and his boss, college president Raj Chopra, said they see nothing wrong with the fundraiser. Alioto said it was important because there is so much at stake in the upcoming election, in which union-friendly candidates are trying to unseat those who support Chopra and Alito.
     “If they take over the board, they will fire Chopra and me,” Alioto said. “I did something on my time on my dime to support candidates that I feel are good for the college.
. . .
     Alioto said he did not see a conflict with the fact that he oversees the business contracts donors have with the college because the board has the final say on those contracts.
. . .
     Anyone bidding on construction jobs funded by the bond proposition must go through a competitive bid process and must be vetted and interviewed, Valladolid said. Then Alioto and Chopra make a recommendation to the board for final consideration.
     Both Valladolid and Salcido said they did not base their votes on who contributed to their campaigns.
. . .
     Calls to contributors at Seville and Echo were not returned.
     Both Salcido and Alioto said they are more concerned with an incident on campus Monday, when teacher’s union members promoted their slate of candidates before a mandatory back-to-school event on a day they were paid to work.
     Andy MacNeil, president of the Southwestern College Education Association, said union members handed out T-shirts and other items promoting candidates Norma Hernandez, Tim Nader and Jesseca Saenz-Gonzalez, but that it was before the official work day started so they were not interfering with college business.
     MacNeil said it was inappropriate for Alioto to host the fundraiser.
     “When the person who is vetting all of the bids and the vendors here on campus is throwing a fundraiser and inviting them to support the candidates who will be voting on those bids, I find it a huge conflict of interest.”
. . .
     “I think any time you deal in government, you have to be concerned about the appearance of impropriety,” said Jeffrey Joseph, associate dean and general counsel for Thomas Jefferson School of Law. “It might appear to some people as pay-to-play. Even if your actions are innocent, they are susceptible of being misinterpreted.”
     Joseph previously ran the San Diego legal office for Caltrans, where he advised officials who work on millions of dollars of transportation contracts every day. He said inviting contractors to a political fundraiser could suggest a future payback.
     “The appearance is that if they contributed that perhaps they will be granted a favor that perhaps someone who didn’t contribute would not,” he said.
     Robert Fellmeth, a professor of public interest law at University of San Diego School of Law, said Alioto’s situation is a symptom of pervasive problem.
     “It’s a regrettable offshoot of our campaign finance system,” Fellmeth said. “I’ve been lobbying in Sacramento for 35 years. We don’t get in to see the members. The campaign contributors do. The agenda is being set by access, and access is determined by campaign contributions.”….

Southwestern College board policies, including "conflict of interest."

Friday, August 20, 2010

ABC News stings U of Phoenix


     Above is a segment of Good Morning America in which ABC reporters do their own sting on a U of Phoenix recruiter.
     I zipped over to the Saddleback College Lariat website, where I found this:


     Vanguard might not be a "for-profit," since it is affiliated with a church. Months ago, when I checked the Lariat website, I found several ads for notorious for-profits. I couldn't find those ads today.

UPDATE: 

     We received the following comment:

I'm David Wescott and I'm working with University of Phoenix. Given that you shared the video, I hope you're willing to let me share this link to get the University of Phoenix response to it. Let people see all the facts and then come to their own conclusions, yes?

      Here's the link that Wescott provides:

University of Phoenix Responds to Recent Media Criticism

     The above U of P response does not address the concern that the rate of student loan default is considerable higher at the U of P than it is at the average public college or university — and yet the "for-profits," including the U of P, get a disproportionate share of federally guaranteed loans. The  response is full of the sort of distortion and flummery (it repeatedly refers to being "fully accredited"— there is no such thing; it implies that an accredited institution ipso facto produces graduates qualified for desired employment; clearly, that is not so) that one might expect from a business that is focused on, well, profit, not education.
     In the U of P’s response, the following remark holds a place of prominence:

However, we’re disappointed that these media reports ignore the thousands of success stories from University of Phoenix students and alumni, the overwhelming majority of whom are successful in their career and proud to be a Phoenix.

     This is mere deflection. Instead of dealing with the disturbing actions of, and facts about, the U of P (keep in mind that the U of P was ordered to pay $277 million dollars in a recent legal decision that concerned recruitment practices), this writer changes the subject: "yeah, but what about the good things that happen at the U of P!"
     I wonder if the U of P offers logic courses.
     One might suppose that an institution of higher learning would offer a defense that rises above gross fallacies and specious rhetoric. But consider this paragraph:

     Our degree programs are fully accredited and prepare students to thrive in today’s job market. For example, since 2004 we have graduated more than 25,000 teachers and 15,000 nurses. Our teaching program is accredited by the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) and is recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education. Each state has its own state teacher credentialing examination and standards and graduates of our teaching program must pass the necessary state examinations and student teaching requirements in order to become credentialed to teach in their state of residence.

     Having read this, a reader might suppose that U of P graduates are credentialed, but that’s not quite what this writer says, though he may seem to. In response to the complaint that graduates are often NOT prepared to compete in the marketplace (for teaching jobs, etc.), the above writer notes that “Each state has its own … credentialing examination … and graduates of our … program must pass the necessary examinations … in order to become credentialed to teach in their state of residence.”
     In other words, earning a U of P degree does NOT guarantee that its graduates will become credentialed and employed, for they must still past the state's examinations.
     So how again is this a response to the complaint? No how.
     Further, as the ABC segment revealed, even U of P graduates who do pass the tests in Texas and New York are not ipso facto qualified to teach in those states.

