Monday, January 30, 2012

Nitpickery for a Monday night

Philosophical musitude
     [UPDATE: it appears that the needed correction has now been made at the SOCCCD  website.]
      I noticed this evening that the SOCCCD website declares that
Saddleback College and Irvine Valley College are both fully accredited, preparing students for associate degrees, transfer to four-year colleges and universities, workforce development and basic skills training.
     Tsk, tsk. I seem to recall that, according to the Accreds, it just won’t do to assert that one’s college is “fully accredited.” Why? Surprisingly, for a very good reason. You see, it won't do to talk of a "fully accredited" college for the same reason that it won’t do to talk of, say, someone's being fully dead, for, deadwise, one is either dead or not dead; deadery does not admit of degrees.

     I decided to find where this is made official.
     Found it:

ACCREDITATION REFERENCE HANDBOOK
A Publication of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges

Policy on Institutional Advertising, Student Recruitment, and Representation of Accredited Status (Adopted January 2005)

Part C
p. 68:
The phrase “fully accredited” shall be avoided, since no partial accreditation is possible from ACCJC.
Policy on Representation of Accredited Status (Adopted June 1998; Revised January 1999; Edited June 2003, August 2006)

Part C
p. 96
Representations of accredited status should be limited to the following statement. Additional modifiers such as “fully accredited” are not appropriate since no partial accreditation is possible.
     So there you have it. At the SOCCCD, cheesitude prevails, Accred-claim-wise.

    IVC's new "Student Success Center"; CAFÉ (Library iteration) opening Wednesday

    Pics of IVC "Student Success Center," taken today

         The President of the Irvine Valley College Academic Senate, Lisa Davis Allen, has long dreamed of a special facility for faculty—a center for “excellence.”
         I’m on the Senate. Maybe it’s just me, but it always seemed that one could hear crickets whenever she mentioned this idea at senate meetings.
         But she persevered, and, by late last spring, goshdarnit, her dream of a CAFÉ—i.e., a “Center for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence”—started gettin’ real. As it turned out, at about that time, administration was playing yet another round of facilities musical chairs—that never seems to end—and, by summer, it appeared that the Media Resource Center (MRC)—inside the fancy new BSTIC building—would be sent packing, to be replaced by, well, the faculty CAFÉ.
         Now, you’ve got to understand that the space then occupied by the MRC was seriously cool. It had (and has) lots of sleek Mac computers, an ultra-modern transparent wall, a wrap-around view, and so on. It is surely the coolest space at the college.

    The internal entrance to the "Student Success Center."
         Naturally, the MRC/CAFÉ switcheroo was done very badly. People are never told what’s going on at IVC—they’ve pretty much only got rumors and after-the-fact reports. (Name any issue. Ask people what they know about it. A: nothing.)
         In this informational vacuum, people knew only that the MRC was getting evicted from the super-cool space in BSTIC, and faculty would take its place with something called a “CAFÉ.” Naturally, people took umbrage, aghast at the very idea of replacing student-in-cool-space with faculty-in-cool-space. Some of these employees even seemed to think that the CAFÉ was gonna be, well, a café!


         In the absence of info, people draw those kinds of conclusions. Why wouldn't they?
         To make matters worse, the Senate held a CAFÉ grand (or semi-grand or sub-grand) opening during Fall Flex Week, and the flier for the event made clear that only full-timers were invited! It all sounded kinda elite.
         We at DtB noted all of this, of course. No effort to clarify matters for us was ever made. We heard nothing from anybody.
         Pretty soon, there was yet another reshuffling of the IVC facilities deck. The plan to move the CAFÉ into the BSTIC space was nixed. All the computers remained there, but, for an entire semester, that space remained empty and unused! No explanation was given for any of this.
         Typical.
         When I returned from my sabbatical (early January), I was told that the CAFÉ has at long last found a home, namely, the former Student Learning Center in the IVC Library (see earlier post: CAFÉ BIBLIOTHÈQUE).
         The Grand Opening is Wednesday. (See flier at left)
         Meanwhile, after an entire semester of disuse, that cool space in BSTIC has been given over to something now called the “Student Success Center.”
         Let’s hope that idea sticks.
         I dropped by the SSC today and spoke briefly with the person in charge, namely, Dr. Brooke Choo. I know her; she’s good.
         Looks like the SSC is in good hands.

    This, of course, is BSTIC. The Student Success Center is on the bottom floor, at left.
    Naturally, BSTIC is not used in ways originally intended, owing to program shrinkage
    and other fortuities. They should rename it MISC.
    SEE ALSO:

    The unfortunate (i.e., bungled) August "launch" of the CAFE. Redolent of elitism most foul.

    Williams' emergency petition denied; final decision in six weeks

    • Williams’ bid for immediate reinstatement denied (OC Reg)

    OC's "It" boy
         An Orange County judge this morning denied an emergency petition by John Williams, the county’s locked-out public administrator, for immediate reinstatement to his office.
         Instead, Superior Court Judge William Monroe ordered further hearings on the issue.
         Williams was locked out of his office last week, after he failed to step down on the day he had said he intended to retire.
         Facing accusations that he had mismanaged his department and the estates of some deceased people, Williams last March wrote to Bill Campbell, then chairman of the county’s Board of Supervisors, saying he intended to retire on Jan. 23, 2012, which was last Monday.
         However, Williams recently informed county officials that he’d changed his mind about retiring. He showed up for work on Tuesday, Jan. 24, staying at his Santa Ana office until about 2 p.m. After he left, county workers swooped in to change the locks. John Moorlach, current chairman of the Board of Supervisors, said he approved the lockout and Williams’ removal from the county payroll.
    . . .
    John Moorlach
         Judge Monroe this morning heard arguments from Williams’ attorney, Phil Greer, as well as from Leon Page representing the county. Monroe then denied Williams’ request to be reinstated immediately. The judge suggested he wants more information and testimony on the issue, ordering both sides to agree to a schedule for hearings.
    . . .
         The parties will return to court on March 13.
    . . .
         Williams, 60, has served as the county’s elected public administrator since 2003. He had also served as the appointed public guardian until the Board of Supervisors fired him from that role in June. He continued to receive annual salary and other pay totaling $153,448.44 for the two positions.
    . . .
         In exchange for Williams’ agreement last March to retire, the Board of Supervisors agreed not to cut his pay during his remaining 10 months in office and not to release a “highly critical” report on his performance prepared for the board by an outside lawyer, according to a letter sent to Williams last week by County Counsel Nick Chrisos.

    Cousin It
    • For Now, County Can Keep the Locks on Williams' Door (Voice of OC)

         ...The county's filings argued that Williams' action is "essentially a thinly veiled attempt to remain on county payroll -- and boost his pension entitlement -- even though he had been previously stripped of virtually all of his official duties."....

    • John Williams Told to Stay Away (Navel Gazing)

       ...Williams' own attorney testifies to his client's incompetence, confirming that he did send the board a letter of resignation. Williams later changed his mind, according to the mouthpiece....

    Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

      This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...