Monday, September 15, 2008

Rebel Girl's Poetry Corner: "express happiness and expel scorpions"

Rebel Girl doesn't understand the so-called "dismal science" of economics but she knows something's happening and it doesn't look good. The president just said it was going to be "painful." Ouch!

Veteran journalist Marc Cooper offers his assessment at his blog:

...These seem like perfect times to renew tax cuts for billionaires and big corporations—provided there are any left in solvency by the end of the month. These seem a great time to cut back the safety net and other federal entitlements and let the masses figure their own way out of the coming crash. Who needs Big Government when you have the right economic and political leadership at the helm, right? I say we do away with unemployment insurance altogether while we're at it. Give the American People the chance to show their real grit and gumption. Maybe they can each sell off one of their nine houses. Or marry an alcohol distributor heiress, right?

Anyway, I don't know about you...but these worsening conditions seem to DEMAND the election of a team like McCain-Palin. Anybody who professes to know as little about the economy as Mac does couldn't possibly do worse than the current crew, right? And Phil Gramm for Treasury Secretary! Let's get this sucker over right away.

And if ever there was a need for someone with the vast executive experience of the likes of Sarah Palin wouldn't it be right now? Isn't there some constitutional way or another to advance the election so we don't have to wait 50 more days? I would certainly sleep better through the coming economic winter knowing that at McCain's right hand is someone accustomed to living half the year in the frozen, barren darkness. A perfect fit!

And don't forget, when Palin was Mayor of Wasilla, she had to meet a payroll (of dozens!), oversee a budget for THOUSANDS of people (about 7,000 to be exact!) and she masterfully supervised the building of an ice rink. You try that—once you're out of the soup line.

Go ahead, you weak-kneed panty twisters. Go ahead with your panic sell-off. Go play pattycake with Greenspan. Me? I'm giving orders tomorrow to my broker to buy, buy, buy as I just know we're gonna be in great hands very, very soon.

Buy, baby, buy!

For the rest, click here.

But of course, Rebel Girl consults the poets as well, those unacknowleged legislators.

From C.D. Wright's poem "Like Hearing Your Name Called in a Language You Don't Understand," from the book, "Rising, Falling, Hovering":

Though I have worn the medal of the old town with forlorn pleasure
I say unto you:

Comrades, be not in mourning for your being


to express happiness and expel scorpions is the best job on earth.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

OCC Accred issues

Our colleges aren't the only ones with accreditation and governance issues these days. As we reported several months ago, OCC is on the ACCJC's "warning" list over SLOs and program review.

You'll recall that, during an Accred site visit back in April, some OCC faculty charged the administration with an attempt to sweep faculty "shared governance" issues under the rug. I think the administration was hiding secret papers in some pumpkin or something. Not sure.

You can read all about it in an old Coast Report article (from last April): Faculty hands over complaints: Teachers give notebook of grievances to state accreditation team

The OCC crowd sound like they just fell off the turnip wagon. You can judge for yourself.

And think of it: boot enthusiast Armando "double dip" Ruiz is the leader of their district's conservative (?) Board Majority!

What if you could trade trustees: Fuentes for Ruiz? Would you do it? That's a tough one. Ruiz is stupid, so I'd have to say Yep.

Last Wednesday, OCC’s Coast Report (Senate Seeks Transparency) explained that the Academic Senate President is proposing a new process that would route the college's Accred reports through the Senate.

Gosh, is this the first time they thought of that? Sheesh. I wonder if they have indoor plumbing yet over there.

The fellow is quoted as saying, “I want to make sure the report to the ACCJC is accurate, transparent and reflects what is."

—As opposed to what is not, I guess.

Typewriters, baby, typewriters!

Did you read Thomas Friedman’s op-ed yesterday in the New York Times? (Making America Stupid.)

You know Friedman. He’s one of Chancellor Raghu Mathur’s favorite authors. Remember Raghu’s endless references to The World is Flat a couple of years ago? Yeah, Friedman wrote that.

