Tuesday, January 26, 2016

IVC's successful free speech "forum"

Anissa and Brittany: an event was needed
     I was able to attend the first half hour of IVC's free speech forum, a response to last week's unfortunate episode of hate speech in the "free speech" zone in front of the Student Services Building.
     IVC President Glenn Roquemore spoke, offering various murky thoughts (or, at any rate, he made a series of points that yielded little clarity), although he finally offered some helpful remarks at the end of his ten-minute commentary, noting that last Wednesday's hate speakers were in no sense sponsored by the college. The college could not prohibit that speech, but neither was it sponsoring it.

Last Wednesday: hate speechifier
targets Muslims, women, gays, et al.
    Thanks for the clarification, Glenn. Took you long enough to get there.
     Next up was IVC Police Chief Will Glen, who helpfully pointed out that the speech that we encountered last week was BOTH hate speech and protected free speech, a crucial point. (It's not "either/or." See No, there’s no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment.) And so we can't, and we shouldn't, prevent such speech.
     But we can condemn it just the same. There's no contradiction. Last week's crew was obnoxious and offensive, but they plainly were within their rights to express themselves as they did. As a judge in federal court said, in my own 1st Amendment case seventeen years ago, "That's just life under the First Amendment!" Deal with it.
Chief Glen
     Chief Glen set out the bare facts of what happened last Wednesday, noting that the speakers sought to inspire an angry reaction from students (hoping for an opportunity for noisy litigation) and succeeded in doing so. Two students were inspired to take such actions as spit gum or throw water on the speakers. Those students crossed a line. The speakers, however, had been apprised of their legal rights and were careful not to cross any lines.
     Chief Glen wisely recommended ignoring such speakers as we encountered last week.
     Next, people in the audience had an opportunity to speak, and that's when I had to leave to teach.
     More later.
     I'm glad for this event, which was well attended. We need more opportunities for thought and conversation on this campus. Let's have less astounding kiddie inventions and more discussion about issues. IVC is, after all, a college. Glenn.

Monday, January 25, 2016

Tonight's board meeting


     I was gonna go to tonight’s board meeting, but then I realized that I’d miss this week's episode of Fast ‘n’ Loud (Aaron’s racing up Pike’s Peak in his Falcon) plus part 2 of the new X-Files, which, I know, will be pretty shitty (at least last night’s episode was dreadful), but I’m kind of a fan.
     So, instead of reporting tonight’s meeting, I thought I’d briefly imagine it instead.
     It will probably start on time. Tim Jemal, the new board Prez, will ask the board Secretary (I forget who that is; it couldn’t possibly matter) to report actions taken during closed session. “I got nothin’," he/she will say.
     Then somebody—maybe Trustee Wright; he loves that shit—will lead the group in prayer: “Dear Heavenly Father,” he'll intone, “we realize that we’re unworthy human filth, but we beseech you and fear you and hope you can lay off of any more disasters and shit. Plus, I wanna put in a good word for our youngsters here at Saddleback College. Amen.”
'63 Falcon
     Then he’ll turn 90 degrees southward and commence pledging to the flag “of our great nation.”
     Natch, it will be downhill from there. Board members will report attending football games. They’ll say chirpy, silly things. Somebody will have to wake Gary for his report. They’ll issue prizes and listen, politely, to lots of jargon and gibberish and bullshit. They’ll approve everything.
     And then they’ll go home.
     A letter opener through the right ear? Mulder solicits sex from a handsome Indian dude? I’ve gotta admit: so far, this X-Files episode really sucks.

Be sure to read Tere's Board Meeting Highlights.


