Monday, January 15, 1979

Saddleback College North opens


North Saddleback Campus
It’s Small, Has No Name, but a New College It Is
By Thomas Fortune

LA Times, Jan. 15, 1979

     IRVINE – It will start out the size of a junior high school. And it’s a long way from getting a name of its own.
     But students will begin taking classes next Monday at Orange County’s newest community college, known as the north campus of Saddleback College.
     College officials say they expect to enroll about 1,500 persons at the outset, many of them taking courses both at the new campus (carved from an orange grove at Irvine Center Drive and Jeffrey Road) and at Saddleback College (14 miles south in Mission Viejo).
     For a few years, the new school will be merely a satellite campus. No attendance boundaries will be drawn to separate it from Saddleback College. It will not have its own name or a football team.
     But it is planned that eventually the north campus will become a full-fledged community college.
     The initial $6.6 million development is on 20 acres. The college district has a five-year option with the Irvine Co. to buy 80 additional acres at $45,000 an acre.

Groundbreaking, 1977
     The plan is to develop the campus in 20-acre increments. Each new cluster is to have its own educational them and central architectural focus.
     Since passage of Proposition 13, the Saddleback College District has lost the capacity to fund that plan locally. But college officials say they have not abandoned the idea.
     “We’re dependent upon the state, the munificence of the Irvine Co., somebody,” [sic] Board president Larry Taylor said late last week. “But I am convinced this is only the beginning of a 100-acre plant. Our board and the people in the area will not allow it not to happen. I’m sure enrollment will justify our planning.”
     Only two of the three academic buildings in the first cluster will be ready for the start of classes next Monday. A late start on the science building—held up until the college district could secure state money after passage of Proposition 13—will delay its availability by a couple of months. An administration facility also is behind schedule.

C. 1978
     During a press preview last week, the campus was still very much a construction site. The raw buildings were surrounded by mud. A workman was painting a door through which visitors entered.
Campus administrator Ed Hart had his full-time faculty there for introductions—all 11 of them.
     Proposition 13 also cut into staffing. But there will be more school here than at first meets the eye.
     There will be 85 daytime class offerings, Hart said. Another 50 classes will be given at night on campus, and 25 more classes will be held at affiliated locations—including Tustin and Laguna beach high schools.
     The campus has a 150-seat classroom, with curtain and stage, that will be turned over on weekends for community use.
     Some who live at the north end of the district will get all their schooling at the new campus. Others may go there two days and three days to Saddleback.
     After the first three days of registration, classes already were filling. Continuing students from Saddleback took all the photography slots. Math, spelling and business management courses were popular.
     Staff size is going to keep the initial enrollment to about 1,500. But Hart said the first cluster of buildings will accommodate 40 to 45 faculty and up to 4,500 day and night students before bursting at the seams.

c. 1979
     The buildings are of brick with mostly flat roofs. A clock tower is the focus of the central plaza. Lots of outside windows are intended to show off a business machines center and a reading and language lab and entice students inside. The buildings feature solar heating.
     White chalkboards in the classrooms double as movie screens and also conserve light.
     Student services will be handled on an umbilical cord concept. Library books ordered from the Saddleback College library or a student file that a counselor might need will be brought to the campus in a van making a freeway shuttle.
     Greater things are ahead, promised District Supt. Robert Lombardi. He said the new campus probably will be one of the last community colleges built in the state and will have an opportunity to do what others should have already done—establish close ties with local industry.
     He said chemistry, pharmaceuticals, electronics and computer science are prominently represented in the Irvine Industrial Complex and the college could develop specialties in those fields. He said that if things develop well, the college might even take over some of the industrial training within the plants of local firms.

Memorial Scheduled for Edward A. Hart (LA Times, March 20, 1990)

8-14: do you regret all the lying?

✅ Trump Encourages Racist Conspiracy Theory on Kamala Harris’s Eligibility to Be Vice President NYT ✅ Orange County Sees Overall Coronavirus...

Goals and Values and Twaddle

blather: long-winded talk with no real substance*
The whole concept of MSLOs [measurable student learning outcomes] as the latest fad in education is somewhat akin to the now discredited fad of the '90's, Total Quality Management, or TQM. Essentially, the ACCJC adopted MSLOs as the overarching basis for accrediting community colleges based on their faith in the theoretical treatises of a movement.... After repeated requests for research showing that such use of MSLOs is effective, none has been forthcoming from the ACCJC [accreditors]. Prior to large scale imposition of such a requirement at all institutions, research should be provided to establish that continuous monitoring of MSLOs has resulted in measurable improvements in student success at a given institution. No such research is forthcoming because there is none….
The Accountability Game…., Leon F. Marzillier (Academic Senate for California Community Colleges, October, 2002)
In the summer of ’13, I offered a critique of the awkward verbiage by which the district and colleges explain their values, goals, and objectives —aka SOCCCD'S G&V (goals and values) blather.
I wrote a post each for the district, Saddleback College, and Irvine Valley College efforts. (See the links below.)
This verbiage—stated in terms of “values,” “missions,” “goals,” “visions,” and whatnot—is often badly written. It is sometimes embarrassingly trite.
It occasionally communicates something worthwhile.
No doubt you are familiar with the usual objections to jargon. Higher education, too, has its jargon—an irony, given typical college-level instruction in writing, which urges jargon eschewery.
Sure enough, SOCCCD G&V blather is riddled with jargon and with terms misused and abused. For instance, in the case of the district’s dubious blather, the so-called “vision” is actually a purpose. Why didn't they just call it that?
As one slogs through this prattle, one finds that "visions" tend to be awfully similar to “missions,” with which they are distinguished. The latter in turn are awfully similar to “goals,” which must be distinguished from “objectives.” But aren't goals and objectives pretty much the same thing?
These perverse word games will surely perplex or annoy anyone armed with a command of the English language. In fact, readers will be perplexed to the degree that they are thus armed. Illiterates, of course, will be untroubled.
Here's a simple point: the district and colleges’ G&V blather tends to eschew good, plain English in favor of technical terms and trendy words and phrases (i.e., it tends to be bullshitty and vague). Thus, one encounters such trendy terminological turds as “dynamic,” “diversity,” “student success,” and “student-centered.” Even meretricious neologisms such as ISLOs and “persistence rates” pop up, unexplained, undefended.
Does anyone see a transparency problem with all of this? Shouldn't the public, or at least the well educated public, be able to comprehend statements of the colleges' goals and values?
In the case of the district, to its credit, all it really seems to want to say is that it wants to teach well and it wants students to succeed. Admirable!
So why all the ugly, common-sense defying, buzzword-encrusted claptrap?

Districtular poppycock: our “vision” and our “mission” and our tolerance of twaddle - July 31, 2013

THEY BUZZ: Saddleback College's "Mission, Vision, and Values" - August 4, 2013

IVC’s vision, mission, and goals: nonsense on stilts - August 5, 2013

THE IRVINE VALLEY CHRONICLES: no ideas, just clichés & buzzwords - Sep 30, 2013

*From my Apple laptop's dictionary