Thursday, November 4, 2010

Roquemore's curious account of the Schrader affair: "the gene pool"



Nov. 4:
     1. THE SCHRADER AFFAIR. You’ll recall that, at last week’s board meeting, IVC President Glenn Roquemore was smacked around by Board President Don Wagner. As he walked to the podium to make a presentation regarding IVC’s 25th Anniversary celebration, Wagner suddenly declared a break to allow everyone to go to the back of the room to get a piece of celebratory cake (donated, I think, by the IVC cafeteria). Glenn never did get to show his video.
     So he showed up today (at the Senate meeting) with that very video. He played it. It was pretty good, I guess. At one point, cheerleaders seemed to be screaming something about “big boobs.” That seemed perfectly natural, though a little surprising. (A colleague behind me groaned.)
     Only later did I realize that they must have been referring to “big blue” (blue is among IVC’s colors).
     Craig seemed to want Glenn to stick around for a Q and A. Oh really?
     People wanted light shed on the Dean Kathy Schrader situation. Roquemore was asked several questions about it. Glenn presented quite a yarn about the episode. You'll recall that Dean Schrader was called into Glenn's office about a problem: something objectionable that was said during an Oct. 22 meeting of the School of Biological Sciences (over which Schrader presided). Yes, Glenn's wife was mentioned during the meeting, he said, but "that was not the issue." He has always had an understanding with her (i.e., his wife), he said, that she would be treated just as any instructor is treated. –That sort of thing.
     He managed to say that with a straight face. It was remarkable.
     No, said Glenn, the problem wasn’t a remark about Glenn’s “spouse”; rather, it was a remark concerning classified employees: something about being at the “bottom of the gene pool.”
     The bio faculty have consistently told me that, when it became clear that something about the School meeting had upset Roquemore, they could not think what happened that should cause offense. What could it possibly be? They told me that Schrader has never been the type to joke about people at their expense. If anything, she attempts to suppress such talk. So what was this about? The joke about Kiana?
     I spoke with some of my bio friends after the meeting, and they expressed skepticism regarding some of Glenn’s account. They remained puzzled regarding the remark during the Oct. 22 meeting that caused offense. They were sure that Schrader had not made any remark at classified’s expense.
     A couple of hours ago, one of the biologists emailed me, explaining that "they" had listened to the first 45 minutes of the tape of the school meeting in question. (I have not heard it, though I have had at least two or three persons who were at the meeting describe the meeting to me.)
     In the email, “they” offer the following analysis:
Glenn’s account of the meeting is not truthful. The interesting parts of the meeting concern the discussion of the dedication (last week) of the Chemistry Annex and the discussion of a “lab coordinator.” One faculty member opined that he would not choose a “coordinator from that pool,” but it is very unclear what pool is being discussed. I commented that his pool reference is to the shallow end of the gene pool, a comment that is not audible to me. Kathy [Schrader?] then comments on not picking someone from the shallow end of the gene pool, which seems like a response to my comment, not a comment about any group in particular. Knowing me, I was probably commenting generally, not about a particular group, and if it was about a particular group it was about the administration not the classified staff. (In part, this is a paraphrase.)
     According to Roquemore’s account, Schrader was called into his office and confronted with the tape. He played it. She said nothing, he said. She then said that she was resigning. Later, when she was leaving, she said that he would have to fire her. Then, he said, she went off and locked herself into a building.
     Roquemore’s story involves Schrader in some sort of confrontation with a classified employee. It was his understanding, he said, that Schrader "threatened her.”
     Again, I have spoken with several bio faculty, and none can imagine Schrader threatening anyone.
     I do believe that one of our readers left a comment recently that provides the url to the “tape.” You might want to give it a listen. (I can't seem to access it. Besides, my hearing isn't very good.)
* * *
     I noticed that at least one of our readers imagines that I have some sort of relationship with Dean Schrader (I guess), who, we learned today, is on paid administrative leave. In fact, I have never met the woman.
     In my experience, Coronas and blog surfing just don't mix.

     2. A200 CONSTRUCTION-FACULTY ZONE.

Gosh, when we're not dodgin' "disturbed," scissors-wielding students, we're trying not to breathe particles of who-knows-what!

Workers get masks. Faculty (and students)--not so much.



23 comments:

Anonymous said...

The admin's response to the case of the student has been reckless to say the least and points to a dangerous absence of coherent policy and leadership.

The fact that they couldn't take the time to inform the student's teachers of the potential threat is unbelievable. They have put those instructors -and the students in those classes - at increased risk. Unbelieveable. Unforgiveable.


A photo of the student was circulated via email earlier this week - but to a limited and odd list - WHY? The student was unlikely to encounter any of these individuals - but the very people he was likely to encounter were not informed of the possible danger - WHY????

Perhaps if there were cake involved admin and the president would have paid attention.

SHAME.

Anonymous said...

The hole Glenn's digging keeps getting deeper and deeper. My goodness.

By the way, is this why they have decided to create a poisonous and dangerous work environment in A-200? To kill us off? Has anyone seen what they're doing over there? has anyone called OSHA? The demo workers get masks but the rest of us breathe it in all day - SO DO THE STUDENTS.

Anonymous said...