So one of these nights and about twelve o'clock
This old world's going to reel and rock
Saints will tremble and cry for pain
For the Lord's gonna come in his heavenly airplane



Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right

They just seem a little weird
Surrender, surrender
But don't give yourself away

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Golden West College: Confronting Islamophobia in OC


Click on graphic
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE FIGHTS ISLAMOPHOBIA IN HB BEFORE TOWN HALL ON ISLAMOPHOBIA (OC Weekly)
     Last year, the [GWC] campus Alliance for Cultural Advancement club hosted an interfaith panel that included a Muslim speaker. "We noticed that when we opened it up for the students to ask questions, 99 percent of the questions were directed to the Muslim gentlemen," says Lorena Ortega, Program Associate of the Intercultural Program at Golden West College. "And they were not questions that were kind. They were born out of fear and our own ignorance."....
     A week after the San Bernardino massacre this December, Lyon [Melissa Lyon, Director of the Center for International and Intercultural Programs at GWC] called Ortega into her office and asked about putting on an event challenging Islamophobia. Ortega was game, only Lyon wanted to open it up to the broader community. "This is Orange County," Ortega recalls of her initial hesitation. "We're going to get annihilated." She eventually put her concerns aside and signed up for it all. Ortega contacted the local Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-LA) who suggested some knowledgeable speakers both Muslim and non-Muslim.

. . .
     "The overarching goal of this event is to not just to do what it says, challenging Islamophobia, but to bring the community together and open up dialogue," Ortega says. "We want to give everybody their place and space to talk about those fears and smash those fears. We don't have to be afraid of people of this faith." ….
     Isn't this the sort of thing that our college should be hosting? Let's hope this event turns out well.—RB

Friday, January 22, 2016

The IVC "hate speech" debacle: the campus responds

The "Radical Reverend": "most" sorority girls are "whores" (photo from the RR's Instagram Site)
     Already yesterday it became clear that a handful of faculty and the Director of Student Life were pursuing some sort of organized, helpful response to the unfortunate "free speech" episode that occurred two days ago in front of IVC's Student Services Center. (See Free speech at IVC: the case of the Christian provocateur.)
     This morning, a group of interested parties met with the Director to consider the possibilities (I was busy teaching at the time).
     This afternoon, the IVC campus community received this invitation from the President’s office:
Colleagues:

As many of you may be aware, on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 an uninvited group came onto campus and engaged in hate speech against several different groups; they successfully attempted to offend and spark angry reactions from members of our community.

This group was in no way sponsored or supported by the IVC community. They do not embody the values of Irvine Valley College.

We would like to invite all members of the campus community to an open forum to discuss your reactions to this event and let us know what we can all do to support you and make IVC a safer place for all.

The open forum will take place: 
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Noon to 1 pm
Live Oak Terraces

Thank you,

Anissa Cessa Hear-Johnson [sic]
Director, Student Life and Equity Programs
Office of Student Life
See also Yesterday's Visitor: The Radical Reverend 

Thursday, January 21, 2016

More Jesus

      A few minutes ago, yet another preacher appeared in the “free speech” zone in front of IVC’s Student Services building. He is speechifyin’ like a robot. A shouting robot. (Evidently, he’s done this many times before; he barely pauses to breathe.)
     No crowd has yet formed. From what I can tell, this fellow is not particularly provocative. It’s the standard “Jesus” stuff: the wages of sin and all. Students are snickering.
     I like his tie.

P.S.: less than an hour later, the "preacher" was gone. —RB

Yesterday's Visitor: The Radical Reverend

The "reverend" holds forth at Cal Poly Pomona on January 13th. 
     With the help of her intrepid son, Rebel Girl was able to track down the social media accounts of yesterday's visitor, aka the Radical Reverend.
He'll be back!

*

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Free speech at IVC: the case of the Christian provocateur

Photo by L Tonkovich
     At 2:02 this afternoon, IVC President Glenn Roquemore sent this remarkable email to the college community:
Colleagues,
This afternoon, in the free speech area in front of the Student Services Center, a man exercised his first amendment rights drawing an angry crowd that remained mostly peaceful. One student was arrested and released when he spit gum on the speaker. No further incidents were reported. Following the incident, the free exchange of ideas continued peacefully. A successful “teaching moment” was afforded to many IVC staff because most of the students in the crowd had little, if any, familiarity with the concept of free speech and several students rejected the idea outright. 
—Very Respectfully, Glenn R. Roquemore, Ph.D.

