The first note, left in her mailbox on Halloween. |
Meanwhile, over at UC Irvine, a female professor turns to social media after the university fails to respond to letters and materials she receives that she considers threatening.
From Alejandra Reyes-Veldarde's article in LA Times:
UC Irvine professor gets security escort after saying on Twitter that a colleague was harassing her
In [Lecturer Richard] Symanski’s letter posted by [chair of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Kathleen] Treseder, he suggests that because of her identification with the #MeToo movement, she read the part of his book about a sexual harassment charge made against him. He warns that a large part of the novel focuses on sex and prostitutes.
Richard Symanski
The letter referenced Treseder’s involvement in the university’s investigation of geneticist Francisco J. Ayala, who was accused of sexually harassing several faculty members and graduate students. Treseder was one of Ayala’s accusers, and in June, the geneticist resigned.
In her tweets, Treseder included quotes from Symanski’s memoir, which also referenced an unpublished crime novel he wrote featuring a main character who executes academics.
“They were taken into a seminar room and, with one exception (a coward who jumped out the window instead of facing the killer’s humiliating charges), were killed with a sawed off shotgun,” Symanski writes in the memoir, describing part of his novel. “Nearly an entire academic department was eliminated.”
Treseder said she found the comments unsettling.From Inside Higher Ed, Colleen Flaherty writing: Fearing a Colleague:
A handwritten note delivered on Halloween, which Treseder said was the first of multiple such missives from Symanski, is essentially an invitation to read his self-published memoir, Bad Boy Geographer. Sharing a copy of the book, Symanski wrote in the note, in part, “Since you found yourself in the middle of a highly visible sexual harassment issue, and now apparently strongly identify with the Me Too movement, you may want to read about the formal sexual harassment charge filed against me in 1995 at this very university, the very long chapter in this memoir titled, ‘The Inquisition.’”...
Kathleen Treseder
Other commenters remarked that [Symanski'] book included numerous derogatory statements about women, such as the following: "All these 'poor' and 'victimized' and 'oppressed' and 'sensitive' women don’t have the intelligence to see that men saying they want to fuck them is an enormous compliment, and if they don’t like the compliment, they can simply say: Thank you very much, but I think you’re too ugly or too old or I’m simply not interested. The reason women can’t do this is that beside their precious 'dignity,' they have their victimhood to worry about, and their quite fragile angry feminist egos to worry about, and more than a small handful have an overriding desire to emasculate men and make up for all the poor treatment they believe they have received since Adam met Eve."....On Monday, Treseder tweeted: "What bothers me most about this is that it highlights just how little I matter to @UC Irvine."
The university said in a statement Monday afternoon that its School of Biological Sciences and administration "intervened immediately as soon as we became aware of Treseder’s concerns” and that it’s been “working closely with all involved parties to reach a resolution for several weeks.” On its face, the account conflicts — at least in part — with Treseder’s in that it has in part responded to her requests.
Rebel Girl knows the feeling. The themes and details present in the material shared by Treseder echo the ones present in the material the college received about Rebel Girl — as did the initial administrative response.
*
6 comments:
Same toxic masculinity at work but the main difference is the UCI prof rec'd the letter and was aware of this guy while Lisa and other faculty found out THREE WEEKS after the fact. Major ball droppage. Poor judgment.
I see. No direct threat therefore no threat. Who are these people?
They should read this: The Shock Collar That Is Misogyny - Kate Manne.
"Manne tosses out the common thinking that misogyny is equivalent to despising all women, and instead offers that it’s a way to keep women in their place. Misogyny, she writes, is “the system that operates within a patriarchal social order to police and enforce women’s subordination and to uphold male dominance.” Like a shock collar used to keep dogs behind an invisible fence, misogyny, she argues, aims to keep women—those who are well trained as well as those who are unruly—in line. The power of Manne’s definition comes from its ability to bring together various behaviors and events under one umbrella. If misogyny is anything that enforces women’s subordination, then it turns out that lots of phenomena fit the profile."
https://www.guernicamag.com/kate-manne-why-misogyny-isnt-really-about-hating-women/
The contrast between this woman's statement and the trustees' and other's statements about the holiday season and the platitudes about the wonderful sense of family and community, etc. etc. is striking - don't they listen?
When employers receives threats targeting their employees, there is an obligation - perhaps moral, if not legal - to inform the employees. Major ball droppage in this case and no one has owned up to it. Meanwhile they do natter on about one big family. One big dysfunctional family maybe.
At IVC, with the apparent wink-wink collaboration of the Board of Trustees, the employees feel no sense of safety, none, especially after 3 faculty were threatened and they did not inform those faculty, this despite all of the King Roquemore's and sycophantic Queen Fontinella's non-believable, disingenuous bloviating to the contrary. Ultimately, it is the Board of Trustees once again. Clearly the 7 of them do not give a damn about the safety of anyone at IVC.
Post a Comment