* * *
    Cat lovers will enjoy the following video (no doubt I’m the only Fan o’ Felines in the world who hasn’t already seen it a thousand times):

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Family war stories

     I had a chance to speak with my father about Opa—his father, my grandfather—and Opa's association with Hanns Klemm, an important aircraft innovator and entrepreneur who, in 1943, was arrested by the Gestapo for the crime of resigning from the Nazi Party. (In May of '43, he wrote them, "I consider my membership of the NSDAP to be no longer compatible with my belonging to the Christian community." Six years earlier, owing to his constant objections to party meddling in his business—including removal of valued Jewish employees—the Nazis had declared him to be "unreliable.")
     As I’ve explained previously, Opa, who had been a communist, was a noisy denouncer of Hitler and the Nazis and, in 1943, was rushed, by friends, into the Wehrmacht (army) to keep him out of the reach of the Gestapo. Today, I asked my dad if there was any connection between Klemm’s famous "death sentence" resignation and Opa’s sudden military recruitment at the age of 36.
     He wasn’t sure. Indeed, he had never thought about the matter before. In 1943, he was eleven years old and so he does not have a clear memory of chronology or even an understanding of major events at the time. Most families, of course, need only refer to other family members for clarifying information, but our family lacks that resource. My grandparents are now long dead, my dad’s sister died a year ago, and no other knowledgeable family member lives in this country. There are some relatives in Germany, even some who are elderly, but only my dad knows them, and he is disinclined to pepper them with such questions. I’m trying to arrange an email, in German, to family there in hopes of getting more information.
     “Now that you raise the question,” says dad, “it does seem very likely that the two events were connected.” He was pleased that I was pursuing the matter, and he was very happy to receive the results of my initial research into the career and fate of the legendary (for him) Hanns Klemm. He had thought that the memory of Klemm, an important figure in his hometown up through the war, had fallen into obscurity, as so much has done.
     But such is not the case. As it turns out, Klemm is remembered and honored, both for his contributions to aviation and related technologies and, to a far lesser extent, his stunning resignation letter, which he would have known would have lethal consequences. (As it turns out, the allies invaded Germany just in time to save Klemm, who was in prison.)
     My father reminded me that, in about 1932, Klemm had asked Opa to manage a new factory, but Opa turned down the job, which infuriated my grandmother.
     "Really? Opa would have been twenty-five years old at the time. Klemm [who would have been 47] asked such a young man to run a factory?"
     "Well, yes he did."
     Dad explains that Opa was a supreme technician and a master of the kind of work he did, which generally involved the making of models as part of the design and fabrication process. His official title was "model maker."
     But Opa didn't want the responsibility of running a factory. "He was strictly a Number 2 man," says my father. "He didn't want to run the show."
     My father grew up in the shadow of this peculiar act of unambitousness, the resulting bitterness of which permeated Opa's marriage and indeed his family. I knew Oma, and I can well imagine the ferocious hectoring she would have unleashed on her husband. I knew Opa, too. He was remarkably stubborn. There is no stubbornness like German stubbornness, which is far deeper and more inveterate than any species known anywhere in the New World.
     Despite Opa’s decision to remain a mere R&D man at Klemm, he and his boss evidently remained friends and maintainted a close working relationship. My father recalls serving as a messenger boy for his father in his town of Böblingen (and its sister town Sindelfingen), and he is sure that he often encountered Klemm; this experience left him with the impression that Opa and Klemm were friends and routinely worked together.
     According to dad, Opa used to tell the story of how the Gestapo would come to Klemm’s place of business, demanding the aircraft maker's attention. Opa would go to the door, open the little view window, and shout “state secrets!” He’d then slam it shut and return to the business at hand. Evidently, Klemm was always pleased by such antics. “So, what did you tell them this time, Otto?”
     (During the war years, it was understood that the open expression of “state secrets” was punishable by death, and so there were many jokes and stories focusing on that phrase.)
     The information I have about my family's war and pre-war history (both sides) is largely provided by two people who were just kids when the war ended—my parents. Naturally, their accounts of events do not always square perfectly with the facts available in history books. But, in my experience, their stories always ultimately check out as essentially accurate. Talking with my parents is indeed a hellish or absurd thing, a cross between dinner with the Costanzas and conversation with Gracie Allen. They’re pretty zany.
     But they’re no liars.


     I recalled that my mother’s father (who was actually her stepfather and uncle) was often described as a “Marxist.” So I asked my mother about that today. Despite the “Gracie Allen” factor, I did learn a few things. He was a well-educated man from Berlin, and, along with most of his college friends, he was a Marxist. He often talked politics, and his politics were decidedly left-wing.
     So did this cause problems for him during the Nazi years?
     He died of tuberculosis in about 1941. He was indeed outspoken in his hatred for Hitler and the party until the end. But he was liked and respected in the little town of Bärwalde. Friends and other town leaders did routinely implore him to keep his views to himself, for they feared that Nazi authorities would not tolerate his defiance forever. But he ignored such entreaties. In the last few years of his life, he was clearly ill and then dying, and so, evidently, the authorities left him alone.
     “Were these friends and others Marxists?”
     “Oh no, not all of them” says mom. “Some of them were even Nazis!”
     I should mention that not all Nazi-era family members shared my two grandfathers’ hatred for the Nazis. My mother tells stories of her older sister’s haughtiness and contempt for the Polish prisoners, who  performed various jobs in towns and in businesses, including in the family lumber business. (The engineer of the train my mother ultimately took to flee the Russian invasion was a Polish prisoner.) On one occasion, Ilsa was in town and demanded of a Polish man that he step aside to make way for her on the sidewalk. That got back to her mother (by then widowed), and, well, there was hell to pay.
     “Our family does not do such things," she declared. Nazi notions of superiority and inferiority were strictly verboten among the Schultzes.
     Neither of my parents strike me as rebellious in any way. They voted for Bush.
     Maybe it skips a generation.

From the archives







Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...