     At the end of my second class today, at about 1:50 p.m., a student motioned to the east window and directed my attention to some excitement in front of the Student Services Building. I saw the usual noisy Christian speaker or speakers, shouting "Jesus saves" and the like. The student called them "idiots." I said, "Maybe so, but they've got a right to think and say what they like." I went to my office.
     Just now, upon encountering Roquemore's remarkable email, I went outside to the aforementioned area and found two men with signs surrounded by maybe fifty or sixty people. As often happens midweek, one of them was shouting the standard "Christian" pleas: "repent," "Jesus saves," etc.
     One of the men held a sign with a predictable message about Jesus on one side. On the other side, however, the sign declared that Mohammed is/was a false prophet and that he was a "child molester." The latter notion seemed to be the most obnoxious of the messages displayed on the speakers' four or five signs. I later learned that, throughout the afternoon, the speaker had been shifting from target to target, sometimes attacking Muslims, sometimes attacking gays, sometimes attacking the "n-word President," and so on. 
     He was there, not to discuss or enlighten, but to provoke. He was successful.
     A student, evidently a veteran, stood about twenty feet from these "Christian" speakers, holding up a sign that said something like: "I'm a veteran. I didn't fight to protect 'bigoted' speech." There were two signs flat on the ground at the feet of the "Christian" speakers. Both condemned the speakers' message (the Islamophobia?), though they did not quite suggest that these speakers should be made to cease ranting. The crowd was somewhat rowdy, much amused, and a little hostile.
     I bumped into one of our police officers standing nearby. I asked if our students were behaving themselves. He stated that some of our students seem not to understand the First Amendment—the right to speak one's mind freely, to express even unpopular ideas—for there were some students, he said, who thought that the speakers' presentation should be stopped, that surely it was "illegal."
     The cop also noted that, in general, students had behaved very well and allowed the speakers to express themselves without hindrance.
     While I stood there, I saw that informal groupings of male students occasionally sought to shout down the Christian speaker. The idea, it seemed, was to prevent him from expressing his views.
* * *
Things were winding down by the time we took this pic. The chief
speaker was the man in black.
(Photo by L Tonkovich.)
     P.S.: 3:15 p.m. — The crowd has grown to about 100 and it has grown rowdier. The main "speaker," sporting a fedora and cheap suit, has offered attacks on gays, the field of psychology(?), the Obama administration, women (who, evidently, should not teach), and other predictable right-wing targets. He is clearly trying to provoke the students to anger, to action; unfortunately, students are taking the bait.
     There seem to  be at least three IVC policeman standing by, monitoring the situation. I spoke with them; they seem to be doing a good job keeping the crowd under control.
     I'm told that the crowd has swelled and shrunk and swelled again throughout the afternoon. Earlier in the afternoon, it was much larger, and that's when trouble occurred and Irvine PD were called in.



     P.P.S.: 3:45 — Just spoke with a colleague who noted that the college really ought to provide some kind of follow through to today's episode. It is clear that many students are in need of instruction concerning the notion of free speech—that, as Chomsky explains in the clip below, one does not believe in free speech unless one is willing to support speech that one does not like. (Even tyrants support "free" speech that they agree with.) She also said that this kind of episode reveals the desperate need on this campus for a student newspaper, where such issues can be addressed in a more satisfying manner that reaches students. (As you know, the reason that we do not have a student paper is the President's fear of criticism and other inconveniences that attend a genuine journalism program.) 
     As things are, there are now lots of angry and confused students at the little college in the orange grove and nothing will occur to address that situation, aside from various ad hoc efforts in classes here and there.
     I recommend viewing the clip from the documentary "Manufacturing Consent" below.


"If you believe in freedom of speech, you believe in freedom of speech that you don't like."

Monday, January 18, 2016

Pentagon Lifts Probation of U of Phoenix (Inside Higher Ed)
     The U.S. Department of Defense on Friday removed the University of Phoenix from probationary status, allowing the for-profit chain to again be eligible to participate in a tuition assistance program for active-duty members of the U.S. military.
     The sanction, which the Pentagon handed down last October, was related to allegations of improper recruiting of service members….
. . .
     Several Senate Republicans, including Arizona Senator John McCain, had complained about the sanction….

