.....Here are excerpts from a review of the movie that appeared in Scientific American a week or so ago: Ben Stein's Expelled: No Integrity Displayed:
.....In the new science-bashing movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Ben Stein and the rest of the filmmakers sincerely and seriously argue that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution paved the way for the Holocaust. By "seriously," I mean that Ben Stein acts grief-stricken and the director juxtaposes quotes from evolutionary biologists with archival newsreel clips from Hitler's Reich…...... The chief financial backer of the Discovery Institute is, of course, Orange County’s own Howard Ahmanson, Jr., a close (and filthy-rich) friend of trustee Tom Fuentes (both are on the Claremont Institute board of directors and Bible Study Group).
.....No one could have been more surprised than I when the producers called, unbidden, offering Scientific American's editors a private screening. Given that our magazine's positions on evolution and intelligent design (ID) creationism reflect those of the scientific mainstream (that is, evolution: good science; ID: not science), you have to wonder why they would bother. It's not as though anything in Expelled would have been likely to change our views. And they can't have been looking for a critique of the science in the movie, because there isn't much to speak of.
.....Rather, it seems a safe bet that the producers hope a whipping from us would be useful for publicity…..
.....Unfortunately, Expelled is a movie not quite harmless enough to be ignored. Shrugging off most of the film's attacks—all recycled from previous pro-ID works—would be easy, but its heavy-handed linkage of modern biology to the Holocaust demands a response for the sake of simple human decency.
…..
.....…Stein explains that he is speaking out because he has "lately noticed a dire trend" that threatens the state of our nation: the ascendance of godless, materialist, evolutionary science and an unwillingness among academics to consider more theistic alternatives. … He and Expelled charge that scientists, in their rejection of religious explanations, have become as intolerant as Nazis….
…..
.....I should note that Stein and Expelled rarely refer to "scientists" as I did—they call them Darwinists. Similarly, this review may have already used the word "evolution" about as often as the whole of Expelled does; in the movie, it is always Darwinism. The term is a curious throwback, because in modern biology almost no one relies solely on Darwin's original ideas—most researchers would call themselves neo-Darwinian if they bothered to make the historical connection at all because evolutionary science now encompasses concepts as diverse as symbiosis, kin selection and developmental genetics….
.....Expelled then trots out some of the people whom it claims have been persecuted by the Darwinist establishment. First among them is Richard Sternberg, former editor of the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington…. Sternberg tells Stein that he subsequently lost his editorship….
.....What most viewers of Expelled may not realize—because the film doesn't even hint at it—is that Sternberg's case is not quite what it sounds. Biologists criticized Sternberg's choice to publish [an ID] paper not only because it supported ID but also because Sternberg approved it by himself rather than sending it out for independent expert review. He didn't lose his editorship; he published the paper in what was already scheduled to be his last issue as editor. He didn't lose his job at the Smithsonian; his appointment there as an unpaid research associate had a limited term, and when it was over he was given a new one. His office move was scheduled before the paper ever appeared… And so on.
.....…The movie's one-sided version is either the result of shoddy investigation or deliberate propagandizing—neither of which reflects well on the other information in the film.
.....So it is with the rest of Expelled's parade of victims. Caroline Crocker, a biology teacher, was allegedly dismissed from her position at George Mason University after merely mentioning ID; the film somehow never reports exactly what she said or why anyone objected to it. Reporter Pamela Winnick was supposedly pilloried and fired after she wrote objectively about evolution and ID; we don't know exactly what she wrote but later we do hear her asserting with disgust that "Darwinism devalues human life." The film forgot to mention that Winnick is the author of the book A Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion—a title that suggests her objectivity on the subject might be a bit tarnished.
