I’ve done a little research since then, and, as it turns out, this kind of grade information is fairly readily available, owing to such entities as the website Pick-A-Prof (PAP). According to Wikipedia,
Pick-A-Prof is a pay-to-use online website found at www.pickaprof.com that hosts professor reviews and other academic tools and services for university students and professors. …
…
The site posts grade histories of professors. The grade history graphs display the distribution of grades from A’s to F’s.
This feature displays the semester(s) a professor teaches a particular course and the average GPA each professor gives in that course. While searching for a course, the site shows the professors teaching the course, a 5-star rating system ..., the number of student reviews submitted for each professor and the percentage of students who dropped the class.
…
Many professors say the website portrays their courses unfairly and students will hesitate to take their classes if the grade distribution reported on Pick-A-Prof does not match their definition of earning an “easy A.” ….
I found a year-old article in UC Santa Barbara's Daily Nexus (New Web Site Evaluates Professors) that reports that
Pick-A-Prof won a lawsuit against University of California, Davis in 2006 that opened the gateway for the widespread publication of professors’ grades. The site sued the school claiming that professors’ grades were public record after the university had originally given out the grades but then refused to release them.
I’ve been told (but need to verify) that our own district has handed over grade distribution records per instructor to Pick-A-Prof.
So I visited PAP, and, sure enough, PAP has the data, at least for IVC. (One must register to access PAP's data, but there's no charge.)
I looked up Professor Roy Bauer and found that the fellow gives lots of A’s but many more B’s and his “G.P.A” (i.e., the average grade he gives) is slightly below 2.0 (C) for “Intro to Philosophy” and slightly above 2.0 for “Ethics.”
Bastard!
Naturally, I provided a review of this fine fellow. I gave him five stars (the maximum) and wrote that he is “epoch-shatteringly delightful.”
And it's all true.
For those youngsters who were mystified by my earlier allusion to Cool Hand Luke:
I think I'm beginning to like this Anderson Cooper fella:
2 comments:
Just from reading the article I thought "Well, Roy advises students to leave if they can't hack the writing, perhaps some take this advice, and so only the strong stick around."
Then I noticed 35% F's for Phil 1. Jeez!
A-HAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wasn't "youngster" the term you were chiding me about a month ago, Roy--the term that is not "groovy"?
Okay; now I KNOW I'm losing it. I'm going to bed.
MAH
Post a Comment