Vice President, Western Region, Workforce Solutions/University of Phoenix, Chuck Parker, President, Irvine Valley College, Dr. Glenn R. Roquemore.
Roquemore has been President of IVC for 13 years and 7 months. No relief in sight.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Ten years ago.... (January, 2006)

The SOCCCD Match Game

Saturday, January 7, 2006

by Red Emma
he recent spectacle of a right-wing born-again Christian Indian-American former Chemistry professor turned community college district Chancellor dressing up as the whimsically racist Johnny Carson “Tonight Show” seer “Carnac the Magnificent” offers to the willing seat-warmer in our stuffy Theater of the Absurd yet another opportunity to mine previously unexplored strata of irony, mystery and horror. As if having a Holocaust denier on the board, Creationists and homophobes in positions of policy-making, and a low-level dean who proposed (all on his own, bless his tiny little head) construction of a 700 million dollar entertainment complex on the campus (See) were not, well, enough already.

One weeps with despair and delight, as if peeling the world’s largest onion, a fragrant and generous bulb of paradox and incongruity, an organic life force. It is an impossible and rotten fruit. While trying to find its center one laughs and cries at the same time, simply overwhelmed at the fecundity and awesome pungency of it even as it disappears in one’s hand.

Hell, it’s like watching those people who, genuinely awed by M.C. Escher drawings, can be tricked into giving you their credit cards, cars, and young children. “Neat,” they marvel, “the way the fish becomes the chicken and then a gull. Neat-o!”

o, kids, here’s a fun game. In light of Chancellor Raghu Mathur’s unlikely moment of inspired or simply insane vaudevillian performance art, we know you’ll enjoy playing a game of modest subliminal political association and speculation, all for entertainment and more of the jolly sado-masochism so darn available here at Dissent the Blog.

Match the real-life district personality with the fictional, literary, or historical character you’d expect them most likely (and by that we mean least likely) to dress up as in, say, an official college function, e.g., the Chancellor's Opening Session.

Choose as many as you can stand.

Extra points for an essay answer in which you use the phrase “laser beam” or “fiscal conservative.”

Oh, and remember to bring your camera!

Warning: Any resemblance to characters living, dead or in administration is simply a realistic audio-video simulacrum powered by the work of the little hamster. You know, the one trapped on that treadmill now installed in your head courtesy of Human Resources.

Steven Frogue: Franz Liebkind, Aloys Shicklgruber, Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, Marshal Philippe Petain, Vidkun Quisling.

Dave Lang: Inspector Clouseau, Elmer Fudd, Polonious, Super Mario.

Don Wagner: Hamilton Burger, Newt Gingrich, Whittaker Chambers, Donald Segretti.

John Williams: Officer Krupke, Major-General Stanley, Sergeant Joe Friday, J. Edgar Hoover, Barney Fife.

Howard Gensler: Frank Lloyd Wright, Albert Speer, Howard Roark, Conrad Hilton, Dagwood Bumpstead, Alfred E. Neuman, or Randall from “Monster’s Inc.”

Thomas Fuentes: Generalissimo Francisco Franco, Roy Cohn, Spiro Agnew, Tom DeLay, Randy “Duke” Cunningham, Robert Schuller.

Dennis White: Betty White, Barry White, Macy’s parade balloon of Snow White, Dennis Mitchell.

Glenn Roquemore: Raghu Mathur, Thomas Fuentes, Charlie McCarthy, Mortimer Snerd, the Horta, Ruff the Dog, Jackie Battley Gingrich.

Andrew Tonkovich

“Decomposed materials of organic origin”

Friday, January 13, 2006
by Roy Bauer


s you know, dear readers, Dissent has chronicled the IVC A200 “mold monster” story right from the start. When Mr. S was found hyperventilating in a pool of his own drool over by the A200 water cooler, Dissent was there. When some guys were spotted standing and pointing on the roof of A200, Dissent was there. When technicians showed up in A200 with what they called a “really expensive gizmo,” yes, Dissent was there.