Yesterday, Friedman smacked the Republican Party, and especially its Presidential candidate, John McCain, upside the head. He describes that special moment during the GOP convention when the crowd chanted “drill, baby, drill!” That is an America, says Friedman, that wants to feed its disastrous oil habit. Plus it's an America that is stuck in the past:
Why would Republicans, the party of business, want to focus our country on breathing life into a 19th-century technology — fossil fuels — rather than giving birth to a 21st-century technology — renewable energy? …[I]t reminds me of someone who, on the eve of the I.T. revolution … is pounding the table for America to make more I.B.M. typewriters and carbon paper. “Typewriters, baby, typewriters.”
This ruinous lunacy, he says, is symbolic of Senator McCain’s Presidential campaign:
It’s a campaign now built on turning everything possible into a cultural wedge issue — including even energy policy, no matter how stupid it makes the voters and no matter how much it might weaken America.
“Stupid.” That is the unofficial theme of the Republican Presidential campaign. Lacking in pizzazz? No problem! We’ll just put a minor, gun-toting, moose-shooting, lie-spouting Alaskan governor on the ticket! Who cares that, in truth, she’s clueless and to the right of Bush? So what that Her Cluelessness could easily end up with her finger on the button? We’ve gotta get elected!

As Friedman notes, Senator McCain, “who would not sell his soul to win his party’s nomination, is ready to sell every piece of his soul to win the presidency.”

John McCain, version .08, is an unmitigated disaster.

Meanwhile, Frank Rich (I don’t think Raghu reads him much) drew attention to the “real elephant in the room of this election”:
No longer able to remember his principles any better than he can distinguish between Sunnis and Shia, McCain stands revealed as a guy who can be easily rolled by anyone who sells him a plan for “victory,” whether in Iraq or in Michigan. A McCain victory on Election Day will usher in a Palin presidency, with McCain serving as a transitional front man, an even weaker Bush to her Cheney.
Rich focuses on Palin’s curious acceptance speech, in which she compared herself with Harry Truman—you know, the guy who became President when FDR died. (Get it?) You’ll recall that Palin offered a quotation from an author who, she said, had praised Truman.

The author has now been identified: he was Westbrook Pegler, who, says Rich, after Truman was elected in 1948, declared that America was now “done for.”

Gosh, I guess Sarah got that “praise” thing wrong.

According to Rich, “Pegler was a rabid Joe McCarthyite who loathed F.D.R. and Ike and tirelessly advanced the theory that American Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe (“geese,” he called them) were all likely Communists.”

No wonder Palin reads this guy! He was a culture warrior, like her!
… [T]he vitriolic animus of right-wing populism preached by Pegler and McCarthy and revived by the 1990s culture wars remains the same. The game is always to pit the good, patriotic real Americans against those subversive, probably gay “cosmopolitan” urbanites (as the sometime cross-dresser Rudy Giuliani has it) who threaten to take away everything that small-town folk hold dear.
On Friday, the Times’ Bob Herbert brought up the inevitable “stupid” theme:
…I’ve gotten the scary feeling, for the first time in my life, that dimwittedness is not just on the march in the U.S., but that it might actually prevail.
Yeah, we’re hitting a new low. We’ve got millions of stupid people cheering for a stupid candidate:
With most candidates for high public office, the question is whether one agrees with them on the major issues of the day. With Ms. Palin, it’s not about agreeing or disagreeing. She doesn’t appear to understand some of the most important issues.

The Bush doctrine, which flung open the doors to the catastrophe in Iraq, was such a fundamental aspect of the administration’s foreign policy that it staggers the imagination that we could have someone no further than a whisper away from the White House who doesn’t even know what it is.
Herbert notes that the same fact-challenged spirit that got us into the Iraq quagmire (viz., Screw you, college boy!) is alive and well in Sarah Palin:
…[A]t Palin’s son’s deployment ceremony [to Iraq]…, she told the audience of soldiers that they would be fighting “the enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the death of thousands of Americans.” ¶ Was she deliberately falsifying history, or does she still not know that Iraq and Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the Sept. 11 attacks?
Do you recall the polls back in 2004 that showed that those who voted for Bush believed that Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks? Many of them even believed that there were WMDs in Iraq!

Yeah, the stupid people.

They’re still around, and they’re getting excited.

Speaking of cynical and/or clueless cultural warriors, have you ever wondered what it’s like to be a member of the SOCCCD board of trustees? I’m thinking in particular of Don Wagner, a smart guy, but a guy who has done as much as anybody to impose the spirit-crushing, incompetent, and fear-inducing Raghu Mathur upon our colleges. 

It’s stunning, really. Here we have two of the best community colleges to be found anywhere, and, for years now, they’ve been running on three cylinders, with morale in the toilet.

Wagner is explicit about his enthusiasm for the “culture wars.” To people like Wagner, a real American, faculty are those “probably gay” atheistic communists that Rich was talking about and that Pegler hated.

