Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Out of the fire: the union PAC comes to its senses

     As you know, in late 2010, SOCCCD trustee John Williams was up to his eyeballs in trouble with his county gig as Public Administrator/Guardian. Explaining that he had health issues, he decided to resign from the board—presumably, to concentrate on trying to save his ass downtown.
     He was replaced by the mild-mannered Mike Meldau, who turned out to be a pretty good trustee.
     Eventually, the OC board of Supes managed to get Williams out of office, though the price was a sweet deal for Orlando Boy that included an agreement not to release what must have been a damning report regarding his office at the county. Brown Boy left. Good riddance.
     By that point, Williams was the (latest) poster child for incompetent and corrupt OC government, and, ipso facto, he was a huge embarrassment for the local GOP, some of the past and present leaders of which created and maintained the cronyistic system that brought Orange Countians the likes of Sheriff Mike Carona, Treasurer Chriss Street, Public Administrator John Williams, and many other boobs, rascals, and creeps.
     But John Williams is a shameless bastard, and a guy who, despite his stupidity, does possess a range of minor crafty capacities, including his instinctive sense that he can continue to count on his utterly clueless red-countied, blue-haired constituency, even as his corruption and incompetence has become obvious to intelligent beings everywhere. When some of his long-time supporters in the SOCCCD faculty union—the union had sidled up to him for twenty years, solely owing to his support of the faculty contract (the cheap bastard was willing to tweak his “fiscal conservatism” for the sake of the chump change necessary to run a trustee campaign)—dropped by to suggest his running to regain his seat for the area 7 trustee seat, he saw his chance to complement his very comfy circumstances with a return to his old office, an undemanding job that, nonetheless, had for decades provided him with great benefits and innumerable taxpayer-paid trips to Orlando, Florida.
     He filed.
     A remnant of the corrupt union regulars who controlled the organization during the 1990s then went to work, exploiting faculty’s traditional inattention during summer. They got themselves on the union PAC and managed to get that group to recommend endorsing you-know-who.
     Then disaster struck. Meldau had no stomach for a fight. As an incumbent, he would have been a shoo-in. But it was no use: he wasn't going forward. That meant that Williams had a fighting chance to regain his seat. (For a while there, it looked like Williams would be unopposed! As it turned out, he has three competitors, at least one of whom—Tim Jemal (see)—has attracted significant endorsements.)
     Meanwhile, new union leadership recognized that it was now sitting on a potential powder keg. That crew arranged to put off the Rep Council decision whether to accept the PAC recommendation with regard to area 7 until Sept 10. That bought some time.
     (Comic relief: Supervisor-elect Todd Spitzer sued Williams for lying on his candidate statement, and the judge ruled that Williams must delete the preposterous claim that the OC Grand Jury praised his office.)
     Then (I gather), some time recently, the few sentient beings on the PAC managed to persuade one or two others of the group to vote to “unrecommend” endorsement of Williams. I have no idea how that happened, though I can imagine. In any case, it now appears that the PAC recommendation with regard to area 7 is “no endorsement.”
     Excellent.
     The meeting in which the Rep Council will decide whether to go along with the new recommendation will be at IVC, on Monday (the 10th). Stay tuned.

UPDATE (9/10): During the Sept. 10 Rep Council meeting, faculty were informed that the Ex. committee had voted to accept the PAC's last recommendation (which included no suggestion that Williams be endorsed). The FA Prez described late summer as a "roller coaster ride"—an allusion, I think, to the endorsement fiasco, which (evidently) came about owing to thebylaws, which entitle former FA Presidents to join the PAC. Some of those oldsters showed up to promote Williams. Later, of course, this was undone.

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

OFF TOPIC: They could warn us at IVC when they close down half the faculty parking spots in front of A-100. A little head's up would help. 30 minutes ttrying to find one spot, somwhere. Unlike Richard Morely, I can't leave MY car in loading indefinitely or the cops will ticket ME.

Anonymous said...

the judge did not rule on anything, the parties stipulated to a modification of the language in the ballot statement

Anonymous said...

You missed the email they sent out on Tuesday warning us to find parking elsewhere and suggesting early arrival to prevent snafus.

Anonymous said...

No such email was sent!

When they have to get that many parking spots they shouldn't carve it out the of the people who have to get to work on time - and without notice.

Anonymous said...

I didn't get the email announcement about the parking lot closure.

But I did arrive an hour before my class started. good thing. It took 30 minute to finally find one spot in the student parking lot in front of BSTIC.