Dissent has now secured a copy of a report, dated December 5 (hmmm, why is it circulating only now?), from The Machado Environmental Corporation, a company that, evidently, the college has hired to conduct “limited inspection and testing” of HVAC systems (I think they mean “air conditioning”).

The testing will be in two phases: one before and one after the HVAC systems are cleaned. This particular report concerns phase 1.

Here’s my report on the Machado report:

STINKAGE:

According to Mr. Huff, the author of the Machado report, “A number of sewer vents are all located between three and seven feet from an outside air intake of one or more of the A/C units.” “This situation,” he continues gravely, “could result in complaints from occupants of sewer odors due to sewer gases….”

“Could result in complaints”? Well, yeah, that could happen. But the situation could result in complaints because the situation could result in wafting stinkage.

ROOF: 

We now know what those guys were doing on the roof. “The roof was quite clean,” reports Mr. Huff. One wonders what he expected to find up there. Zoroastrian bone yards?

INTERIOR, SMALL OFFICES: 

In a section of the report entitled, “Inspection of building interior,” Huff writes that “the [A200] building consists of numerous classrooms and a variety of offices. The office area, apparently for professors and instructors, consists of a number of relatively small offices.”

I’m glad he noticed the smallness of our offices. He is pleased by the "variety" of office configurations. That's nice.

Huff says that, in the few offices he could enter—many, he says, were “locked”; apparently, no one had bothered to arrange for Huff’s crew to actually enter anything—things looked pretty good.

“No unpleasant odor,” writes Mr. Huff. Evidently, at least one hallway was stink-free. Oh good.

IT STINKS LIKE THREE GUYS, NOT TWO: 

On the other hand, “The supply vents in some of the offices were closed or nearly closed.” Huff seems to focus on one hell hole in particular: “In the Kaufman [sic] /Frets office the supply vent was almost completely closed. There were three desks in this office, suggesting three occupants. [Nope. Just two.] The supply vent appeared to have mold growth on the exposed surface.”

Um, what's the point of noting that three people occupy this space? Can somebody explain that to me? Is Huff thinking that, if toxins are gonna fill the room it's best to keep the number down to two?

Further, writes Huff, “We inspected the supply vents in a number of classrooms. Each of the supply vents we inspected was dirty inside….”

Well, to make a long story short, a “surface sample” was taken from the supply vent in the “Kaufman office.” This and some air samples were sent to a laboratory for “analysis by direct microscopy.”

That sounds pretty technical. It's science.

KAUFMAN HOSTS SPORES: 

The result: “Analysis of…[air samples throughout the building] revealed only background or normal mold spore levels….”

Mostly, the samples didn’t show much, but then there's the hell hole sample: “Kaufman’s supply vent had very high levels of fungal hyphae and fungal spores, which is consistent with the mold growth detected there.”

That can’t be good.

So you’ll probably want to avoid going inside Jeff and David’s office—an office that, incidentally, opens up to the infamously uninviting “faculty lounge” (which sports one ratty sofa and a fake tree) and that is right across from Mr. S’s notoriously mold-infested office. (Have I mentioned that Mr. S has evacuated his office? He now resides down the hall, far from the madding spore, seething in peevitude.)

DUST: 

What about dust? Mr. Huff helpfully notes that “inhaling dust is unhealthy….” But he and his gizmo-wielding crew didn’t find much dust, except in the case of some “Fabric chairs.”

I think he means to say that when you bang on the cushion of that ratty sofa in the faculty lounge, a dust cloud forms and a great fetid stink envelops the building, choking all life.

In the “discussion” part of the report, Huff declares that, in general, the air conditioning supply ducts were “dirty.” He refers to the “growth of Cladosporium on the supply vent in the Kaufman office….”

