They shouldn’t be. Our system is now such that shit happens in their city, county, state and federal government all of the time about which they haven’t a solitary clue. It's still pretty easy to get clued in. But people don't make the effort. They don't think they need to. They even think they are knowledgeable.
They're deeply, f*cking clueless. They're über-clueless!
The prevailing cluelessness of voters—admittedly, also encouraged by the decline of local newsreporting—is well illustrated by the SOCCCD. Our seven elected trustees oversee the expenditure of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. Do people understand this? Do they know who these trustees are and how they conduct themselves? Clearly not. Over and over again, trustee incumbents are reelected, even when they act badly and irresponsibly. Several of them have done so. For years.
The SOCCCD comprises three campuses: Saddleback College, Irvine Valley College, and ATEP (the Advanced Technical and Education Park), in Tustin. Very big things have been promised at ATEP for many years—it’s the SOCCCD’s endlessly promised but albatrossian “Great Park”—and, despite the expenditure of many millions of dollars, all we have there so far is a dinky cluster of tin buildings, a few bewildered administrators, and a few hundred students.
The board has been divided about ATEP, but its champions have generally prevailed, in part because of the ardent advocacy of former Chancellor Raghu Mathur, who saw the facility as his Mt. Rushmore. It seems to me that it was not unreasonable for trustees, all those many years ago, to pursue the property, which was part of the old Tustin Marine Corps Air Station, and to try to do something special with it. But, in part owing to some bad luck, things haven’t worked out.
For several years now, it has seemed to many observers that we’re throwing good money after bad. In the meantime, money gets tighter and tighter, and important college services have been cut back or worse.
Do citizens have any idea about this? Don’t think so.
* * *
As it happens, one of our trustees, John Williams, is also the county’s Public Guardian/Public Administrator, a job that he has royally screwed up, or so said two Grand Jury reports and lots of unhappy people who work or have worked with the fellow.Williams eventually faced a kind of “day of reckoning” before the OC Board of Supervisors, but at least four of the five Supes are politically affiliated with Williams. Three of them decided essentially to leave Williams and his combined offices alone, despite the top-heavy management, the irregularities and unprofessionalism, the growing costs. It was outrageous and inexplicable (well, no, it was way explicable, I’m afraid).
Does the community understand any of this? Clearly not. In the recent election, despite those “scathing” Grand Jury reports, Williams was reelected.
* * *
Two important issues have come up in county politics very recently: redistricting and campaign finance restrictions. Things could have gone very badly, but that hasn’t happened yet. Do you think your neighbors know about this?Journalists do report these things. We’ve still got some excellent news media in this county. For instance, the Voice of OC seems so far to be doing a good job reporting on important local issues in politics. I've been a big fan from the start.
Check out editor-in-chief Norberto Santana’s recent appearance on the Real Orange (KOCE). Again, important decisions are being made—or, more recently, have failed to be made—in county government. Santana lays it out.
And don’t forget to read The Voice of OC online!
4 comments:
Well, what does this suggest in the broadest terms about the educational institutions in our country--private, home schooled, and public? And when a state like Texas says revisionist history is fine, I wonder what direction a remarkable country like this going.
We have so much to offer and we seem not to take the good and make the best of it.
So what is going on with the ATEP? Have funds meant for it been spent on other things instead, or...? ES
I'm not sure. For now, it seems, the board continues to support the ATEP dream. One unfortunate and irritating feature of this "process" has been the continued veil of secrecy around the project imposed by this top-down board, and so we only learn about things in doses usually long after the fact. (Faculty are supposed to take the lead in the expansion of instructional programs, and Big ATEP will involve new programs; yet faculty have been kept out of the loop.) A key problem has been finding a viable financial partner or partners. In the end, this board is indeed fiscally conservative, and so the project will not be supported indefinitely. It probably helps that Mathur is gone. (He boosted Big ATEP--until he became a short-timer. Then he reversed gears, not wanting others to get the glory.)
How frustrating it must be that the board is like that... ES
Post a Comment