We get so many emails about events that do not affect on work on campus that you'd think they would send out emails about events that do. Closing half the spots available to staff affects our ability to do our jobs in a timely manner.

The same thing happens (without advance notice) on Transfer Day and other special events. Why they do not sue the student lots immediately adjacent to the staff lot is beyond me. It's easy enough to direct folks there.

And sure the admin types get to park in loading until a comfy spot opens up. No tickets for them.

Anonymous said...

Too bad the summer PAC messed up and we lost Meldau.

(Why all the complaints about parking here?)

Anonymous said...

yes, too bad about the insult to Meldau.

Anonymous said...

I didn't get any email about the annoying parking lot closure. Was there one?

Anonymous said...

facilities just sent out an email about a scheduled power outage next week. That's great. I agree there need sot be more of that kind of thing - fewer announcements about events that do not affect our working conditions. The blizzard of email announcements discourages people from opening most of them.

Anonymous said...

Parking? Really? The best you can do is bitch about parking? Try working at UCI where the parking permit doesn't buy you anything for $800 a year.

Anonymous said...

I work at UCI AND IVC and I can "bitch" about parking at both places. I think if you shell out money you should be able to park in order to do your job. Hell, I think you should be able to park for FREE in order to do you job but that's just me.

Anonymous said...

Did Daryl Cox's (trustee candidate) wife also visit Saddleback's Senate?

I think she's just trying to draw enough votes so that Williams wins. Williams and Cox are friends.

(Yes, the parking the other day was bad. And the event didn't even draw that many people. Yes, they should take from the student parking lot, not staff.)

Anonymous said...

Dear 4:18 Cox and Williams are not friends. Cox put her name in the hat when Meldeau pulled out and it looked like Williams would run unapposed.
I hope she also visits the IVC Academic Senate (and both Classified Senates)it would be nice to hear what a trustee candidate has to say and more importantly if they ask what they can do to support our govenrnance groups with the Board.

Roy Bauer said...

Ms. Cox did briefly visit the IVC Academic Senate yesterday. She briefly explained why she was running and what she stood for. As I recall, she opined that her district (Mission Viejo and environs) has been underrepresented (i.e., historically, the area 7 trustee--Williams (until very recently)--has done little to meet with his constituency). She also said that it is the board's job to "develop" the colleges, and that ATEP could use development.

Anonymous said...

But how real IS Cox's campaign? There's something sus about it.

Anonymous said...

What makes one campaign more real than another?

Do you think she is in it just to siphon off votes from Jemal (with his bevy of endorsements) - the only "real" contender Williams has?

Anonymous said...

"What makes one campaign more real than another?"

Money, slates, a candidate statement, well-known and trusted in the community endorsements, a ground game, a web presence... All things Moodian and Cox lack and that Williams and Jemal have.

At this point, Moodian and Cox are spoilers only, regardless of why they got into the race. Only Jemal has a chance of beating Williams. If the FA and its members don't get involved on Jemal's side, the public WILL re-elect Williams.

Anonymous said...

I don't think Jemal gave the FA a reason to back him other than he wasn't Williams.

That's not enough.

It's best for the FA to stay out that race altogether.

Anonymous said...

Spoken like a member of the Old Guard.

Anonymous said...

4:15 - you state the judge did not rule on anything? The judge, in his minute order, states: "Petitioner (Spitzer)has met his burden by clear and convincing evidence that this statement is false and misleading pursuant to Elections Code section...Petitioner is entitled to the issuance of a Writ of Mandate ORDERING Registrar of Voters to strike this statement....The Court does order the Real Party in Interest, Mr. John S. Williams, to pay Petitioners court filing fee in the amount of $525.00." Nice try Phil.

Here is the link to the court order:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17059664/Butterfield%20V.%20Williams/Butterfield%20v%20Williams.JudgeSanders.CourtOrder.pdf

PP

Anonymous said...

I don't think there is a compelling reason to support anyone in that race. They are all, unfortunately, pretty much wackadoodles.

Anonymous said...

Wackadoodles!

Anonymous said...

6:20 What,s sus about a community member wanting to engage for the right reasons?

Anonymous said...

Hey 6:31 Real contenders? Compared to Williams, they are are real.

Anonymous said...

My goggle search puts everyone on the map with a presence. A trusted community endorsement from Spitzer or anyone else is only as good as John Q Public believes it to be.

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...