Huff suddenly gets clinical (and grammatical): "Cladosporium is capable of eliciting allergic responses in certain individuals. This mold type can also produce toxins that are potentially harmful to humans.”


RECOMMENDATIONS: 

In the “Recommendations” portion of the report, Huff opines that the “ductwork of all 15 A/C systems should be thoroughly cleaned.” Plus stuff should be vacuumed once a month. Not once a decade, Glenn. Once a month.

Appended to the report are lab reports for each of the samples. One air sample was typical. It showed a

~ 38% concentration of dander, i.e., “animal epidermal cell remnants” [rat dandruff],
~ 12% concentration of “organic detritus,” i.e., “partially decomposed materials of organic origin” [rat turds]
~ (less than) 1% “fungal spores,” “insect body parts,” “spider webs,” and so on.

Yum.

Also appended to the report are “photographic documentation.” These photos look like Nineteenth Century daguerreotypes of pipes and walls. Huff or somebody even squiggled over some of them, further obscuring their nature.

What does it all mean? Hell if I know. But we certainly are looking forward to “phase 2”!

Rebel Girl Has a Dream: The Girl Can't Help It

Monday, January 16, 2006
by Rebel Girl


nce again, Rebel Girl is humbled by the thoughtful, inspired programming commemorating the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. offered by the college.

Some colleges are satisfied with a day of events or even a single event, but not IVC. No. Only an entire week of activities will do.

This surely demonstrates the college’s commitment to inclusion, civil rights and all that is good and just in the world. It shows our community that this little sector of Orange County is committed, nay, dedicated to living the legacy of Dr. King. It makes her proud.

One glance at the heft of the Schedule of Events booklet shows the depth of our respect.

The week begins with a free pancake breakfast on Tuesday morning, with all the trustees taking their turns behind the griddle, clutching spatulas. Performing will be a local interfaith chorus. Representatives of local peace and justice, community and environmental organizations will be present. Irvine Valley College will announce its institutional adoption of an Amnesty International prisoner of conscience and unveil plans for a Peace and Justice Center adjacent the (former) Terry Burgess Greenhouse. Chancellor Mathur will cut the ribbon. President Roquemore does the honors with the shovel.

Throughout the week, district administrators will visit classes, encouraging involvement in service projects both on and off campus, toward helping provide for the needs of those without. Furthermore, each administrator has made a personal pledge to tithe amounts equivalent to the unprecedented raises each received last year: the monies will go to local groups battling poverty, including the Catholic Worker. Rebel Girl was told that the meeting where this decision was made was very, very emotional.


Noontime events on the lawn in front of the Student Services Center include college trustees giving the King speech of their own choosing. The event is free, and community members are welcome. While reports suggest there was indeed a friendly tussle for the honor to recite the famous “I Have a Dream” speech, Trustee Fuentes, former chair of the Orange County Republican Party, prevailed and will offer the landmark speech--from memory--on Tuesday. Wednesday’s presentation has been claimed by Trustee John Williams who will read, not a speech but instead King’s 1963 “Letter from the Birmingham Jail.” On Wednesday, Don Wagner will recreate King’s classic anti-war speech given at Riverside Church a year before his death: “Beyond Vietnam.” In accepting the responsibility of this controversial address, for which Dr. King was attacked at the time as a “demagogue” by Time magazine, Wagner quoted King: “Our lives begin to end on the day we refuse to speak.” Thursday’s schedule includes a “Civil Rights” recreation event, the 1965 nonviolent confrontation at the Edmund Pettus Bridge, facilitated by Dave Lang, Nancy Padberg, Marcia Milchiker and Bill Jay.


Throughout the week, the Orange County Lego League will honor Dr. King by staging various interactive scenes from his life in the A-quad. The centerpiece is their distinctive and award-winning recreation of the 1963 March on Washington where Dr. King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. The OCLL is particularly proud of, not only its ability to re-create the mall, Washington Monument and reflecting pool, the Lincoln Memorial, but also its construction of uncanny models of historical figures who took the stage that day alongside King: Peter Paul & Mary, Bob Dylan, SNCC’s John Lewis and Mahalia Jackson.

