Saturday, April 29, 2006

A festival for the likes of us

Today, I attended the LA Times Festival of Books at UCLA, accompanied by my old friend the Janster, a full-time lawyer and part-time writing teacher at CSUF. On our way up there, the weather was gloomy, but we weren't.

Red Emma had his usual booth--he edits a respected literary journal--and so we checked that out and visited. Gary Stewart--formally top A&R guy at Rhino--dropped by. Lots of great people came around.

Right next door was the L. Ron Hubbard booth. Despite warnings from Red, I wandered over there and inspected the lively and garrish (and, indeed, impressive) covers of Mr. Hubbard's numerous sci-fi books.

The two people in the booth--they were disturbingly clean-cut, like Young Republicans--wouldn't leave me alone. I kept sayin' that I didn't need any help, but they kept asking. Finally, they handed me a small box of playing cards. "Hubbard" cards, I guess. They said it was free. They seemed to want me to go.


At 11:00 a.m., we attended the panel discussion on disasters, which featured Timothy Egan (cute, but probably gay, a gal there opined), Philip Fradkin (uncute, but funny, said the same lady), and Scott Gold (I dunno). The discussion was moderated by public radio's own Larry "Earnest" Mantle. (One gal offered this appraisal of the fellow: "I cannot imagine a less sexual being." Ouch!)

Egan was there to talk about the Oklahoma Dustbowl disaster, which was caused by the systematic destruction of prairy grass. You see, after the war, there was a huge demand for wheat, and so they tore out the grass in and around Oklahoma to farm the land. Then all hell broke loose, smack dab in the middle of the Depression.

It took but two generations to ruin the land. Sheesh. They saw it comin', but that didn't slow 'em down one little bit. Lemmings!

Fradkin was there to discuss the San Francisco earthquake, which happened at a time when the feds and the state did exactly zip to help people during disasters. San Francisco pretty much had to fend for itself, although it did manage to attract international assistance.

Anybody looting--including, sometimes, those who were told to take whatever they needed--were shot on sight. Good grief!

Gold was there to talk about Katrina. He was mighty glum. He talked about just how bad it was in New Orleans, during the first few days of that disaster. He explained about looting--he himself was forced to steal gasoline and other things. There was no avoiding it, he said. Most people had no way to leave before or after the hurricane. There was no way to eat if one did not take what one needed wherever one could find it.


These speakers were compelling. They said lots of the expected things: we're not prepared for disasters; if the "big one" hits, it'll make Katrina look like a day in the park; everybody failed in the case of Katrina; people are mighty stupid, etc.

--And unexpected things. The "cute" guy explained that those Okies were often heroic, despite messing up the grasslands (at the urging of the federal government). You wanted to hate 'em, he said, but you ended up admiring lots of 'em.

At one point, a mob grabbed a banker (a foreclosing rat bastard!) and took him out to the dust for a neck-tie party (I don't think they went through with it; whew!). But mostly people behaved well, and two-thirds stuck it out. Amazingly, the land is now returning to its original condition, now that small farming is nearly dead. Towns are dying there. Only old people remain, with their memories.

UCLA sure is a beautiful campus. And they take good care of it, too. Here are some snaps:



At 1:00, we headed over to magnificent Royce Hall to see Joan Didion. We were accompanied by Rebel Girl, who showed up to the festival with Limber Lou in a little red wagon.


Royce Hall is one of my favorite buildings. It was named after the idealist philosopher Josiah Royce, who was born in a California mining camp (in the 1850s) and went on to become one of the most influential intellectuals of his time.

Royce wouldn't be pleased by the corrupt fools who are messing up our college district. I learned about him at UCI, back in 1976, from Frederick Will, a philosopher, and the father of George Will.


Fact is, I really liked that old man, despite his stuffed-shirt son, and I remember everything he said. He'd sit behind a table in front of class and kind of think out loud. Sometimes, he'd think in silence for maybe a minute or two before saying something, but he made every word count. I was the only kid in the room who thought Will's method was cool.

Silence is powerful. Sometimes I use silence just like that old man did.

The Janster and I always seem to end up in the balcony at Royce Hall, and that's just swell by me, because the interior of Royce Hall is as impressive as its exterior, and the view from the balcony is tops. Here are some pics (of the stage and the balcony and the ceiling):




Here's a detail of the ceiling:


Joan Didion was interesting, I suppose, but she sure is soft-spoken, and I'm kind of deaf, and so I didn't hear much.

Every once in a while, she'd say something funny. I know this because people laughed. I stared at the ceiling. "Wow," I said.