Faculty are dispirited and thwarted, are they? Ha! Serves ‘em right, the subversive, anti-American bastards!

I wonder though. When you get up close to faculty—and Wagner’s been doing that for the last half-year—you can’t help but notice that they are no subversives. Mostly, they’re just ordinary people trying to teach and to do it well. 

Spirit-crushing and fear is the wrong atmosphere for that, you know.

Do you suppose that there is a corner of Don’s soul where he recognizes the evil he has done and that he continues to do? D’ya think?

DON WAGNER ON THE "CULTURE WAR":

"My side of the culture war thought that the first term of the Clinton Administration was … a disaster. There was nothing to like about his positions on gays in the military, nationalization of the health care industry, opposition to welfare reform that took a Republican Congress to finally achieve, …the incineration of children in Waco, …stonewalling on Vince Foster, missing Rose Law Firm billing records, … sale of the Lincoln Bedroom, ad nauseam.

…"Those on my side of the culture war believe that with rights come responsibilities, and that you have a right to build on your own property even if a snail darter or some such endangered vermin happens to live on it, a right to pack a gun, and the right to live free of an oppressive nanny state. You also have a responsibility to care for yourself and your family, and to exhaust every effort to do so before asking the government for a handout. Personal responsibility and self reliance [sic] are more highly regarded on my side of the culture war than are feelings and groupthink.

"My side of the culture war laughs at the hypocracy [sic!] of the left when it says we care about children only until they are born, when in fact it is our side that also opposes euthanasia, the left's creeping culture of death, the killing of Terry Schiavo….”

Saturday, September 13, 2008

David Foster Wallace: gone

David Foster Wallace, author, short story writer, essayist and teacher, found dead at age 46 in his home in Claremont. Killed himself.

Damn it.

Here's an excerpt from the commencement speech he gave at Kenyon College in 2005:

...the so-called real world will not discourage you from operating on your default settings, because the so-called real world of men and money and power hums merrily along in a pool of fear and anger and frustration and craving and worship of self. Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom all to be lords of our tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the center of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talk about much in the great outside world of wanting and achieving and [unintelligible -- sounds like "displayal"]. The really important kind of freedom involves attention and awareness and discipline, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them over and over in myriad petty, unsexy ways every day.

That is real freedom. That is being educated, and understanding how to think. The alternative is unconsciousness, the default setting, the rat race, the constant gnawing sense of having had, and lost, some infinite thing.

I know that this stuff probably doesn't sound fun and breezy or grandly inspirational the way a commencement speech is supposed to sound. What it is, as far as I can see, is the capital-T Truth, with a whole lot of rhetorical niceties stripped away. You are, of course, free to think of it whatever you wish. But please don't just dismiss it as just some finger-wagging Dr. Laura sermon. None of this stuff is really about morality or religion or dogma or big fancy questions of life after death.

The capital-T Truth is about life BEFORE death.

It is about the real value of a real education, which has almost nothing to do with knowledge, and everything to do with simple awareness; awareness of what is so real and essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, all the time, that we have to keep reminding ourselves over and over:

"This is water."

"This is water."

It is unimaginably hard to do this, to stay conscious and alive in the adult world day in and day out. Which means yet another grand cliché turns out to be true: your education really IS the job of a lifetime. And it commences: now.

I wish you way more than luck.


To read the rest, click here.

What a Tangled Web He Weaveth—the latest crisis

Oh! What a tangled web he weaves
The Goo, Hurrah!, himself deceives!
—With apologies to Walter Scott
It’s been a wild week in the district, in some corners anyway. Last week, on Wednesday, Chancellor Raghu Mathur announced that his ballyhooed “consultant,” who was scheduled to meet with all sorts of groups at both colleges over two weeks re "decision-making processes," had reported to him, after one day on the job!, that decision-making seems to be just fine and dandy! And so he (Mathur) decided to discontinue the consultation.

I forwarded Mathur’s email to the consultant, Bill Vega, who responded by stating that, no, it was his (Vega’s) decision to discontinue. During his one-day visit, Vega signaled that he might pull the plug. He also made pretty clear that he didn’t think much of the Chancellor’s involvement in college decisions. (It was evident that he had reached that assessment before he got to the 2:00 p.m. “open forum” that I attended. That is, Vega had reached that assessment before he encountered any faculty. Prior to the open forum, Vega met with classified and administrators.)