Finally, in honor of King’s commitment to labor justice, the district has announced that it will settle the contract dispute with the Classified Union. It will be, indeed, a “fair contract.”

As you can probably tell by now, Rebel Girl dreams too.


Now some may gripe that Rebel Girl is simply eating a plate of sour grapes. That she, given lemons, lacks the vision to make lemonade. That she is one of those who sees a glass of water for what it isn’t, not for what it is: wet.

It’s true that when she was newly hired and full of all sorts of ideas and full of the energy that comes from working at an institution that seeks to nurture rather than oppress, that she and her colleagues had the temerity to put together a modest but singular King Day offering for a number of years: a showing of the award-winning documentary: "From Montgomery to Memphis." It was an effort that sought to fill a need. It did. Of course, she secretly hoped that the institution would take on what is obviously an institutional obligation.

Years passed, the college underwent its “changes” and so-called “multicultural programming” was taken over by people who imagined Yul Brynner’s “The King and I” offered relevant lessons in assimilation for college students. Say no more, though Rebel Girl could say plenty.

But Rebel Girl can’t help to add that the deafening silence by which King Day is celebrated on this campus is a sharp contrast to another day that she still remembers: on April 27, 1994, our district distinguished itself by becoming the only college district in the nation to close in an official day of mourning in honor of the passing of Richard Milhouse Nixon.

Say no more.



Student evaluations of teaching (SET): unreliable

Bias Against Female Instructors (Inside Higher Ed, January 11, 2016)
     There’s mounting evidence suggesting that student evaluations of teaching are unreliable. But are these evaluations, commonly referred to as SET, so bad that they’re actually better at gauging students’ gender bias and grade expectations than they are at measuring teaching effectiveness? A new paper argues that’s the case, and that evaluations are biased against female instructors in particular in so many ways that adjusting them for that bias is impossible.
     Moreover, the paper says, gender biases about instructors -- which vary by discipline, student gender and other factors -- affect how students rate even supposedly objective practices, such as how quickly assignments are graded. And these biases can be large enough to cause more effective instructors to get lower teaching ratings than instructors who prove less effective by other measures, according to the study based on analyses of data sets from one French and one U.S. institution.
. . .
     “Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness,” was published last week in ScienceOpen Research. Philip B. Stark, associate dean of the Division of Mathematical and Physical Sciences and a professor of statistics at the University of California at Berkeley and co-author of a widely read 2014 paper questioning the reliability of evaluations, co-wrote the paper with Anne Boring, a postdoctoral researcher in economics at the Paris Institute of Political Studies, and Kellie Ottoboni, a Ph.D. candidate in statistics at Berkeley.
. . .
     Stark said he doubted the new study would be the “nail the coffin” for student evaluations of teaching, but said he hoped it will “bring us closer to ending any use of SET for employment decisions.” Still, he said, pretending that such evaluations are strong measures of teaching effectiveness remains “irresistible” to some, for a variety of complicated reasons.
     But could the tide be turning? Stark said he expected class action lawsuits against universities that rely on these evaluations for employment decisions will start this year, and that there’s evidence to support such cases.
     “Our analysis would support an argument that the use of SET has adverse impact on female instructors, at least in the two settings we examined,” he said. “Replication of this kind of experiment and analysis elsewhere would strengthen the argument. Eventually, lawsuits will lead universities to do the right thing, if only to mitigate financial risks.”

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Who counts as an "educator"?

We missed this one, five days ago:

California Accreditor Loses Appeal (Inside Higher Ed, Jan 7)
Babs vs. educators
. . .The [DOE's] decision is the latest development in a complicated, drawn-out battle over the accreditation of California's community colleges. In 2013, ACCJC sought to revoke the accreditation of the City College of San Francisco. That decision drew sharp criticism from faculty unions and California political leaders, who filed lawsuits and brought their complaints about the accreditor to the Education Department.