Royce Hall is cavernous, and so a tiny woman in a chair on the stage is hard to see. To help out, they set up a big screen--just behind Didion--which projected her image. That lady is thin. Her hand looked like it was all sinew and bone, and it was wrinkly and incredibly long.

I guess anything will look weird if you blow it up to the size of a wall. Mostly, Didion is unweird.

Later, with Red Emma, we showed up again at Royce Hall for an interview of Gore Vidal by Ariana Huffington. On my way into the hall, Ariana ran past and nearly ran me down. She's tall. She sounds like she's from Transylvania. I think she said "Dahling" to me.

They rolled Mr. Vidal out in his wheelchair, and that inspired a standing O. As always, Vidal was funny and clever and actorish. Occasionally, he'd find himself on a rhetorical roll, and then he'd pull out all the stops (incidentally, there's a huge organ in Royce Hall) with that great voice of his. The old guy was shameless. The audience gobbled it up. Me too.

Huffington did a great job, though she didn't need to add much, cuz Mr. Vidal makes his own sauce. He noted that there's considerable evidence that the 2004 election was stolen. How come the New York Times is ignoring this? he asked. It's a pretty undemocratic democracy, he said, when people can steal elections and then get away with it. And they're getting away with it.

Ariana proclaimed that Mr. Bush is the most incompetent and corrupt president ever, and Mr. Vidal did not disagree. Neither did the audience. It was lovely being among such people for once!

Mr. Vidal explained that the media have really dropped the ball on reporting the Bush Administration's scandals and outrages. W is getting away with murder, he said. It'll be at least two generations, he added, before we will recover what we've lost. It took but two terms for these creeps to ruin what took many years to build.

We soon left Royce Hall and emerged to a beautiful day of bright sunlight and cool breezes. Perfect!

On our way out, we ran into a lady with anti-Bush signs, who insisted that there's gotta be a revolution. I nodded, wondering what kind of revolution she had in mind.


It's great hangin' out all day with tens of thousands of people--they're called readers--who, it seems, without exception agree that the President of the United States is a phenomenally evil and stupid man.

It's impossible to have that experience in the O.C. But we went back there anyway, smilin'.


Thursday, April 27, 2006

"I'm a taxpayer"

grandstanding: to play or act so as to impress onlookers
Nobody loves grandstanding as much as Trustee Fuentes. At Monday's special meeting, despite the meeting's purpose--responding to the Accreditors' recommendations to the colleges (trustees must cease micromanaging, etc.)--Mr. Fuentes pursued a very different purpose: pandering to his right-wing constituency by expressing a plaintive hope to hear the lonely voice of the poor "taxpayer."

But Mr. Fuentes' dig at employees turned into something else. In the audio clip below, you will hear many members of the audience--faculty and classified--respond to Fuentes' red-meat tossage by proclaiming, "I'm a taxpayer."


Fuentes pressed on. The board had come to the meeting with its draft of how it conceives the duties and responsibilities of the trustees (in a revised draft of Board Policy 101: Authority and Powers of the Board of Trustees). For some reason, Mr. Fuentes sought to modify that draft further, for, he said, it is "too neutral." He suggested the following insertion:


Evidently, the president of IVC's classified senate could take no more of Mr. Fuentes' employee-bashing grandstanding. She told him in no uncertain terms that she has worked for the district for twenty years, advising some 30,000 students, and, she said, he needs to trust that she has always acted on behalf of "taxpayers."

this is an audio post - click to play

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Ian, Diane, and Barbara vs. board micromanagement

At Monday's big district powwow, Ian Walton, Diane Woodruff, and Barbara Beno tried to help the trustees understand how they might avoid further micromanagement. (These three were critiquing the board's draft of how it conceives its "duties and responsibilities.")

In the following audio clip, Ian Walton (of the State Academic Senate) expresses pessimism. He refers to recent board remarks--no doubt he is thinking of Mr. Fuentes' defiant squawkings--as an indication that some in the room are not disposed to make the needed changes:

this is an audio post - click to play

In this next audio clip, Diane Woodruff (of CCLC) notes that the board's draft of its "duties and responsibilities" comprises legal Ed Code language. She suggests that such language is inadequate, for it potentially implies that the board may take roles and responsibilities that are excessive. She urges the board to modify the draft so that it refers to Board Policy 2100.1, which defines those areas in which the board must rely primarily on the Academic Senates (i.e., on faculty):

this is an audio post - click to play


In this next audio clip:

1. Ian Walton also comments on the Board's draft of its responsibilities. He, too, notes the draft's reliance on legal language, which really is not adequate, since it fails to indicate the importance of delegating to relevant experts (faculty), etc.

2. Barbara Beno (of ACCJC) explains that the "current" policies are inadequate in that they speak of the board's "supervising" the colleges. (She is responding to Trustee Wagner's suggestion that the current policy--as opposed to the draft--is unproblematical.)