.....The movie's unreliable reporting is even more obvious during the scene in which Stein interviews Bruce Chapman, the president of the Discovery Institute, the institutional heart of ID advocacy. Stein asks whether the Discovery Institute has supported the teaching of ID in science classes so avidly because it is trying to sneak religion back into public schools. Chapman says no and the film blithely takes him at his word. No mention is made of the notorious "Wedge" document, a leaked Discovery Institute manifesto that outlined a strategy of opposing evolution and turning the public against scientific materialism as the first step toward making society more politically conservative and theistic. Maybe Ben Stein didn't think it was relevant, but wouldn't an honest film have trusted its audience to judge for itself? [END]
.....As we’ve reported previously, Ahmanson is a Christian Reconstructionist, i.e., someone who seeks to apply “the general principles of Old Testament and New Testament moral law and case laws in the appropriate family, church and/or civil government.” Christian Reconstructionists further believe “that God's kingdom began at the first coming of Jesus Christ, and will advance throughout history until it fills the whole earth through conversion to the Christian faith….”
.....(Ahmanson is a disciple of Rousas John Rushdoony, who wrote: "...Christianity and democracy are inevitably enemies....")
.....Fuentes is on the board of a right-wing publisher that puts out anti-evolution books such as Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? See "Kill It or Grill It"—and other Fuentean titles.
14 comments:
I wouldn't be patronizing anything that Ben Stein is in anyway @ this time. The only reason I bought "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" when I did was b/c a) I loved the movie, & Stein only had a cameo appearance in it as the monotone high school teacher," & b) Before I became aware that Stein was a Nixon apologist, etc. What I cannot understand for the life of me is why Stein, who is Jewish is going on w/"W" & his buddies right-wing reactionary agenda. By the way, I happen to be a big fan of Goofy, so please don't affiliate him w/Stein. Although I'm not sure about Walt, I think that Mr. Goofy might be offended.LOL
Ben Stein understands the menace that Islam is to the West and to Israel particularly.
So does W (unartfully, I'll give ya).
That is why, 4:19, you won't find Stein in his enemies camp. He gets it.
Expelled will become the object of hatred by the automatons of hoary Darwinism. Not only are these haters clear about the necessity of Darwinism to be true, even if it is not true, but they are equally clear about their lust to deconstruct morality and to reduce life itself to a meaningless treadmill.
Interesting to see another 'free-thinker' offering an opinion on something they haven't seen.
Obviously it is best to never have anything challenged -- cause it could hurt your brain.....
4:46 Darwin lived long before we had a handle on molecular biology.
The most immediate postulate we had out of his observations morphed into that crazy Soviet theory that animals who even tried to "stretch their necks" to get food would give birth to animals with longer necks.
We know now that we know very little about the mechanics of how life forms evolve or change. But due to our inquiries that may be moot. Humans will soon engineer lifeforms and when they do, I'm sure they will screw things up to our collective detriment. We're not gonna have to worry about being around when the sun goes nova.
Yes, fundamentalist Islam is a menace. So is fundamentalist Christianity.
Does anyone really believe Stein gives a flying fuck about ID? He's just trying to make a few dollars here. He's a Republican after all; the idea of a vision for a better world--especially by bringing an imaginary friend into the classroom-- is just not in his purview.
Is it my imagination, or is it fear that I smell running through this post--fear that there IS an intelligent designer, which in the end would change everything--like accountabilty and morality?
No, we're afraid that people like you get to vote.
i've been meaning to see this movie, if only just to say "i've seen it." then again, maybe i'll wait for the rental
You're a dufus, 10:31, if you really believe that. In fact, even if you don't you're a fucking dufus for saying it.
Doofus here. Can you elaborate, please, Mr. 4:43?
IMO what Anonymous 9:14 a.m. said today (April 22) was classic, & I agree w/you 100%. The fact that that person who clearly belongs in the "Recycle the Stupid" program gets to vote is truly scary.:-)
For an excellent analysis on the problem with ID see "Northstatescience" online.
Mr. O'Brian has a fine blog that tackles the issue forcefully.
Post a Comment