     Critics of the ACCJC see one of those issues -- the federal standard requiring that accreditors be "widely accepted" among educators -- as particularly helpful to their cause because, they argue, the accreditor has only continued to lose support among California community colleges since the CCSF showdown. Leaders of the state's community college system, for example, last year said that they have lost faith in the ACCJC and are looking for ways to transition to a new accrediting agency.
     Joshua Pechthalt, president of the California Federation of Teachers, praised the department's decision, saying it affirmed the union's concerns with the accreditor.
     The department, he said in a statement, "has wisely rejected ACCJC's appeal, and we look forward to the department's assistance as we move to find a new path for accreditation in California."
Two portions of the letter/decision (dated Jan 4):

Glenn and Tod can stick this in their pipe and smoke it.


Saturday, January 9, 2016

Separated at birth

Is it just me? Or do others, too, find that this "El Chapo" fella looks awfully familiar?

Friday, January 8, 2016

5 years ago today: tea & bullets

TEA AND BULLETS, DtB, Jan 8, 2011



"Arizona has become a Mecca for prejudice and bigotry."
—Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik
(at a press conference today)

"Don’t Retreat; Instead – RELOAD!"
—Sarah Palin

"We’re paying particular attention to those House members who voted in favor of Obamacare and represent districts that Senator John McCain and I carried during the 2008 election... [W]e’re going to hold them accountable for this disastrous Obamacare vote. They are: Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ-1), Harry E. Mitchell (AZ-5), Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8)...."
—Sarah Palin

SEE ALSO:

Referring students, sight unseen, to tutoring? Huh? DtB, Jan 8 11

Jared Lee Loughner, DtB, Jan 10 11
Alleged Shooter Was Suspended by Pima CC (Inside Higher Ed)

     Jared Lee Loughner, the suspect in the shootings of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and others on Saturday, withdrew from Pima Community College in October, after the college had suspended him. A statement from the college said that he was suspended after five contacts with college police officers and after the college discovered a YouTube video, made on a Pima campus, in which Loughner claimed that the college was an illegal organization under the U.S. Constitution....


Trump and Other Republicans Do the Gun Lobby’s Bidding (NYT, Jan 8)
     Just when President Obama was attempting a reasoned debate on gun control this week, Donald Trump was engaged in his latest pandering to the gun rights crowd — vowing as president to strike down laws that bar firearms from schools….
. . .
     It was remarkable, too, for its contrast with Mr. Obama’s televised defense of his own modest gun proposals, for which he asked full and fair attention by this year’s presidential candidates so that all of them might rationally address genuine public concerns with the grim reality of 30,000 gun deaths every year.
     Mr. Trump quickly dashed that hope, though his response has been no worse than those of the other Republican candidates, who across the board have peddled simplistic evasions and dangerous misinformation. “Obama Wants Your Guns,” warns a deceitful fund-raising pitch on Senator Ted Cruz’s website, which also features a photograph of Mr. Obama distorted to show him in military attack helmet and combat uniform ready to confiscate the hundreds of millions of guns now in public hands. These are among other hallucinatory fictions peddled by opportunists like Mr. Cruz as they comfort an arms industry enriched by a gun mortality rate far higher than that of any other modern nation.
 PLUTO: An ‘X’ formation appears on the surface of Pluto in one of the newly released photos taken by New Horizons for Nasa. Photograph: Nasa/JHUAPL/SwRI

Monday, January 4, 2016

Irvine, 90 years ago



Many if not all of these photos depict the area that is now called "Old Town" in Irvine (Sand Canyon at, or just south of, the 5). Click on photos to enlarge them.










SEE ALSO
Bonus pics:

Jeffrey Rd. at Triomph, Irvine, Aug. 1968 or 1969.
IVC was constructed ten years later—down the road and to the left

Perspective of above photo
El Toro Rd. @ Laguna Canyon, c. 1973 (not quite in Irvine)
Culver Drive @ University, looking south, c. 1963.
Assuming we're on Culver, the future site of Mason Park would be ahead and to the right of the road (i.e., straight ahead). UCI would be behind Mason Park (dead ahead, more or less, beyond that darkened hill).

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...