3. Diane Woodruff (of CCLC) suggests that the draft of Board "duties and responsibilities" should be written so that it would guide a new trustee. She notes that the board should be accomplishing the tasks listed in the Ed Code "collegially"--i.e., with appropriate input from relevant faculty experts, etc.

this is an audio post - click to play

Trustee Fuentes picks cherries with his ears

cherry-pick: to select the best or most desirable from
At Monday's big powwow among the various "constituent groups" of the district, Barbara Beno, President of the ACCJC, gave a Powerpoint presentation in which she spelled out the nature of accreditation (the presentation was entitled "What Every Board Should Know"). Her presentation was made that night as part of an effort to facilitate overcoming problems that the Accreditation agency (i.e., ACCJC) found with our two colleges. Foremost among them were (a) trustee micromanagement and (b) an institutional climate of fear and despair.

Below, I present two audio posts. The first is a series of excerpts from Ms. Beno's presentation. I'm afraid that it is a bit choppy, in part because I worked from an incomplete recording. Still, by listening to this post, you will get a pretty fair sense of what she came to communicate.

That audio post is followed by another: Trustee Fuentes' remarks in response to Beno's presentation. As you'll hear, Mr. Fuentes seemed to find in Beno's presentation an emphasis that, arguably, she did not give, for, though she said virtually nothing about the board's "independence," Fuentes seems to suggest that it is the board's independence that she came to emphasize.

Judge for yourself.

ACCJC President Barbara Beno (excerpts from her presentation):

this is an audio post - click to play
(about 5 minutes)

Trustee Tom Fuentes (responding to Beno's presentation):

this is an audio post - click to play
(about 1 1/2 minutes)

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Mathur: "we're not here to serve our egos"


At the start of yesterday's powwow among leadership of the district's "constituent groups," Chancellor Mathur offered some remarks. I present a complete audio post below (unedited).

Some of his remarks:

* "We're all taking the Accrediting team's recommendations seriously."

(In fact, trustee Fuentes has responded to the Accreds' recommendation that the board cease micromanagement by asserting that the trouble with the district is not so much micromanagement by trustees as the "macromanagement" of "others." In fact, the Accreds made no mention of, and did not find, "macromanagement" by anyone. To hear Fuentes' "macromanagement" remark, go to the end of this blog)

* "[At the February meeting] over 90 suggestions were identified in terms of how we can enhance institutional climate....[including] 'respect people' [and] 'address issues without attacking individuals'."

(At a recent district administrative meeting, Mathur repeatedly excoriated the IVC Academic Senate President, falsely asserting that she was "behind" the senate's decision to pursue a complaint regarding the district's violation of BP2100.1)

* "[The board members] no longer are interested in micromanagement."

(During the open session that followed this special meeting, the board acted to explore a recent decision, at IVC, to discontinue the tennis teams, despite an explanation of how that decision was arrived at by the appropriate parties. I.e., the board once again engaged in micromanagement.)

* "We're not here to serve our egos."

this is an audio post - click to play

Faculty speak out about Accreditation and the ALA


Before the start of yesterday's powwow of district "constituent groups," facilitated by the trio of Diane Woodruff of the CCLC, Ian Walton of the State Academic Senate, and Babs Beno of the ACCJC, the public was allowed to address the group. Three faculty took that opportunity. I offer their unedited remarks in audio posts below:

Anna Maria Cobos:
* "[By inserting language about the "macromanagement" of "others" in a resolution] the board and district leadership undermined the intention of the ACCJC recommendation regarding micromanagement directed at the board."
* "The Chancellor stated that faculty members are involved in generating negative press coverage, that they express concern of losing accreditation. As a result faculty leaders are [supposedly] spreading hostility and fear...[Such remarks are a] public attack [on faculty]...."
* "In my opinion, members of this board manipulated the ALA institutional membership for personal purposes...."

this is an audio post - click to play

To hear trustee Fuentes' infamous "macromanagement" remark, go to the end of this post

Margot Lovett:
* "...I am deeply worried by and I'm profoundly saddened at the current state of affairs in our district...."
* "I cannot adequately express my frustration with a chancellor and a board of trustees that stubbornly refuse to take seriously the report of the accreditation commission and address recommendations...that detail the changes that must be made at the district level...."

this is an audio post - click to play


Bob Cosgrove:
* "...a healthy debate involves various sides. And the debate that I've been hearing has become less of a debate and more finger-pointing and accusation...."
* "We cannot get people to serve on our committees any longer, and what I see at this college is a lapse into mediocrity...."

this is an audio post - click to play

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...