The logic of Mathur’s email was manifestly absurd: since (according to Mathur) Vega had found decision-making at IVC to be hunky-dory, it follows that decision-making throughout the district—including at Saddleback College—is also hunky-dory! So why continue with the consultation?

(And if Vega had indeed found decision-making hunk-doritude, shouldn't we include that judgment in the Accred reports? Why would Mathur not urge the focus groups to include this alleged finding? Why would he prevent Vega from writing the report?)

I’m told that Saddleback’s Accreditation Focus Group has been on this episode like white on rice, owing, no doubt, to its manifest relevance to our governance difficulties (not to mention our "fear and despair" difficulties) here in the good old SOCCCD. During Vega’s day at the district, it became clear that the college community was not alone in its abject foggitude about the nature of this consultation. Who had hired Vega? To whom would he report? How would Vega’s report connect with the two colleges’ accreditation reports? Nobody seemed to know, including Vega.

This kind of "communication" problem is, um, relevant to the Accred's stated concerns, doncha think?

And then, right after Vega bailed (last Wednesday), Mathur put out a memo containing two BIG LIES:

• That, according to the estimable Dr. Vega, our decision-making processes were in swell shape
• That, given this happy assessment, Mathur had naturally decided on discontinuance of Vega's consultation

Again, that the second is a lie is pretty clear, given (1) Vega’s having hinted that he might pull the plug already last Tuesday and (2) Vega’s having written to me that he, not Mathur, had recommended discontinuance.

That the first is a lie is less certain, I suppose. But there can be little doubt that, last Tuesday, Vega had expressed himself in a manner clearly implying that he did not approve of (in particular) Mathur’s kind of involvement in college decision-making. Those who met with Vega will testify to this.

From what I’ve been told, it appears that the trustees, too, were left largely in the dark about Mathur’s curious consultation process. Many of us guess that, for trustees, the following perception is unavoidable: that Mathur instigated this process in an attempt to lay blame for the colleges/district’s difficulties, not at Mathur’s doorstep (as per the two Accreditation report drafts), but at that of faculty and the board. Anyone who knows Mathur knows that he is exactly the kind of guy who would assume that a fellow Chancellor pal (like Vega) would spin things to help out a colleague. It's what pals do!

If that is what Mathur was thinking, he was very much mistaken.

So the upshot of Mathur’s “consultation” gambit is this: he pursued a crassly self-serving process that blew up in his face. Further, from the perspective of many members of the two Accreditation focus groups, Mathur’s gambit can only be viewed as an eleventh-hour and wholly inappropriate attempt to sneak a new element into the Accreditation reports due on October 15. (Indeed, during his visit, Vega revealed his belief that his report was to be included in those reports. He was visibly horrified to discover that faculty had not been consulted about his hire.)

CRISIS:

So this brings us to our latest crisis. Will pressure be exerted to prevent mention of this sorry episode in the Accreditation reports?

While contemplating that, please do consider this factoid: that Mathur’s latest gambit has so angered members of the two college communities that it will be impossible for the district to hide it from the ACCJC. 

That is, efforts at suppression will likely have the opposite of the desired effect.

* * *

Have you read the editorial in the latest issue of the Lariat? Check it out: here. Also, check out the Lariat's online poll of presidential candidates. 54% of voters say they'll vote for McCain: See. Also: UCI editorial: the clueless generation?

Friday, September 12, 2008

Holga Goo and Tom by Jason



My friend Jason took these really cool photos yesterday during and after the IVC 9-11 ceremony, using his Holga camera.

With the help of his Chinese camera, he captured the weirdness, the darkness of the dismal enterprise.


A detail.

It's Snowing!

"Blizzard of Lies," by Paul Krugman in today's NY Times:

Did you hear about how Barack Obama wants to have sex education in kindergarten, and called Sarah Palin a pig? Did you hear about how Ms. Palin told Congress, “Thanks, but no thanks” when it wanted to buy Alaska a Bridge to Nowhere?

These stories have two things in common: they’re all claims recently made by the McCain campaign — and they’re all out-and-out lies...

But I can’t think of any precedent, at least in America, for the blizzard of lies since the Republican convention. The Bush campaign’s lies in 2000 were artful — you needed some grasp of arithmetic to realize that you were being conned. This year, however, the McCain campaign keeps making assertions that anyone with an Internet connection can disprove in a minute, and repeating these assertions over and over again...


Click here for the rest: Paul Krugman, Blizzard of Lies.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...