Uneventful.
Boring.
Civil.
Brief.
Neat.
Sweet.
Petite.
Here are my notes:
Board Prez Don Wagner asked board clerk Tom Fuentes for his report on "actions taken" during the closed session that had just then concluded. Tom archly reported that, during that session, “the board did nothing.”
It was the apex of good feeling for this meeting.
Trustee Marcia Milchiker’s invocation focused on the expectation that everyone present (i.e., the trustees?) would be thoughtful and civil. “I know” everyone will be, she said. (Perhaps Marcia was alluding to a failure of civility & thoughtfulness recently exhibited—by board members? Dunno.)
Chancellor Raghu Mathur got his chance to run the “Did You Know?” video, which failed to flicker during June’s meeting owing to a technical snafu. According to the district website, this “electronic presentation” is “about the technological revolution in the world today and its impact on all segments of education.”
In truth, the presentation was just what you might expect: a sequence of images designed by people who believe that an audience can be enlightened by a quick succession of discrete, unexplained (and often dubious) factoids.
I.e., idjits who confuse knowledge with "information."
Among these factoids: that we are training people for jobs that do not yet exist; that “We are living in exponential times.” (I did not know that "times" could be "exponential.")
One motif was that the world is being overwhelmed by Chinese and Indian people. (I watched Mathur’s face. He snickered in silence.)
The video's background music was a bland bit of thumping pop featuring a woman chanting, “Right here, right now.”
The presentation ended with the question: “So what does it all mean?”
That was it. Silence. Nobody noted, let alone answered, the ending question. There was awkward and feeble applause, which (as I sat, staring at my Mac) caused me to chuckle.
Evidently, the presentation came to the board via Fuentes, who got it from some friend in New Mexico or someplace. (In fact, the video is readily available on YouTube. See below.)
(NOTE: the creators of "Did You Know?"—educators Karl Fisch and Scott McLeod—explain their video here.)
Public comments: Saddleback College’s Bob Cosgrove noted that the outside lettering that identifies the “Ronald Reagan" room refers also to the “trustees” meeting place. Bob carped about the missing apostrophe. Illiterate, that, said Bob.
Nobody cared. Williams nudged Lang and asked, "What's an apostrophe?"
Board reports: Jay was absent, so his report was unusually crisp. Padberg or Fuentes offered nothing. Wagner briefly noted the state budget cuts' impact on education. Milchiker declared her super-duper membership in some alumni association.
Trustees Dave Lang and John Williams (and the student trustee) offered no report.
Mathur spoke. According Tracy’s board highlights,
Chancellor … Mathur commented on the state budget deal which cost California community colleges close to $1 billion, mostly in categorical programs such as EOPS and DSPS. If passed by the legislature and signed by the Governor, fees will go up from $20 to $26 per unit starting this fall, which will be challenging to implement because fall registration has already begun. … Orange County Treasurer Chriss Street met in the Chancellor's Office recently … to discuss the impact on our basic aid revenues of the decline in value of … properties assessed in Orange County. Indications are that property values will be down 1.2% this year, 5% next year and then stay down for a number of years….”
There were two discussion items: 4.1: the foundations; 4.2: “My Academic Plan” (MAP).
Saddleback College Prez Todd Burnett presented the Saddleback College Foundation's new prez, Gary Capata, a lawyer. The latter spoke of the foundation’s accomplishments, including receipt of a gift. When Capata said, “[The gift] will help with technology,” some of our technology immediately broke, and a tech guy had to come up and fiddle with faders and dials while Capata grinned awkwardly at the three people in the audience.
Board meetings are such fun.
IVC Prez Glenn Roquemore introduced IVC’s Al Tello, who offered a PowerPoint presentation. Blah, blah, blah, said Al who, as always, seemed to sport good hair.
Bob Bramucci, who does not sport good hair, got up to explain that even ATEP has a foundation. He was very brief. Marcia noted that she did not know that ATEP had a foundation. Well, yes, it has had a foundation since 2005, said Bramucci.
Next, Bramucci explained “my academic plan” (MAP), which is a reportedly excellent career planning program that is available to our students. We don’t have enough counselors to help every student with academic plans (hint, hint), and so students can use MAP instead. It's got lots of bells and whistles.
Do you ever get the feeling that, if all the counselors and librarians were to disappear one day, nobody'd notice?
Just kidding. Actually, I'm just testing to see if anybody actually reads this. I suspect that, at this point, what with summer and all, I am writing to no one.
And yet. --And yet ... I am writing to the cosmos.
Ever get all existential like that?
Bramucci handed off to Jim Gaston, who explained that MAP has received awards, expressions of interest from other districts, and so on. We’re approaching “50,000” plans done, said Gaston. “I’m a geek,” he added. He joked about installing “GPS chips” in “students’ necks,” which yielded guffaws. Somebody actually snorted.
Bramucci and Gaston did a good job, as usual. I do believe that Tracy offers a link to video of the presentation in her “Highlights.” I wouldn't bother with it though.
Trustee Williams, who has recently received harsh criticism for his phenomenally shitty performance as county Guardian/Administrator, persisted in his strategy of acting as though everything were just peachy-keen. He yammered uselessly about MAP. He was twinkly. Mathur joined him in this (not the twinkling, the yammering). Padberg offered “kudos.” She never twinkles.
