The SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT — "[The] blog he developed was something that made the district better." - Tim Jemal, SOCCCD BoT President, 7/24/23
Sunday, October 18, 2009
A marriage not made in Heaven: Wagner and Fuentes
WE ARE EXACTLY 50 days away from the SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ annual “Organizational Meeting.” That’s when the board selects its officers for the subsequent year.
It seems likely that Don Wagner will not seek to continue as Board President, what with the success of his campaign for Assemblyman (70th District). Political observers seem to think that Don, with his many endorsements and his campaign cash, is the man to beat.
He’s got Tom Fuentes, that notoriously crafty Neanderthal and GOP wheeler-dealer, very much in his corner.
That is worrisome. Tom’s not the kind who helps his colleagues with no strings attached. He’s definitely a “strings” kinda guy. And, in truth, though Don and Tom dominate the Board’s “majority” and share similar Neanderthal/Libertarian ideals, in some ways, they represent an important division on the board. Fuentes, true to his crafty and cronyistic nature, is loyal to long-time board toady Raghu Mathur, who, for all his faults, can be counted on to follow orders, no matter how unsavory, and to treat underlings badly, another plus in the sordid Fuentessphere.
Meanwhile, in recent years, Don Wagner has worked closely with faculty (especially with faculty on IVC’s accreditation group), and he’s plainly backed away from the standard, right-wing “lazy and corrupt faculty” worldview, while Fuentes continues to plumb its ugly and clueless depths. Further, as board President, and unlike Fuentes, he’s worked closely with Mathur; he’s likely observed Mathur’s duplicitous ways up close.
Don and Tom, it seems, don’t see eye to eye on "our good Chancellor."
So theirs is a marriage not made in Heaven.
What’s Don got that Tom wants?
These days, Fuentes, who underwent liver transplant surgery a year and a half ago, is frequently described as “reinvigorated.” He does seem more active—perhaps like a guy with a new lease on life. (Or maybe like I guy whose days are numbered.) And he ain’t going anywhere in politics, what with his odious baggage and his Pandora’s closet. So maybe being Board President has finally come to seem attractive to him.
Could be.
So I’m thinking that, starting Dec. 7, just maybe, Tom Fuentes will be the President of our Board.
We’ll see.
If I’m right, we need to consider: just how much trouble can Tom cause as the President of the SOCCCD BoT?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"
This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...
-
Professor Olga Perez Stable Cox OCC Trumpsters/GOP A professor called Trump’s election an ‘act of terrorism.’ Then she became the vict...
-
The "prayer" suit: ..... AS WE REPORTED two days ago , on Tuesday, Judge R. Gary Klausner denied Westphal, et alia ’s motion f...
-
Yesterday morning, the Irvine Valley College community received an email from college President, Glenn Roquemore, announcing the coll...
8 comments:
Good Lord! Beelzebub!
The world has always, I suspect, brought odd ducks together. Trade-offs: in some minds that equates with the way the world does operate. But does it have to?
"...Don Wagner has worked closely with faculty (especially with faculty on IVC’s accreditation group)."
You mean like with his buddy (girlfriend?) Windy who he's planning to put in as dean at IVC? I hear it's on the next board agenda.
Dude, her name is Wendy, not Windy. This "girlfriend" stuff is a ridiculous rumor based on fools' fantasies. You may be right, however, concerning the dean position, but the P and the VPI are the ones pushing for that, and Wagner is sympathetic to them and to their needs. If they do announce this new dean position, let's hope that the appropriate processes are followed.
Windy has the right to vote Republican if she wants. It's still a free country.
Did someone refer to her voting preferences? Don't think so.
What's with this "Windy" stuff? If it's meant to be a joke, it is sorely lacking in the element of comedy. If it's just an error, it's embarrassing and just plain dumb, after all this time and a correction in the comments to this post. Knock it off, okay?
(Doesn't know Wendy and doesn't teach at IVC)
RE: "Windy": I think it's related to the topic Roy posted about in "Arrrrgh." A general lack of awareness and care about language.
(But I, for one, DO think it's funny.)
Post a Comment