I don't know who is overseeing the A-200 renovation but it's pretty bad. yesterday was the worst when they took down the plastic sheeting - and now it's just an open space. The workers gets to wear masks but not the rest of us. Particulate matter in the air, dust, vintage mold spores...and god knows what else.

Anonymous said...

It's great that the Senate wants to agendize the matter about the threatening student - but what is the Administration doing????

Adn what about the working conditions in A-200? If the staff in A-100 had to deal with the fiberglass pillows, the dust and various substances filtering down from the ceiling all day they'd be complaining too.

This week has really showcased some major problems. Too bad the Accreds aren't in town...

Anonymous said...

Don't you like how it all falls apart just DAYS AFTER the Accreditation team left?

I wonder if there is any leftover celebration cake somewhere...

Anonymous said...

The construction crew had taped up plastic sheeting earlier in the week - still pretty in ineffective - but yesterday that was taken down - WHY?

Once again - no notice of such activity, no communication about its impact, duration - no notices posted (per state law) about exposure to elements that can harm people especially the young, elderly and those with a history so respiratory problems.

Anonymous said...

Say you do have a respiratory problem but that A-200 is your primary wokrplace where your office and one or two of your classes are taught.

You've already worked weeks under these conditions which are now worsening dramatically - what do you do?

Anonymous said...

Suck it up.

What do you you think they're running here - a public education institute which has to abide by certain laws and regulations?

Anonymous said...

I am sure there is something listed in the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1993. You have pictures of fiberglass insulation laying about... bad stuff. Edwards needs to get on this.

Anonymous said...

The insulation has been there for WEEKS.

Edwards and Justice came around yesterday and didn't seem too concerned at all...

Anonymous said...

What are the health effects of fiberglass?

Direct contact with fiberglass or with airborne dust containing fiberglass may irritate the skin, eyes, nose, and throat.
High levels of exposure to airborne fiberglass may aggravate asthma or bronchitis.
Long-term health effects associated with fiberglass are not completely known. However, studies of people routinely working with fiberglass have not shown increased risk of long-term health conditions, such as respiratory disease, cancer, or allergic sensitization.

Anonymous said...

Health and safety issues for installers are a major disadvantage of installing fiberglass insulation. Issues include potential cancer risk from exposure to glass fibers (based on animal studies) and formaldehyde off-gassing from the resin used in the backing and petrochemicals in the resin.

Anonymous said...

Scenario: You are removing fiberglass insulation from metal air conditioning ducts. The fiberglass insulation is held in place on the duct by means of asbestos-containing black mastic applied at the seams of the fiberglass insulation wrap. The width of the black mastic running along the seams is two inches. The black mastic is intact. In the process of removing the fiberglass you must make five or six cuts through the 2-inch wide mastic for each 30-foot length of insulation removed. Due to the interference of fiberglass, you use Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to analyze air samples for airborne asbestos concentrations.

Question: What controls does OSHA require for protecting employees from asbestos exposure during the fiberglass insulation removal operation described in the scenario?

Reply: The operation you describe involves removing an asbestos-containing construction mastic and is therefore a Class II asbestos work operation covered by OSHA's construction asbestos standard (29 CFR 1926.1101(b)) 1. Therefore, the controls set forth in the construction asbestos standard for performing Class II asbestos work must be instituted.

TrueBlew said...

On the day that she was "fired," Schrader told friends that the action was sparked by the "cake" [i.e., the Kiana] comment, not anything about classified.

Anonymous said...

Shut the doors to your offices and you should be ok. Walking through the hallway isn't going to harm anyone. Most of the dust came from the drywall demo. WOW! Grow up.

Anonymous said...

All grown up here - why don't you come see for yourself? Please. Say it to our faces. I dare you Anonymous at 6:55. You know where to find us.

Anonymous said...

7:42 I have seen it for myself. It's all cleaned up. What are you bitching about now?

Roy Bauer said...

Do not feed the troll.

Anonymous said...

I LOVE it when the admin types talk dirty. Come up and see me some time big boy.

Anonymous said...

If you don't like it, go work at another district. You'll find out it's all the same.

Anonymous said...

TWO THINGS
1. WHY IS IS THAT THE STUDENTS GET ATTENTION ABOUT SOME KIND OF MATERIAL THAT CAN AFFECT THERE HEALTH BUT NOT THE CAMPUS POLICE BUILDING THAT MOLD WAS FOUND IN AND PROVEN BY OSHA AND ALL THE POLICE OFFICERS THAT HAVE BEEN SICK. HMM

2. WHO IN THE WORLD WOULD LEAVE ALL THAT MESS SITTING THERE ONLY SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT SAFETY OR DON'T KNOW THERE JOB. MAYBE PEOPLE ARE GETTING PAYED TO DO SOMETHING THEY ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DO.

Anonymous said...

SOMEONE SHOULD ASK EDWARDS ABOUT THE MOLD IN THE CAMPUS POLICE...THE ROOMER IS HE NEW ABOUT IT BUT DID NOTHING ABOUT IT.

Anonymous said...

7:05pm I've heard about that, the girl/boy? (whatever) cop is suing for 10 million. How much mold is in that place?

Roy's obituary in LA Times and Register: "we were lucky to have you while we did"

  This ran in the Sunday December 24, 2023 edition of the Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register : July 14, 1955 - November 20, 2...