Trustee Dave Lang quibbled--or, indeed, beefed--about something somehow misleading in the “basic aid” report. Gary P tried to shrug it off, but Dave did not join in Gary's shruggery, maintaining intead his beefery.
Gary seemed irked.
Wagner, exhibiting pure and pithy Wagnerian peevitude, publicly spanked Marcia for turning something on, then off, on her console. Trustees were too focused on the prospect of the meeting's impending end to roll their eyes or chortle.
It was a trivial event, like all of the events of this meeting.
P.S.: I've been plowin' through the first season of HBO's drama "True Blood." It's about a vampire and his girlfriend living in some sleepy Louisiana town. From the creator of "Six Feet Under."
I recommend it. Cool metaphors. Check out the bluesy opening credits sequence below. (Singer: Jace Everett.)
I feel like that vampire right now. Thsssssssssssssss (glug, glug).
P.P.S.:
TigerAnn's Lithuanian cousin, Tige, a musician, has finally hit the big time. Check out this recent performance:
12 comments:
Wow. Tige is good. Really good.
My thoughts on "MAP": a) very slow to load, b) courses taken at other schools (as you know, many students do) that will apply to IGETC/CSU planning will not be viewable; being unviewable means, for the sake of online planning away from a personal counseling session with transcripts in hand for an advisor, that the areas and subareas are not met, and may conflict with future course enrollments, since prereqs will not be observed.
Of course, for the student ONLY going to IVC, or ONLY Saddleback (not sure if they can view transcripts from both, though they should!), then MAP, aside from the slow load times, is a fantastic resource.
Few seem to understand what the word exponential means or is referring to: Growth that is proportional to its size. There seems to be a non-mathematical, colloquial sense of the word where it means "very fast." So, while exponential means very fast, very fast does not mean exponential, so I'd argue they aren't the same thing.
Anyways, True Blood. I wrote up a a few scathing remarks at this suggestions owing to my experience with a group of tweens vomiting interest over the book Twilight, and this show. It seems I prejudged too quickly as I watched two episodes and am probably going to watch some more tomorrow. It is intriguing, but I ain't feeling the love yet.
Gotta go, on a break.
It's the metaphors, dude. Plus the main character, who is oddly, absurdly wholesome. Even the lead vampire is. Wholesomeness set against human/vampire love.
Best line I've heard so far: "Puns used to be the highest form of humor."
Hear that Roy? You'd make a poor Vamp! Sssssttt!
Most folks confuse exponential with asymptotic.
I suppose "we are living in exponential times" is supposed to mean: things are getting faster and faster. I take this to be saying that more and more is happening, but it might mean that time itself is speeding up. I'm not sure that the latter idea is coherent. (No doubt there is some esoteric "way" that physicists talk about, making sense of increase in "speed" of time. But I'm trying to stay within ordinary concepts here.)
I guess my initial problem with the statement was based on the assumption that time is the backdrop against which events occur, and so "time" itself does not increase--what could that mean?-- just the events (in some sense) within time (they become "more" or there are more and more of them).
I'm not sure the statement is quite as nonsensical as I originally thought. If it communicates that things are speeding up (not time, but "events" somehow occur more quickly or are more hurried), then, well, I guess that isn't a stupid thing to say. It does seem to be saying something. A bit inarticulate, though. It isn't really time that is exponential.
I have little knowledge of mathematics, but I've always assumed that "exponential" is "like" the "geometric progression" that is contrasted with an "arithmetic progression" in Malthus' famous prediction about massive starvation (should we feed the poor). You know: 2 plus 2 plus 2...versus 2 times 2 times 2....
But waddoo I know.
That's what I get for scribbling the comment together in a small span in class (break time; I always keep the laptop closed during class). I knew later that night that what I had written was perhaps too specific and accusatory of something taken out of context.
Via the dictionary that statement actually does make sense, I was gonna use the "The times they are a'changin" to compare, but yeah, it'd be over extending a scientific meaning of "time" to a more colloquial. And gee, that's just wrong.
To note, the rate at which Google's DB grows is exponential, and the rate at which technology is spreading is asymptotic (approaching instantaneous? Or the time it takes to spread is approaching zero?). The difference between the two might be the range of the function, exponential functions are limitless (range is infinity), and asymptotic, well, aren't (their range is bound).
With regards to "geometric progression" I suppose real world exponential growth will always level off and well, ultimately, start to behave like Malthus' model. So, exponential initially, then it starts to "settle down."
Consider the rate at which Google's DB grows. Initially, when Google starts scanning websites, they start with a single site that might branch to say, four other sites. Then those four other sites yield another four other sites each, etc. So the growth can be said to be exponential. However, there are only so many websites in the world and so if Google is scanning them faster than people are making them, it will eventually level off (it has to).
Any freakin' questions?
BS
Using hyperbole to initiate discussions about exponents without reference to hyperbolic families is doing a disservice to exponential mapping. Asymptotic values are the result of mapping exponents. They can be infinite or infinitesimal. I think I need to sneeze; arsinh who!
Mathematician!
I am not a mathematician, merely both sides of my brain are being used. I love language, and have a smattering of ignorance in all fields.
http://www.playhimoffkeyboardcat.com
Post a Comment