Pal o' Wagner (POW): hysterical homophobic demagoguery

John Eastman Goes to Washington (NavelGazing/OC Weekly, R. Scott Moxley)
The Chapman University law professor and anti-gay marriage activist stars in a House committee vaudeville act

     You remember Chapman University's John Eastman. He’s one of Don Wagner’s pals, a crew that includes Arizona's Joe Arpaio.
     Well, the East Man is in the news again, testifying about gay marriage before Congress.
     Here's an excerpt from R. Scott Moxley's report:

     …[I]t's Eastman's oratory that's most entertaining. He claims he's living in an apocalyptic setting in which, as with any good summer blockbuster, good confronts evil. In the frequent AM-Christian-radio pontificator's mind, he's a fearless warrior for righteousness….

Shameless scoundrel

     From his perch atop [National Organization for Marriage], Eastman suggests gay marriage threatens the survival of humans, whose ranks have more than doubled on the planet since 1960. In 2012, he said what “flows” from traditional marriages “are children” and “we need children to perpetuate society.” During a March NPR interview, he ignored two key technicalities: matrimonial vows are hardly necessary to procreate, and no proposed gay-marriage law bans heterosexual intercourse. Having delved into make-believe territory, he then asserted that expanding marriage would destroy the one institution that “is uniquely capable of producing children.”
     It takes a shameless scoundrel, especially for a man who wraps himself in a scholarly wardrobe, to try to convert a debate over marriage equality into a hysterical, non sequitur question about whether civilization wants to exterminate itself. But Eastman isn't just a professor. He's also a would-be Republican politician who has been trounced in efforts to become California's Attorney General, a race in which he called for armed revolution if gay couples are allowed to marry….

Right-wing paranoia and foolishness c. 1970: "The depths of your own mind"

1970: burned entrance of B of A across from UCI (From Anteater Antics)

     This morning, I came across the following post on the Anteater Antics blog, a stodgy-yet-interesting site created by the University of California, Irvine, “Libraries’ Department of Special Collections and Archives.”
     But first: as you know, back in December, 1970, the Saddleback Community College District BOT, still freaking out over the burning of a bank by student protesters at UC Santa Barbara in February (see)—and likely also over the October UCI B of A incident described below—made remarkable modifications to already-approved plans for the Saddleback College Library/Admin Building—eventually called the “James B. Utt” Memorial Library. They modified them to protect the structure against feared (but, as it turns out, nonexistent) violent student protesters.

Library opening, 1973

     Hence the lack of windows, etc.
     Of course, the board didn’t just come right out and say that.
     Said board prez Hans Vogel, “A fortress without windows is the ideal environment for library study since when you go to the library you are trying to reach the depths of your own mind.”
     Yep.
     What about high windows? Can’t we at least have high ones? Nope, said Hans: “from a security standpoint I would question high windows and would favor solid walls.”
     Yep, security. That's key. (No violent protests have ever occurred in our district.)
     How about outdoor reading balconies? Those would be nice!
     Nope. Robert Lowery, the architect, explained that “We cut out the second floor outdoor reading balconies … in order to eliminate the chance students will throw books down from them to other students as you [trustees] suggested.”
     That's a hell of a suggestion, boys. (What were they smokin'?)

     Meanwhile, ten or twenty miles up the road at newish UCI (it opened in 1965; Saddleback College opened in Sept. of '68):

Local Bank of America burned (February, 2011)

     A fire was ignited at the entrance to the local branch of the Bank of America, located directly across the street from UCI on the ground floor of the Town Center Building, shortly after midnight on October 26, 1970. This is certainly among the most mysterious, and controversial, occurrences in UCI history. This event was viewed by some in the community as having a direct relation to the burning of the Bank of America at UCSB during anti-war protests in the Spring of 1970. That action drew national attention to the anti-war movement at UCSB. Then Chancellor Aldrich received many calls from the local community with concerns about the Irvine event, many accusing UCI students of this action. Chancellor Aldrich took exception to this assumption. Opinions voiced during this period ranged from those on the far right accusing the students and blaming UCI campus administrators for their tolerance of this type of dissent. Some on the left blamed those from the far right of carefully calculating and executing an event that would cause limited physical damage but significant political damage among local community members and taxpayers. Damage to the bank was estimated at $125,000 but no cash or records were lost in the short blaze. 

UCI, c. 1969

     There were no witnesses to the event and no one was ever arrested. (My emphases throughout.)

UCI Town Center (as seen from UCI Gateway Commons), 1969

"Utt" Library, September 1972